[videoblogging] Re: Rox Lumiere for Rupert
You know what? Robert Scoble was right... Heath http://batmangeek.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Rox, > > I know the lumiere videos have not been discussed in this group (they > don't have ads and there's no web 2.0 start-up involved, I guess), but > it's still not very nice not to give credit where credit is due. Lumiere > videos have been posted since May/June last year. Since the beginning it > has been a two-person effort where Brittany and I have been collecting the > videos, encouraging people to create the videos and writing our reasoning > for pushing these types of videos. That's why both our names are on the > front page of the website: http://videoblogging.info/ > > You may think this is a small mistake and in the amount of letters missing > from your email and blogpost it is. At the same time not doing this very > basic research and thus leaving out the name of half the people behind the > project is extremely discouraging to those left out. Over the past 8 > months Brittany and I have put in a large amount of work handling the > lumiere videos and acknowledging my work, but not hers, is insulting to > both of us. > > The collection of lumiere videos currently consists of 548 videos from 78 > different people. You can jump straight to the videos at > http://videoblogging.info/lumiere/ If I must say so myself it is an > amazing repository of creativity. > > - Andreas > > Den 11.01.2008 kl. 05:17 skrev Roxanne Darling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > A little public gushing here, I hope you all will indulge me. I learned > > about Lumiere from Rupert. > > I finally made one today, and I want to thank you publicly, Rupert, (and > > Andreas too) for illuminating me about this art form. > > > > http://www.beachwalks.tv/2008/01/11/beach-walk-567-first-lumiere- for-rupert/ > > > > Love, > > > > Rox > > > > -- > Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen > http://www.solitude.dk/ >
[videoblogging] Re: Short Film blog / forums?
Some places that I like: http://ticklebooth.com/ (a site that I run) http://dekku.blogspot.com/ http://directorsnotes.com/ ajit --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "akrobotics" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Any suggestions for good blogs, forums, or podcasts devoted > specifically to short films and the people who make them? >
Re: [videoblogging] Rox Lumiere for Rupert
That was a mention. A discussion takes more than me mentioning it in half a sentence. :o) There were a couple of other emails back in the early summer, but yahoo search probably didn't let you go back that far. All of that is besides the point. - Andreas Den 12.01.2008 kl. 19:52 skrev Markus Sandy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On Jan 12, 2008, at 4:21 PM, Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen wrote: > >> I know the lumiere videos have not been discussed in this group (they >> don't have ads and there's no web 2.0 start-up involved, I guess), but >> it's still not very nice not to give credit where credit is due > > Andreas, > > it seems like you have a short memory > > http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/message/65677 > > and a short fuse, too :) > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > -- Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen http://www.solitude.dk/
Re: [videoblogging] Rox Lumiere for Rupert
On Jan 12, 2008, at 4:21 PM, Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen wrote: > I know the lumiere videos have not been discussed in this group (they > don't have ads and there's no web 2.0 start-up involved, I guess), but > it's still not very nice not to give credit where credit is due Andreas, it seems like you have a short memory http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/message/65677 and a short fuse, too :) [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [videoblogging] Rox Lumiere for Rupert
Rox, I know the lumiere videos have not been discussed in this group (they don't have ads and there's no web 2.0 start-up involved, I guess), but it's still not very nice not to give credit where credit is due. Lumiere videos have been posted since May/June last year. Since the beginning it has been a two-person effort where Brittany and I have been collecting the videos, encouraging people to create the videos and writing our reasoning for pushing these types of videos. That's why both our names are on the front page of the website: http://videoblogging.info/ You may think this is a small mistake and in the amount of letters missing from your email and blogpost it is. At the same time not doing this very basic research and thus leaving out the name of half the people behind the project is extremely discouraging to those left out. Over the past 8 months Brittany and I have put in a large amount of work handling the lumiere videos and acknowledging my work, but not hers, is insulting to both of us. The collection of lumiere videos currently consists of 548 videos from 78 different people. You can jump straight to the videos at http://videoblogging.info/lumiere/ If I must say so myself it is an amazing repository of creativity. - Andreas Den 11.01.2008 kl. 05:17 skrev Roxanne Darling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > A little public gushing here, I hope you all will indulge me. I learned > about Lumiere from Rupert. > I finally made one today, and I want to thank you publicly, Rupert, (and > Andreas too) for illuminating me about this art form. > > http://www.beachwalks.tv/2008/01/11/beach-walk-567-first-lumiere-for-rupert/ > > Love, > > Rox -- Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen http://www.solitude.dk/
