[videoblogging] my friend mike albo

[Irina]

http://www.current.tv/pods/tba/GC03372

 Finding a Cure 
 By [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Current TV)
*Mike Albo* talks to a guy who says he can cure gayness.

 

--


.



-- 
http://geekentertainment.tv


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[videoblogging] Re:cell phone website? question??

[Gromik Tohoku]

Hi everyone,

as a newbie in cell phones, I would like to know if it
is possible to embed a video from blip.tv onto a cell
phone.

If that is not possible, my next question is, how is
it possible to insert a video into a wml document?

I have a h264 5minute video and I can not insert it
into a wml doc. I am using Adobe Go Live, and they
offer either QT or SWF as video embedding options.

Thanks in advance for offering any advice.
Nicolas


Gromik Nicolas
Tohoku University
Sendai, Japan
fax=81-22-7647

http://www.filmedworld.com/page.php?3
http://nag-productions.blip.tv/?
http://sendai-city-tourism-tohoku-university.blip.tv/
http://eflresources.wikispaces.com/


  
_
  

Yahoo!7 Mail has just got even bigger and better with unlimited storage on all 
webmail accounts.
http://au.docs.yahoo.com/mail/unlimitedstorage.html

Re: [videoblogging] Catch Me on Colbert Tonight!

[Roxanne Darling]

And Josh was fantastic; right there keeping up with Mr. Colbert. :-)

R

On 6/12/07, Charles Iliya Krempeaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> It's on now!
>
>
>  On 6/12/07, Charles Iliya Krempeaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  > That's awesome :-) (I love that show.)
>  >
>  > On 6/12/07, Josh Wolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  > >
>  > > Hey everyone, just wanted to drop a note out to the videoblogging
>  > > group letting you all know that I'll be on the Colbert Report tonight
>  > > (that's Tuesday for those checking old messages). So, if you have
>  > > Comedy Central, please tune in... if you don't then you can always DL
>  > > it on iTunes tomorrow. If anyone's in New York City right now, let me
>  > > know, I'm here through tomorrow afternoon.
>  > >
>  > > Josh
>  >
>  > --
>  > Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. 
>  >
>  >
>  > All the Vlogging News on One Page
>  > http://vlograzor.com/
>  >
>
>  --
>  Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. 
>
>  All the Vlogging News on One Page
>  http://vlograzor.com/
>
>
>
>  


-- 
Roxanne Darling
"o ke kai" means "of the sea" in hawaiian
808-384-5554
http://www.twitter.com/roxannedarling

http://www.beachwalks.tv
http://www.barefeetshop.com
http://www.barefeetstudios.com

Re: [videoblogging] Political Video archive

[randulo]

> On 6/11/07, Jay dedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >  Anyway...I encourage you to join our email list of you want to help us
> >  collect video..or lead the way on remixing:
> >  http://groups.google.com/group/politicalvideo

Amazing effort, thanks for this! I'll post it where I think people
will most enjoy it. Or *not* enjoy it ;)

Re: [videoblogging] Catch Me on Colbert Tonight!

[Jan McLaughlin]

Where you flying out of, Josh? Don't suppose it's Newark airport?

Congrats! Can't wait to see the footage.

Got a call yesterday from a local NJ rag about the Federal Shield law issue
- interviewing local bloggers on the subject. They were up to speed on your
case. Will see if it's on line and post a link to this thread if it is.
Supposed to print today / tomorrow.

Jan

On 6/13/07, Roxanne Darling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> And Josh was fantastic; right there keeping up with Mr. Colbert. :-)
>
> R
>
> On 6/12/07, Charles Iliya Krempeaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > It's on now!
> >
> >
> >  On 6/12/07, Charles Iliya Krempeaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >  > That's awesome :-) (I love that show.)
> >  >
> >  > On 6/12/07, Josh Wolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >  > >
> >  > > Hey everyone, just wanted to drop a note out to the videoblogging
> >  > > group letting you all know that I'll be on the Colbert Report
> tonight
> >  > > (that's Tuesday for those checking old messages). So, if you have
> >  > > Comedy Central, please tune in... if you don't then you can always
> DL
> >  > > it on iTunes tomorrow. If anyone's in New York City right now, let
> me
> >  > > know, I'm here through tomorrow afternoon.
> >  > >
> >  > > Josh
> >  >
> >  > --
> >  > Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. 
> >  >
> >  >
> >  > All the Vlogging News on One Page
> >  > http://vlograzor.com/
> >  >
> >
> >  --
> >  Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. 
> >
> >  All the Vlogging News on One Page
> >  http://vlograzor.com/
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Roxanne Darling
> "o ke kai" means "of the sea" in hawaiian
> 808-384-5554
> http://www.twitter.com/roxannedarling
>
> http://www.beachwalks.tv
> http://www.barefeetshop.com
> http://www.barefeetstudios.com
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>


-- 
The Faux Press - better than real
http://fauxpress.blogspot.com
http://wburg.tv
http://twitter.com/fauxpress
aim=janofsound
air=862.221.5280
skype=janmclaughlin


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[videoblogging] Any vloggers in Daytona FL?

[Heath]

I am going to be on vacation in Daytona next week and was wondering if 
there where any vloggers down that way?  If so let me know, like to 
say "hey"

Heath
http://batmangeek.com
http://aroundcincinnati.net

Re: [videoblogging] Political Video archive

[randulo]

On 6/13/07, randulo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Amazing effort, thanks for this! I'll post it where I think people
> will most enjoy it. Or *not* enjoy it ;)
>

Not sure what I did, but I was referring to the Dubya archive. Sorry
for the mis-post!

Re: [videoblogging] Catch Me on Colbert Tonight!

[Steve Garfield]

Direct Link to Colbert Report with Josh Wolf:


http://www.comedycentral.com/motherload/index.jhtml?ml_video=88497


http://tinyurl.com/27aja2


On Jun 12, 2007, at 3:18 PM, Josh Wolf wrote:

> Hey everyone, just wanted to drop a note out to the videoblogging
> group letting you all know that I'll be on the Colbert Report tonight
> (that's Tuesday for those checking old messages). So, if you have
> Comedy Central, please tune in... if you don't then you can always DL
> it on iTunes tomorrow.

--
Steve Garfield
http://SteveGarfield.com

Watch Spices of Life with Nina Simonds:
http://spicesoflife.com

[videoblogging] More Colbert

[bordercollieaustralianshepherd]

Josh, you indeed held your own very well.

I'd like to start up a discussion that began a few months back. 

I'll try to be clever ...

Credentials,/Credibility (interchangeable), Content Creators,
Consumers, Copyright and  Corporate Control. Or navigating the 7 C's.
(for the pirate in all of us)

One thing that is obvious. Made even more so with Wolf's Colbert
appearance last night. Explaining the position Josh took is nearly
impossible to make clear in a short period of time. It is even harder
when the point is lost trying to compare a citizen to a journalist.

30+ years ago the Journalist was a reporter first a personality
second. Times change.

Take a look at the headlines today. Blair bashes the press
.
Rather and Moonves

we just endured days of Paris without the Riviera.

Now is a good  time to revisit organizing a Association of online
content producers or some other descriptive name.

Like my Fav Faux Facilitator would say... What say you?


On a related Colbert note:



Dave

Re: [videoblogging] Catch Me on Colbert Tonight!

[[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

Josh, That was great!

I have mixed emotions.

So cool to see you there and the bit went great. But it s sucks  
that you had to sit in jail to get there.

I hope more good things happen to you to make up for all the bad.

Tim

Tim Street
http://frenchmaidtv.com







On Jun 13, 2007, at 7:55 AM, Steve Garfield wrote:

> Direct Link to Colbert Report with Josh Wolf:
>
> http://www.comedycentral.com/motherload/index.jhtml?ml_video=88497
>
> http://tinyurl.com/27aja2
>
> On Jun 12, 2007, at 3:18 PM, Josh Wolf wrote:
>
> > Hey everyone, just wanted to drop a note out to the videoblogging
> > group letting you all know that I'll be on the Colbert Report  
> tonight
> > (that's Tuesday for those checking old messages). So, if you have
> > Comedy Central, please tune in... if you don't then you can  
> always DL
> > it on iTunes tomorrow.
>
> --
> Steve Garfield
> http://SteveGarfield.com
>
> Watch Spices of Life with Nina Simonds:
> http://spicesoflife.com
>
>
> 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[videoblogging] Citizen journalists deserve to be heard

[bordercollieaustralianshepherd]

I threw out a discussion request and like always, coming back to add
to it.

