[videoblogging] Re: Another Wordpress question

2008-02-20 Thread Markus Sandy
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, quietleader [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 Every time I create a new post on my blog, Wordpress wants to put a date on 
 it.  Is it 
possible 
 to override that feature? I'd like to replace the date with simple text. (I 
 don't care if my 
posts 
 are still organized by date, I just want to display text in the place that 
 the date normally 
 appears)
 

if you are able to edit your theme, you can simply remove the date from the 
template

you can also use CSS to hide it. try something like:

span.submitted { display: none; }

more info here

http://en.forums.wordpress.com/topic.php?id=11447




[videoblogging] Re: Ninja Girl Debut!

2008-02-20 Thread Bill Cammack
What Fun! :D

I just watched your Gift to Children episode. Great!

http://ninjagirl.from.tv/?p=9

Bill Cammack
http://BillCammack.com

--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Yukako Tajima [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 Thank you for your feedbacks! Here is another new episode from Ninja
Girl!
 
 http://ninjagirl.from.tv/
 
 Kojima Yoshio is very popular here in Japan.
 He's a funny guy.
 He infects many Japanese kids and adults:)
 
 
 - Original Message 
 From: Jan McLaughlin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
 Sent: Friday, February 15, 2008 4:02:14 AM
 Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Ninja Girl Debut!
 
 Oh, Tajee!
 
 Well done. You're adorable.
 
 Jan
 
 On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 1:53 PM, Richard H. Hall
[EMAIL PROTECTED] l.org
 wrote:
 
  Tajee ... very entertaining ... looking for more ... Richard
 
  On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 12:24 AM, Yukako Tajima tajee_bomber@
yahoo.com
  wrote:
 
   Hi
  
   Ninja Girl, our new show has just been released today!
   http://ninjagirl. from.tv/
  
   We just did videoblogging event in Tokyo, Japan.
   It was very exciting!
   (here is one of the articles)
   http://search. japantimes. co.jp/cgi- bin/nc20080206a1 .html
  
   We felt like starting something that we can connect to the world,
   and that is why we have started this show!
   Hope you will like it.
  
   Thank you!
  
   Tajee
  
   P.S.
  
   We also have videoblogging community in Japan!
   Join us if you are interested!
   videoblogjapan@ googlegroups. com videoblogjapan%
40googlegroups. com
  
    _ _ _ _ _ _
   Be a better friend, newshound, and
   know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
   http://mobile. yahoo.com/ ;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR 8HDtDypao8Wcj9tA cJ
  
   [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
  
  
  
 
 
 
  --
  Richard
  http://richardhhall .org
  Shows
  http://richardshow. org
  http://inspiredheal ing.tv
 
 
  [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
 
 
 
 
  Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 
 
 
 -- 
 The Faux Press - by whatever media necessary
 http://feeds. feedburner. com/diaryofafaux journalist - RSS
 http://fauxpress. blogspot. com
 aim=janofsound
 air=862.571. 5334
 skype=janmclaughlin
 
 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
 
 
 
 
 
  

 Be a better friend, newshound, and 
 know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now. 
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ 
 
 
 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





Re: [videoblogging] Re: we should all enter this one

2008-02-20 Thread Brook Hinton
Charles, are you implying normal people don't want to watch (let
alone make) art or arty things? There's a lot of art and arty as
well in the videoblogging world and among those in this group.  The
phrasing of your question is pretty insulting.

Brook


   On 2/19/08, Charles Iliya Krempeaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   
What type of works are they looking for?
   
Only artsy type stuff? Or are they accepting the type of things that
normal people would watch.
   
   
See ya
   
--
Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc.
http://ChangeLog.ca/
   

___
Brook Hinton
film/video/audio art
www.brookhinton.com
studio vlog/blog: www.brookhinton.com/temporalab


Re: [videoblogging] Re: we should all enter this one

2008-02-20 Thread Brook Hinton
Whoops just saw your followup. Gosh golly, you're right, I guess I
don't have any layman or common people in my audience.  Only
royalty and criminals/

Sheesh.

Brook





___
Brook Hinton
film/video/audio art
www.brookhinton.com
studio vlog/blog: www.brookhinton.com/temporalab


[videoblogging] Re: we should all enter this one

2008-02-20 Thread Heath
There are a ton of festivals going around some cater to mainstream, 
some don't, I thought that was what Charles was talking aboutI 
mean there is arty stuff out there, that people don't get, heck 
there is mainstream stuff, I don't get

Heath
http://heathparks.com
http://batmangeek.com


--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Brook Hinton [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 Whoops just saw your followup. Gosh golly, you're right, I guess I
 don't have any layman or common people in my audience.  Only
 royalty and criminals/
 
 Sheesh.
 
 Brook
 
 
 
 
 
 ___
 Brook Hinton
 film/video/audio art
 www.brookhinton.com
 studio vlog/blog: www.brookhinton.com/temporalab





Re: [videoblogging] screen cast wow

2008-02-20 Thread Richard H. Hall
wow ... it appears to do what it says it will do ... cool

On Feb 18, 2008 6:37 PM, schlomo rabinowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

   Richard, you beat me to the punch!
 I just uploaded a little test of it here: http://blip.tv/file/678156/

 This was all done within the app, recorded in real time. It has other
 functionality to do in post, but I didnt do any of it.

 It's pretty cool, though true, its pricey.


