[videoblogging] Re: How to embed hi-res Youtube videos

2008-11-15 Thread Renat Zarbailov
Another way, albeit not the most user friendly... :)

Add ap=%2526fmt%3D18 onto the end of the YouTube link in the embed code…

object width=425 height=344param name=movie
value=http://www.youtube.com/v/MuqiGrWBRqEhl=enfs=1
ap=%2526fmt%3D18/paramparam name=allowFullScreen
value=true/paramparam name=allowscriptaccess
value=always/paramembed
src=http://www.youtube.com/v/MuqiGrWBRqEhl=enfs=1ap=%2526fmt%3D18;
type=application/x-shockwave-flash allowscriptaccess=always
allowfullscreen=true width=425 height=344/embed/object


--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Jay dedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Rupert made this cool hack to embed the hi-res version of Youtube
videos:
 http://www.twittervlog.tv/high-quality-youtube-embed-generator.html
 
 This guy has a post with some more detailed i fo about the process here:
 http://blog.jimmyr.com/High_Quality_on_Youtube_11_2008.php
 
 Jay
 
 
 -- 
 http://jaydedman.com
 917 371 6790





Re: [videoblogging] Recording Live audio from different locations

2008-11-15 Thread Jan McLaughlin
Hi,

Brainstorming a bit.

Seems to me that you might - via a desktop sharing application and Audacity
(or whatever you're using to record audio on your computer) - be able to
approach both 'live recording' and 'quality' together. Don't know if desktop
sharing would have the same kind of audio compression / latency as Skype.
Might be interesting to find out.

Tried Gmail's audio / video chat recently and the audio quality was pretty
darned good. None of the Skype echo or weird digital hash hesitations. If
may be that Verdi and I both have good connections. I have FIOS.

Maybe iChat or any other video conference app in combination with CamTwist
(Google it), playing back the pre-recorded video in the chat window so you
can sync the audio performance to the vid.

What OS do each of you have?

If the double-ender strategy appeals and you're bound and determined to use
better-quality mics, I should think you wouldn't need 'recorders', but only
a free recording application like Audacity, and a preamp or other bit of
hardware to put between the mics and the computer, in order to get the mic
signal where it needs to be to be 'heard' by the computer.

Because of your post, I broke out a Shure FP-11 mic to line amp (new from
Ebay for $135) and hooked it up with a dynamic headset mic and it's working
okay - with a bit more hiss than I'd prefer - but still much better than the
on-board MacBook Pro mic and associated computer noise well in the
foreground of the background.

Podcasters would be well placed to tell you which USB mics would get you the
quality you need. I'm certain there are 'good' USB mics out there for well
less than $100 a piece.

You can certainly pick up a Shure SM57 or two used for less than $100 each.
The Shure mic you later mention - the SM7B - for sure isn't in the budget
you describe. The SM57's should be plenty good enough for the web, with the
added benefit of rejecting most ambient room noise (like echo,
refrigerators, air conditioners, traffic and the neighbors' argument).

Another idea is that one or both of you may have a video camera handy to use
as a mic, attached and recorded to the computer via fireware or USB. There
IS the some time problem of camera noise associated with recording audio
with inboard mics on video cameras, but it's usually not THAT much of a
problem for lo-budge web purposes.

Toward the lo-budget side, you can always write the story so that one (or
both) of the characer's voice(s) are supposed to be 'futzed' - e.g., EQ'd so
they sound as if they're on a telephone.

Call me if you want, and I'll walk you through some more ideas. 862-571-5334
Better these discussions held in real time. Texting possibilities without
knowing precisely what you have / want is not an efficient use of our time
:)

Jan



On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 9:11 PM, Richard Amirault [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:

 - Original Message -
 From: Dom
 (snip)
  The video portion will utilize voice-over while our content plays
  beneath. We may also use animation or puppets along with our voices.
  Anyway, you can see that it would be less than ideal to have the
  voices at different qualities. Are there any tools for recording two
  audio streams live from two separate locations that don't involve
  thousands of dollars of audio equipment? Thanks folks!
 