Depending on your POV, determines what resonates.

One citizen journalist
http://blackboxvoting.org/

Watergates, Watersheds & Manchurian Candidates

Nearly four long years ago this column "Sludge Report #154 - Bigger
Than Watergate" (archive version in original July, 2003 livery)
heralded a watershed in the history of US Democracy in the form of a
remarkable piece of online citizen research published on Scoop.co.nz –
Bev Harris's seminal article " Inside A U.S. Election Vote Counting
Program".

A site with similar goal, worth mentioning.
http://blackboxvoting.com/

I used the above because it was quick to grab. Josh made a better
point ... Tom Paine (in the ass?)

The day that CNN and others (including my local TV, Radio and print)
started accepting and ENCOURAGING people to particapate by sending in
VIDEO, the blurry line was lost. If the MSM is willing to use (not
always pay for) stories they will use in a news cast, I feel confident
that Citizen journalism is deserving of protection under the law.

Just me framing a position.

RE: [videoblogging] Congrats Blip.tv!

[Mike Hudack]

Thanks Mark!

-Original Message-
From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Schoneveld
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2007 8:44 AM
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [videoblogging] Congrats Blip.tv!

Way to go on getting funding!  Yay!  We love you!

Love,
Mark*

http://cheapdatesphilly.blogspot.com



 
Yahoo! Groups Links

RE: [videoblogging] Spices of Life in Boston Globe

[Mike Hudack]

Congratulations!!

-Original Message-
From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Garfield
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2007 2:08 AM
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [videoblogging] Spices of Life in Boston Globe

The video blog I shoot and edit for Nina Simonds, Spices of Life, is  
featured in the Boston Globe Food section today:

Simonds is the life of this video party

By Jonathan Levitt, Globe Correspondent  |  June 13, 2007

SALEM -- For the latest episode of her new video blog, cookbook  
author Nina Simonds is bouncing around her kitchen throwing together  
what she calls the "best dumplings ever." She's funny and charmingly  
scatterbrained, with red ballet slippers on her feet, eye glasses  
perched on her head, and a voice hoarse from talking and talking and  
talking.

Also in the kitchen is Julie Lutts, her tall blonde recipe tester;  
Ingrid Schwamb, her personal assistant; Maureen Yasi, a shorter  
blondish recipe tester; and Steve Garfield, the quirky Jamaica Plain- 
based video blog pioneer who tapes the show. Everyone is laughing,  
cooking, getting bossed around, and mugging for the camera. It's like  
they're not really doing anything serious here, which is why  
Simonds's vlog, spicesof life.com , is becoming a hit.

http://tinyurl.com/2xy87w

or

http://www.boston.com/news/globe/living/articles/2007/06/13/ 
simonds_is_the_life_of_this_video_party/

--Steve
--
Steve Garfield
http://SteveGarfield.com

Watch Spices of Life with Nina Simonds:
http://spicesoflife.com





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

RE: [videoblogging] keep on blipping

[Mike Hudack]

Thanks Jan!  By the way, have you checked out our Show Player?
http://blip.tv/syndication/showplayer - plays all your videos in
sequence from an RSS feed... I think you mentioned wanting something
like this a while back :) 

-Original Message-
From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jan McLaughlin
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2007 7:23 PM
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [videoblogging] keep on blipping

Tossing the confetti cows!

Can't think of any company I'd rather see get a boost.

Jan

On 6/5/07, Jay dedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > http://newteevee.com/2007/06/04/indie-supporter-blip-raises-funding/
>
> this is serious good news for Blip.
> big up to Mike, Charles, Jared, Justin, and Dina.
> support the creator supporters.
>
> Jay
>
>
> --
> Here I am
> http://jaydedman.com
>
> Check out the latest project:
> http://pixelodeonfest.com/
> Webvideo festival this June
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>


-- 
The Faux Press - better than real
http://fauxpress.blogspot.com
http://wburg.tv
http://twitter.com/fauxpress
aim=janofsound
air=862.221.5280
skype=janmclaughlin


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



 
Yahoo! Groups Links

[videoblogging] cell phone picture blogging options

[eric gunnar rochow]

i'm curious about the different ways one can have a blog/gallery of  
cell phone still pictures and would like to hear from you all about  
what you use or have heard of. my ideal would be a wordpress plug in,  
but one could also use flicker.  ? thx, eri.c

http://gardenfork.tv
http://ericrochow.com

[videoblogging] Re: Pixelodeon Success!

[Heath]

I have been catching some of the vids from the event and it looks 
like everyone had a great time(sigh)...

So listen who wants to come to Cincinnati and just hang out with the 
Batman Geek, think of it as a retreat, no panels, no speakers, just 
vloggers getting toghether brainstorming, sharing ideas and 
projects.  I will drive it, if you wanna camp we have multiple 
campground, hotels?, plenty of those.  So..?

Heath
http://batmangeek.com
http://aroundcincinnati.net

--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "David Howell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
>
> I'll second, third or fourth this.
> 
> It was great finally meeting all of you and seeing you in 3D. The 
screenings that I was able 
> to attend were, in the words of Rupert Howe, "quite fantastic!".
> 
> Thank you to everyone I met for being so nice to me. It was really 
hard to leave the 
> gathering at the Castle on Sunday evening. Would have loved to have 
stayed one more 
> day.
> 
> Wanting to hold on to what I experienced this weekend for as long 
as possible.
> 
> David
> http://www.davidhowellstudios.com
> 
> --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Bill Streeter"  wrote:
> >
> > Yes it was a great event. Thanks to everyone who worked so hard 
to 
> > make it all work. It's always fun to get together with everyone. 
> > 
> > The thing that I really loved about this was it was all about the 
> > work--the end product of what we all do. Well done. I wish I 
could 
> > have seen all the programs but the ones I did catch were really 
fun. 
> > And nothing beats the experience of seeing this stuff in a real 
> > cinema environment with a bunch of people at the same time--just 
> > watching--with no interuptions. 
> > 
> > And thanks to everyone who came to my mashup screening. I was 
happy 
> > to see it so well attended. Hope you enjoyed it. 
> > 
> > Bill Streeter
> > LO-FI SAINT LOUIS
> > www.lofistl.com
> > www.billstreeter.net
> > 
> > --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Tim Street"  wrote:
> > >
> > > Hey I only got to swing by to chat and scarf some free food and 
> > drinks for an hour or so on 
> > > Sunday but I wanted to say thanks to Zadi Steve and Jay for 
> > helping the community and 
> > > putting on such a great event at such a wonderful venue.
> > > 
> > > I had to work most of the weekend so I didn't see a single 
session 
> > as I was too busy "working 
> > > the room" when I was there but everyone I spoke with was really 
> > impressed with the Keynotes 
> > > and the sessions. 
> > > 
> > > I also heard the parties were great and I saw some Twitters 
about 
> > a BBQ pool party with 
> > > Jackson West and http://mickipedia.com/ that sounded like it 
would 
> > make a great session for 
> > > next year.
> > > 
> > > Thanks again and if anyone has any video video links from the 
> > sessions, please share.
> > >
> >
>

[videoblogging] Re: Pixelodeon Success!

[Bill Streeter]

We all were wondering why you weren't there Heath. You really should 
have been there. There really isn't any way to quantify the value of 
hanging with people in real space. Besides, it's Hollywood--you 
would have loved it. I want to see you at the next big event Heath, 
no excuses. Don't tell me you can't do it.

