Re: [videoblogging] New contender on the Live broadcasting field

[randulo]

Hi Ron,

I'm just guessing here that at least during beta they won't respond
quickly, although I did get an answer when the server was down for
awhile and I asked about that. I'm guessing the preferred format is
FLV, but they do MOV and I think even WMV. No MV4 though.

On 6/28/07, Ron Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Like what formats play well with Mogulus? My QT movies are
> languishing in this sometimes grey-ed out sometimes yellow marked
> shells of the video files they should be. What's up with that?
>
> Most of my stuff is in MOV format, and I was wondering what the deal
> was. I'm a few hours out since sending them a note.

Re: [videoblogging] New contender on the Live broadcasting field

[Ron Watson]

I think this is a pretty cool idea here.

I'm looking for additional support though.

The basic blocks for usage are up and running, but there are a few  
details left out.

Like what formats play well with Mogulus? My QT movies are  
languishing in this sometimes grey-ed out sometimes yellow marked  
shells of the video files they should be. What's up with that?

Most of my stuff is in MOV format, and I was wondering what the deal  
was. I'm a few hours out since sending them a note.

I bet they can't touch Mike @ Blip for support though. Thanks Mike!

Hey Mike, can you check with them and get Blip hooked up to their  
search?

Anyway, I think this is a cool project and could really use the tools  
Mogulus has to offer.

I hope they are a 'good' company. Haven't even checked. That gets so  
depressing...

Cheers,

Ron Watson
http://k9disc.blip.tv
http://k9disc.com
http://pawsitivevybe.com/vlog
http://pawsitivevybe.com



On Jun 19, 2007, at 4:29 PM, Jonathan Bloom wrote:

> I just got accepted into the Mogulus beta and wanted to share with  
> you about
> a new broadcasting tool. I've been toyng with the whole Live  
> broadcasting
> field for a little bit.
>
> It sets you up with a channel and you can either broadcast live or  
> setup an
> auto-pilot playlist of the clips you decide. Broadcasting live is like
> uStream except for the fact you can then add text overlays, a logo,  
> or even
> those stingers you see on TV! Add to this the fact you can then  
> bring in
> cued up clips or go straight to an archive or even switch to  
> another camera
> feed or another user who has their computer's webcam hooked up.
>
> Then the auto-pilot can come on and you setup a playlist of clips  
> you'd like
> to play automatically and soon they will be adding the ability to  
> rerun your
> live broadcasts. There's more features than I mentioned here so goto
> http://mogulus.com and see why I'm excited as a vlogger/video  
> producer.
>
> Also for people wondering, their business model is that after 8  
> minutes a
> 5-15 second ad plays unless you upgrade to their pro version (which  
> at this
> moment means you have no ads, you just pay for your bandwidth).
>
> I apologize if I sound like I'm marketing this, I just am crazy  
> about the
> idea! This is what I was looking for! This is exactly what live  
> broadcasting
> needs!
>
> -- 
> -Jonathan Bloom
> http://thenameiwantedwastaken.com
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
> 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[videoblogging] British English 001 -released

[John Cardenas]

I have just uploaded this new language series
   
  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DRGl207J7Nc
   
  hope it helps some people to start learning English...
   
  this time I have "British English"  but soon -I hope - I can have an american 
tutor and start filmming "American English"   . It is pretty hard to find 
native tutor who are willing to cooperate with these series...specially if you 
live in China..:
   
  but I will keep on- no problem
   
  regards
   
  from my Chinese Island
   
  Chengdu-China
   
  JohnDkar

   
-
Pinpoint customers who are looking for what you sell. 

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [videoblogging] Rotating banner solution?

[Markus Sandy]

On Jun 27, 2007, at 8:03 PM, caminofilm wrote:

> I have added a banner to my wordpress vlog site www.overlander.tv, and
>  was wondering if someone knows of a solution whereby I can rotate
>  different banners when viewers click on different pages, much like the
>  randomized header of the K2 theme I use?
>
>  Mark


Hi Mark,

I once helped install a WP plug-in for this at Swajana.com

worked pretty nice

we used this one if I recall

http://mhough.com/wordpress/2007/header-image-rotator-plugin/

markus


--
http://tools.ourmedia.org/blog
http://SpinXpress.com/Markus_Sandy
http://Ourmedia.org/Markus_Sandy



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [videoblogging] Re: PC Vlogger gets a Mac

[David Meade]

I made the switch about a week ago.  So far, I'm loving it.   There are
Pros, and there are Cons ... but they are all sleeker, shinier, sexier, and
well thought out.

On 6/27/07, David S Kessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> it's ok Mike, nothing to be ashamed of.  I personally swing both ways.
> in fact sometimes I run windows on my Mac - nothing wrong with that.
>
> david
>
>
>
>
>
> --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Shawn Carpenter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > I made the switch about a month ago myself.  I also upgraded to
> > Quicktime Pro.  I have noticed that saving my files on iMovie gives me
> > a much higher resolution, but also a huge file size.  With Quicktime
> > Pro I can compress the file size down without losing too much of the
> > resolution.  I still post my original files to blip.tv because they
> > have the capability to handle my large files, but other sites that
> > require 100 MB or less require that you compress your file.
> >
> > In short the quality and the effects with iMovie are much better then
> > with movie maker, but be prepared to deal with large files and getting
> > creative with saving your files so that they can be uploaded everywhere.
> >
> > --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Mike Moon"  wrote:
> > >
> > > Well, after years of wishing and hoping, I finally have a Mac.
> > > Mac Mini 1.42ghz etc etc.
> > > I've done the updates and am starting to play around with iMovie.
> > > But I guess before I get going too far along this road of unknown
> > destination, I better check
> > > out http://www.freevlog.org to see what setup I should use.
> > >
> > > Anyhow... that's all, go about your day.
> > >
> > > Mike
> > > http://vlog.mikemoon.net
> > >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>


-- 
http://www.DavidMeade.com


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[videoblogging] Rotating banner solution?

[caminofilm]

I have added a banner to my wordpress vlog site www.overlander.tv, and
was wondering if someone knows of a solution whereby I can rotate
different banners when viewers click on different pages, much like the
randomized header of the K2 theme I use? 

