[videoblogging] Re: what is best plug in for posting flv's in your own WP Blog?

2009-04-13 Thread Daryl Urig
I mean do both plugins allow you to have full flash functionality? In flash you 
can use actionscript to create interactive design and video. Can it be 
interactive?

Urig

--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Michael Sullivan sullele...@... wrote:

 
  Do both of these support the use of actionscript in a wordpress document?
 
 
 please rephrase this.  you might mean to say support of flash in wordpress
 posts.  if so, indeed, you can embed video in your wordpress posts.
 
 you should probably just use youtube  and copy the share embed code into
 your own blogposts unless you want to distribute your videos on itunes and
 for various devices... use blip.tv for the latter.
 
 
 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





Re: [videoblogging] Re: what is best plug in for posting flv's in your own WP Blog?

2009-04-13 Thread Michael Sullivan
the flash plugin that a web browser loads can take advantage of any
functionality that a flash app contains (ie. features written with
actionscript).  in some cases, you may need to update your flash player to
latest version but that has nothing to do with wordpress.

On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 9:18 AM, Daryl Urig da...@totalmediasource.comwrote:



 I mean do both plugins allow you to have full flash functionality? In flash
 you can use actionscript to create interactive design and video. Can it be
 interactive?

 Urig


 --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com,
 Michael Sullivan sullele...@... wrote:
 
  
   Do both of these support the use of actionscript in a wordpress
 document?
 
 
  please rephrase this. you might mean to say support of flash in wordpress
  posts. if so, indeed, you can embed video in your wordpress posts.
 
  you should probably just use youtube and copy the share embed code into
  your own blogposts unless you want to distribute your videos on itunes
 and
  for various devices... use blip.tv for the latter.
 
 
  [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
 

  



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



Re: [videoblogging] Re: what is best plug in for posting flv's in your own WP Blog?

2009-04-13 Thread Rupert
Hi Daryl,

It might be easier if you explained what the end result is supposed to  
be.  You may not need to create a swf file, and you might be asking  
more complicated questions than you need to.

Most people just embed flash video players from video sharing sites.   
These play a flv file within an flv player (different from a regular  
swf file) all the files for which are delivered by the sharing site.   
YouTube, Blip, Vimeo players are all examples of this.

You can also embed a flash video within a swf flash file, created  
using Flash.  This gives you more options for creating interactivity,  
but the files are larger and (I think) require the whole swf file  
contents to be downloaded before playing can begin, unlike an flv  
player.

With a self hosted Wordpress.org blog you can use pretty much anything  
you'd be able to put on a regular web page.
With a Wordpress.com blog, hosted by them, your options are severely  
restricted.  They have a special process for embedding media, using  
their own Wordpress code.  So if you have a Wordpress.com blog, the  
answer to your question is almost certainly no.  But then I don't know  
exactly what it is that you're trying to do.

If you're trying to create your own Flash player to insert lots of  
clickable interactive elements on top of and alongside the video,  
designing it yourself in Flash and using custom ActionScript that  
you've coded yourself, then you'd be able to put that in a post on  
your self-hosted Wordpress.org blog just like you would on a regular  
page, but not on a Wordpress.com blog.

But you may not have to go to all that trouble of making your own  
player and scripts and embedding custom-built swf flash files.   
Perhaps you're a Flash genius and want to do it yourself - but if not,  
there are various ready-made products to allow you to do these things.

If you want clickable hotspots in your videos, you can use Asterpix to  
make a clickable Flash video or LiveStage Pro to make a clickable  
Quicktime video.
If you want a funky Flash player that allows you to style it and add  
lots of custom widgets, you might find the JW Player does what you want.
Or you might just find that YouTube Annotations does what you need.   
It allows you to put clickable notes and hotspots in videos, which can  
link to other videos and channels on YouTube.

Asterpix interactive video:
http://video.asterpix.com

LiveStage:
http://totallyhip.com

JW Player:
http://www.longtailvideo.com/

Rupert
http://twittervlog.tv


On 13-Apr-09, at 6:18 AM, Daryl Urig wrote:



 I mean do both plugins allow you to have full flash functionality?  
 In flash you can use actionscript to create interactive design and  
 video. Can it be interactive?