Bill Streeter
www.lofistl.com
www.billstreeter.net

--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Heath" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I have been catching some of the vids from the event and it looks 
> like everyone had a great time(sigh)...
> 
> So listen who wants to come to Cincinnati and just hang out with 
the 
> Batman Geek, think of it as a retreat, no panels, no speakers, 
just 
> vloggers getting toghether brainstorming, sharing ideas and 
> projects.  I will drive it, if you wanna camp we have multiple 
> campground, hotels?, plenty of those.  So..?
> 
> Heath
> http://batmangeek.com
> http://aroundcincinnati.net
> 
> --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "David Howell"  
> wrote:
> >
> > I'll second, third or fourth this.
> > 
> > It was great finally meeting all of you and seeing you in 3D. 
The 
> screenings that I was able 
> > to attend were, in the words of Rupert Howe, "quite fantastic!".
> > 
> > Thank you to everyone I met for being so nice to me. It was 
really 
> hard to leave the 
> > gathering at the Castle on Sunday evening. Would have loved to 
have 
> stayed one more 
> > day.
> > 
> > Wanting to hold on to what I experienced this weekend for as 
long 
> as possible.
> > 
> > David
> > http://www.davidhowellstudios.com
> > 
> > --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Bill Streeter"  
wrote:
> > >
> > > Yes it was a great event. Thanks to everyone who worked so 
hard 
> to 
> > > make it all work. It's always fun to get together with 
everyone. 
> > > 
> > > The thing that I really loved about this was it was all about 
the 
> > > work--the end product of what we all do. Well done. I wish I 
> could 
> > > have seen all the programs but the ones I did catch were 
really 
> fun. 
> > > And nothing beats the experience of seeing this stuff in a 
real 
> > > cinema environment with a bunch of people at the same time--
just 
> > > watching--with no interuptions. 
> > > 
> > > And thanks to everyone who came to my mashup screening. I was 
> happy 
> > > to see it so well attended. Hope you enjoyed it. 
> > > 
> > > Bill Streeter
> > > LO-FI SAINT LOUIS
> > > www.lofistl.com
> > > www.billstreeter.net
> > > 
> > > --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Tim Street"  
wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hey I only got to swing by to chat and scarf some free food 
and 
> > > drinks for an hour or so on 
> > > > Sunday but I wanted to say thanks to Zadi Steve and Jay for 
> > > helping the community and 
> > > > putting on such a great event at such a wonderful venue.
> > > > 
> > > > I had to work most of the weekend so I didn't see a single 
> session 
> > > as I was too busy "working 
> > > > the room" when I was there but everyone I spoke with was 
really 
> > > impressed with the Keynotes 
> > > > and the sessions. 
> > > > 
> > > > I also heard the parties were great and I saw some Twitters 
> about 
> > > a BBQ pool party with 
> > > > Jackson West and http://mickipedia.com/ that sounded like it 
> would 
> > > make a great session for 
> > > > next year.
> > > > 
> > > > Thanks again and if anyone has any video video links from 
the 
> > > sessions, please share.
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: [videoblogging] Youtube in french

[Stephanie Bryant]

Trés bien!

--Stephanie

On 6/12/07, Loiez D. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Youtube and Flickr realise soon a version in french ( and spanish,
> corean...)
> Half of users of these site are living out America
>
> Loiez
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>


-- 
Stephanie Bryant
Author, Videoblogging for Dummies
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.mortaine.com/

[videoblogging] Re: cell phone picture blogging options

[Bill Streeter]

Yes you can moblog from a cell with flickr. I do it frequently. Also 
you can post videos to the web from your cell via blip and youtube. 
Basically it just involves emailing the photo or movie from your phone 
to the service of your choice via a special email address.

Bill Streeter
www.lofistl.com
www.billstreeter.net

--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, eric gunnar rochow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
>
> 
> 
> i'm curious about the different ways one can have a blog/gallery of  
> cell phone still pictures and would like to hear from you all about  
> what you use or have heard of. my ideal would be a wordpress plug 
in,  
> but one could also use flicker.  ? thx, eri.c
> 
> http://gardenfork.tv
> http://ericrochow.com
>

[videoblogging] Videolbog from antartica!!!!

[Jay dedman]

check this guy out:
http://www.jasonsolis.blogspot.com/

he needs to seriously compress his videos...but its amazing what he's
putting up there with his little camera. Give him some love.

Jay

-- 
Here I am
http://jaydedman.com

Check out the latest project:
http://pixelodeonfest.com/
Webvideo festival this June

Re: [videoblogging] YouTube to have H.264 versions

[andrew michael baron]

This news re: youtube certainly helps to change my opinion about H. 
264's adoption potential.

I think my prior comments on 3ivx went up against H.264 but I still  
believe the main benefit of 3ivx is that it is a better alternative  
to mpeg4 compression as an encoder. Its comparison to H.264 is really  
just that, a comparison between two different kinds of things.

Whenever there is a demand, its usually worth providing the extra  
file format to fill it, so we've had both for awhile now.

I always thought we would be really lucky if Apple could spark a home  
ip-TV demand with their AppleTV like they did with the iPod, where  
EVERYONE wants one or has one. Even though there are so many other  
options, maybe Apple could kick it all in gear. Having all of YouTube  
in H264 avail for d/l is a pretty good move if just to expedite  
people hooking up.. ..perhaps.


On Jun 12, 2007, at 5:25 PM, Enric wrote:

> From iLounge, http://tinyurl.com/2fq3t7 :
>
> =
> ...YouTube will soon be encoding videos in the H.264
> streaming-efficient compression format preferred by Apple TV, and that
> all new videos submitted to YouTube as of the mid-June launch of the
> AppleTV update will be playable by the device. From then until fall,
> YouTube will be encoding its entire back-catalog in H.264 format,
> adding videos in chunks until everything is accessible to Apple TV
> users. Direct links and the on-screen keyboard-based search engine
> mentioned in our previous update will bring you to current and old
> videos alike
> =
>
> If available to all, easier to mash-up.
>
> -- Enric
>
>
> 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[videoblogging] Re:cell phone website? question??

[Steve Watkins]

It depends on the cell phone. Theres a lot of different capabilities
out there at the moment, longterm things will probably move towards
phones having fully featured browsers, with support for mp4, h264 &
flash video.

I do not know anything about wml, from the little I have read I expect
it will slowly dissapear as full browsers become more common in
phones. I guess what format video it supports is again more of a
question of what each different phone supports, rather than there
being a video format that is supported by all devices that have wml
capability.

The QT or swf thing is probably a limitation of Adobe Go Live rather
than wml. 

There are only a tiny number of phones that support h264 at this
moment in time. For maximum compatibility the poor quality 3gp format
is probably the safest choice for mobiles.

Cheers

Steve Elbows
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Gromik Tohoku
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
> 
> as a newbie in cell phones, I would like to know if it
> is possible to embed a video from blip.tv onto a cell
> phone.
> 
> If that is not possible, my next question is, how is
> it possible to insert a video into a wml document?
> 
> I have a h264 5minute video and I can not insert it
> into a wml doc. I am using Adobe Go Live, and they
> offer either QT or SWF as video embedding options.
> 
> Thanks in advance for offering any advice.
> Nicolas
> 
> 
> Gromik Nicolas
> Tohoku University
> Sendai, Japan
> fax=81-22-7647
> 
> http://www.filmedworld.com/page.php?3
> http://nag-productions.blip.tv/?
> http://sendai-city-tourism-tohoku-university.blip.tv/
> http://eflresources.wikispaces.com/
> 
> 
>  
_
 
> 
> Yahoo!7 Mail has just got even bigger and better with unlimited
storage on all webmail accounts.
> http://au.docs.yahoo.com/mail/unlimitedstorage.html
>

[videoblogging] Re: YouTube to have H.264 versions

[Steve Watkins]

Yeah Id agree, it was easy to get distracted by h264 vs mpeg4 issues,
but at the end of the day 3ivx is a much better mpeg4 encoder than
quicktimes own. We probably should forget other opensource
alternatives, and DivX of course, but then all the other file wrapper
& ease of instructing people how o do this stuff easily comes into play.

So has anybody had a chance to try 3ivx 5 yet? The lack of chatter on
this is surely a sign in itself that many people here who previously
played it safe and stuck to mpeg4, have moved on to h264 at some point
in the last 2 years.

Just to be my usual h264 bore of a self, heres an incomplete list of
devices that support h264:

ipod
appletv
sony psp
sony ps3
xbox360
hd-dvd and blueray use h264 (as well as mpeg2 and VC-1)
nokia n95
little doubt that over time digital satellite, cable & over-the-air TV
will also move to h264.

With this in mind, who would bet against h264?

Only in the browser is h264's domination not a near-total certainty. I
still hope that one day video will form a part of web standards and be
incorporated into browsers directly rather than through plugins such
as quicktime. But it may not happen, who knows at this stage. Maybe
its more likely once royalties arent payable on certain uses of h264?

Id still like to help identify the h264 quality issues you werent
happy about. Have you tried encoders other than quicktime? Got any
screenshots of clips where the poor quality is visible?