 On Feb 18, 2008 4:21 PM, Richard H. Hall [EMAIL 
 PROTECTED]richard%40richardhhall.org
 wrote:
 
 
  However, the real thing that drove me to this post was a link to this
  software called screen flow that Schlomo posted on flicker, and it
 looks
  amazing, even compared to iShowU (which is great) - and it appears to be
  free - wondering if anyone else knows anything about it ... Richard
 
  --
  Richard
  http://richardhhall.org
  Shows
  http://richardshow.org
  http://inspiredhealing.tv
 
  [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
 
 
 

 --
 Schlomo Rabinowitz
 http://schlomolog.blogspot.com
 http://hatfactory.net
 AIM:schlomochat

 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

  




-- 
Richard
http://richardhhall.org
Shows
http://richardshow.org
http://inspiredhealing.tv


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



Re: [videoblogging] Re: we should all enter this one

2008-02-20 Thread Charles Iliya Krempeaux
I'm sorry you were insulted by what I said.  I didn't mean to insult.

The way it looks like to me is that whatever you want to call them...
the vast majority of the people I know seem to have certain tastes in
videos.  I was trying to use a monicker that described them.

I thought putting normal in quotes would be sufficient, and people
would know what I meant.  Maybe I should have used something like...
the common blue collar person.

I thought normal would be a good monicker since you often hear terms
like the real people used in political discourse to describe the
same group.  (Please note the quotes around the real people... and
that I'm not the one who came up the phrase the real people.)

Again, sorry if I insulted you.

-- 
Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc.
http://ChangeLog.ca/

Motorsport Videos
http://TireBiterZ.com/

Vlog Razor... Vlogging News... http://vlograzor.com/



On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 8:08 AM, Brook Hinton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Whoops just saw your followup. Gosh golly, you're right, I guess I
  don't have any layman or common people in my audience. Only
  royalty and criminals/

  Sheesh.

  Brook


  ___
  Brook Hinton
  film/video/audio art
  www.brookhinton.com
  studio vlog/blog: www.brookhinton.com/temporalab


[videoblogging] Re: we should all enter this one

2008-02-20 Thread David Howell
Yes. Of course. the common blue collar person has no appreciation
for art or arty things.

How about you just stop with the labels. Your hole is already deep enough.



--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Charles Iliya Krempeaux
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I'm sorry you were insulted by what I said.  I didn't mean to insult.
 
 The way it looks like to me is that whatever you want to call them...
 the vast majority of the people I know seem to have certain tastes in
 videos.  I was trying to use a monicker that described them.
 
 I thought putting normal in quotes would be sufficient, and people
 would know what I meant.  Maybe I should have used something like...
 the common blue collar person.
 
 I thought normal would be a good monicker since you often hear terms
 like the real people used in political discourse to describe the
 same group.  (Please note the quotes around the real people... and
 that I'm not the one who came up the phrase the real people.)
 
 Again, sorry if I insulted you.
 
 -- 
 Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc.
 http://ChangeLog.ca/
 
 Motorsport Videos
 http://TireBiterZ.com/
 
 Vlog Razor... Vlogging News... http://vlograzor.com/
 
 
 
 On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 8:08 AM, Brook Hinton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Whoops just saw your followup. Gosh golly, you're right, I guess I
   don't have any layman or common people in my audience. Only
   royalty and criminals/
 
   Sheesh.
 
   Brook
 
 
   ___
   Brook Hinton
   film/video/audio art
   www.brookhinton.com
   studio vlog/blog: www.brookhinton.com/temporalab





[videoblogging] Opinions on .tv extension and squatters...

2008-02-20 Thread Ron Watson
Hi, y'all!

I was wondering what you all thought about .tv extensions. Good? Bad?  
Better?

I'm also wondering how to approach squatters on URLs. There are a  
couple of URLs I'd like to have that have been squatted on for nearly  
a decade. They are coming up for renewal this summer.

The squatters look to be people interested in the same topic as my  
show, but have done nothing. Another squatter is an AOL email  
connection thingy... don't know anything about AOL stuff. I think  
they may be approachable, but not sure.

How do I proceed? Do I get the .tv URL and let the chips fall where  
they may? Do I approach the squatters?

Any advice would be appreciated.

Cheers,
Ron Watson

Pawsitive Vybe Canines
11659 Berrigan Ave.
Cedar Springs, MI 49319

Personal Contact:
616.863.DOGS
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

On the Web:
http://pawsitivevybe.com
http://k9disc.com
http://k9disc.blip.tv
http://discdogradio.com







[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



[videoblogging] Collective Experience in the Moment of YouTube @ Berkeley Community Media Feb 23rd

2008-02-20 Thread Steve Rhodes


Celebrating over 25 years of media industry myth-smashing, Paper Tiger TV's
Arts, Analysis and Activism tour is now underway in California.

Spread the word and we'd love to see you at this tour event on Saturday in
Berkeley….



February 23, 2008 2-4pm


Community Dialogue: The Collective Experience in the Moment of YouTube @
Berkeley Community Media – 2239 Martin Luther King Jr. Way, Berkeley



Join members of various media collectives (including PTTV, First Voice, Poor
News Network, Video Machete  Video Feedback) as they reflect on the
history, present and future of their practice.