 As suggested a double ender will work just fine. How low cost it is
 depends on what your definition of cost is. You will need quality
 recorders. A pair of Zoom H-2s will work great. Do not use anything like a
 digital voice recorder from Olympus or Sony.

 I'm not sure about the video aspect of this.  Will you both need to see the
 video to comment on it? I would think that this may be a problem. You both
 need to see the same thing at the same time.

 Richard Amirault
 Boston, MA, USA
 http://n1jdu.org
 http://bostonfandom.org
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J7hf9u2ZdlQ



 

 Yahoo! Groups Links






-- 
Jan McLaughlin
Production Sound Mixer
air = 862-571-5334
aim = janofsound
skype = janmclaughlin


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



[videoblogging] How to create a link within a .wmv?

2008-11-15 Thread Bookmarts
Using QuickTime Pro I now know the html code necessary to create a link to a 
url from within 
a .mov video, but can someone explain how to do the same in a .wmv video? 
I only use macs and have no experience with Windows programs but surely there 
must be a  
means to create this type of link for  WindowsMedia Player. 
Thanks,
Michael  



Re: [videoblogging] Web Hosting

2008-11-15 Thread Matthew Milam
I'm hitting up Mediatemple now.

More expensive -- but not quite as bad as the one I got at 2.99 a month. The 
cpanel is slow.

Matthew


From: Ruud Elmendorp: Video journalist 
Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2008 1:34 AM
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com 
Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Web Hosting


Am quite happy with Dreamhost.

Ruud Elmendorp
Video Journalist Africa
http://www.videoreporter.nl

On 11/14/08, David Terranova [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Oh yeah, I¹ve got some sites on mediatemple, but they all seem to have
 bandwidth problems (even though each site has a lot of dedicated bandwidth)
 and connection errors.

 --
 David Terranova
 www.davidterranova.com | blog.davidterranova.com | www.rebelrave.tv



 From: Rupert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reply-To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
 Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 11:33:38 -0800
 To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
 Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Web Hosting




 I've asked around on Twitter about this.
 A lot of people use and like Dreamhost, and they have various nice
 things like automatic Wordpress installation.
 If you need a bit more, people seem to like MediaTemple.

 If you want to go green - in light of the data-centers-polluting-more-
 than-airlines-by-2020 thing - Dreamhost offset their power use with
 carbon credits. For properly green hosting, AISO.net is the biggest
 solar powered host, I think, based in California. When my payment
 period is up with my current host, I'm moving to http://
 solarenergyhost.com which is a solar  hydro powered host using
 AISO's servers but based in Vancouver.

 Rupert
 http://twittervlog.tv/

 On 14-Nov-08, at 11:24 AM, Lil Peck wrote:

 On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 1:11 PM, bmilam52 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 mailto:bcnvmilam%40live.com  wrote:
  Hostgator blows.
 
  I need a new web host for my blog. I'm sick of trying to get into my
  blog and always running into a problem. What's a good host that some
  of you use?
 
 

 I use seekdotnet.com. It isn't perfect -- no host is, but so far, of
 all the ones I have tried over the years. this one has been the best.

 Lil

 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]






 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



-- 
Sent from Gmail for mobile | mobile.google.com


 

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



Re: [videoblogging] Web Hosting

2008-11-15 Thread Matthew Milam
Okay -- things are looking good now.  I guess it's worth paying that much.

Let's see if Mediatemple stays cool.

Matthew

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



Re: [videoblogging] How to create a link within a .wmv?

2008-11-15 Thread Charles Iliya Krempeaux
AFAIK, you can't.

--
Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc.
http://changelog.ca/



On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 10:44 AM, Bookmarts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Using QuickTime Pro I now know the html code necessary to create a link to a 
 url from within
 a .mov video, but can someone explain how to do the same in a .wmv video?
 I only use macs and have no experience with Windows programs but surely there 
 must be a
 means to create this type of link for WindowsMedia Player.
 Thanks,
 Michael


[videoblogging] Re: Recording Live audio from different locations

2008-11-15 Thread bordercollieaustralianshepherd
Besides a decent mic there is a need to work with your firewall from
what it sounds (no pun) like.  

