Re: [videoblogging] Let's chat about the Open Video Conference....

[t. whid]

Great post Jay. Some thoughts below...

On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 5:07 PM, Jay dedman  wrote:

> > I'm surprised we're over a week out and people haven't brought back their
> > takes to the list, but Lauren G. just put up a blog post with her take:
> > http://laurengalanter.com/2009/06/30/open-video-round-up/
> > What did the other attendees think about the Conference, and what is
> there
> > to tell people beyond the  tag and OGG Theora? I'll chime in
> later,
> > but I just wanted start the conversation.
>
> The conference confirmed several things I already thoughtand introduced
> some surprises.
>
> Many people discussed the need for independent creators to become more
> decentralized. As we see more and more free commercial hosting sites close
> down, creators need to think about hosting their own content IF they care
> about it lasting online. Many people just throw a video up like disposable
> graffiti, but others will want to make sure their videos live on. So
> archiving is a big issue.


We need to be decentralized but centralized. We need to be semantically
centralized but physically decentralized. People use YouTube because that's
where they can find an audience. We need a YouTube of independent video --
something that can aggregate an audience without relying on one
legal/physical choke point.


>
>
> Creators (me included) are still confused as to what the  and
>  tags will do for our own creativity. We need more examples to get
> inspired by the fact that we can now use video in html like any other
> element. No more trapped in a player. If you could make videos do anything,
> what would you want to do? Here are some links to see where we're at. Sull
> says he's share his experiments.
>
>   - http://people.mozilla.com/~prouget/demos/
>   - http://blog.mozbox.org/
>   -
>
> http://blog.mozbox.org/post/2009/04/12/Firefox-35%3A-a-new-experiment-with-Canvas-Video
>
> The codec wars rage on. Still a lot of confusion among creators why they
> should care about Ogg/Theora instead of flash, mp4, or h264. What is an
> open
> source codec? Tim linked to a good explanation here:
> http://lists.whatwg.org/htdig.cgi/whatwg-whatwg.org/2009-June/020620.htmlA
> FOSS (free and open source) standard helps innovation.


As that post on WHATWG points out, the FOSS codec theora, according to
Apple, isn't actually free of legal constraints (Apple sites patent issues).
Perhaps Apple is using this as a smokescreen since they can't easily support
theora on the iPod so it makes no sense for them to push the codec... But
there do seem to be both legal and structural issues (the hardware decoder
issues) that are preventing big vendors (Apple, MS) from adopting the codec.
And though Google put it in Chrome, they still won't commit to using 
with theora on YouTube.


>
>
> The most surprising thing was the state of FOSS video editors. I had no
> idea
> how far they had come along the past 3 years. I learned that much work has
> been put into building the libraries, transcoders, etc. Now each project is
> more just dealing with interface. This is a huge win. Pitivi (
> http://www.pitivi.org) and VLC (http://www.videolan.org/vlc/) are the main
> ones we saw. Unlike the editors we all use, you can throw any codec into
> it,
> and the program should know how to play it. I'm still a couple years from
> dumping iMovie/FCP, but I like the idea of more capability rather than
> less.
>
> All in all, the train rolls on. Commercial companies has baked in a lot of
> innovation and provided stability to web video...while the greassroots
> continue to do the advanced research and push the envelope of what we want
> to do.
>
> Jay
>
>
> --
> http://ryanishungry.com
> http://jaydedman.com
> http://twitter.com/jaydedman
> 917 371 6790
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> 
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Let's chat about the Open Video Conference....

[t. whid]

very relevant:
http://lists.whatwg.org/htdig.cgi/whatwg-whatwg.org/2009-June/020620.html

On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 4:08 PM, hamish  wrote:

> We made a video about the subject for http://visionontv.org this is part
> one: http://plugandplay.visionon.tv/
>
> Part 2 coming soon.
>
> Hamish
>
>
> 
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [videoblogging] XML to HTML

[t. whid]

The wget technique would allow him to archive it as-is offline, it should
pull down and link all relevant files -- probably would take a bit of
prodding and pushing to make it perfect. Of course it wouldn't be plain text
-- it would retain the blogger templates, etc. So it depends on what he
wants in the end... just the barebones of the text, or an archive of the
actual site.

Not sure you could use wget on Windows however.