Bring your questions, your concerns and desires for the future of community
media. The first hour of the forum will be taped for cablecast on B-TV.
www.betv.org http://UrlBlockedError.aspx



Produced in collaboration with B-TV, Video Feedback  the First Voice
Apprenticeship Program at KPFA


http://www.papertiger.org


Contact: Martha Wallner marthaw at lmi.net for more information






 --
Steve Rhodes

http://flickr.com/photos/ari/  photos

http://ari.typepad.com

http://tigerbeat.vox.com blogs

http://del.icio.us/tigerbeat   interesting articles  sites

http://twitter.com/tigerbeat


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Re: [videoblogging] Opinions on .tv extension and squatters...

2008-02-20 Thread schlomo rabinowitz
Personally, I dont have a problem with .tv I used to think Its Television,
Dude!, but I'm over that.  Its just another extention so you can hopefully
get the domain name you want.
A guy has had schlomo.com FOREVER; occasionally I think I should just email
and ask him for it as he doesnt use it.  Thats the first thing I would do.
 Many people just keep them for sentimental value... I have a couple of
those.  Hell, I have schlomo.tv just sitting around collecting dust.

You can either set up one of those automatic domain buy thingies that track
the domain if they dont renew, or you could just ask them and save the time
waiting.  I'd just ask them and impress them with how happy you would be to
get it.

Who knows, they may not mind it being put to good use.


On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 9:43 AM, Ron Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

   Hi, y'all!

 I was wondering what you all thought about .tv extensions. Good? Bad?
 Better?


 Cheers,
 Ron Watson

 Pawsitive Vybe Canines
 11659 Berrigan Ave.
 Cedar Springs, MI 49319

 Personal Contact:
 616.863.DOGS
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] k9disc%40mac.com

 On the Web:
 http://pawsitivevybe.com
 http://k9disc.com
 http://k9disc.blip.tv
 http://discdogradio.com
 .

 




-- 
Schlomo Rabinowitz
http://schlomolog.blogspot.com
http://hatfactory.net
AIM:schlomochat


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



[videoblogging] Re: we should all enter this one

2008-02-20 Thread Milt Lee
I'm stunned at the responses I've seen here.  Here's something to
think about.  When Alan J. Lerner was working on some new lyrics for
Camelot, he was struggling with one line - for a week.  Jack Warner
wondered what was going on, so he stopped in to see what the hold up
was with his movie.  Alan explained what was happening, and Jack
Warner responded, Alan, stop trying so hard to different - being good
is different enough

I stand by Charles.

Milt Lee



[videoblogging] Re:we should all enter this one

2008-02-20 Thread Patrick Race
Thanks Irina, this looks like a great screening!



Re: [videoblogging] Re:we should all enter this one

2008-02-20 Thread Irina
i just like doing stuff that makes ME feel good
if anyone else likes it, thats just icing on the cake

On 2/20/08, Patrick Race [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

   Thanks Irina, this looks like a great screening!

  




-- 
http://geekentertainment.tv


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



[videoblogging] 2 pm PST i'm doing a charity chat thing

2008-02-20 Thread Irina
hi guys i'm doing this for a charity
http://www.myoovooday.com/signup.php

-- 
http://geekentertainment.tv


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



[videoblogging] Re: LED lights

2008-02-20 Thread influxxmedia
Yikes. That makes zero sense. I had no idea about the FW drives. I just shut 
down my mac 
at night, often leaving the drived powered up. Could this be contributing to 
the fairly high 
failure rate of FW drives (3 of the 7 drives I've owned have failed. 0 of the 5 
ATA drives 
have failed. 0 of the 3 SCSI drives have failed).

I cant wait to upgrade my system and get into SATA and eSATA. Are these hot 
swapable 
and safer/more reliable than FW at all?

cheers
adam

--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Brook Hinton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 It's insane, because the common wisdom about the way to protect the
 camera port and the way to protect drives conflicts. For cameras, yes,
 connect with everything powered down is what some mfrs. have said. For
 drives, it's turn everything on, then connect (and always unmount
 before disconnnect, sleep, or shutdown).  Does a lot of good when
 you're using a portable system with everything on one bus.
 
 I wish my eSATA expresscard could do more than two devices.
 Performance on eSATA ime blows firewire 800 away too.






Re: [videoblogging] Opinions on .tv extension and squatters...

2008-02-20 Thread Tim Street
I would watch Schlomo.tv !

It would be like the early day promos of MTV and everyone would be  
talking about it 24/7.




Tim Street
Creator/Executive Producer
French Maid TV
Subscribe for FREE @
http://frenchmaidtv.com/itunes
MyBlog
http://1timstreet.com






On Feb 20, 2008, at 9:56 AM, schlomo rabinowitz wrote:

 Personally, I dont have a problem with .tv I used to think Its  
 Television,
 Dude!, but I'm over that. Its just another extention so you can  
 hopefully
 get the domain name you want.
 A guy has had schlomo.com FOREVER; occasionally I think I should  
 just email
 and ask him for it as he doesnt use it. Thats the first thing I  
 would do.
 Many people just keep them for sentimental value... I have a couple of
 those. Hell, I have schlomo.tv just sitting around collecting dust.

 You can either set up one of those automatic domain buy thingies  
 that track
 the domain if they dont renew, or you could just ask them and save  
 the time
 waiting. I'd just ask them and impress them with how happy you would  
 be to
 get it.

 Who knows, they may not mind it being put to good use.

 On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 9:43 AM, Ron Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  Hi, y'all!
 
  I was wondering what you all thought about .tv extensions. Good?  
 Bad?
  Better?
 
