[videoblogging] miniblog
I'm wanting to add a miniblog (with comments) on my blog. Does anyone have any idea how I can go about it?
Re: [videoblogging] miniblog
May be tumblr.com Nice day all Loiez Le 7 déc. 08 à 16:54, terry.rendon a écrit : > I'm wanting to add a miniblog (with comments) on my blog. Does anyone > have any idea how I can go about it? > > > Loiez Deniel http://www.loiez.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] ! new cell phone : +33 06 08 31 96 98 Skype : ultimcodex M'appeler gratuitement de votre PC sur mon portable http://call.mylivio.com/loiez [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[videoblogging] Re: VloMo08
Well, I made it to day 20 (again). Yeah, nothing like having your computer completely die on you to put a crimp in the action. Still looking for the activation keys for some of my software. All I got to do is find the right pile of paper that I printed it out on. Which pile would that be? ;-) Hope it get better for all who are in life agitation mode. When in doubt go with the flow. Or not. Gena Next year, there is always another year. --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Rupert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Well, I funked it again. Big life changes. This month is for > watching, I hope. Well done to everyone who did it - even those of > us who didn't make the 30. > > > On 4-Dec-08, at 4:36 PM, Mike Moon wrote: > > I just wanted to give a big shout out to those that were able to > complete VloMo08 (a video per day for the month of November). It > certainly wasn't easy, but if you completed it, wear it like a badge > of honor. Wo0T! > > Thanks a bunch for those that gave it a try. Sometimes life just > happens. Maybe next time. > > I couldn't be happier with all the new content we have to watch. It > was great to see some of the _pioneers_ dust off the camcorders and > shoot some vlogs. > > Everyone is pretty busy and might not be able to watch the thousands > of videos that were produced in November, so here's my vlog that > capsulizes my month. With directors commentary of course. :) > http://mikemoon.net/vlog/2008/11/30/reflection-on-vlomo08/ > > Keep those cameras rolling folks. Shoot some video, save the moment > forever. I'm not sure where it originated (Clintus maybe?), but VLOG > ON BITCHES! > > Mike > http://vlog.mikemoon.net > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >
Re: [videoblogging] miniblog
On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 10:54 AM, terry.rendon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm wanting to add a miniblog (with comments) on my blog. Does anyone > have any idea how I can go about it? Can you be more specific? what do you mean by a "mini-blog o your blog"? how would it work? Jay -- http://jaydedman.com 917 371 6790
Re: [videoblogging] YouTube alternatives - vlog review.
> I am a newbie in this vlog-whatchamacallit thing, so please be kind > and forgive me if this is a stupid question. > I have been uploading at YouTube, and I am curious why so many other > people use Blip or Vimeo or such other services. > Is it the quality? > Because in my mind, the social functions and the masses of people that > are on YouTube make it the only option for me. I also don't have the > patience for multi-site distribution through TubeMogul or otherwise... I checked out your videoblog: http://www.myfirstmemory.org/ cool project: aksing different people their first memory. and nice layout...did you code that page yourself? or is that a service? And yes, some of us post on sites like Vimeo or blip because the quality of compression is better. Also, blip hosts your original file and lets you cross-upload to archive.org so there's a double backup. also, it's easier to talk with sites like blip if there's an issue because they will actually respond. all depends on what is most important to you. When I checked out your site, it looks important that people see the videos in context of your page...versus someone finding in the wild on Youtube. Jay -- http://jaydedman.com 917 371 6790
Re: [videoblogging] Dropping frames, long firewire?
Amazingly, this problem decided to solve itself. I have no idea how or why, but I have no more latency issues. Thanks for the help, universe. On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 5:25 AM, Jan McLaughlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Troubleshoot: > > Have you tried the setup with a shorter firewire with the same (or > different) results? If the problem solves itself with shorter firewire, > then > some kind of amp in the line may be just the thing. Peter @ Gotham Sound > can > probably lend you one for an hour to see if that solves your issue. > > Do you have the capacity to run one or both Windows & Vegas on the internal > hard drive? if so, try one, the other & then both on the internal drive, & > see if that solves the issue. > > If that doesn't work, try the setup having moved the firewire so it runs > perpendicular as it crosses the power cables. I don't think your cable run > fits the problem you describe - rather, the bad result of such interference > would be electromagnetic 'futz' to the picture and/or audio. That said, I > would run audio / video cables so they make perpendicular crossings of > power > cables (and avoiding power cable coils altogether) in any and every event > as > a preventative measure. > > Better to make a longer electrical run than a longer firewire run... > > Jan > > On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 1:00 AM, Adam Quirk <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >wrote: > > > Hey all, > > I'm running into some frame drop issues with a live capture setup I'm > > doing. > > > > I'm running a 25' firewire alongside some power and HDMI cables, from my > > HV30 shooting in SD to Vegas Pro on a Vista 64bit PC. I'm running a > couple > > fast SATAs, one running the software and windows, and one capturing the > > media. And all other programs are shut down. > > > > Questions: > > Is the length an issue? > > Is there a possibility of interference from the other cables being next > to > > it? > > Is there a way around either of these? > > Do I need some sort of amplifier for the firewire? > > > > This is probably a question for another forum, but I know a lot of you > > folks > > have messed with this sort of stuff before. > > > > Halp. > > > > AQ > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Jan McLaughlin > Production Sound Mixer > air = 862-571-5334 > aim = janofsound > skype = janmclaughlin > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[videoblogging] Presenting stills in video
I'm looking for interesting ways to incorporate still photos into video. If you've seen any interesting ways they have been presented, post a link. Looking for alternatives to the tried and true Ken Burns style. Thank you, Adam Quirk [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [videoblogging] Presenting stills in video
There's a clever section in "Plagues and Pleasures on the Salton Sea" that uses a physical set, tricky camerawork and speed control to deal with archival photos in an historical background segment. I don't think it's online though. Brook ___ Brook Hinton film/video/audio art www.brookhinton.com studio vlog/blog: www.brookhinton.com/temporalab [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [videoblogging] Presenting stills in video
I'm too tired to remember the name, but I saw a British TV documentary last year that took old archive photos and subtly animated elements in the background or foreground. So parts of a photo behind or in front of people which were sky or grass or sea would be replaced by video of the same. Was done very well - not drawing too much attention to itself - so there'd be a slight shimmer on the sea, or a slight blowing in the grass. Then sometimes a slight Ken Burns effect was added, but with a 3D effect created by splitting the foreground, middleground and background elements into separate layers and animating them appropriately. Creating a slight feeling of tracking towards the subject rather than just zooming. I expect a slight grain/flicker was added to the image to make it seem like a video GV rather than a still, too. People who weren't film- savvy might not even have noticed. It definitely brought a little life to old pictures and blurred the boundary between them and the film/video clips they were intercut with. Rupert http://twittervlog.tv On 7-Dec-08, at 9:17 PM, Brook Hinton wrote: There's a clever section in "Plagues and Pleasures on the Salton Sea" that uses a physical set, tricky camerawork and speed control to deal with archival photos in an historical background segment. I don't think it's online though. Brook ___ Brook Hinton film/video/audio art www.brookhinton.com studio vlog/blog: www.brookhinton.com/temporalab [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
