Re: [Veritas-ha] Solaris 10 U5 Update

2008-06-17 Thread Hudes, Dana
I've got a machine with both SF5 and NBU6.5master on Solaris 10 u5 with
all the latest patches. Works fine. Please note that is not just
10_Recommended its whatever update connection's analysis indicates is
applicable.  You'll definitely need to apply all the Veritas patches but
UC should get and apply those for you (this assumes you have a sun
support contract such that you can use update connection to get all
patches).

 

When I went to 10u5 from previous versions of 10 I used Live Upgrade. I
also use LU for Veritas upgrades.

 

 

=

Dana Hudes

UNIX and Imaging group

NYC-HRA MIS

+1 718 510 8586

Nextel:  172*26*16684

=

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Goutham
N
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2008 1:36 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED];
veritas-ha@mailman.eng.auburn.edu; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Veritas-ha] Solaris 10 U5 Update

 

 

Hi,

 

I am going to use Veritas Storage Foundation 5.x product in Solaris 10
U5 update. Will there be any compatability report available in

a place who would have already tested VSF 5.x in Solaris 10 U5 update on
SPARC and X86.  Pls advice with your answers.


N. Gowthaman 

___
Veritas-ha maillist  -  Veritas-ha@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-ha


Re: [Veritas-ha] Server crashes but VCS doesn't detect it

2008-06-17 Thread Jim Senicka
If power cycle fixed it, it was still heartbeating on LLT. 


Sent from my Nokia E62 handheld by goodlink.


 -Original Message-
From:   Andrey Dmitriev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:   Tuesday, June 17, 2008 03:33 PM US Mountain Standard Time
To: veritas-ha@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Cc: veritas-ha@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject:[Veritas-ha] Server crashes but VCS doesn't detect it


Had sort of a weird case today.
We had a server failure, lost network, console was being filled with some sort 
of crash info.
The cluster however, showed everything online. We also had a netdump configured 
(linux), but that couldn't work b/c network was down.
Customer is unhappy why it didn't fail over.
Anyone can think of a reason or think of how I can prevent something similar in 
the future?
I sort of suspect LLT might still have been up somewhat.
It wasn't until we powercycled the box did the other nodes detect it was down.

-andrey

___
Veritas-ha maillist  -  Veritas-ha@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-ha

___
Veritas-ha maillist  -  Veritas-ha@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-ha