 
  Cheers,
  Ron Watson
 
  Pawsitive Vybe Canines
  11659 Berrigan Ave.
  Cedar Springs, MI 49319
 
  Personal Contact:
  616.863.DOGS
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] k9disc%40mac.com
 
  On the Web:
  http://pawsitivevybe.com
  http://k9disc.com
  http://k9disc.blip.tv
  http://discdogradio.com
  .
 
 
 

 -- 
 Schlomo Rabinowitz
 http://schlomolog.blogspot.com
 http://hatfactory.net
 AIM:schlomochat

 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



[videoblogging] Good VST plugins for boosting vocals?

2008-02-20 Thread Chris
Can anybody suggest some good, free VST plugins (Audacity-compatible)
for cleanly boosting vocal range and/or minimizing room tone?

Even a good graphic equalizer would make me happy...

Chris



Re: [videoblogging] vPIP tutorial!

2008-02-20 Thread schlomo rabinowitz
Just marry her already!

And get a room!


On 2/20/08, Jay dedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  i made a tutorial on How To Install and Use vPIP plugin for wordpress.
  http://showinabox.tv/2008/02/19/how-to-install-and-use-vpip/

 does anyone here use Enric's vPIP?
 ryanne's tutorial rocks!
 can I get a witness?

 Jay


 --
 http://jaydedman.com
 917 371 6790
 Professional: http://ryanishungry.com
 Personal: http://momentshowing.net
 Photos: http://flickr.com/photos/jaydedman/
 Twitter: http://twitter.com/jaydedman
 RSS: http://tinyurl.com/yqgdt9

--
Schlomo Rabinowitz
http://schlomolog.blogspot.com
http://hatfactory.net
AIM:schlomochat


Re: [videoblogging] Opinions on .tv extension and squatters...

2008-02-20 Thread schlomo rabinowitz
ok Tim, Im going to build something there-- and it'll be all your fault!

 2/20/08, Tim Street [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I would watch Schlomo.tv !

 It would be like the early day promos of MTV and everyone would be
 talking about it 24/7.




 Tim Street
 Creator/Executive Producer
 French Maid TV
 Subscribe for FREE @
 http://frenchmaidtv.com/itunes
 MyBlog
 http://1timstreet.com






 On Feb 20, 2008, at 9:56 AM, schlomo rabinowitz wrote:

  Personally, I dont have a problem with .tv I used to think Its
  Television,
  Dude!, but I'm over that. Its just another extention so you can
  hopefully
  get the domain name you want.
  A guy has had schlomo.com FOREVER; occasionally I think I should
  just email
  and ask him for it as he doesnt use it. Thats the first thing I
  would do.
  Many people just keep them for sentimental value... I have a couple of
  those. Hell, I have schlomo.tv just sitting around collecting dust.
 
  You can either set up one of those automatic domain buy thingies
  that track
  the domain if they dont renew, or you could just ask them and save
  the time
  waiting. I'd just ask them and impress them with how happy you would
  be to
  get it.
 
  Who knows, they may not mind it being put to good use.
 
  On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 9:43 AM, Ron Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
   Hi, y'all!
  
   I was wondering what you all thought about .tv extensions. Good?
  Bad?
   Better?
  
  
   Cheers,
   Ron Watson
  
   Pawsitive Vybe Canines
   11659 Berrigan Ave.
   Cedar Springs, MI 49319
  
   Personal Contact:
   616.863.DOGS
   [EMAIL PROTECTED] k9disc%40mac.com
  
   On the Web:
   http://pawsitivevybe.com
   http://k9disc.com
   http://k9disc.blip.tv
   http://discdogradio.com
   .
  
  
  
 
  --
  Schlomo Rabinowitz
  http://schlomolog.blogspot.com
  http://hatfactory.net
  AIM:schlomochat
 
  [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
 
 
 



 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


--
Schlomo Rabinowitz
http://schlomolog.blogspot.com
http://hatfactory.net
AIM:schlomochat


[videoblogging] Re: we should all enter this one

2008-02-20 Thread Cheryl
Huh. I got what you meant. Didn't find it insulting. But now I'm
curious - there has to be a more precise way to say it. Heath used the
term mainstream, which seems closer and doesn't add a word implying
social status (like blue collar does).

How about people who only drink the pop-culture kool-aid?

No, too weird, like me... Off to seek advice from the next wordsmith I
see.

Cheryl

--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Charles Iliya Krempeaux
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I'm sorry you were insulted by what I said.  I didn't mean to insult.
 
 The way it looks like to me is that whatever you want to call them...
 the vast majority of the people I know seem to have certain tastes in
 videos.  I was trying to use a monicker that described them.
 
 I thought putting normal in quotes would be sufficient, and people
 would know what I meant.  Maybe I should have used something like...
 the common blue collar person.
 
 I thought normal would be a good monicker since you often hear terms
 like the real people used in political discourse to describe the
 same group.  (Please note the quotes around the real people... and
 that I'm not the one who came up the phrase the real people.)
 
 Again, sorry if I insulted you.
 
 -- 
 Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc.
 http://ChangeLog.ca/
 
 Motorsport Videos
 http://TireBiterZ.com/
 
 Vlog Razor... Vlogging News... http://vlograzor.com/
 
 
 
 On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 8:08 AM, Brook Hinton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Whoops just saw your followup. Gosh golly, you're right, I guess I
   don't have any layman or common people in my audience. Only
   royalty and criminals/
 
   Sheesh.
 