 Urig

 --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Michael Sullivan  
 sullele...@... wrote:
 
  
   Do both of these support the use of actionscript in a wordpress  
 document?
 
 
  please rephrase this. you might mean to say support of flash in  
 wordpress
  posts. if so, indeed, you can embed video in your wordpress posts.
 
  you should probably just use youtube and copy the share embed code  
 into
  your own blogposts unless you want to distribute your videos on  
 itunes and
  for various devices... use blip.tv for the latter.
 
 
  [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
 


 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



Re: [videoblogging] Re: what is best plug in for posting flv's in your own WP Blog?

2009-04-13 Thread Michael Verdi
It's not all that sophisticated but here's a project that I did that
uses actionscript and cue points embeded in the flv files to provide
some interactivity. There is nothing installed on the site. Just a
swf file played by your browser's flash plugin and loading flv files
as necessary. http://whatisscioncity.com

- Verdi

On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 1:17 PM, Michael Sullivan sullele...@gmail.com wrote:

 the flash plugin that a web browser loads can take advantage of any
 functionality that a flash app contains (ie. features written with
 actionscript).  in some cases, you may need to update your flash player to
 latest version but that has nothing to do with wordpress.

 On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 9:18 AM, Daryl Urig da...@totalmediasource.comwrote:

 
 
  I mean do both plugins allow you to have full flash functionality? In flash
  you can use actionscript to create interactive design and video. Can it be
  interactive?
 
  Urig
 
 
  --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com,
  Michael Sullivan sullele...@... wrote:
  
   
Do both of these support the use of actionscript in a wordpress
  document?
  
  
   please rephrase this. you might mean to say support of flash in wordpress
   posts. if so, indeed, you can embed video in your wordpress posts.
  
   you should probably just use youtube and copy the share embed code into
   your own blogposts unless you want to distribute your videos on itunes
  and
   for various devices... use blip.tv for the latter.
  
  
   [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
  
 
 
 


 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



 

 Yahoo! Groups Links






--
http://michaelverdi.com


Re: [videoblogging] Re: VideoBloggingWeek2009 Finale

2009-04-13 Thread Rupert
Yay!
The great thing about videoblogging week is that lots of people who  
haven't made videos for a while suddenly make a video again - or more  
than one.
I've enjoyed a lot.

For those who didn't see, the amazing Duncan Speakman was posting vids  
again this week.
http://duncanspeakman.net

And I always get the most enjoyment when people remix each other's  
work.  It hasn't happened so much recently, but Quirk and Proctor were  
playing racquet sports with each other all week:
http://vimeo.com/quirk
http://jenniferproctor.com

We had a guest this weekend and I don't really do internet at the  
weekends, so I skipped Saturday and posted my Day 6 and Day 7 together  
last night.  Feels good to have done 7 videos this week.  Usually I  
crap out of these things two thirds of the way through, running out of  
ideas or time.  But this week I did something different every day and  
it was never a chore.

Rupert
http://twittervlog.tv

On 12-Apr-09, at 4:33 PM, Heath wrote:



 I ended videobloggingweek 2009 by showing everyone's whose fault it  
 is I am on the internet making vlogs.

 http://heathparks.com/blog1/?p=355

 Congrats to us all for another week of great video's!

 Heath
 http://heathparks.com/blog1

 --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Ian Beaumont  
 i.beaum...@... wrote:
 
  Yep, it's over, and I felt it was a tough week to do. I've done a  
 few video posts before, but to do a week of posts with good content  
 was tough. I'm quite sure that I could have done things a lot  
 better, but some of that was down to just plain nerves. Anyway, I'll  
 list all 7 posts here, and feel free to give me any feedback you  
 want to.
 
  Day 1: 
  http://cityprod.blogspot.com/2009/04/this-is-my-first-video-blog-post-for.html
  Day 2: 
  http://cityprod.blogspot.com/2009/04/video-blogging-week-on-viewpoint-day-2.html
  Day 3: 
  http://cityprod.blogspot.com/2009/04/video-blogging-week-on-viewpoint-day-3.html
  Day 4: 
  http://cityprod.blogspot.com/2009/04/video-blogging-week-on-viewpoint-day-4.html
  Day 5: 
  http://cityprod.blogspot.com/2009/04/video-blogging-week-on-viewpoint-day-5.html
  Day 6: 
  http://cityprod.blogspot.com/2009/04/video-blogging-week-on-viewpoint-day-6.html
  Day 7: 
  http://cityprod.blogspot.com/2009/04/video-blogging-week-on-viewpoint-day-7.html
 
  Congratulations to everyone else who contributed to Video Blogging  
 Week 2009.
 