A lot of great info can be found on the
http://www.conversationsnetwork.org/  The Conversations Network's
forums. http://www.conversationsnetwork.org/forum/ mentioned on the
site belowwhich is probably where I first discovered this if not on
this list or another.

The following video has information that's been a Must watch video
I've recommended often. Covers system  Skype preference settings.

Hope this helps

From Doug Kaye's Weblog http://www.blogarithms.com/

Skype for Interviews - A How-To Video


After years of discouraging the use of Skype for interviews here at
The Conversations Network, we're now saying a resounding Yes! Paul
Figgiani and I have prepared this audiovisual presentation that covers
all you need to know in order to get true broadcast-quality Skype
recordings. http://tr.im/dkaye_skype ...

--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Jan McLaughlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi,
 
 Brainstorming a bit.
 
 Seems to me that you might - via a desktop sharing application and
Audacity
 (or whatever you're using to record audio on your computer) - be able to
 approach both 'live recording' and 'quality' together. Don't know if
desktop
 sharing would have the same kind of audio compression / latency as
Skype.
 Might be interesting to find out.
 
 Tried Gmail's audio / video chat recently and the audio quality was
pretty
 darned good. None of the Skype echo or weird digital hash
hesitations. If
 may be that Verdi and I both have good connections. I have FIOS.
 
 Maybe iChat or any other video conference app in combination with
CamTwist
 (Google it), playing back the pre-recorded video in the chat window
so you
 can sync the audio performance to the vid.
 
 What OS do each of you have?
 
 If the double-ender strategy appeals and you're bound and determined
to use
 better-quality mics, I should think you wouldn't need 'recorders',
but only
 a free recording application like Audacity, and a preamp or other bit of
 hardware to put between the mics and the computer, in order to get
the mic
 signal where it needs to be to be 'heard' by the computer.
 
 Because of your post, I broke out a Shure FP-11 mic to line amp (new
from
 Ebay for $135) and hooked it up with a dynamic headset mic and it's
working
 okay - with a bit more hiss than I'd prefer - but still much better
than the
 on-board MacBook Pro mic and associated computer noise well in the
 foreground of the background.
 
 Podcasters would be well placed to tell you which USB mics would get
you the
 quality you need. I'm certain there are 'good' USB mics out there
for well
 less than $100 a piece.
 
 You can certainly pick up a Shure SM57 or two used for less than
$100 each.
 The Shure mic you later mention - the SM7B - for sure isn't in the
budget
 you describe. The SM57's should be plenty good enough for the web,
with the
 added benefit of rejecting most ambient room noise (like echo,
 refrigerators, air conditioners, traffic and the neighbors' argument).
 
 Another idea is that one or both of you may have a video camera
handy to use
 as a mic, attached and recorded to the computer via fireware or USB.
There
 IS the some time problem of camera noise associated with recording audio
 with inboard mics on video cameras, but it's usually not THAT much of a
 problem for lo-budge web purposes.
 
 Toward the lo-budget side, you can always write the story so that
one (or
 both) of the characer's voice(s) are supposed to be 'futzed' - e.g.,
EQ'd so
 they sound as if they're on a telephone.
 
 Call me if you want, and I'll walk you through some more ideas.
862-571-5334
 Better these discussions held in real time. Texting possibilities
without
 knowing precisely what you have / want is not an efficient use of
our time
 :)
 
 Jan
 
 
 
 On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 9:11 PM, Richard Amirault [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
 
  - Original Message -
  From: Dom
  (snip)
   The video portion will utilize voice-over while our content plays
   beneath. We may also use animation or puppets along with our voices.
   Anyway, you can see that it would be less than ideal to have the
   voices at different qualities. Are there any tools for recording two
   audio streams live from two separate locations that don't involve
   thousands of dollars of audio equipment? Thanks folks!
  