Cheers

Steve Elbows
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, andrew michael baron
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This news re: youtube certainly helps to change my opinion about H. 
> 264's adoption potential.
> 
> I think my prior comments on 3ivx went up against H.264 but I still  
> believe the main benefit of 3ivx is that it is a better alternative  
> to mpeg4 compression as an encoder. Its comparison to H.264 is really  
> just that, a comparison between two different kinds of things.
> 
> Whenever there is a demand, its usually worth providing the extra  
> file format to fill it, so we've had both for awhile now.
> 
> I always thought we would be really lucky if Apple could spark a home  
> ip-TV demand with their AppleTV like they did with the iPod, where  
> EVERYONE wants one or has one. Even though there are so many other  
> options, maybe Apple could kick it all in gear. Having all of YouTube  
> in H264 avail for d/l is a pretty good move if just to expedite  
> people hooking up.. ..perhaps.
> 
> 
> On Jun 12, 2007, at 5:25 PM, Enric wrote:
> 
> > From iLounge, http://tinyurl.com/2fq3t7 :
> >
> > =
> > ...YouTube will soon be encoding videos in the H.264
> > streaming-efficient compression format preferred by Apple TV, and that
> > all new videos submitted to YouTube as of the mid-June launch of the
> > AppleTV update will be playable by the device. From then until fall,
> > YouTube will be encoding its entire back-catalog in H.264 format,
> > adding videos in chunks until everything is accessible to Apple TV
> > users. Direct links and the on-screen keyboard-based search engine
> > mentioned in our previous update will bring you to current and old
> > videos alike
> > =
> >
> > If available to all, easier to mash-up.
> >
> > -- Enric
> >
> >
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

Re: [videoblogging] Videolbog from antartica!!!!

[Brook Hinton]

Whoa. Fantastic.
The world feels so much smaller and more wondrously large at the same
time...


Brook

On 6/13/07, Jay dedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>  check this guy out:
> http://www.jasonsolis.blogspot.com/
>
>

___
Brook Hinton
film/video/audio art
www.brookhinton.com <

[videoblogging] Re: YouTube to have H.264 versions

[Steve Watkins]

Doh, sorry I meant shouldn't, not should.

On the 'making h264 encoding much faster' front, Im happy with that
elgato turbo.264 hardware, certainly takes away the longer encoding
time downside of h264. The quality is acceptable, but not quite as
good as a real good multi-pass h264 software encoder could manage. It
gets a definite thumbs up from me for saving energy.

Cheers

Steve Elbows

--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Steve Watkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We probably should forget other opensource
> alternatives, and DivX of course, but then all the other file wrapper
> & ease of instructing people how o do this stuff easily comes into play.

[videoblogging] Re: Free DivX pro download

[Steve Watkins]

Probably by posting your vids in that format and raving about it,
along with being able to give people a decent reason why theyd
actually offer their vidoes in DivX format. Has anybody done this or
are my long-stated gloomy thoughts on the prospects for DivX possibly
coming true?

My advice to DivX for longterm survival remain the same. Embrace the
.mp4 file wrapper format, and make a really stunning h264 encoder, or
else you will be left behind.

Cheers

Steve Elbows

--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "bordercollieaustralianshepherd"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Thank you Jay. How do I thank Divx?
> 
> Dave
> 
> --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Jay dedman"  wrote:
> >
> > Divx is one of the sponsors of Pixelodeon...and they've given us links
> > to their pro version (20$).
> > might as well check it out if you're interested.
> > 
> > Jay
> > _
> > 
> > Here are the download links for a free copy of DivX Pro:
> > 
> > For Windows:
> > http://www.divx.com/dff/
> > 
> > For Mac:
> > http://www.divx.com/dff/?version=mac
> > 
> > For your friends to receive their free DivX Pro serial number they
> > must install the software; just follow the instructions on the page…
> > Also, depending on the response this will only be available for a
> few days.
> > That's it!  Enjoy DivX Pro!
> >
>

[videoblogging] Discdog 'Self Help' Video

[Ron Watson]

I'd just like to draw y'all's attention to a friend of mine's blip show.

He's gone a little wacko, and I thought you all would enjoy the show.

It's kind of funny.

http://blip.tv/file/261500

Cheers,

Ron Watson
http://k9disc.blip.tv
http://k9disc.com
http://pawsitivevybe.com/vlog
http://pawsitivevybe.com





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Pixelodeon Success!

[David Meade]

I had an absolute blast.  It was so great to meet everyone.  I look forward
to the next get together.  BIG thanks to all the organizers.

No to find time to edit all that footage I have. :-)

Oh ... And yes, Heath, I'd be glad to attend any gathering here in the
mid-west!

- Dave

-- 
http://www.DavidMeade.com


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [videoblogging] Re: YouTube to have H.264 versions

[Charles Iliya Krempeaux]

Hello Steve,

On 6/13/07, Steve Watkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

[...]

>  Only in the browser is h264's domination not a near-total certainty. I
>  still hope that one day video will form a part of web standards and be
>  incorporated into browsers directly rather than through plugins such
>  as quicktime. But it may not happen, who knows at this stage. Maybe
>  its more likely once royalties arent payable on certain uses of h264?

Just an FYI.

A new  element has already been defined in HTML5...

http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#video

And like it is specified that browsers support JPG's, PNG's, and GIF's
with the  element, we have Ogg Theora for the  element
(because of patent reasons).

For a better description of why Ogg Theora (and not H.264) read this...

http://maketelevision.com/log/why_ogg_theora_matters_for_internet_tv


See ya

-- 
Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. 


  All the Vlogging News on One Page
 http://vlograzor.com/

[videoblogging] Re: YouTube to have H.264 versions

[Steve Watkins]

Greetings,

Cheers for the info. I would like to support Ogg Theora. Unfortunately
, and for a variety of reasons, it just hasnt caught on enough so far
to make me take it at all seriously at this stage. All the hardware
that has appeared in recent years that supports mpeg4 and h264 is not
helping.

Being free from patent woes, and quite good, is tragically not enough
to ensure adoption. Anyway I will go and study the html5 stuff in more
detail, I hope it points to a brighter future for theora, but I remain
highly skeptical.

Cheers

Steve Elbows

--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Charles Iliya Krempeaux"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello Steve,
> 
> On 6/13/07, Steve Watkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> 
> A new  element has already been defined in HTML5...
> 
> http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#video
> 
> And like it is specified that browsers support JPG's, PNG's, and GIF's
> with the  element, we have Ogg Theora for the  element
> (because of patent reasons).
> 
> For a better description of why Ogg Theora (and not H.264) read this...
> 
> http://maketelevision.com/log/why_ogg_theora_matters_for_internet_tv
> 
> 
> See ya
> 
> -- 
> Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. 
> 
> 
>   All the Vlogging News on One Page
>  http://vlograzor.com/
>

[videoblogging] Re: Free DivX pro download

[Steve Watkins]

Oh I notice that DivX have made some hardware that is in some ways
comparable to the Apple TV, although it has no hard drive:

http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/09/divx-gejbox-media-streamer-hardware-revealed/

Was this device at Pixelodeon at all?

I have mixed feelings about it, in some ways its a sign of what I was
saying, they have to create something like this/get 3rd party hardware
companies to make equivalent devices, to keep DivX alive. 

I also dont like devices like this that stream straight from a
computer, because it means leaving your computer on, which is a waste
of electricity. Even the Apple TV and suchlike make no sense to me
now, because I was appauled by how much juice my LCD TV was using, so
have moved to using a smaller LCD monitor as my TV, connected to a
relatively low-power-consuming computer.

Cheers

Steve Elbows

--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Steve Watkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Probably by posting your vids in that format and raving about it,
> along with being able to give people a decent reason why theyd
> actually offer their vidoes in DivX format. Has anybody done this or
> are my long-stated gloomy thoughts on the prospects for DivX possibly
> coming true?
> 
> My advice to DivX for longterm survival remain the same. Embrace the
> .mp4 file wrapper format, and make a really stunning h264 encoder, or
> else you will be left behind.
> 
> Cheers
> 
> Steve Elbows
> 
> --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "bordercollieaustralianshepherd"
>  wrote:
> >
> > Thank you Jay. How do I thank Divx?
> > 
> > Dave
> > 
> > --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Jay dedman" 
wrote:
> > >
> > > Divx is one of the sponsors of Pixelodeon...and they've given us
links
> > > to their pro version (20$).
> > > might as well check it out if you're interested.
> > > 
> > > Jay
> > > _
> > > 
> > > Here are the download links for a free copy of DivX Pro:
> > > 
> > > For Windows:
> > > http://www.divx.com/dff/
> > > 
> > > For Mac:
> > > http://www.divx.com/dff/?version=mac
> > > 
> > > For your friends to receive their free DivX Pro serial number they
> > > must install the software; just follow the instructions on the page…
> > > Also, depending on the response this will only be available for a
> > few days.
> > > That's it!  Enjoy DivX Pro!
> > >
> >
>

[videoblogging] H.264 Also Dominating the iPhone

[Dave Burstein]

Folks

The YouTube/Apple MPEG .264 is big news, and that will only be
reinforced on June 29 when the iPhone comes out. I've confirmed with
 it's all designed around H.264. I'm doing a session
in the paid part of Web Video Summit on that on June 28 - not yet on
the web site. But I don't want to use this list to push a paid event. 