  Ian B
  http://cityprod.blogspot.com/
 
 
  - Original Message -
  From: Mike Moon
  To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
  Sent: Sunday, April 12, 2009 12:33 PM
  Subject: [videoblogging] VideoBloggingWeek2009 Finale
 
 
 
 
 
  Well, it's over. VideoBloggingWeek2009 has come to an end.
  I wasn't nearly as prepared as I should have been, but I'm done.
  http://mikemoon.net/vlog/2009/04/12/car-wash-confidential/
 
  Congrats to all those that tried or accomplished 7 videos in 7 days.
 
  Mike
  RSS: http://feeds.feedburner.com/MoonEchoes
 
 
 
 
 
  [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
 


 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



Re: [videoblogging] Re: the coming Broadband limit?

2009-04-13 Thread Patrick Delongchamp
As a Canadian, it seems hysterical to me as well.

If bandwidth concerns were in fact misleading than you would expect
countries with a lot of competition (e.g. UK) to have ISPs all offering
unlimited bandwidth at ultra low costs.  The opposite seems to be the case.

On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 10:00 PM, Jay dedman jay.ded...@gmail.com wrote:



  OK $150 a month for 'virtually unlimited' seems a tad pricey. Maybe
  $75/month for 100GB is slightly more sane though, does anybody who uses a
  lot of video online monitor their bandwidth to see if they get anywhere
 near
  100GB a month?
  Its expensive enough to moan at the companies involved, but isnt extreme
  enough to confirm that 'they hope to kill Internet video before it's any
  more popular.' which is what that thing you pasted is trying to suggest
 in a
  rather hysterical way.

 Hmmmattention grabbing but not hysterical.
 Currentlya single HD show is usually about 750MB. Almost a gig.
 The size of files will only increase as quality gets better.
 Start doing the math based on the things you watch.

 we arent even calculating the amount of bandwidth a person uses for
 daily web use.

 If someone must think about every megabyte they download, this factor
 weighs on the choice to download a video by some unknown.

  If we are thinking that in the near future people will be watching many
  hours of high-def TV via the internet every day, then there are capacity
  issues which someone will have to pay for. I never heard what happened to
  the battle in the UK between the ISPs and the BBC who were using
 peer2peer
  to make TV shows available to customers, thus saddling the ISPs with a
  greater bandwidth bill, causing them to moan, All I know is that viewers
  have certainly embraced downloading TV shows legitimately via the net
 here,
  and so far there has not been any substantial change to ISP price
 structure
  or quality of service as a result.

 Until broadband providers give proof that the networks are overloaded,
 I think this argument is specious.

 The strategy is to squeeze more profit out of broadband, especially if
 people continue to cancel their cable TV subscriptions because they
 are just pulling down the shows they want to watch. Fair enough. These
 companies are private and can charge 10 per GB if they want. But
 let's all be very aware of the truth behind the decisions, so
 consumers can make clear choices. This also allows us as voters to
 make sure government is not giving unfair monopolies to private
 companies who are squeezing every cent out of their customers.

 Jay

 --
 http://ryanishungry.com
 http://jaydedman.com
 http://twitter.com/jaydedman
 917 371 6790
  



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



Re: [videoblogging] Re: the coming Broadband limit?

2009-04-13 Thread Jeffrey Taylor
Well, it is the case in France, where France Telecom, Free and other
companies have been battling it out for years...all unlimited.

2009/4/13 Patrick Delongchamp pdelongch...@gmail.com



 As a Canadian, it seems hysterical to me as well.

 If bandwidth concerns were in fact misleading than you would expect
 countries with a lot of competition (e.g. UK) to have ISPs all offering
 unlimited bandwidth at ultra low costs. The opposite seems to be the case.


 On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 10:00 PM, Jay dedman 
 jay.ded...@gmail.comjay.dedman%40gmail.com
 wrote:

 
 
   OK $150 a month for 'virtually unlimited' seems a tad pricey. Maybe
   $75/month for 100GB is slightly more sane though, does anybody who uses
 a
   lot of video online monitor their bandwidth to see if they get anywhere
  near
   100GB a month?
   Its expensive enough to moan at the companies involved, but isnt
 extreme
   enough to confirm that 'they hope to kill Internet video before it's
 any
   more popular.' which is what that thing you pasted is trying to suggest
  in a
   rather hysterical way.
 