   Brook
 
 
   ___
   Brook Hinton
   film/video/audio art
   www.brookhinton.com
   studio vlog/blog: www.brookhinton.com/temporalab





[videoblogging] Re: LED lights

2008-02-20 Thread Steve Watkins
Well I guess there must be some real potential problems with firewire for 
people to talk 
about it, but Ive personally never had any firewire problems with drives or 
cameras, and I 
pay no attention to when I am plugging them in, or what order things are 
switched on.

I wouldnt leave your drives on overnight, for no other reason than it wasting a 
small but 
real amount of electricity. Leaving drives on could shorten their life, but so 
does switching 
them on and off a lot. It mostly comes down to luck as far as I can tell, Ive 
had internal and 
USB drives fail, no firewire failures yet, but this pattern doesnt tell me much 
about 
anything really.

As for whether firewire issues killed any of your drives, could possibly 
guesstimate if the 
symptoms of death are known. Did the drives just fail to power on or be seen by 
the 
computer any more, or did they exhibit symptoms being written or read to, nasty 
clunking 
noises etc?

Cheers

Steve Elbows

--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, influxxmedia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Yikes. That makes zero sense. I had no idea about the FW drives. I just shut 
 down my 
mac 
 at night, often leaving the drived powered up. Could this be contributing to 
 the fairly 
high 
 failure rate of FW drives (3 of the 7 drives I've owned have failed. 0 of the 
 5 ATA drives 
 have failed. 0 of the 3 SCSI drives have failed).
 
 I cant wait to upgrade my system and get into SATA and eSATA. Are these hot 
 swapable 
 and safer/more reliable than FW at all?
 
 cheers
 adam
 
 --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Brook Hinton bhinton@ wrote:
 
  It's insane, because the common wisdom about the way to protect the
  camera port and the way to protect drives conflicts. For cameras, yes,
  connect with everything powered down is what some mfrs. have said. For
  drives, it's turn everything on, then connect (and always unmount
  before disconnnect, sleep, or shutdown).  Does a lot of good when
  you're using a portable system with everything on one bus.
  
  I wish my eSATA expresscard could do more than two devices.
  Performance on eSATA ime blows firewire 800 away too.






Re: [videoblogging] Re: we should all enter this one

2008-02-20 Thread David Meade
To David Howell's objection: I think what David is saying is that
using normal or real or some class-based term as the alternative
to artsy tends to imply that artsy therefore has some odd, fake,
or obscure measure of worth. (correct me if I'm wrong and putting
words in your mouth, David.)

However, I agree with Cheryl ... I don't see what Charles said as all
that bad ... I like artsy stuff and I wasn't insulted.

There is a reason the term artsy has common use (and it DOES have
common use).  In terms of film/video, I have believed that the term
artsy is used because it's generally describing a subset of stuff
out there that is often outside of mainstream
consumption/expectation ... perhaps normal is a poor term to use for
mainstream but cut him some slack ... he did quote it - which has
the generally accepted implication of for my lack of a better word -
and he has since apologized for not having a better word for it.

It's the nature of the human brain to classify and categorize and
label ... Charles didn't create the distinction of mainstream or
artsy ... and he's hardly the first to recognize it.


All that being said ... I'd love to see some vlogger win this contest
no matter their style!  :-)


- Dave


On Feb 20, 2008 2:40 PM, Cheryl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Huh. I got what you meant. Didn't find it insulting. But now I'm
 curious - there has to be a more precise way to say it. Heath used the
 term mainstream, which seems closer and doesn't add a word implying
 social status (like blue collar does).

 How about people who only drink the pop-culture kool-aid?

 No, too weird, like me... Off to seek advice from the next wordsmith I
 see.

 Cheryl

 --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Charles Iliya Krempeaux
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  I'm sorry you were insulted by what I said.  I didn't mean to insult.
 
  The way it looks like to me is that whatever you want to call them...
  the vast majority of the people I know seem to have certain tastes in
  videos.  I was trying to use a monicker that described them.
 
  I thought putting normal in quotes would be sufficient, and people
  would know what I meant.  Maybe I should have used something like...
  the common blue collar person.
 
  I thought normal would be a good monicker since you often hear terms
  like the real people used in political discourse to describe the
  same group.  (Please note the quotes around the real people... and
  that I'm not the one who came up the phrase the real people.)
 
  Again, sorry if I insulted you.
 
  --
  Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc.
  http://ChangeLog.ca/
 
  Motorsport Videos
  http://TireBiterZ.com/
 
  Vlog Razor... Vlogging News... http://vlograzor.com/
 
 
 

  On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 8:08 AM, Brook Hinton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
   Whoops just saw your followup. Gosh golly, you're right, I guess I
don't have any layman or common people in my audience. Only
royalty and criminals/
  
Sheesh.
  
Brook
  
  
___
Brook Hinton
film/video/audio art
www.brookhinton.com
studio vlog/blog: www.brookhinton.com/temporalab
 





 Yahoo! Groups Links







-- 
http://www.DavidMeade.com


[videoblogging] Re: we should all enter this one

2008-02-20 Thread Steve Watkins
Its always hard to talk in terms of generalisations and labels. Its 
understandable that 
people resent it sometimes, but sometimes generalisations and stereotypes have 
some 
truth to them, they just dont apply to people quite as broadly as solid words 
suggest.