Much of WVS in San Jose is free, however, and I'd like to
introduce it here. Many folks you know are in the free sessions (code
DSL07) including Jen Gouvea, Documentarian, Echo Chamber

PANELIST: Oscar Grimm, Producer, Freshtopia

PANELIST: Justin Kan, Lifecaster, Justin.tv

Moderator: Graham Leggat, Executive Director, San Francisco Film Society

PANELIST: Schlomo Rabinowitz, Producer, Echoplex Park

PANELIST: Irina Slutsky, Producer, Podtech

PANELIST: Michael Verdi, Videoblogger, Freevlog 

-- 

If no one objects, I'd like to post information on the list about the
free parts of the show, and also how Vlogger reporters and others can
get in to the whole thing gratis. But I'm stopping this note here, to
make sure I'm not overstepping the bounds of what's appropriate for
this list. 

If people think it's wrong to promote the free parts of the event,
contact me on or off-list and I won't do it. If no one objects, I'll
modestly post some details later.

Dave Burstein
Editor, DSL Prime
Conference Chair,
http://www.webvideosummit.com/conference/sessionsbyday.php

Re: [videoblogging] Re:cell phone website? question??

[Frank Carver]

Wednesday, June 13, 2007, 8:14:10 PM, Steve Watkins wrote:
> I do not know anything about wml, from the little I have read I expect
> it will slowly dissapear as full browsers become more common in
> phones. I guess what format video it supports is again more of a
> question of what each different phone supports, rather than there
> being a video format that is supported by all devices that have wml
> capability.

My job at the moment is building web applications to support selling
and serving "content" (music, videos, ringtones, pictures, etc.) -
mainly to mobile phones. Along the way I've learned a few things about
WAP, WML and phone capabilities.

The first thing is that phone browsers and phone capabilities are
*very* different from each other. In the web world most people don't
even worry about the differences between Mozilla, IE and Safari; in
the world of mobile browsers, it's common to support many tens of
different configurations for different types and models of phone.

The second thing is that most phones in the world are really dumb. A
large proportion have no data access at all. Of the ones which do have
data access, the great majority connect over slow GPRS or an
equivalent, and only support basic WAP.  Hardly any phones even
support MP3, let alone video. Of the phones which do support any kind
of video, it's almost always 3gp, but each phone has its own quirks of
what sizes and formats it will support.

We use a pretty complex transcoding service to prepare video and audio
content for delivery to mobile phones. It's complex because it has to
detect and support the capabilities and quirks of so many different
handsets, and it needs continual adjustment as new phones appear and
old ones split into updated and original versions.

WML is not actually too bad to work with. It's essentially a very
reduced subset of XHTML, with a few cunning extras to avoid the need
for JavaScript in common cases. It has the technical advantage of
using reduced bandwidth, and the psychological advantage of reduced
expectations. It's quite feasible to write a really useful WAP
application which just uses simple text, forms and links with the
occasional small image, people don't expect fancy graphics, fonts,
layout and animation.

-- 
Frank Carver   http://www.makevideo.org.uk

Re: [videoblogging] Re: YouTube to have H.264 versions

[Charles Iliya Krempeaux]

Hello Steve,

As a side note...

Opera has already implemented built-in Ogg Theora support a preview
version of their browser.

So, on that preview version of Opera, the  element will work
with Ogg Theora video.


See ya


-- 
Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. 


  All the Vlogging News on One Page
 http://vlograzor.com/

On 6/13/07, Steve Watkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Greetings,
>
>  Cheers for the info. I would like to support Ogg Theora. Unfortunately
>  , and for a variety of reasons, it just hasnt caught on enough so far
>  to make me take it at all seriously at this stage. All the hardware
>  that has appeared in recent years that supports mpeg4 and h264 is not
>  helping.
>
>  Being free from patent woes, and quite good, is tragically not enough
>  to ensure adoption. Anyway I will go and study the html5 stuff in more
>  detail, I hope it points to a brighter future for theora, but I remain
>  highly skeptical.
>
>  Cheers
>
>  Steve Elbows
>
>  --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Charles Iliya Krempeaux"
>  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  >
>  > Hello Steve,
>  >
>  > On 6/13/07, Steve Watkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  >
>  >
>  > A new  element has already been defined in HTML5...
>  >
>  > http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#video
>  >
>  > And like it is specified that browsers support JPG's, PNG's, and GIF's
>  > with the  element, we have Ogg Theora for the  element
>  > (because of patent reasons).
>  >
>  > For a better description of why Ogg Theora (and not H.264) read this...
>  >
>  > http://maketelevision.com/log/why_ogg_theora_matters_for_internet_tv
>  >
>  >
>  > See ya
>  >
>  > --
>  > Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. 
>  >
>  >
>  >   All the Vlogging News on One Page
>  >  http://vlograzor.com/
>  >

[videoblogging] Re: H.264 Also Dominating the iPhone

[Steve Watkins]

I doubt people would object to you posting relevent stuff to this
list, even paid events are ok to talk about if they are relevent, and
especially if you actively communicate on this list. Its those that
only post here with offtopic stuff or glorified adverts and then
vanish that tend to annoy people. You dont seem to be one of those, as
youve already had the courtesy to ask :)

Its funny, the iphone and comments made by apple when it was first
announced, regarding youtube compatibility, that first started the
h264 rumours.

What I wonder about, is whether the h264 version of youtube will be an
Apple exculsive, at least for a while, that wouldnt surprise me at
all. I wonder if it will improve the number of youtube videos
available on the Nokia N95, which has a youtube thing but very
limited, and must already be using mpeg4 or h264 as the phone doesnt
support flash video.

If youtube go the whole distance and make their main website h264,
will this make media companies who like to sue youtube, even angrier,
as it will be perceived that the copyright abuse the masses indulge in
through youtube is 'even more damaging' due oto people being able to
download youtube stuff so easily. Will video creators get upset if
downloads are promoted, as it will potentially reduce their 'number of
plays' stats if people download a video and watch it repeatedly, as
opposed to having to go to youtube each time?

Cheers

Steve Elbows

--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Dave Burstein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Folks
> 
> The YouTube/Apple MPEG .264 is big news, and that will only be
> reinforced on June 29 when the iPhone comes out. I've confirmed with
>  it's all designed around H.264. I'm doing a session
> in the paid part of Web Video Summit on that on June 28 - not yet on
> the web site. But I don't want to use this list to push a paid event. 
> 
> Much of WVS in San Jose is free, however, and I'd like to
> introduce it here. Many folks you know are in the free sessions (code
> DSL07) including Jen Gouvea, Documentarian, Echo Chamber
> 
> PANELIST: Oscar Grimm, Producer, Freshtopia
> 
> PANELIST: Justin Kan, Lifecaster, Justin.tv
> 
> Moderator: Graham Leggat, Executive Director, San Francisco Film Society
> 
> PANELIST: Schlomo Rabinowitz, Producer, Echoplex Park
> 
> PANELIST: Irina Slutsky, Producer, Podtech
> 
> PANELIST: Michael Verdi, Videoblogger, Freevlog 
> 
> -- 
> 
> If no one objects, I'd like to post information on the list about the
> free parts of the show, and also how Vlogger reporters and others can
> get in to the whole thing gratis. But I'm stopping this note here, to
> make sure I'm not overstepping the bounds of what's appropriate for
> this list. 
> 
> If people think it's wrong to promote the free parts of the event,
> contact me on or off-list and I won't do it. If no one objects, I'll
> modestly post some details later.
> 
> Dave Burstein
> Editor, DSL Prime
> Conference Chair,
> http://www.webvideosummit.com/conference/sessionsbyday.php
>

[videoblogging] Re: YouTube to have H.264 versions

[Steve Watkins]

Ta for the info. Ive been reading up on this. The html 5 video thing
should really make a difference at some point in the future, if it
survives the draft process and is done in a flexible enough way. I
note that so far it is proposed that ogg is the format that html 5
browsers should definately support, but that they are free to use
other formats as well.