Mark

[videoblogging] Re: PC Vlogger gets a Mac

[David S Kessler]

it's ok Mike, nothing to be ashamed of.  I personally swing both ways.
 in fact sometimes I run windows on my Mac - nothing wrong with that.

david





--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Shawn Carpenter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> I made the switch about a month ago myself.  I also upgraded to
> Quicktime Pro.  I have noticed that saving my files on iMovie gives me
> a much higher resolution, but also a huge file size.  With Quicktime
> Pro I can compress the file size down without losing too much of the
> resolution.  I still post my original files to blip.tv because they
> have the capability to handle my large files, but other sites that
> require 100 MB or less require that you compress your file.
> 
> In short the quality and the effects with iMovie are much better then
> with movie maker, but be prepared to deal with large files and getting
> creative with saving your files so that they can be uploaded everywhere.
> 
> --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Mike Moon"  wrote:
> >
> > Well, after years of wishing and hoping, I finally have a Mac.
> > Mac Mini 1.42ghz etc etc.
> > I've done the updates and am starting to play around with iMovie.
> > But I guess before I get going too far along this road of unknown
> destination, I better check 
> > out http://www.freevlog.org to see what setup I should use.
> > 
> > Anyhow... that's all, go about your day.
> > 
> > Mike
> > http://vlog.mikemoon.net
> >
>

Re: [videoblogging] PC Vlogger gets a Mac

[Vergel Evans]

I've been seriously thinking about getting a Macbook Pro...  It's scary to
say... but after having dealt with Adobe Premier for the past 2 years on a
PC... I'm starting to look at finalcut pro and think. it's not such a bad
idea...

right now it's just a matter of saving the $$$ and also waiting for the new
OS to be bundled with their laptops.


-- 
http://www.Lx7.ca - Something in the Square (blog & A/V podcast)
http://www.humanjava.com - techno music & web development

Now on iTunes - http://www.Lx7.ca/everybody-has-a-story

Twitter ID - http://www.twitter.com/vveerrgg


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[videoblogging] Re: PC Vlogger gets a Mac

[Heath]

No, mike, nonot you tooLong live the PC, death to Mac!!  All 
hail the power and greatness of Bill Gates and Windows the best that 
ever will be

I just laughed out loudbut still Mike, no

Heath
http://batmangeek.com
http://aroundcincinnati.net


--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Mike Moon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Well, after years of wishing and hoping, I finally have a Mac.
> Mac Mini 1.42ghz etc etc.
> I've done the updates and am starting to play around with iMovie.
> But I guess before I get going too far along this road of unknown 
destination, I better check 
> out http://www.freevlog.org to see what setup I should use.
> 
> Anyhow... that's all, go about your day.
> 
> Mike
> http://vlog.mikemoon.net
>

[videoblogging] Re: Screencast: Demystifying Web Analytics

[johnleeke]

Beth:

I must say, after fiddling with Google Analytics for a year and not
figuring it out, your research and screen cast has immediately helped
me get some useful info out of GA. --Thank you!

I hope you will produce a follow up report and screen cast.

John
www.HistoricHomeWorks.com

[videoblogging] Re: PC Vlogger gets a Mac

[Shawn Carpenter]

I made the switch about a month ago myself.  I also upgraded to
Quicktime Pro.  I have noticed that saving my files on iMovie gives me
a much higher resolution, but also a huge file size.  With Quicktime
Pro I can compress the file size down without losing too much of the
resolution.  I still post my original files to blip.tv because they
have the capability to handle my large files, but other sites that
require 100 MB or less require that you compress your file.

In short the quality and the effects with iMovie are much better then
with movie maker, but be prepared to deal with large files and getting
creative with saving your files so that they can be uploaded everywhere.

--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Mike Moon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Well, after years of wishing and hoping, I finally have a Mac.
> Mac Mini 1.42ghz etc etc.
> I've done the updates and am starting to play around with iMovie.
> But I guess before I get going too far along this road of unknown
destination, I better check 
> out http://www.freevlog.org to see what setup I should use.
> 
> Anyhow... that's all, go about your day.
> 
> Mike
> http://vlog.mikemoon.net
>

[videoblogging] San Francisco location needed (large, well lit bathroom...)

[Mark Day]

I'm looking for a large bathroom to film in.  The filming will take not very
long at all (10 minutes at most...).  Needs to be enough room to pull back
on someone sitting on the throne with laptop on lap.  An office bathroom
would be OK, but the less it looks like an office, the better (i.e. prefer
no wall-bars or seat-cover dispensers...)  Needed ASAP (like, for tomorrow
sometime)

Any assistance off-list would be appreciated.  Public transport accessible
preferred.

Cheers

Mark
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[videoblogging] PC Vlogger gets a Mac

[Mike Moon]

Well, after years of wishing and hoping, I finally have a Mac.
Mac Mini 1.42ghz etc etc.
I've done the updates and am starting to play around with iMovie.
But I guess before I get going too far along this road of unknown destination, 
I better check 
out http://www.freevlog.org to see what setup I should use.

Anyhow... that's all, go about your day.

Mike
http://vlog.mikemoon.net

Re: [videoblogging] The FTC sucks...

[Richard (Show) Hall]

"The latter group wants the option of charging customers more for
transmitting certain content, including live
video, faster or more reliably than other data."

... this is NOT what net-neutrality is - and this is a big misconception in
how it is often presented - as specified in, for example, the Markey
ammendment in the house ... net neutrality is NOT that you can't treat data
differently based on data TYPE, rather you can non treat data differently
based on the data SOURCE ... so, it's perfectly reasonable, based on these
proposed net neutrality laws, to treat video and text differently within the
network, for example; but it is not reasonable to treat video from the
Richard Show differently from AT&T's TV channel ... the problem with the
latter in terms of the negative impact on start ups, creativity,
competition, and innovation in general is pretty self-evident to me

... as for how it would benefit consumers for AT&T, Sprint, or whoever, to
determine whose content will be easy to access vs. whose will not ... and
their decisions are all based on income to the company ... how's that going
to help the consumer?