  As suggested a double ender will work just fine. How low cost
it is
  depends on what your definition of cost is. You will need quality
  recorders. A pair of Zoom H-2s will work great. Do not use
anything like a
  digital voice recorder from Olympus or Sony.
 
  I'm not sure about the video aspect of this.  Will you both need
to see the
  video to comment on it? I would think that this may be a problem.
You both
  need to see the same thing at the same time.
 
  Richard Amirault
  Boston, MA, USA
  http://n1jdu.org
  http://bostonfandom.org
  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J7hf9u2ZdlQ
 
 
 
  

[videoblogging] Re: Recording Live audio from different locations

2008-11-15 Thread bordercollieaustralianshepherd
Besides a decent mic there is a need to work with your firewall from
what it sounds (no pun) like.  

A lot of great info can be found on the
http://www.conversationsnetwork.org/  The Conversations Network's
forums. http://www.conversationsnetwork.org/forum/ mentioned on the
site belowwhich is probably where I first discovered this if not on
this list or another.

The following video has information that's been a Must watch video
I've recommended often. Covers system  Skype preference settings.

Hope this helps

From Doug Kaye's Weblog http://www.blogarithms.com/

Skype for Interviews - A How-To Video


After years of discouraging the use of Skype for interviews here at
The Conversations Network, we're now saying a resounding Yes! Paul
Figgiani and I have prepared this audiovisual presentation that covers
all you need to know in order to get true broadcast-quality Skype
recordings. http://tr.im/dkaye_skype ...

--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Jan McLaughlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi,
 
 Brainstorming a bit.
 
 Seems to me that you might - via a desktop sharing application and
Audacity
 (or whatever you're using to record audio on your computer) - be able to
 approach both 'live recording' and 'quality' together. Don't know if
desktop
 sharing would have the same kind of audio compression / latency as
Skype.
 Might be interesting to find out.
 
 Tried Gmail's audio / video chat recently and the audio quality was
pretty
 darned good. None of the Skype echo or weird digital hash
hesitations. If
 may be that Verdi and I both have good connections. I have FIOS.
 
 Maybe iChat or any other video conference app in combination with
CamTwist
 (Google it), playing back the pre-recorded video in the chat window
so you
 can sync the audio performance to the vid.
 
 What OS do each of you have?
 
 If the double-ender strategy appeals and you're bound and determined
to use
 better-quality mics, I should think you wouldn't need 'recorders',
but only
 a free recording application like Audacity, and a preamp or other bit of
 hardware to put between the mics and the computer, in order to get
the mic
 signal where it needs to be to be 'heard' by the computer.
 
 Because of your post, I broke out a Shure FP-11 mic to line amp (new
from
 Ebay for $135) and hooked it up with a dynamic headset mic and it's
working
 okay - with a bit more hiss than I'd prefer - but still much better
than the
 on-board MacBook Pro mic and associated computer noise well in the
 foreground of the background.
 
 Podcasters would be well placed to tell you which USB mics would get
you the
 quality you need. I'm certain there are 'good' USB mics out there
for well
 less than $100 a piece.
 
 You can certainly pick up a Shure SM57 or two used for less than
$100 each.
 The Shure mic you later mention - the SM7B - for sure isn't in the
budget
 you describe. The SM57's should be plenty good enough for the web,
with the
 added benefit of rejecting most ambient room noise (like echo,
 refrigerators, air conditioners, traffic and the neighbors' argument).
 
 Another idea is that one or both of you may have a video camera
handy to use
 as a mic, attached and recorded to the computer via fireware or USB.
There
 IS the some time problem of camera noise associated with recording audio
 with inboard mics on video cameras, but it's usually not THAT much of a
 problem for lo-budge web purposes.
 
 Toward the lo-budget side, you can always write the story so that
one (or
 both) of the characer's voice(s) are supposed to be 'futzed' - e.g.,
EQ'd so
 they sound as if they're on a telephone.
 