I need theora to be supported in more mac & windows end-user apps for
me to be more positive about the format. Right now it seems relatively
unknown beyond the linux community, which is a shame. Also gotta be a
tiny bit worried that its not definately immune from patent/licencing
claims, if it catches on then all sorts of companies will scrutinize
it closely to see if it uses any methods which they have patents to cover.

Cheers

Steve Elbows

--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Charles Iliya Krempeaux"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello Steve,
> 
> As a side note...
> 
> Opera has already implemented built-in Ogg Theora support a preview
> version of their browser.
> 
> So, on that preview version of Opera, the  element will work
> with Ogg Theora video.
> 
> 
> See ya
> 
> 
> -- 
> Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. 
> 
> 
>   All the Vlogging News on One Page
>  http://vlograzor.com/
> 
> On 6/13/07, Steve Watkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Greetings,
> >
> >  Cheers for the info. I would like to support Ogg Theora.
Unfortunately
> >  , and for a variety of reasons, it just hasnt caught on enough so far
> >  to make me take it at all seriously at this stage. All the hardware
> >  that has appeared in recent years that supports mpeg4 and h264 is not
> >  helping.
> >
> >  Being free from patent woes, and quite good, is tragically not enough
> >  to ensure adoption. Anyway I will go and study the html5 stuff in
more
> >  detail, I hope it points to a brighter future for theora, but I
remain
> >  highly skeptical.
> >
> >  Cheers
> >
> >  Steve Elbows
> >
> >  --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Charles Iliya Krempeaux"
> >   wrote:
> >  >
> >  > Hello Steve,
> >  >
> >  > On 6/13/07, Steve Watkins  wrote:
> >  >
> >  >
> >  > A new  element has already been defined in HTML5...
> >  >
> >  > http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#video
> >  >
> >  > And like it is specified that browsers support JPG's, PNG's,
and GIF's
> >  > with the  element, we have Ogg Theora for the  element
> >  > (because of patent reasons).
> >  >
> >  > For a better description of why Ogg Theora (and not H.264) read
this...
> >  >
> >  >
http://maketelevision.com/log/why_ogg_theora_matters_for_internet_tv
> >  >
> >  >
> >  > See ya
> >  >
> >  > --
> >  > Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. 
> >  >
> >  >
> >  >   All the Vlogging News on One Page
> >  >  http://vlograzor.com/
> >  >
>

[videoblogging] Re: H.264 Also Dominating the iPhone

[Enric]

Michael Verdi is listed, but I think he has a conflicting event he'll
be at and won't be at Web Video Summit.

I'll be on the THURSDAY, JUNE 28 session "E9: Your Web Presence:
Designing Great Pages for Video" from 2:00PM - 2:50PM with Eddie
Codel, Producer, Geek TV; Jon Phillips, COMMUNITY and BUSINESS
DEVELOPER, CREATIVE COMMONS; and Aza Raskin, President, Humanized.

  -- Enric

--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Dave Burstein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Folks
> 
> The YouTube/Apple MPEG .264 is big news, and that will only be
> reinforced on June 29 when the iPhone comes out. I've confirmed with
>  it's all designed around H.264. I'm doing a session
> in the paid part of Web Video Summit on that on June 28 - not yet on
> the web site. But I don't want to use this list to push a paid event. 
> 
> Much of WVS in San Jose is free, however, and I'd like to
> introduce it here. Many folks you know are in the free sessions (code
> DSL07) including Jen Gouvea, Documentarian, Echo Chamber
> 
> PANELIST: Oscar Grimm, Producer, Freshtopia
> 
> PANELIST: Justin Kan, Lifecaster, Justin.tv
> 
> Moderator: Graham Leggat, Executive Director, San Francisco Film Society
> 
> PANELIST: Schlomo Rabinowitz, Producer, Echoplex Park
> 
> PANELIST: Irina Slutsky, Producer, Podtech
> 
> PANELIST: Michael Verdi, Videoblogger, Freevlog 
> 
> -- 
> 
> If no one objects, I'd like to post information on the list about the
> free parts of the show, and also how Vlogger reporters and others can
> get in to the whole thing gratis. But I'm stopping this note here, to
> make sure I'm not overstepping the bounds of what's appropriate for
> this list. 
> 
> If people think it's wrong to promote the free parts of the event,
> contact me on or off-list and I won't do it. If no one objects, I'll
> modestly post some details later.
> 
> Dave Burstein
> Editor, DSL Prime
> Conference Chair,
> http://www.webvideosummit.com/conference/sessionsbyday.php
>

Re: [videoblogging] Re: YouTube to have H.264 versions

[Charles Iliya Krempeaux]

Hello Steve,

Just out of curiosity... what specific applications would want to Ogg
Theora to be supported in?

-- 
Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. 


  All the Vlogging News on One Page
 http://vlograzor.com/

On 6/13/07, Steve Watkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Ta for the info. Ive been reading up on this. The html 5 video thing
>  should really make a difference at some point in the future, if it
>  survives the draft process and is done in a flexible enough way. I
>  note that so far it is proposed that ogg is the format that html 5
>  browsers should definately support, but that they are free to use
>  other formats as well.
>
>  I need theora to be supported in more mac & windows end-user apps for
>  me to be more positive about the format. Right now it seems relatively
>  unknown beyond the linux community, which is a shame. Also gotta be a
>  tiny bit worried that its not definately immune from patent/licencing
>  claims, if it catches on then all sorts of companies will scrutinize
>  it closely to see if it uses any methods which they have patents to cover.
>
>  Cheers
>
>  Steve Elbows
>
>  --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Charles Iliya Krempeaux"
>  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  >
>  > Hello Steve,
>  >
>  > As a side note...
>  >
>  > Opera has already implemented built-in Ogg Theora support a preview
>  > version of their browser.
>  >
>  > So, on that preview version of Opera, the  element will work
>  > with Ogg Theora video.
>  >
>  >
>  > See ya
>  >
>  >
>  > --
>  > Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. 
>  >
>  >
>  >   All the Vlogging News on One Page
>  >  http://vlograzor.com/
>  >
>
>  > On 6/13/07, Steve Watkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  > >
>  > > Greetings,
>  > >
>  > >  Cheers for the info. I would like to support Ogg Theora.
>  Unfortunately
>  > >  , and for a variety of reasons, it just hasnt caught on enough so far
>  > >  to make me take it at all seriously at this stage. All the hardware
>  > >  that has appeared in recent years that supports mpeg4 and h264 is not
>  > >  helping.
>  > >
>  > >  Being free from patent woes, and quite good, is tragically not enough
>  > >  to ensure adoption. Anyway I will go and study the html5 stuff in
>  more
>  > >  detail, I hope it points to a brighter future for theora, but I
>  remain
>  > >  highly skeptical.
>  > >
>  > >  Cheers
>  > >
>  > >  Steve Elbows
>  > >
>  > >  --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Charles Iliya Krempeaux"
>  > >   wrote:
>  > >  >
>  > >  > Hello Steve,
>  > >  >
>  > >  > On 6/13/07, Steve Watkins  wrote:
>  > >  >
>  > >  >
>  > >  > A new  element has already been defined in HTML5...
>  > >  >
>  > >  > http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#video
>  > >  >
>  > >  > And like it is specified that browsers support JPG's, PNG's,
>  and GIF's
>  > >  > with the  element, we have Ogg Theora for the  element
>  > >  > (because of patent reasons).
>  > >  >
>  > >  > For a better description of why Ogg Theora (and not H.264) read
>  this...
>  > >  >
>  > >  >
>  http://maketelevision.com/log/why_ogg_theora_matters_for_internet_tv
>  > >  >
>  > >  >
>  > >  > See ya
>  > >  >
>  > >  > --
>  > >  > Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. 
>  > >  >
>  > >  >
>  > >  >   All the Vlogging News on One Page
>  > >  >  http://vlograzor.com/
>  > >  >

[videoblogging] Re: YouTube to have H.264 versions

[Steve Watkins]

No one app in particular, was mostl thinking of the encoding side of
things at the moment. eg if a windows or mac user asks 'how can i
encode into this format' there needs to be a nice easy one sentence
answer, nice straightforward encoders that have a simple GUI,
command-line stuff forever condemns formats to obscurity. If there are
such apps alredy please point me in the right direction, last time I
tried I gave up, so Ive still never actually seen or made an ogg file
in my life.