I mean there are a lot of 'scenes' that have their own culture, vocabulary, and 
feel like they 
are mostly made of a certain group of people, even if this is only a 
superficial impresion, it 
still means something if thats what lots of people see.

I think there a lot of people who can appreciate art and culture and creativity 
of many 
sorts, but do not necessarily have the formal training/education to join in 
with the 
'experts' or others who represent and talk about the scene publicly. 

But at the same time I have talked about how the BBC during the early decades 
of TV, had 
a paternatistic instinct, trying to bring 'high culture' to the 'great 
unwashed', and how by 
'dumbing down' and offering more light entertainment, the first commercial 
rival was able 
to better satisfy the needs of the masses. 

And in this group we sometimes see people from different spheres of life, have 
awkward 
moments when their worlds collide. The business, entertainment, techie, 
academic, 
political, creative, arts and other angles of approach to the human condition, 
have all been 
represented here, sometimes for mutual benefit and understanding, and other 
times we 
may as well have been talking in completely different languages.

From snobbishness about 'worthless crap' on youtube to labes that paint the 
masses as 
philistines, it is a minefield for sure, still better to talk about it and risk 
slipping and 
annoying someone, than be silent for fear of erring.

Cheers

Steve Elbows


--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Cheryl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Huh. I got what you meant. Didn't find it insulting. But now I'm
 curious - there has to be a more precise way to say it. Heath used the
 term mainstream, which seems closer and doesn't add a word implying
 social status (like blue collar does).
 
 How about people who only drink the pop-culture kool-aid?
 
 No, too weird, like me... Off to seek advice from the next wordsmith I
 see.
 
 Cheryl
 
 --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Charles Iliya Krempeaux
 supercanadian@ wrote:
 
  I'm sorry you were insulted by what I said.  I didn't mean to insult.
  
  The way it looks like to me is that whatever you want to call them...
  the vast majority of the people I know seem to have certain tastes in
  videos.  I was trying to use a monicker that described them.
  
  I thought putting normal in quotes would be sufficient, and people
  would know what I meant.  Maybe I should have used something like...
  the common blue collar person.
  
  I thought normal would be a good monicker since you often hear terms
  like the real people used in political discourse to describe the
  same group.  (Please note the quotes around the real people... and
  that I'm not the one who came up the phrase the real people.)
  
  Again, sorry if I insulted you.
  
  -- 
  Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc.
  http://ChangeLog.ca/
  
  Motorsport Videos
  http://TireBiterZ.com/
  
  Vlog Razor... Vlogging News... http://vlograzor.com/
  
  
  
  On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 8:08 AM, Brook Hinton bhinton@ wrote:
  
   Whoops just saw your followup. Gosh golly, you're right, I guess I
don't have any layman or common people in my audience. Only
royalty and criminals/
  
Sheesh.
  
Brook
  
  
___
Brook Hinton
film/video/audio art
www.brookhinton.com
studio vlog/blog: www.brookhinton.com/temporalab
 






[videoblogging] Re: How do I create SWF files with media player skin

2008-02-20 Thread influxxmedia
You need to use the FLVPlaybackComponent in F8. In the component inspector 
there is a 
field for SKIN. Default is set to NONE. CLick and choose one of the built in 
skins from the 
list. Also, you can choose for the controls to AUTOHIDE

HTH

adam




--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Darren Winkler Darren Scott [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 I know that people have posted on this issue in the past but I can't 
 find any info in the posts now.
 I need to create files for a client in SWF format that will open with a 
 video player skin, (play, stop, volume...)
 Can anyone offer me information on how to accomplish this?
 I own Flash 8 and I know you can do it but just can't get my head 
 around it.
 
 Thanks very much!
 
 Darren W. 
 MultiMedia Group






[videoblogging] Re: vPIP tutorial!

2008-02-20 Thread Mike Moon
vPIP rocks!
I've been using vPIP for over a year, and as I rebuild my site, vPIP
is there to make my life easier. I use to only output to .mp4 and
.wmv, vPIP handles both. Now I use .mov and .flv formats and .vPIP is
there to make them look good. 
I have ideas of delving into AppleTV format and once again vPIP is
there. Not only do my users have the option for different formats,
vPIP gives them access to a separate RSS feed for each format.

Ryanne's tutorial is bang on, very professional looking and easy to
follow. Nice job! 

Mike
http://vlog.mikemoon.net

--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Jay dedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

   i made a tutorial on How To Install and Use vPIP plugin for
wordpress.
   http://showinabox.tv/2008/02/19/how-to-install-and-use-vpip/
 
 does anyone here use Enric's vPIP?
 ryanne's tutorial rocks!
 can I get a witness?
 
 Jay
 
 
 -- 
 http://jaydedman.com
 917 371 6790
 Professional: http://ryanishungry.com
 Personal: http://momentshowing.net
 Photos: http://flickr.com/photos/jaydedman/
 Twitter: http://twitter.com/jaydedman
 RSS: http://tinyurl.com/yqgdt9





[videoblogging] Re: we should all enter this one

2008-02-20 Thread missbhavens1969
Yeah. This comes up all the time in my house: the relationship/lack of
relationship between class and artsy as a label. Oh, yes. So
familiar. This is the conversation that comes up when my artsy
fiancee gives me (reasonably good-natured) grief about not
understanding whatever artsy static he bought from Aquarius Records
 that he likes to pretend is music, or an artsy painting painting I
don't get or a sculpture I just plain don't like. Suddenly, in his
eyes I'm put in the category of The Masses (that's the term I use
instead of mainstream or normal, by the way).