... definitely will NOT help anyone interested in independent/grass roots
media

... I'm with you Heath on that, for sure ... Richard

On 6/27/07, Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>   Like anyone here on this group didn't know this but look at the last
> line from this article
>
> WASHINGTON - The Federal Trade Commission on Wednesday urged
> policymakers to proceed cautiously on any regulation of high-speed
> Internet traffic.
>
> The agency issued a report addressing the controversial subject of
> network neutrality, which is the notion that all online traffic
> should be treated equally by Internet service providers.
>
> The issue pits consumer groups and content providers such as Google
> Inc. against large telecommunications companies, such as AT&T Inc.
> and Comcast Corp. The latter group wants the option of charging
> customers more for transmitting certain content, including live
> video, faster or more reliably than other data.
>
> FTC Chairwoman Deborah Platt Majoras said that without evidence
> of "market failure or demonstrated consumer harm, policy makers
> should be particularly hesitant to enact new regulation in this
> area." The Federal Communications Commission and Department of
> Justice have jurisdiction over high-speed Internet access, while
> Congress has considered legislation that would mandate network
> neutrality.
>
> The agency also said that certain practices that would discriminate
> among Internet traffic, such as prioritizing some data or providing
> exclusive deals to content providers, "can benefit consumers."
>
> "can benefit consumers".my a$$.
>
> Heath
> http://batmangeek.com
> http://aroundcincinnati.net
>
>  
>



-- 
Richard
http://richardhhall.org
Shows
http://richardshow.org
http://inspiredhealing.tv


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [videoblogging] Vloggercon Europe 2007?

[RANDY MANN]

b better go to vlog eurpe becuse there wont be a vloggercon in the usa this
year

On 6/27/07, Adam Quirk, Wreck & Salvage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> VlogEurope 2007: September 1-2 in Heidelberg,
> Germany<
> http://www.vlogeurope.com/2007/06/20/vlogeurope-2007-september-1-2-in-heidelberg-germany/
> >
> http://vlogeurope.com/
>
> On 6/27/07, Gabriel Soucheyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > HeidelbUrg or HeidelbErg ?
> > and when ?
> >
> >
> > Le 27 juin 07 à 16:34, schlomo rabinowitz a écrit :
> >
> > > VlogEurope is coming to Heidelburg Germany at that time; and is
> > > should be a
> > > really good time. (Last year in Milan was pretty near perfect of an
> > > experience for me)
> > >
> > > Do a search for VlogEurope and you should find the yahoogroup and
> > > site.
> > >
> > > Schlomo
> > > http://schlomolog.blogspot.com
> > > http://weknowhow.tv
> > > http://winkshow.com
> > > http://hatfactory.net
> > >
> > > On 6/27/07, Lisa Rein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hey gang :-)
> > > >
> > > > hey i saw a reference to vloggercon europe on http://vlograzor.com/
> > > > and a date of Sat Sep 1 - Sun Sep 2
> > > > but then nothing from a google search...
> > > >
> > > > anyone know?
> > > >
> > > > thanks!
> > > >
> > > > lisa
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > Gabriel Soucheyre
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Département Métiers du livre et éditions numériques
> > Université Blaise Pascal
> > 34, av Carnot
> > BP 185
> > 63006 Clermont-Ferrand cedex
> > --
> > VIDEOFORMES vidéo et nouveaux médias dans l'art contemporain
> > www.videoformes.com
> > BP 50 -64, rue Lamartine • 63002 CLERMONT-FERRAND Cedex 1 / France
> > T + 33 (0) 473 17 02 17 • Direction : Gabriel SOUCHEYRE + 33 (0) 612
> > 59 27 53
> > Skype : callto:gabrielsoucheyre
> >
> > SVP / P lease :  n'imprimer que si nécessaire / print only if
> > necessary
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Adam Quirk
> Wreck & Salvage
> 551.208.4644
> Brooklyn, NY
> http://wreckandsalvage.com
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Re: [videoblogging] The FTC sucks...

[Charles Iliya Krempeaux]

I question whether the FTC is "good" for television.


I'm against any kind of (non-voluntary... and thus forced) regulation.

-- 
Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. 


  All the Vlogging News on One Page
 http://vlograzor.com/

On 6/27/07, Jonathan Bloom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This is why I totally support Jeff Pulver in his move to tell the FTC to
>  keep their hands off the internet.
>
>  The FTC is good for television, but the internet is supposed to be free!
>
>
>  On 6/27/07, Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  >
>  >   Like anyone here on this group didn't know this but look at the last
>  > line from this article
>  >
>  > WASHINGTON - The Federal Trade Commission on Wednesday urged
>  > policymakers to proceed cautiously on any regulation of high-speed
>  > Internet traffic.
>  >
>  > The agency issued a report addressing the controversial subject of
>  > network neutrality, which is the notion that all online traffic
>  > should be treated equally by Internet service providers.
>  >
>  > The issue pits consumer groups and content providers such as Google
>  > Inc. against large telecommunications companies, such as AT&T Inc.
>  > and Comcast Corp. The latter group wants the option of charging
>  > customers more for transmitting certain content, including live
>  > video, faster or more reliably than other data.
>  >
>  > FTC Chairwoman Deborah Platt Majoras said that without evidence
>  > of "market failure or demonstrated consumer harm, policy makers
>  > should be particularly hesitant to enact new regulation in this
>  > area." The Federal Communications Commission and Department of
>  > Justice have jurisdiction over high-speed Internet access, while
>  > Congress has considered legislation that would mandate network
>  > neutrality.
>  >
>  > The agency also said that certain practices that would discriminate
>  > among Internet traffic, such as prioritizing some data or providing
>  > exclusive deals to content providers, "can benefit consumers."
>  >
>  > "can benefit consumers".my a$$.
>  >
>  > Heath
>  > http://batmangeek.com
>  > http://aroundcincinnati.net
>  >
>  >
>  >
>
>  --
>  -Jonathan Bloom
>  http://thenameiwantedwastaken.com

Re: [videoblogging] The FTC sucks...

[Jonathan Bloom]

This is why I totally support Jeff Pulver in his move to tell the FTC to
keep their hands off the internet.

The FTC is good for television, but the internet is supposed to be free!