Cheers

Steve Elbows

--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Charles Iliya Krempeaux"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello Steve,
> 
> Just out of curiosity... what specific applications would want to Ogg
> Theora to be supported in?
> 
> -- 
> Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. 
> 
> 
>   All the Vlogging News on One Page
>  http://vlograzor.com/
> 
> On 6/13/07, Steve Watkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Ta for the info. Ive been reading up on this. The html 5 video thing
> >  should really make a difference at some point in the future, if it
> >  survives the draft process and is done in a flexible enough way. I
> >  note that so far it is proposed that ogg is the format that html 5
> >  browsers should definately support, but that they are free to use
> >  other formats as well.
> >
> >  I need theora to be supported in more mac & windows end-user apps for
> >  me to be more positive about the format. Right now it seems
relatively
> >  unknown beyond the linux community, which is a shame. Also gotta be a
> >  tiny bit worried that its not definately immune from patent/licencing
> >  claims, if it catches on then all sorts of companies will scrutinize
> >  it closely to see if it uses any methods which they have patents
to cover.
> >
> >  Cheers
> >
> >  Steve Elbows
> >
> >  --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Charles Iliya Krempeaux"
> >   wrote:
> >  >
> >  > Hello Steve,
> >  >
> >  > As a side note...
> >  >
> >  > Opera has already implemented built-in Ogg Theora support a preview
> >  > version of their browser.
> >  >
> >  > So, on that preview version of Opera, the  element will work
> >  > with Ogg Theora video.
> >  >
> >  >
> >  > See ya
> >  >
> >  >
> >  > --
> >  > Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. 
> >  >
> >  >
> >  >   All the Vlogging News on One Page
> >  >  http://vlograzor.com/
> >  >
> >
> >  > On 6/13/07, Steve Watkins  wrote:
> >  > >
> >  > > Greetings,
> >  > >
> >  > >  Cheers for the info. I would like to support Ogg Theora.
> >  Unfortunately
> >  > >  , and for a variety of reasons, it just hasnt caught on
enough so far
> >  > >  to make me take it at all seriously at this stage. All the
hardware
> >  > >  that has appeared in recent years that supports mpeg4 and
h264 is not
> >  > >  helping.
> >  > >
> >  > >  Being free from patent woes, and quite good, is tragically
not enough
> >  > >  to ensure adoption. Anyway I will go and study the html5
stuff in
> >  more
> >  > >  detail, I hope it points to a brighter future for theora, but I
> >  remain
> >  > >  highly skeptical.
> >  > >
> >  > >  Cheers
> >  > >
> >  > >  Steve Elbows
> >  > >
> >  > >  --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Charles Iliya Krempeaux"
> >  > >   wrote:
> >  > >  >
> >  > >  > Hello Steve,
> >  > >  >
> >  > >  > On 6/13/07, Steve Watkins  wrote:
> >  > >  >
> >  > >  >
> >  > >  > A new  element has already been defined in HTML5...
> >  > >  >
> >  > >  > http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#video
> >  > >  >
> >  > >  > And like it is specified that browsers support JPG's, PNG's,
> >  and GIF's
> >  > >  > with the  element, we have Ogg Theora for the 
element
> >  > >  > (because of patent reasons).
> >  > >  >
> >  > >  > For a better description of why Ogg Theora (and not H.264)
read
> >  this...
> >  > >  >
> >  > >  >
> >  http://maketelevision.com/log/why_ogg_theora_matters_for_internet_tv
> >  > >  >
> >  > >  >
> >  > >  > See ya
> >  > >  >
> >  > >  > --
> >  > >  > Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. 
> >  > >  >
> >  > >  >
> >  > >  >   All the Vlogging News on One Page
> >  > >  >  http://vlograzor.com/
> >  > >  >
>

[videoblogging] Re: Pixelodeon Success!

[David Howell]

Let me know where and when and I'll be there.

David
http://www.davidhowellstudios.com

--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Heath" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I have been catching some of the vids from the event and it looks 
> like everyone had a great time(sigh)...
> 
> So listen who wants to come to Cincinnati and just hang out with the 
> Batman Geek, think of it as a retreat, no panels, no speakers, just 
> vloggers getting toghether brainstorming, sharing ideas and 
> projects.  I will drive it, if you wanna camp we have multiple 
> campground, hotels?, plenty of those.  So..?
> 
> Heath
> http://batmangeek.com
> http://aroundcincinnati.net
> 
> --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "David Howell"  
> wrote:
> >
> > I'll second, third or fourth this.
> > 
> > It was great finally meeting all of you and seeing you in 3D. The 
> screenings that I was able 
> > to attend were, in the words of Rupert Howe, "quite fantastic!".
> > 
> > Thank you to everyone I met for being so nice to me. It was really 
> hard to leave the 
> > gathering at the Castle on Sunday evening. Would have loved to have 
> stayed one more 
> > day.
> > 
> > Wanting to hold on to what I experienced this weekend for as long 
> as possible.
> > 
> > David
> > http://www.davidhowellstudios.com
> > 
> > --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Bill Streeter"  wrote:
> > >
> > > Yes it was a great event. Thanks to everyone who worked so hard 
> to 
> > > make it all work. It's always fun to get together with everyone. 
> > > 
> > > The thing that I really loved about this was it was all about the 
> > > work--the end product of what we all do. Well done. I wish I 
> could 
> > > have seen all the programs but the ones I did catch were really 
> fun. 
> > > And nothing beats the experience of seeing this stuff in a real 
> > > cinema environment with a bunch of people at the same time--just 
> > > watching--with no interuptions. 
> > > 
> > > And thanks to everyone who came to my mashup screening. I was 
> happy 
> > > to see it so well attended. Hope you enjoyed it. 
> > > 
> > > Bill Streeter
> > > LO-FI SAINT LOUIS
> > > www.lofistl.com
> > > www.billstreeter.net
> > > 
> > > --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Tim Street"  wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hey I only got to swing by to chat and scarf some free food and 
> > > drinks for an hour or so on 
> > > > Sunday but I wanted to say thanks to Zadi Steve and Jay for 
> > > helping the community and 
> > > > putting on such a great event at such a wonderful venue.
> > > > 
> > > > I had to work most of the weekend so I didn't see a single 
> session 
> > > as I was too busy "working 
> > > > the room" when I was there but everyone I spoke with was really 
> > > impressed with the Keynotes 
> > > > and the sessions. 
> > > > 
> > > > I also heard the parties were great and I saw some Twitters 
> about 
> > > a BBQ pool party with 
> > > > Jackson West and http://mickipedia.com/ that sounded like it 
> would 
> > > make a great session for 
> > > > next year.
> > > > 
> > > > Thanks again and if anyone has any video video links from the 
> > > sessions, please share.
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: [videoblogging] Re:cell phone website? question??

[David Meade]

There was a company at pixelodeon that was talking about this very thing. (
http://www.mywaves.com/ ) I didnt get the low down on them or their
product/service ... but maybe someone here can give a summary.

If that's not what you're looking for you may have to get inventive. :-)

On 6/13/07, Gromik Tohoku <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Tohoku University
> Sendai, Japan
>


I see you're in Japan.  Are you targeting mobile phones in Japan or
elsewhere?

Here in the USA phones are all over the map.  I can watch just about
anything on my phone so long as I have room to store it.  I also have a
decent browser with which to get to the content.  I'm very lucky in that
regard as most phones probably cant say they have both features.

However my data network is painfully slow ... but the time I'd download a
5min h.264 vid I could have arrived at where ever I was going and used a
real computer.  =P

The situation may be (and likely is) better elsewhere ... especially Japan
as they seem to have wicked cool phones before we do.

My instinct is that if this is for a personal use (meaning you don't some
great service to transcode and deliver to mobile phones) ... the best bet is
probably to just 'embed' a thumbnail image of the video in a lightweight
page and let the user download the file should their mobile browser allow
for it.  It would probably be nice to include a link to some mobile viewing
tips etc.

- Dave

-- 
http://www.DavidMeade.com


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [videoblogging] Re: YouTube to have H.264 versions

[Charles Iliya Krempeaux]

Hello Steve,

You mean something like this...

http://www.erightsoft.net/SUPER.html

With this you can convert virtually any video format to Ogg Theora.
(It runs on Windows.)