The Masses watch movies that star The Rock. They listen to Z100. They
shop at Wal-Mart and buy all their clean CDs there, too. They
subscribe to Us magazine.

Now, I don't actually do any of these things, not that there's
anything really wrong with them (except for movies with The Rock.
That's truly unforgivable.). But I get pissy about it. I'm being
categorized and i don't like it. So I do it right back, and call him a
snob.

Why? Because he's a snob. An artsy snob.

Artsy people watch 2001: A Space Odyssey over and over and over and
when you ask questions about what the hell is going on, they roll
their eyes. They really dig Duchamp. The only good music is music that
absolutely no one else is listening too. I could go on.

But why does my fiancee the Sensitive Artist hate the artsy label?
Because he is, in fact a blue collar and normal person who got in
many a nose-breaking fight in South Boston as a youth for being so
artsy. Fair enough. 

There's a lot of crossover between artsy and The Masses. Mr. Artsy
recently rented Night at the Museum and no, I'll never, ever, EVER
let him live it down. I think he's even claimed he thought it was a
documentary. 


As humans (and more specifically, I think American humans have a worse
time of it) our brains jump to labels. We label, we classify, we file,
we pigeonhole. Makes things easier, and frequently it's just wrong.
But it's better to try and make a go of it with air quotes, than not.

Carry on,
Bekah

--
http://www.missbhavens.com



--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, David Meade [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 To David Howell's objection: I think what David is saying is that
 using normal or real or some class-based term as the alternative
 to artsy tends to imply that artsy therefore has some odd, fake,
 or obscure measure of worth. (correct me if I'm wrong and putting
 words in your mouth, David.)
 
 However, I agree with Cheryl ... I don't see what Charles said as all
 that bad ... I like artsy stuff and I wasn't insulted.
 
 There is a reason the term artsy has common use (and it DOES have
 common use).  In terms of film/video, I have believed that the term
 artsy is used because it's generally describing a subset of stuff
 out there that is often outside of mainstream
 consumption/expectation ... perhaps normal is a poor term to use for
 mainstream but cut him some slack ... he did quote it - which has
 the generally accepted implication of for my lack of a better word -
 and he has since apologized for not having a better word for it.
 
 It's the nature of the human brain to classify and categorize and
 label ... Charles didn't create the distinction of mainstream or
 artsy ... and he's hardly the first to recognize it.
 
 
 All that being said ... I'd love to see some vlogger win this contest
 no matter their style!  :-)
 
 
 - Dave
 
 
 On Feb 20, 2008 2:40 PM, Cheryl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Huh. I got what you meant. Didn't find it insulting. But now I'm
  curious - there has to be a more precise way to say it. Heath used the
  term mainstream, which seems closer and doesn't add a word implying
  social status (like blue collar does).
 
  How about people who only drink the pop-culture kool-aid?
 
  No, too weird, like me... Off to seek advice from the next wordsmith I
  see.
 
  Cheryl
 
  --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Charles Iliya Krempeaux
  supercanadian@ wrote:
  
   I'm sorry you were insulted by what I said.  I didn't mean to
insult.
  
   The way it looks like to me is that whatever you want to call
them...
   the vast majority of the people I know seem to have certain
tastes in
   videos.  I was trying to use a monicker that described them.
  
   I thought putting normal in quotes would be sufficient, and people
   would know what I meant.  Maybe I should have used something like...
   the common blue collar person.
  
   I thought normal would be a good monicker since you often hear
terms
   like the real people used in political discourse to describe the
   same group.  (Please note the quotes around the real people... and
   that I'm not the one who came up the phrase the real people.)
  
   Again, sorry if I insulted you.
  
   --
   Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc.
   http://ChangeLog.ca/
  
   Motorsport Videos
   http://TireBiterZ.com/
  
   Vlog Razor... Vlogging News... http://vlograzor.com/
  
  
  
 
   On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 8:08 AM, Brook Hinton bhinton@ 

[videoblogging] Re: we should all enter this one

2008-02-20 Thread Chris
 Artsy people watch 2001: A Space Odyssey over and over and over and
 when you ask questions about what the hell is going on, they roll
 their eyes.

I could watch 2001 over and over and over again, but I'd seriously
have to take the scissors to that interminably long psychedelic
fly-over of Jupiter (or wherever the hell it was supposed to be).

The rest of the movie - even the inscrutable stuff - is great fun.  :)

Chris



Re: [videoblogging] vPIP tutorial!

2008-02-20 Thread John Coffey
I thought they were married. He's just pimpin her out like Chelsea Clinton!

schlomo rabinowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:  Just marry her already!

And get a room!

On 2/20/08, Jay dedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  i made a tutorial on How To Install and Use vPIP plugin for wordpress.
  http://showinabox.tv/2008/02/19/how-to-install-and-use-vpip/

 does anyone here use Enric's vPIP?
 ryanne's tutorial rocks!
 can I get a witness?

 Jay


 --
 http://jaydedman.com
 917 371 6790
 Professional: http://ryanishungry.com
 Personal: http://momentshowing.net
 Photos: http://flickr.com/photos/jaydedman/
 Twitter: http://twitter.com/jaydedman
 RSS: http://tinyurl.com/yqgdt9

--
Schlomo Rabinowitz
http://schlomolog.blogspot.com
http://hatfactory.net
AIM:schlomochat


 


Jimmy CraicHead TVVideo Podcast about Sailing, Travel, Craic and Cocktails 
www.jchtv.com
   
-
Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



Re: [videoblogging] Re: we should all enter this one

2008-02-20 Thread Patrick Delongchamp
What the fuck?? An interminably long psychedelic fly-over of Jupiter?!?