On 6/27/07, Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>   Like anyone here on this group didn't know this but look at the last
> line from this article
>
> WASHINGTON - The Federal Trade Commission on Wednesday urged
> policymakers to proceed cautiously on any regulation of high-speed
> Internet traffic.
>
> The agency issued a report addressing the controversial subject of
> network neutrality, which is the notion that all online traffic
> should be treated equally by Internet service providers.
>
> The issue pits consumer groups and content providers such as Google
> Inc. against large telecommunications companies, such as AT&T Inc.
> and Comcast Corp. The latter group wants the option of charging
> customers more for transmitting certain content, including live
> video, faster or more reliably than other data.
>
> FTC Chairwoman Deborah Platt Majoras said that without evidence
> of "market failure or demonstrated consumer harm, policy makers
> should be particularly hesitant to enact new regulation in this
> area." The Federal Communications Commission and Department of
> Justice have jurisdiction over high-speed Internet access, while
> Congress has considered legislation that would mandate network
> neutrality.
>
> The agency also said that certain practices that would discriminate
> among Internet traffic, such as prioritizing some data or providing
> exclusive deals to content providers, "can benefit consumers."
>
> "can benefit consumers".my a$$.
>
> Heath
> http://batmangeek.com
> http://aroundcincinnati.net
>
>  
>



-- 
-Jonathan Bloom
http://thenameiwantedwastaken.com


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[videoblogging] The FTC sucks...

[Heath]

Like anyone here on this group didn't know this but look at the last 
line from this article

WASHINGTON - The Federal Trade Commission on Wednesday urged 
policymakers to proceed cautiously on any regulation of high-speed 
Internet traffic.

The agency issued a report addressing the controversial subject of 
network neutrality, which is the notion that all online traffic 
should be treated equally by Internet service providers.

The issue pits consumer groups and content providers such as Google 
Inc. against large telecommunications companies, such as AT&T Inc. 
and Comcast Corp. The latter group wants the option of charging 
customers more for transmitting certain content, including live 
video, faster or more reliably than other data.

FTC Chairwoman Deborah Platt Majoras said that without evidence 
of "market failure or demonstrated consumer harm, policy makers 
should be particularly hesitant to enact new regulation in this 
area." The Federal Communications Commission and Department of 
Justice have jurisdiction over high-speed Internet access, while 
Congress has considered legislation that would mandate network 
neutrality.

The agency also said that certain practices that would discriminate 
among Internet traffic, such as prioritizing some data or providing 
exclusive deals to content providers, "can benefit consumers."


"can benefit consumers".my a$$.

Heath
http://batmangeek.com
http://aroundcincinnati.net

[videoblogging] Re: Screencast: Demystifying Web Analytics

[Chuck]

Thank you for this, Beth!

Chuck

--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Beth Kanter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Folks:
> 
> I just finished a screencast - a primer to understanding web 
analytics using
> google analytics.
> http://beth.typepad.com/beths_blog/2007/06/new-screencast-.html
> 
> I included a wiki companion with lots of useful articles on the 
topic
> http://analytics.wikispaces.com/
> 
> Now, onto researching video analytics
> 
> Beth
> 
> 
> On 6/14/07, Steve Watkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >   I read on newteevee about this video analytics service just the 
other
> > day:
> >
> > http://newteevee.com/2007/06/12/vidmetrix-epidemiology-for-viral-
videos/
> >
> > That or alternatives would certainly be potentially useful for 
people
> > who put their videos on a variety of sites.
> >
> > If I was into this stuff myself Id probably take a close interest 
in
> > other things not directly related to the videos themselves, like 
how
> > many people link to your site, google pagerank, general buzz about
> > your stuff, number of comments on the site.
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > Steve Elbows
> >
> > --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com ,
> > "Roxanne Darling" 
> >
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > I am looking forward to your filtering through all of the 
different
> > > choices Beth. We are in the early stages of this, and it is a 
very
> > > imprecise (and frustrating) activity.
> > >
> > > We've used GA, Urchin, Feedburner and now Blip for 
measurements. Along
> > > with cross-posting some stuff to YouTube.
> > >
> > > We hosted our videos on a separate media server (sep from the WP
> > > install) up until a month ago. We have found that GA and Urchin 
do not
> > > agree; many say GA under reports.
> > >
> > > On our media server, we have Urchin data that shows the actual 
data
> > > transferred per file type and per file path. We trust that more 
than
> > > hits or views as the TV Tonic service downloads media in 
multiple
> > > sessions that can generate wildly inflated numbers for some 
criteria.
> > > Seems that actual bandwidth tells us what files were being 
downloaded.
> > >
> > > The main thing is that all of these companies use their own
> > > (fluctuating) algorithms. So for example, one day they might 
count all
> > > requests for a file from iTunes, but the next day they might 
disregard
> > > all requests for the file after the first request, within a 24 
hour
> > > time period. (I heard this from a source.) Thing is, my Mom 
watches
> > > our show in iTunes. Whenever anyone comes over to the house, 
she shows
> > > them a few episodes too. From an aggregator's point of view, it 
may
> > > look like one person viewing same files multiple times. In 
reality it
> > > is more like the magazine sitting on the doctor's office coffee 
table
> > > - in fact more people are watching it.
> > >
> > > Feedburner went through one of these tweaks a while back and 
people
> > > saw their subscriber base change by 20-30% in 24 hours. :-)
> > >
> > > YouTube provides some stats on views, and there is also this 
service
> > > that is providing stats for YouTube, Metacafe, MySpace, Yahoo, 
Revver,
> > > and AOL video:
> > > http://www.tubemogul.com
> > > "TubeMogul is command central for those that publish and monitor
> > > online video, as well as for organizations that advertise within
> > > online video."
> > >
> > > My friends at Aweli are also working on an independent stats
> > > verification service; hopefully they'll chime in here too.
> > >
> > > Gathering data across so many services and then trying to find 
those
> > > who have republished our feed and provide no stats...is leading 
me to
> > > worry less and less about stats.
> > >
> > > After all, it's not so much about how many watched, but how 
were they
> > > affected by the media?
> > >
> > > Rox
> > >
> > >
> > > On 6/14/07, Beth Kanter  wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Hi Folks,
> > > >
> > > > I've been working on a screencast about web analytics in 
general
> > and google
> > > > analytics for nonprofits to measure mission - but with a 
focus on
> > more
> > > > traditional online strategies (not social media). I have been
> > interviewing
> > > > analytics geeks and experts including Avanish Kaushik.
> > > >
> > > > While not the content for the screen, I went off on a social
> > media metrics
> > > > tangent focusing on what metrics one might use to measure
> > "success" of a
> > > > blog. (And that 's up for debate as whether you can really
> > measure that ..
> > > > 
http://beth.typepad.com/beths_blog/2007/05/measuring_your_.html
> > > >
> > > > Okay, so now I'm thinking about that means in terms of 
tracking
> > viewership
> > > > of video blog - and have a few questions:
> > > >
> > > > What metrics do you use to track the success or audience 
growth
> > of your
> > > > video blog? A few come to mind like - video views, RSS
> > subscribers, unique
> > > > visitors to your blog/vlog, search 