[videoblogging] Re: Rox Lumiere for Rupert
Oh Rupert, You all sound like Stewie from Family Guy. lol Beardo's rule, lol
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Quicktime Weirdness
Yes. I am using Vista. I guess I shouldn't be surprised if that is part of the problem Tim On Jan 12, 2008 5:27 AM, WWWhatsup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Are you, by any chance, using Vista? > > joly > > > > something is happening to my videos when I create them as .avi files > >on Windows media player and then convert them to .mov on QT Pro. > >Nothing is ever as easy as yout hink. It gets all fuzzy, pixelates, > >and even breaks > >down at certain times, and the sound quality diminishes at some points > >to loud static. > > -- > WWWhatsup NYC > http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com > -- > > > >
Re: [videoblogging] Re: the inevitable conversation about what we're doing
i know more than your name! i know that your wife is the best smellingwife inamerica! On Jan 9, 2008 1:56 PM, Richard (Show) Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well, I'm way behind reading my emails for this group. > > I finally made a filter in gmail so that all the group ones are tagged and > moved from the inbos and there were 300 threads in there and I'm down to > 160. > > However, I did not delete any of these threads without reading, because > > I LOVE THIS GROUP > > This was my favorite thread of the 140 I've read so far - great drama! > > Many posts made me feel all sorts of great emotions, holier than thou > emotions, hell yeah emotions - shock - horrer and lots of memories of the > friends I've made in the last few years - I'm thinking ... > ... Scoble - how cool, a big whig posts on MY list ... how could he > possibly > say mean things about MY group ... now I remember, I don't even like him, > since I met him once and he didn't even know my name (if you can believe > that) ... yeah, my buddy Bill made a perfect post, and he knows my name > ... > Jay and Ryanne - perfect posts as usual, and they know my name (unlike > that > dumb Scoble) ... yeah, and Chuck posts - that's so cool I played WII (sp?) > bowling with him, and he totally knows my name, and makes the sort of > comment you'd expect from a nice guy like him ... oh cool! Jason > Calacanus, > another big wig - I even wrote him off list once to tell him that I > thought > he was very entertaining on this week in tech, no matter how much the vlog > list abused him for his posts about money, but, luckily I didn't post that > to the list, so no one will know (wait, did I think that or write that?) > ... > I met Frank at Pixelodean - although there is the problem that I don't > think > he knew who I was, he still seemed pretty cool, and, well, you have to > like > mefeedia - and, well, he said nice stuff about MY group ... oh that is so > cool, a post from Adam! ... He always says the coolest stuff like "As for > the commercial vs personal shitbag salad of an argument that perpetually > pops up, I say, if you can make money and still get your point across, > just > fucking do it." ... and Irina loves Adam and Jay ... I love all three of > them totally ... Irina totally knows my name too, by the way, and Adam, > well, I slept in his apartment - not with him or anything but he totally > knows my name too ... Andrew Baron - another big wig, and he sort of knows > my name, seriously - ok, ok, I admit I saw the post about future of TV and > TV networks dead and everything, but, well, who wants to read about that > stuff, when I can read this thread ... Sull - cool guy, met him at > original > vloggercue - long/articulate posts, but don't see too much good drama in > this one, just smart stuff ... hmmm ... Eric Rice is back, like the old > days, cool - raping puppies - cute puppies? - Eric was one of the first to > every bring up money in vlogging that I recall - very courageous ... Cool, > a > post from Charles - totally my buddy and totally knows my name - yes, it's > like siblings ... I'm definitely the older brother ... and Schlomo, this > is > so cool, everybody who knows my name is posting - but, what, Scholmo's > being > crititcal of Jay?? - total drama - and Jay was critical on the Wiki?? - > say > it's not so - I thought he was perfect - damn bubble bursting ... Richard > Bluestein,well, that's pretty much as cool as it gets and I once got a > special url to post to Evil Vlog, and it is turdwobbler.com ... but it's > secret and no one will ever know it's mild mannered Richard Show Hall > (wait, > did I write that or ... ) ... and Mike Meiser, what a guy - really long > emails and he can totally be grumpy on the list, especially when it comes > to > wikipedia, but, he not only knows my name, but was particualrly nice to me > at vloggercon, so he's got to be good, and he's making fun of that dumb > big > wig, who doesn't know my name > > ... now that's entertainment! > > I love you all with lots of kisses and hugs ... Richard (the center > of > the vlog universe) > > On Dec 26, 2007 3:10 AM, Rupert Howe <[EMAIL > PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > You're funny. > > > > Happy Christmas, everybody. > > > > > > --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com > > , > > "Adam Quirk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Glad to see Calacanis took time off from raping puppies, or whatever > he > > does > > > out there in the Hall of Doom, to be the voice of reason here. Funny > to > > see > > > Scoble trying to melodramatically leave all of us loser videobloggers > in > > the > > > pre-video-streaming dust. How can anyone with as much experience in > web > > > video possibly compare Seesmic or Justin tv et al to what most of us > are > > > doing? It's like comparing a phone call with grandma to an episode of > > The > > > Office. Two completely different methods of communications. > > > > > > I'm tired to think clear after sitting in an airport bar for 8 h
Re: [videoblogging] videoblogging rules of thumb
This would be great to add to the wiki. Out the door so no link to wiki. Anybody? Jan On Jan 11, 2008 6:21 PM, Roxanne Darling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This sounds like something fun to noodle on Marcus - thanks for the link! > I > am preparing a talk for tomorrow on the Videoblog process, so maybe I'll > hit on something along the way. > Rox > > On Jan 11, 2008 10:51 AM, Markus Sandy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > hi, > > > > scott beale of laughing squid twitter and blogged about a fun "rules > > of thumb" site > > > > http://rulesofthumb.org/ > > > > i noticed that there is a category for video rules of thumb (some > > listed below) > > > > does anyone here know any *videoblogging* rules of thumb worth sharing? > > > > markus > > > > RENTING VIDEO EQUIPMENT > > Video equipment rents for 5 percent per day. If you're planning to > > rent equipment for more than two months, you might as well buy it. > > > > REDUCING YOUR SAMPLING ERROR > > Sampling error is an important factor in the interpretation of > > television audience ratings. To cut the sampling error by half, > > quadruple your sample size. > > > > LOOKING GOOD ON TV > > You always look 15 percent more serious on TV than you do in real > > life, so try to look 15 percent less serious when you are on camera. > > > > LOOKING GOOD ON TV > > You will look more alert on TV if you lean forward. You will look > > even more alert if you cross your legs. > > > > FIXING YOUR FACE FOR TV > > For TV appearances, match the color of your make-up to the color of > > the tip of your tongue. > > > > SYNDICATING A TV SERIES > > A television series needs to have been produced for 3 years or 80 > > episodes before it is an attractive candidate for daily syndication. > > > > ANNOUNCING THE NEWS > > It takes about 1 minute to read 15 double-spaced typewritten lines on > > the air, or about 4 seconds per line. > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > > > > > -- > Roxanne Darling > "o ke kai" means "of the sea" in hawaiian > Join us at the reef! Mermaid videos, geeks talking, and lots more > http://reef.beachwalks.tv > 808-384-5554 > Video --> http://www.beachwalks.tv > Company -- > http://www.barefeetstudios.com > Twitter--> http://www.twitter.com/roxannedarling > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > -- The Faux Press - better than real http://feeds.feedburner.com/diaryofafauxjournalist - RSS http://fauxpress.blogspot.com aim=janofsound air=862.571.5334 skype=janmclaughlin [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Quicktime Weirdness
Are you, by any chance, using Vista? joly > something is happening to my videos when I create them as .avi files >on Windows media player and then convert them to .mov on QT Pro. >Nothing is ever as easy as yout hink. It gets all fuzzy, pixelates, >and even breaks >down at certain times, and the sound quality diminishes at some points >to loud static. --- WWWhatsup NYC http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com ---
Re: [videoblogging] North America's Oldest Appliance Video Contest Ends January 31, 2008
> > Don't have an old appliance? It's ok…Enter anyway! Send a video > > with your newer appliances! The craziest video entry received on > > apwagner.com will receive Three Brand New GE Appliances plus $1,000 > > in Cash! Only a few entries for this category have been received. wtf is right. its not even hiding that its a "make us an authentic advertisement" plea. Jay -- http://jaydedman.com 917 371 6790 Professional: http://ryanishungry.com Personal: http://momentshowing.net Photos: http://flickr.com/photos/jaydedman/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/jaydedman RSS: http://tinyurl.com/yqgdt9 Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