*rolls eyes*

Fuck you Chris.

On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 4:38 PM, Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:






  Artsy people watch 2001: A Space Odyssey over and over and over and
   when you ask questions about what the hell is going on, they roll
   their eyes.

  I could watch 2001 over and over and over again, but I'd seriously
  have to take the scissors to that interminably long psychedelic
  fly-over of Jupiter (or wherever the hell it was supposed to be).

  The rest of the movie - even the inscrutable stuff - is great fun. :)

  Chris

  


[videoblogging] Re: we should all enter this one

2008-02-20 Thread Chris
Sorry... I can only take so many rolling shots of solarized terrain
before going, Okay, I'm not getting anything new here.  :)

Chris

--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Delongchamp
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 What the fuck?? An interminably long psychedelic fly-over of Jupiter?!?
 
 *rolls eyes*
 
 Fuck you Chris.



[videoblogging] Re: we should all enter this one

2008-02-20 Thread Renat Zarbailov
Tell me who your friends are and I'll tell you who you are :)

Renat

--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, David Howell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 Yes. Of course. the common blue collar person has no appreciation
 for art or arty things.
 
 How about you just stop with the labels. Your hole is already deep
enough.
 
 
 
 --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Charles Iliya Krempeaux
 supercanadian@ wrote:
 
  I'm sorry you were insulted by what I said.  I didn't mean to insult.
  
  The way it looks like to me is that whatever you want to call them...
  the vast majority of the people I know seem to have certain tastes in
  videos.  I was trying to use a monicker that described them.
  
  I thought putting normal in quotes would be sufficient, and people
  would know what I meant.  Maybe I should have used something like...
  the common blue collar person.
  
  I thought normal would be a good monicker since you often hear terms
  like the real people used in political discourse to describe the
  same group.  (Please note the quotes around the real people... and
  that I'm not the one who came up the phrase the real people.)
  
  Again, sorry if I insulted you.
  
  -- 
  Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc.
  http://ChangeLog.ca/
  
  Motorsport Videos
  http://TireBiterZ.com/
  
  Vlog Razor... Vlogging News... http://vlograzor.com/
  
  
  
  On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 8:08 AM, Brook Hinton bhinton@ wrote:
  
   Whoops just saw your followup. Gosh golly, you're right, I guess I
don't have any layman or common people in my audience. Only
royalty and criminals/
  
Sheesh.
  
Brook
  
  
___
Brook Hinton
film/video/audio art
www.brookhinton.com
studio vlog/blog: www.brookhinton.com/temporalab
 





[videoblogging] mics for canon hv20

2008-02-20 Thread mmcallen
So we bought a canon hv20 to do some shooting for a video blog we are
doing. We are now thinking we need to buy a mic for interviews, We
also will get a mic flag.I did some looking around but anybody
have a mic they love that wont break the bank for us?

Thanks
mike



[videoblogging] Re: we should all enter this one

2008-02-20 Thread Chris
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Renat Zarbailov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 Your hole is already deep
 enough.

That phrase should only ever be uttered to the accompaniment of bad
1970's porn music. ;)

Chris



Re: [videoblogging] Re: we should all enter this one

2008-02-20 Thread Markus Sandy

On Feb 20, 2008, at 5:42 PM, Chris wrote:

 --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Renat Zarbailov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
 
  Your hole is already deep
  enough.

 That phrase should only ever be uttered to the accompaniment of bad
 1970's porn music. ;)


Wakka Chikka Wakka Chikka: Porn Music For The Masses Volume 1

http://www.archive.org/details/csr049

good stuff via cheryl colan

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



[videoblogging] Re: Apple TV vs. iPod/iPhone Recommendations?

2008-02-20 Thread Ryan Ozawa
Thanks, Markus, for your kind words. I'm glad my videos are providing
some entertainment!  I've yet to get up the nerve to do mostly
narrated, camera-pointed-at-myself vlog posts, and still stick with
simple montages.  And I appreciate your note that it looks good on
your monitor. Because I am using Apple TV specific settings for my
enclosures right now, I have no idea how things are for those just
watching on their computers like you.

Steve, thanks for your comments. I did a test with 640x360, and while
it ain't bad, it looks like most good videoblogs. The 1280x720 files
I'm posting do look noticably better. Well, from a technical
standpoint. My HD700 struggles in low light and I have a shaky hand. I
didn't think about CPU load, though. I know HD Flash players can
strain a machine, but do you get the same effect in QuickTime player
or iTunes (specific to the video size)?

And Jay, you're right, Apple is pushing specs in its own interests,
not the creative community as a whole. I'm one of those vloggers who
pushes my videos to a whole heap of video hosting sites in various
formats in the hopes of reaching the most people.  My question was
specific to my feed enclosures, though, and whether I'm alienating too
many folks with the 1280x720, 24fps MPEG-4 files I'm using now.

Since I do post different versions of the same video, I'm wondering if
it's worth the trouble to run a second feed (Apple TV HD and
iPod/iPhone).  Sounds like a lot of work, but no more work than
uploading everything to a dozen different places!

Ryan
HawaiiVog
http://www.hawaiivog.com