[videoblogging] Re: Political video bloggers

[bordercollieaustralianshepherd]

http://ihateronpaul.com/

http://www.dailypaul.com/

http://ihateronpaul.com/ronpauljunkie.htm

--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "mediamogirl"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hey all...I am looking for links to great political videos and
> videobloggers to feature on my vlog and also for a MSM project I'm
> working on.  I am producing some myself and interested in linking up
> with other creators who are doing satirical work/parodies and
> opinion/commentary.  I have found many on my own, but know that there
> are probably a lot of great videos out there that I'm missing. 
> Thoughts?
>

[videoblogging] Re: need a videocamera recommendation: good in low light, price <$300

[Tony]

I'm quite impressed by the performance of the Sanyo Xacti c40. It's an
SD camera wrt video, but it's low light performance is very good. You
can get them at Radio Shack of all places, and with a 2GB SD card (2
hours of video!) you'll pay $224 before tax. Not bad. 



--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Bill Streeter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hey Deirdré,
> 
> I don't think a sub $300 cam thats good in low light exists. When 
> you buy a more expensive camera part of what you are paying for is 
> better low light performance and all the things that make it 
> possible (larger ccds, better optics etc). Some of the lower end 
> Canons and Sonys have pretty good low light performance but they are 
> priced just above the $300 mark. Check camcorderinfo.com for some 
> pretty good reviews and sample footage of most of the cameras 
> available now. They do extensive low light testing too.
> 
> Bill Streeter
> LO-FI SAINT LOUIS
> http://lofistl.com
> http://billstreeter.net
> 
> --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Deirdre Straughan" 
>  wrote:
> >
> > Any suggestions?
> > 
> > -- 
> > best regards,
> > Deirdré Straughan
> > 
> > living & travelling in Italy
> > (and other Countries Beginning with I)
> > www.beginningwithi.com
> > Check out my latest blog post: My Potter
> > 
> Predictions >
> > Blogsigs.com , Link your own blog 
> posts.
> > 
> > 
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>

Re: [videoblogging] screensharing software

[Jay dedman]

> does anyone know of any good (or decent) screensharing (live
>  screencasting) software out there?  I have used Spy - and it actually
>  works pretty well if you are not behind any firewall or router, but I
>  want to experiment or at least know if anything else exists - for Mac,
>  please!

ishowu is the best for the mac.
http://www.shinywhitebox.com/home/home.html

Jay

Re: [videoblogging] Vloggercon Europe 2007?

[Adam Quirk, Wreck & Salvage]

VlogEurope 2007: September 1-2 in Heidelberg,
Germany
http://vlogeurope.com/

On 6/27/07, Gabriel Soucheyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> HeidelbUrg or HeidelbErg ?
> and when ?
>
>
> Le 27 juin 07 à 16:34, schlomo rabinowitz a écrit :
>
> > VlogEurope is coming to Heidelburg Germany at that time; and is
> > should be a
> > really good time. (Last year in Milan was pretty near perfect of an
> > experience for me)
> >
> > Do a search for VlogEurope and you should find the yahoogroup and
> > site.
> >
> > Schlomo
> > http://schlomolog.blogspot.com
> > http://weknowhow.tv
> > http://winkshow.com
> > http://hatfactory.net
> >
> > On 6/27/07, Lisa Rein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hey gang :-)
> > >
> > > hey i saw a reference to vloggercon europe on http://vlograzor.com/
> > > and a date of Sat Sep 1 - Sun Sep 2
> > > but then nothing from a google search...
> > >
> > > anyone know?
> > >
> > > thanks!
> > >
> > > lisa
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> Gabriel Soucheyre
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Département Métiers du livre et éditions numériques
> Université Blaise Pascal
> 34, av Carnot
> BP 185
> 63006 Clermont-Ferrand cedex
> --
> VIDEOFORMES vidéo et nouveaux médias dans l'art contemporain
> www.videoformes.com
> BP 50 -64, rue Lamartine • 63002 CLERMONT-FERRAND Cedex 1 / France
> T + 33 (0) 473 17 02 17 • Direction : Gabriel SOUCHEYRE + 33 (0) 612
> 59 27 53
> Skype : callto:gabrielsoucheyre
>
> SVP / P lease :  n'imprimer que si nécessaire / print only if
> necessary
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>


-- 
Adam Quirk
Wreck & Salvage
551.208.4644
Brooklyn, NY
http://wreckandsalvage.com


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Re: [videoblogging] Political video bloggers

[Lisa Ours]

You might give this one a looksee too:

http://www.grandaughtershow.com

She is 14 years old but already a budding activist.

Not sure what her next work will be...but this was her first actual vlog.

Cheers,

Lis





http://www.daughtershow.com
~No explanation needed





>From: "Richard (Show) Hall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
>To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Political video bloggers
>Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 18:24:31 -0500
>
>Here's a couple I did:
>
>"Dennis Kucinich meets Josh Wolf's Mom"
>http://richardshow.org/show/2007/01/21/dennis-kucinich-meets-josh-wolfs-mom/
>
>and
>
>A letter from our representative on net neutrality
>"
>http://richardshow.org/show/2006/08/21/a-letter-from-our-representative-on-net-neutrality/
>"
>
>... Richard
>
>On 6/26/07, mediamogirl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >   Hey all...I am looking for links to great political videos and
> > videobloggers to feature on my vlog and also for a MSM project I'm
> > working on. I am producing some myself and interested in linking up
> > with other creators who are doing satirical work/parodies and
> > opinion/commentary. I have found many on my own, but know that there
> > are probably a lot of great videos out there that I'm missing.
> > Thoughts?
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>--
>Richard
>http://richardhhall.org
>Shows
>http://richardshow.org
>http://inspiredhealing.tv
>
>
>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

Re: [videoblogging] Vloggercon Europe 2007?