  Hmmmattention grabbing but not hysterical.
  Currentlya single HD show is usually about 750MB. Almost a gig.
  The size of files will only increase as quality gets better.
  Start doing the math based on the things you watch.
 
  we arent even calculating the amount of bandwidth a person uses for
  daily web use.
 
  If someone must think about every megabyte they download, this factor
  weighs on the choice to download a video by some unknown.
 
   If we are thinking that in the near future people will be watching many
   hours of high-def TV via the internet every day, then there are
 capacity
   issues which someone will have to pay for. I never heard what happened
 to
   the battle in the UK between the ISPs and the BBC who were using
  peer2peer
   to make TV shows available to customers, thus saddling the ISPs with a
   greater bandwidth bill, causing them to moan, All I know is that
 viewers
   have certainly embraced downloading TV shows legitimately via the net
  here,
   and so far there has not been any substantial change to ISP price
  structure
   or quality of service as a result.
 
  Until broadband providers give proof that the networks are overloaded,
  I think this argument is specious.
 
  The strategy is to squeeze more profit out of broadband, especially if
  people continue to cancel their cable TV subscriptions because they
  are just pulling down the shows they want to watch. Fair enough. These
  companies are private and can charge 10 per GB if they want. But
  let's all be very aware of the truth behind the decisions, so
  consumers can make clear choices. This also allows us as voters to
  make sure government is not giving unfair monopolies to private
  companies who are squeezing every cent out of their customers.
 
  Jay
 
  --
  http://ryanishungry.com
  http://jaydedman.com
  http://twitter.com/jaydedman
  917 371 6790
 
 

 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

  




-- 
Jeffrey Taylor
912 Cole St, #349
San Francisco, CA  94117
USA
Mobile: +14157281264
Fax: +33177722734
http://twitter.com/jeffreytaylor
http://organicconversations.com


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



Re: [videoblogging] Call for Entries: LA GLBT Center's Project Pushback Video Contest

2009-04-13 Thread Adam Quirk
Here's our entry, based on a PSA for National Organization for Marriage:
http://vimeo.com/4097569

On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 11:38 AM, Jeffrey Taylor thejeffreytay...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 From towleroad
 http://www.towleroad.com/2009/04/la-gay-lesbian-center-launches-marriage-equality-video-contest.html
 
 :

 The L.A. Gay  Lesbian Center today launched Project
 Pushback
 http://www.lagaycenter.org/site/PageServer?pagename=Project_Pushback,
 a competition designed to inspire the production of video messages in
 support of marriage equality:

 [image: Pushback]
 http://towleroad.typepad.com/.a/6a00d8341c730253ef0115700ea206970b-pi
 Project
 Pushback isn’t about a specific election but about building support
 for the freedom to marry long before campaign season. The best messages
 will
 educate and persuade voters as well as motivate people who are already
 supportive to be more active in promoting marriage equality.
 Anyone over 18 can enter and the deadline for submissions is May 18.  One
 Grand Prize winner will receive a cash prize of $2,500. One People’s Choice
 Award winner will receive a cash prize of $1,000. Everyone who votes or
 enters will have the chance to win a Sony HD Video Camera valued at $1,000.
 I've agreed to be one of the judges who weighs in after the public has
 voted.

 --
 Jeffrey Taylor
 912 Cole St, #349
 San Francisco, CA  94117
 USA
 Mobile: +14157281264
 Fax: +33177722734
 http://twitter.com/jeffreytaylor
 http://organicconversations.com


 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



 

 Yahoo! Groups Links






[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:videoblogging-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
mailto:videoblogging-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
videoblogging-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/



[videoblogging] Re: what is best plug in for posting flv's in your own WP Blog?

2009-04-13 Thread Daryl Urig
yes, that is what I meant. You both answered it. I can use a swf or flv and 
even have some interactivity.

Thank you,

Daryl



Re: [videoblogging] what is best plug in for posting flv's in your own WP Blog?

2009-04-13 Thread Steve Eisenberg
Also interested in what the group has to say about this.

On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 9:55 PM, Daryl Urig da...@totalmediasource.comwrote:



 what is best plug in for posting flv's in your own WP Blog?

 I want to have some small instructional video blogs.

 Urig

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]