See ya

On 6/13/07, Steve Watkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> No one app in particular, was mostl thinking of the encoding side of
>  things at the moment. eg if a windows or mac user asks 'how can i
>  encode into this format' there needs to be a nice easy one sentence
>  answer, nice straightforward encoders that have a simple GUI,
>  command-line stuff forever condemns formats to obscurity. If there are
>  such apps alredy please point me in the right direction, last time I
>  tried I gave up, so Ive still never actually seen or made an ogg file
>  in my life.
>
>  Cheers
>
>  Steve Elbows
>
>  --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Charles Iliya Krempeaux"
>  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  >
>  > Hello Steve,
>  >
>  > Just out of curiosity... what specific applications would want to Ogg
>  > Theora to be supported in?
>  >
>  > --
>  > Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. 
>  >
>  >
>  >   All the Vlogging News on One Page
>  >  http://vlograzor.com/
>  >
>
>  > On 6/13/07, Steve Watkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  > >
>  > > Ta for the info. Ive been reading up on this. The html 5 video thing
>  > >  should really make a difference at some point in the future, if it
>  > >  survives the draft process and is done in a flexible enough way. I
>  > >  note that so far it is proposed that ogg is the format that html 5
>  > >  browsers should definately support, but that they are free to use
>  > >  other formats as well.
>  > >
>  > >  I need theora to be supported in more mac & windows end-user apps for
>  > >  me to be more positive about the format. Right now it seems
>  relatively
>  > >  unknown beyond the linux community, which is a shame. Also gotta be a
>  > >  tiny bit worried that its not definately immune from patent/licencing
>  > >  claims, if it catches on then all sorts of companies will scrutinize
>  > >  it closely to see if it uses any methods which they have patents
>  to cover.
>  > >
>  > >  Cheers
>  > >
>  > >  Steve Elbows
>  > >
>  > >  --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Charles Iliya Krempeaux"
>  > >   wrote:
>  > >  >
>  > >  > Hello Steve,
>  > >  >
>  > >  > As a side note...
>  > >  >
>  > >  > Opera has already implemented built-in Ogg Theora support a preview
>  > >  > version of their browser.
>  > >  >
>  > >  > So, on that preview version of Opera, the  element will work
>  > >  > with Ogg Theora video.
>  > >  >
>  > >  >
>  > >  > See ya
>  > >  >
>  > >  >
>  > >  > --
>  > >  > Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. 
>  > >  >
>  > >  >
>  > >  >   All the Vlogging News on One Page
>  > >  >  http://vlograzor.com/
>  > >  >
>  > >
>  > >  > On 6/13/07, Steve Watkins  wrote:
>  > >  > >
>  > >  > > Greetings,
>  > >  > >
>  > >  > >  Cheers for the info. I would like to support Ogg Theora.
>  > >  Unfortunately
>  > >  > >  , and for a variety of reasons, it just hasnt caught on
>  enough so far
>  > >  > >  to make me take it at all seriously at this stage. All the
>  hardware
>  > >  > >  that has appeared in recent years that supports mpeg4 and
>  h264 is not
>  > >  > >  helping.
>  > >  > >
>  > >  > >  Being free from patent woes, and quite good, is tragically
>  not enough
>  > >  > >  to ensure adoption. Anyway I will go and study the html5
>  stuff in
>  > >  more
>  > >  > >  detail, I hope it points to a brighter future for theora, but I
>  > >  remain
>  > >  > >  highly skeptical.
>  > >  > >
>  > >  > >  Cheers
>  > >  > >
>  > >  > >  Steve Elbows
>  > >  > >
>  > >  > >  --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Charles Iliya Krempeaux"
>  > >  > >   wrote:
>  > >  > >  >
>  > >  > >  > Hello Steve,
>  > >  > >  >
>  > >  > >  > On 6/13/07, Steve Watkins  wrote:
>  > >  > >  >
>  > >  > >  >
>  > >  > >  > A new  element has already been defined in HTML5...
>  > >  > >  >
>  > >  > >  > http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#video
>  > >  > >  >
>  > >  > >  > And like it is specified that browsers support JPG's, PNG's,
>  > >  and GIF's
>  > >  > >  > with the  element, we have Ogg Theora for the 
>  element
>  > >  > >  > (because of patent reasons).
>  > >  > >  >
>  > >  > >  > For a better description of why Ogg Theora (and not H.264)
>  read
>  > >  this...
>  > >  > >  >
>  > >  > >  >
>  > >  http://maketelevision.com/log/why_ogg_theora_matters_for_internet_tv
>  > >  > >  >
>  > >  > >  >
>  > >  > >  > See ya
>  > >  > >  >
>  > >  > >  > --
>  > >  > >  > Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. 
>  > >  > >  >
>  > >  > >  >
>  > >  > >  >   All the Vlogging News on One Page
>  > >  > >  >  http://vlograzor.com/
>  > >  > >  >



-- 
Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. 

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Free DivX pro download

[Jay dedman]

> Oh I notice that DivX have made some hardware that is in some ways
>  comparable to the Apple TV, although it has no hard drive:
>  
> http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/09/divx-gejbox-media-streamer-hardware-revealed/
>  Was this device at Pixelodeon at all?
>  I have mixed feelings about it, in some ways its a sign of what I was
>  saying, they have to create something like this/get 3rd party hardware
>  companies to make equivalent devices, to keep DivX alive.

yep...DivX showcased the device at Pixelodeon.
It was actually pretty cool.an obvious response/competitor to Apple TV.
seems like it could handle many more formats and seemed more open to hacking.

Jay

-- 
Here I am
http://jaydedman.com

Check out the latest project: http://politicalvideo.org
500 hours of George Bush speeches!!
Search, download, remix!!

Re: [videoblogging] Political Video archive

[Jay dedman]

>  Amazing effort, thanks for this! I'll post it where I think people
>  will most enjoy it. Or *not* enjoy it ;)

yes, we need help in 3 ways.

1. certainly join our group if you're interested in helping us grow
the collection to other kinds of political video
(http://groups.google.com/group/politicalvideo)

2. make a video using any of the Bush archive. We'd love to profile on
the front page to show examples. It can be the obvious remixor you
can make commentary.

3. help us promote http://polticalvideo.org.
email it out to communities you think would appreciate it. this
archive wont help if no one knows about it.

feel free to send me any questions.

Jay

-- 
Here I am
http://jaydedman.com

Check out the latest project: http://politicalvideo.org
500 hours of George Bush speeches!!
Search, download, remix!!

[videoblogging] Another great videoblog

[Jay dedman]

Markus just pointed me to this guy in Philly:
http://undertheel.blogspot.com/

he's been doing a series of video in a community that live under a train bridge.
Its really amazing stuff.
short profiles of people you rarely ever see on video, recorded with talent.

check it out and appreciate.

jay

-- 
Here I am
http://jaydedman.com

Check out the latest project: http://politicalvideo.org
500 hours of George Bush speeches!!
Search, download, remix!!

[videoblogging] Re:cell phone website? question??

[Gena]

At Pixelodeon there was a presentation by Mywaves. I have the first
video that I will upload in a few hours. My understanding is that the
service is free and that it is carrier independent so you aren't
locked in to viewing just what your phone carrier will allow you to
see for $$$. 

You can upload videos in any format and they will handle the
transcoding. They are also looking for content providers to work with
them on shared revenue deals and projects.

For more information check out http://www.mywaves.com

Gena
http://outonthestoop.blogspot.com

-- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Gromik Tohoku <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
> 
> as a newbie in cell phones, I would like to know if it
> is possible to embed a video from blip.tv onto a cell
> phone.
> 
> If that is not possible, my next question is, how is
> it possible to insert a video into a wml document?
> 
> I have a h264 5minute video and I can not insert it
> into a wml doc. I am using Adobe Go Live, and they
> offer either QT or SWF as video embedding options.
> 
> Thanks in advance for offering any advice.
> Nicolas
> 
> 
> Gromik Nicolas
> Tohoku University
> Sendai, Japan
> fax=81-22-7647
> 
> http://www.filmedworld.com/page.php?3
> http://nag-productions.blip.tv/?
> http://sendai-city-tourism-tohoku-university.blip.tv/
> http://eflresources.wikispaces.com/
> 
> 
>  
_
 
> 
> Yahoo!7 Mail has just got even bigger and better with unlimited
storage on all webmail accounts.
> http://au.docs.yahoo.com/mail/unlimitedstorage.html
>