[Gabriel Soucheyre]

HeidelbUrg or HeidelbErg ?
and when ?


Le 27 juin 07 à 16:34, schlomo rabinowitz a écrit :

> VlogEurope is coming to Heidelburg Germany at that time; and is  
> should be a
> really good time. (Last year in Milan was pretty near perfect of an
> experience for me)
>
> Do a search for VlogEurope and you should find the yahoogroup and  
> site.
>
> Schlomo
> http://schlomolog.blogspot.com
> http://weknowhow.tv
> http://winkshow.com
> http://hatfactory.net
>
> On 6/27/07, Lisa Rein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hey gang :-)
> >
> > hey i saw a reference to vloggercon europe on http://vlograzor.com/
> > and a date of Sat Sep 1 - Sun Sep 2
> > but then nothing from a google search...
> >
> > anyone know?
> >
> > thanks!
> >
> > lisa
> >
> >
> >
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
> 



Gabriel Soucheyre

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Département Métiers du livre et éditions numériques
Université Blaise Pascal
34, av Carnot
BP 185
63006 Clermont-Ferrand cedex
--
VIDEOFORMES vidéo et nouveaux médias dans l'art contemporain
www.videoformes.com
BP 50 -64, rue Lamartine • 63002 CLERMONT-FERRAND Cedex 1 / France
T + 33 (0) 473 17 02 17 • Direction : Gabriel SOUCHEYRE + 33 (0) 612  
59 27 53
Skype : callto:gabrielsoucheyre

SVP / P lease :  n'imprimer que si nécessaire / print only if  
necessary





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Re: [videoblogging] Vloggercon Europe 2007?

[schlomo rabinowitz]

VlogEurope is coming to Heidelburg Germany at that time; and is should be a
really good time. (Last year in Milan was pretty near perfect of an
experience for me)

Do a search for VlogEurope and you should find the yahoogroup and site.

Schlomo
http://schlomolog.blogspot.com
http://weknowhow.tv
http://winkshow.com
http://hatfactory.net


On 6/27/07, Lisa Rein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>   Hey gang :-)
>
> hey i saw a reference to vloggercon europe on http://vlograzor.com/
> and a date of Sat Sep 1 - Sun Sep 2
> but then nothing from a google search...
>
> anyone know?
>
> thanks!
>
> lisa
>
>  
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[videoblogging] Re: Fwd: Your Short Films On Grouper

[Heath]

you will know we have reached critial mass once people start making 
me offers.so we have still got a while.

Heath
http://batmangeek.com
http://aroundcincinnati.net

--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Bill Streeter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
>
> I get a message like this almost every week from some service or 
> another.
> 
> Just goes to show that at some point it won't be long until there 
> will be more of these video sharing sites than there are videos to 
> share on them. Have we reached critical mass yet? I can't wait for 
> the bidding wars for talent. 
> 
> Bill Streeter
> LO-FI SAINT LOUIS
> http://lofistl.com
> http://billstreeter.net
> 
> --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, ryan junell  wrote:
> >
> > 
> > 
> > what do you guys think? should I spend two full time weeks 
> > recovering, preparing, and uploading everything I've ever made to 
> > sony?
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > >Subject: Your Short Films On Grouper
> > >Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 12:40:54 -0700
> > >From: "Julianna Jackson" 
> > >To: 
> > >
> > >
> > >Dear Ryan,
> > >
> > >I saw your video, Lester Sleeps Over, and I thought it was 
> awesome. 
> > >Great work! I would love to have your short films on Grouper.  
My 
> > >name is Julianna and I am a member of the Content Team at 
Grouper 
> > >Networks (www.Grouper.com) and our company was recently acquired 
> by 
> > >Sony Pictures Entertainment.
> > >As the online video division of Sony Pictures, Grouper is 
leading 
> > >the next generation of user-generated video production. As part 
> of 
> > >that effort, my team is recruiting talented producers like 
> yourself 
> > >into our community so that we can present you with several 
> > >opportunities in the areas of content and syndication. 
> > >
> > >A first step in working together is for you to simply sign-up on 
> our 
> > >site and upload your work. Once your work is uploaded, shoot me 
> an 
> > >email, so I can manually mark it to be featured.  Please do not 
> use 
> > >any copywritten music/footage in your work as we will not be 
able 
> to 
> > >feature it. iWe have many pathways to future content and we're 
> > >adding more everyday.
> > >
> > >The following are the best specs for uploading to our site:
> > >File type: MOV
> > >Video Codec: AVC/h.264
> > >Audio Codec: AAC/48.000 kHz
> > >OR
> > >File type: WMV
> > >Video Codec: WMV9
> > >Audio Codec: WMA9
> > >AND
> > >Bitrate: 800kbps
> > >Framerate: Native frame rate, up to 30fps
> > >Interlacing: De-interlaced/ Progressive Scan
> > >File size for 4x3: 640x480 (NTSC) or 768x576 (PAL)
> > >File size for 16x9: 854x480 (NTSC) or 1024x576 (PAL)
> > >
> > >If you have any questions, please feel free to email me.  We'd 
> love 
> > >to have you sign on to Grouper and get your content in the 
> spotlight!
> > >Looking forward to hearing from you,
> > >
> > >
> > >Sincerely,
> > >Julianna Jackson
> > >julianna@
> > >A Sony Pictures Company
> > >
> > >A Sony Pictures Entertainment Company
> > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > ryan junell
> > 
> > junell.net
> > slomohorror.com
> >
>

[videoblogging] Vloggercon Europe 2007?

[Lisa Rein]

Hey gang :-)

hey i saw a reference to vloggercon europe on http://vlograzor.com/
and a date of Sat Sep 1 - Sun Sep 2
but then nothing from a google search...

anyone know?

thanks!

lisa

[videoblogging] Re: just curious about facebook groups

[missbhavens1969]

There's even another one, I'm pretty sure. I think I've seen a total
of five. 