 Call me if you want, and I'll walk you through some more ideas.
862-571-5334
 Better these discussions held in real time. Texting possibilities
without
 knowing precisely what you have / want is not an efficient use of
our time
 :)
 
 Jan
 
 
 
 On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 9:11 PM, Richard Amirault [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
 
  - Original Message -
  From: Dom
  (snip)
   The video portion will utilize voice-over while our content plays
   beneath. We may also use animation or puppets along with our voices.
   Anyway, you can see that it would be less than ideal to have the
   voices at different qualities. Are there any tools for recording two
   audio streams live from two separate locations that don't involve
   thousands of dollars of audio equipment? Thanks folks!
  
  As suggested a double ender will work just fine. How low cost
it is
  depends on what your definition of cost is. You will need quality
  recorders. A pair of Zoom H-2s will work great. Do not use
anything like a
  digital voice recorder from Olympus or Sony.
 
  I'm not sure about the video aspect of this.  Will you both need
to see the
  video to comment on it? I would think that this may be a problem.
You both
  need to see the same thing at the same time.
 
  Richard Amirault
  Boston, MA, USA
  http://n1jdu.org
  http://bostonfandom.org
  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J7hf9u2ZdlQ
 
 
 
  

RE: [videoblogging] How to create a link within a .wmv?

2008-11-15 Thread Jake Ludington
 Using QuickTime Pro I now know the html code necessary to create a link
 to a url from within
 a .mov video, but can someone explain how to do the same in a .wmv
 video?
 I only use macs and have no experience with Windows programs but surely
 there must be a
 means to create this type of link for  WindowsMedia Player.

You would need to use Windows Media File Editor, which is Windows-only and
part of the Windows Media Encoder. Steps on how to do it are here:
http://www.jakeludington.com/project_studio/20051004_windows_media_enhanced_
podcast.html

Sony Vegas also includes support for adding links to Windows Media files,
but is not free.

Jake Ludington

http://www.jakeludington.com




Re: [videoblogging] Web Hosting

2008-11-15 Thread Brook Hinton
I've complained about Dreamhost in the past, but they seem to have really
gotten their act together. It now looks like they really are by far the best
of the budget hosts. And the green / ngo hosting is a good thing to support.
Great transfer speed for those downloading your video content too.

Brook



-- 
___
Brook Hinton
film/video/audio art
www.brookhinton.com
studio vlog/blog: www.brookhinton.com/temporalab


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



Re: [videoblogging] Re: Traditional Media Scares the Shi* out of me As I Type

2008-11-15 Thread Brook Hinton
From my perspective, the less mainstream corporate media is involved in
any alternative independent media, the better. They already destroyed
independent film and cable.



-- 
___
Brook Hinton
film/video/audio art
www.brookhinton.com
studio vlog/blog: www.brookhinton.com/temporalab


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



Re: [videoblogging] Re: Traditional Media Scares the Shi* out of me As I Type

2008-11-15 Thread Jan McLaughlin
Bingo.

That's THE question, Jacek.

Jan

On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 3:53 AM, Jacek Artymiak [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:

 On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 7:01 AM, @sull [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  of interest...
 
  http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/13/online-video-wheres-the-money/

 Is advertising the only way to monetize on-line videos that all those
 bright people in the Valley can think of? I watched one of the Web 2.0
 gurus recently admit that the startups need to experiment with new
 revenue models now, like... e-commerce.

 --
 Jacek Artymiak
 http://devGuide.net

 vi(1) Tips: Essential vi/vim Editor Skills, 1st ed.
 http://www.devguide.net/books/vitips1
 
 devGuide.tv
 http://devguide.tv

 

 Yahoo! Groups Links






-- 
Jan McLaughlin
Production Sound Mixer
air = 862-571-5334
aim = janofsound
skype = janmclaughlin


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



[videoblogging] USB 3.0

2008-11-15 Thread Renat Zarbailov
http://lifehacker.com/5086167/usb-30-to-transfer-25gb-in-70-seconds