At first I wondered why there were so many groups (with the same
members, too!) and left comments about this on each of them. No one
really seemed to care, which is fine; I'm not particularly active on
Facebook, and none of the groups there seem to be doing much of
anything besides having members (I haven't checked back with them in
several weeks, so this may no longer be the case). Might as well just
join them all (or none) and see what fits.

When you think about it, NOTHING is really "official" on Facebook!

Bekah


--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Loiez D." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Thank Charles but..
> 
> That was my question :
> Why 3 or more group to spread the same spirit ?
> 
> Just curious ;-)
> 
> Best regards
> Loiez
> 
> Le 26 juin 07 à 22:40, Charles Iliya Krempeaux a écrit :
> 
> > Hey,
> >
> > I don't know if there is an official one. But there's 3 vlogging
> > groups there that I know of...
> >
> > http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=2220925024
> > http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=2223901949
> > http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=2327643684
> >
> > Join them all.
> >
> > See ya
> >
> > --  
> > Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. 
> >
> > All the Vlogging News on One Page
> > http://vlograzor.com/
> >
> > On 6/26/07, Loiez D. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Where is the offical facebook group of this list ? ;-)
> > >
> > > Nice day (or night) all
> > >
> > > Loiez
> >
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

[videoblogging] screensharing software

[andrew L.]

does anyone know of any good (or decent) screensharing (live 
screencasting) software out there?  I have used Spy - and it actually 
works pretty well if you are not behind any firewall or router, but I 
want to experiment or at least know if anything else exists - for Mac, 
please!

thanks,
andrew L.
NewYorkState


as always... posting at:
-- 
http://www.breathingplanet.net
--
andrew lynn  |  fon: 518-573-7947  |  skype/aim: destroyallandrew

Re: [videoblogging] Re: need a videocamera recommendation: good in low light, price <$300

[trine bjørkmann berry]

only problem with the xacti (which i have, and love) is the sound isn't very
good on it... but i think you can use an external microphone... (which i
don't , which is why i don't use the audio ever :))
trine


On 6/26/07, Bill Streeter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>   Hey Deirdré,
>
> I don't think a sub $300 cam thats good in low light exists. When
> you buy a more expensive camera part of what you are paying for is
> better low light performance and all the things that make it
> possible (larger ccds, better optics etc). Some of the lower end
> Canons and Sonys have pretty good low light performance but they are
> priced just above the $300 mark. Check camcorderinfo.com for some
> pretty good reviews and sample footage of most of the cameras
> available now. They do extensive low light testing too.
>
> Bill Streeter
> LO-FI SAINT LOUIS
> http://lofistl.com
> http://billstreeter.net
>
> --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com ,
> "Deirdre Straughan"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Any suggestions?
> >
> > --
> > best regards,
> > Deirdré Straughan
> >
> > living & travelling in Italy
> > (and other Countries Beginning with I)
> > www.beginningwithi.com
> > Check out my latest blog post: My Potter
> >
> Predictions >
> > Blogsigs.com , Link your own blog
> posts.
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
>  
>



-- 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
trine.blogs.com
twitter.com/trine


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [videoblogging] list of video-sites that pay vloggers-videobloggers

[John Cardenas]

thnxz 
   
  for the info
   
  I have tons of videos to be edited
   
  that I have captured-filmmed during my 7 years in China..
   
  I am just exploring sites here and there
   
  looking for places that can be better than youtube and veoh
   
   
  regards
   
  JohnDkar
   
   
  
--
   
  www.dkar.com
   
  John Dkar Films official site
   
  http://www.youtube.com/JohnDkar
  
youtube channel
   
  http://www.veoh.com/users/johndkar
   
  veoh.com channel
   
  http://eldiariodejohndkar.blip.tv
   
  blip.tv channel (spanish)
  
--
   
  

randulo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
  Hi John,

Thanks for posting that, it's very interesting. I know a little about
a few of those sites.

I've been using Brightcove since the end of 2006. Their network is
excellent and they provide all kinds of players including this one:
http://wine-stories.com - some of their players can have linked
banners and they have single title as well as tabbed multiple pages
ones.

I asked to be in their ad program and they only actually rolled it out
a few months ago. I still have received nothing, although revenue is
not why I am producing video.

Brightcove is not intuitive IMO, and is very labor intensive, but it
can be mastered. You have to upload via the Flash on the web studio or
a Windoze app they furnish. Then you have "assets" which consist of
files you uploaded: video (flv or wmv) thumbnails and small icons one
of each of these three types for each "title" you will create. One or
more titles will go into a "lineup" and the lineup can be in one or
more players. It's powerful but a real PITA to put up each video,
though. They also provide extensive download reports.

OTH, Brightcove has a way to sell content to AOL members. THe content
is pay to download WMV files. This would be more for how-to, content
rich editorial or such rather than fiction, although if you could
incite people to download fiction, that'd be great. I think it's
somehow easier to convince someone interested in wine to download a
series of videos on "how to taste like a pro" for example than to get
someone to download fiction titles *unless* they were called "Roof
Sex" :)

So, bottom line, as someone else said, Brightcove is good quality and
has some high powered members like the Wine Spectator magazine. They
require 480x360 videos and recommend 520bps. Flash and WMV. They also
have a syndication program that almlows people to use your vids on
their site. There are a lot of video-hungry sites out there on all
themes.

I was about to post the link to their user manual, but they're in
maintenance at the moment.
I recommend that those of you who produce a lot of content join
Brightcove and take it for a drive. I think Brightcove is a more
professional distribution system than most of the others I've seen. To
get back to the original subject though, I haven't seen a penny from
them, yet.

/r

On 6/27/07, John Cardenas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://www.scottkirsner.com/webvid/gettingpaid.htm
> share your experiences


 

   
-
Ready for the edge of your seat? Check out tonight's top picks on Yahoo! TV. 

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[videoblogging] Re: Most famous vblogger

[oovooworld]

Thanks Harold, that's a great reference, although I now hold you
responsible for vastly increased unproductive work time as I am
spending lots of time checking out his vlog - it's brilliantly eclectic!

[videoblogging] Re: videos embedded into emails?

[oovooworld]

Hi David,

It's not the same as embedding a full-length pre-recorded sample of
your work, but ooVoo (free application) lets you send one-minute video
messages via email. Maybe you could use it to send a 'taster' example
message and then embed a link to your site/a holding page with the
work itself? Just an idea.

Other than that I have tried this before and not had much luck I'm
afraid so would be interested if anyone else has too.

Re: [videoblogging] list of video-sites that pay vloggers-videobloggers

[randulo]

Hi John,

Thanks for posting that, it's very interesting. I know a little about
a few of those sites.

I've been using Brightcove since the end of 2006. Their network is
excellent and they provide all kinds of players including this one:
http://wine-stories.com - some of their players can have linked
banners and they have single title as well as tabbed multiple pages
ones.

I asked to be in their ad program and they only actually rolled it out
a few months ago. I still have received nothing, although revenue is
not why I am producing video.

Brightcove is not intuitive IMO, and is very labor intensive, but it
can be mastered. You have to upload via the Flash on the web studio or
a Windoze app they furnish. Then you have "assets" which consist of
files you uploaded: video (flv or wmv) thumbnails and small icons one
of each of these three types for each "title" you will create. One or
more titles will go into a "lineup" and the lineup can be in one or
more players. It's powerful but a real PITA to put up each video,
though. They also provide extensive download reports.

OTH, Brightcove has a way to sell content to AOL members. THe content
is pay to download WMV files. This would be more for how-to, content
rich editorial or such rather than fiction, although if you could
incite people to download fiction, that'd be great. I think it's
somehow easier to convince someone interested in wine to download a
series of videos on "how to taste like a pro" for example than to get
someone to download fiction titles *unless* they were called "Roof
Sex" :)

So, bottom line, as someone else said, Brightcove is good quality and
has some high powered members like the Wine Spectator magazine. They
require 480x360 videos and recommend 520bps. Flash and WMV. They also
have a syndication program that almlows people to use your vids on
their site. There are a lot of video-hungry sites out there on all
themes.

I was about to post the link to their user manual, but they're in
maintenance at the moment.
I recommend that those of you who produce a lot of content join
Brightcove and take it for a drive. I think Brightcove is a more
professional distribution system than most of the others I've seen. To
get back to the original subject though, I haven't seen a penny from
them, yet.

/r

On 6/27/07, John Cardenas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>   http://www.scottkirsner.com/webvid/gettingpaid.htm
>   share your experiences

Re: [videoblogging] list of video-sites that pay vloggers-videobloggers

[Charles Iliya Krempeaux]

Hello John,

There was a thread on here before that was saying that Revver was paying

http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/message/61415

(The links to the other messages are near the bottom of the page... so
scroll down.)


See ya


-- 
Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. 


  All the Vlogging News on One Page
 http://vlograzor.com/

On 6/27/07, John Cardenas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I have found this list ...which ones DO really pay??
>
>http://www.scottkirsner.com/webvid/gettingpaid.htm
>
>share your experiences
>
>
>regards
>
>JohnDkar

[videoblogging] list of video-sites that pay vloggers-videobloggers

[John Cardenas]

I have found this list ...which ones DO really pay??
   
  http://www.scottkirsner.com/webvid/gettingpaid.htm
   
  share your experiences
   
   
  regards
   
  JohnDkar

   
-
Get the Yahoo! toolbar and be alerted to new email wherever you're surfing. 

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [videoblogging] zango, nother aggregator...

[Mike Meiser]

Man, These guys give aggregators a bad name. :(

I've not played around with their site, but if I'm understanding
correctly they're using videos on the web, the hot thing of the
moment, to get people to install their adware.  I'm I right?

Yeee...  That's all I can say.

-Mike

On 6/24/07, Devlon Duthie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oh, I could tell the difference between our best practices and that page at
> zango :)
>
>
>
> But I did see a clear link on their content handling , etc. those best
> practices.I'm just catching up on the emails
>
>
>
> --
>
> -Devlon
>
>
>
> http://devlonduthie.com | http://mefeedia.com | http://node-64.com/blog
>
> MSN: du.th.ied
>
> AIM: devlond
>
>
>
> From: ryanne hodson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, June 24, 2007 11:34 AM
> To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [videoblogging] zango, nother aggregator...
>
>
>
> devlon
> sorry about that i think you confused the best practices page with a page on
> zango
> best practices was written by this community.
>
> i think i linked weird.
>
> -ry
>
> On 6/24/07, Devlon Duthie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The Best Practices link loads a page that only talks (briefly) about privacy
> and then goes on about the software usageI didn't see anything about how
> content is handled from that Best Practices link in the footer of their
> site.
>
> Maybe that stuff is somewhere else?
>
> --
> -Devlon
>
> http://devlonduthie.com | http://mefeedia.com | http://node-64.com/blog
> MSN: du.th.ied
> AIM: devlond
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com 
> [mailto: 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of ryanne hodson
> Sent: Sunday, June 24, 2007 10:56 AM
> To: videoblogging
> Subject: [videoblogging] zango, nother aggregator...
>
> hey all
> i came across this site in my google alerts
> but i can't look at it properly to see if they're aggregating according to
> best practices
> http://videovertigo.org/information/aggregation/
>
> because it says i have to be on IE or Firefox on windows (wtf?)
> http://zango.com/Destination/catalog/listing.aspx?tag=ryanishungry
>
> can someone on a PC check this out?
>
> thanks!!
>
> -ryanne
>
> --
> http://tinyurl.com/yq63qk
> Pixelodeon-Kicked Butt!
> --
> Author of Secrets of Videoblogging >http://tinyurl.com/me4vs
> Me > http://RyanEdit.com, http://RyanIsHungry.com
> Educate > http://FreeVlog.org, http://Node101.org
> Community Capitalism> http://HaveMoneyWillVlog.com
> iChat/AIM > VideoRodeo
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> http://tinyurl.com/yq63qk
> Pixelodeon-Kicked Butt!
> --
> Author of Secrets of Videoblogging > 
> http://tinyurl.com/me4vs
> Me > http://RyanEdit.com, http://RyanIsHungry.com
> Educate > http://FreeVlog.org   ,
> http://Node101.org
> Community Capitalism> http://HaveMoneyWillVlog.com
> iChat/AIM > VideoRodeo
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>