Good luck! -Tim

On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 10:55 AM, Jay dedman  wrote:

> > He could try mirroring it as it currently is using wget... here's a
> > tutorial:
> > http://fosswire.com/post/2008/04/create-a-mirror-of-a-website-with-wget/
> > I've used this technique to archive old WP blogs that I don't want to
> keep
> > up-to-date with security fixes.
> > Not certain it would work with blogger... but he could export, import to
> > another blog then mirror (hackish workaround tho it is).
>
> Good idea. But I think he wants to take his blog offline...so just
> have a version of his posts local on his computer. It is an
> interesting quandry since Ive never considered wanting a blog archived
> in txt format.
>
> Jay
>
>
> --
> http://ryanishungry.com
> http://jaydedman.com
> http://twitter.com/jaydedman
> 917 371 6790
>
>
> 
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [videoblogging] XML to HTML

[t. whid]

He could try mirroring it as it currently is using wget... here's a
tutorial:
http://fosswire.com/post/2008/04/create-a-mirror-of-a-website-with-wget/

I've used this technique to archive old WP blogs that I don't want to keep
up-to-date with security fixes.

Not certain it would work with blogger... but he could export, import to
another blog then mirror (hackish workaround tho it is).

good luck!

On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 10:02 AM, Jay dedman  wrote:

> I have a friend who wants to export an old blogger blog. The file
> comes out in XML.
> He does NOT want to import it into another blog...but instead wants to
> save the old posts as html or txt files.
> Anyone have any experience saving a blog this way using the export
> files that Blogger spits out?
>
> Jay
>
> --
> http://ryanishungry.com
> http://jaydedman.com
> http://twitter.com/jaydedman
> 917 371 6790
>
>
> 
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [videoblogging] This is kind of kick ass

[T . Whid]

Someone's an artist if they call themselves an artist.

It doesn't matter what anyone else thinks. It's a human right to choose
one's own identity.

On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 1:56 PM, Rupert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Some people get considered celebrities because they go to parties and
> look pretty in magazines.
>
> If somebody does something that I consider art and you consider not
> clever enough to be art, or just the product of someone with too much
> free time, what does it matter?  Is anybody losing out?  Is other art
> devalued?  I'm not so comfortable with drawing a line between what's
> acceptable or 'professional' enough to be considered art and what's not.
>
> I think that's key to what a lot of people do here and how it's seen
> by the outside world.
>
> Rupert
> http://twittervlog.tv
>
> On 29-Oct-08, at 10:40 AM, sull wrote:
>
> anybody is an artist...
> nobody is an artist...
>
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 11:49 AM, David Terranova
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
>  > He also has a lot of free time by the looks of it.
>  > Some people just have the free time part, yet get considered as
> artists by
>  > making [time-consuming but not-so-clever] gimmicks.
>  > Nothing wrong with that. It¹s just fascinating who gets considered
> artists
>  > sometimes.
>  >
>  > I don¹t really know much about this guy, so I may be wrong in
> including him
>  > in this generalization...
>  >
>  > --
>  > David Terranova
>  > davidterranova.com
>  >
>  >
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
> 
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [videoblogging] This is kind of kick ass

[T . Whid]

The creator's name is John Michael Boling http://johnmichaelboling.com/

He's an artist that creates all sorts of clever web visual/cultural things.

On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 11:02 AM, Brook Hinton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> www.gogle.com is a
> wonder.
>
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 6:38 AM, Kath O'Donnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >   makes it hard to click play though unless you're on a slow connection!
> >
> >  > name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/3ccvfwbe8-E";> > name="wmode" value="transparent"> > src="http://www.youtube.com/v/3ccvfwbe8-E&autoplay=1&loop=1";
> > type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425"
> > height="350">
> >
> >
> > >>
> > >> I would love to know how this is done.
> > >>
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> ___
> Brook Hinton
> film/video/audio art
> www.brookhinton.com
> studio vlog/blog: www.brookhinton.com/temporalab
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
> 
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[videoblogging] The Reason Project -- pro-Obama video series

[T . Whid]

Hi all,

Just a quick note to promote a friend's new web video series.

http://votingreason.com/

from the site:
"You've heard a lot about this election from both the campaigns and the
media. Now you can hear from your fellow citizens. [Watch] as Republicans,
Independents and conservatives explain their reasons for supporting Barack
Obama."

It's a totally independent project (no campaign money, no outside money),
has very high production quality, the people are very interesting and the
video is hosted by Blip.

Hope you like it!

Vote Obama!


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[videoblogging] off-topic -- looking for HD documentation of an art installation -- location: orange county

[T . Whid]

Hi everybody,

Sorry for this off-topic post...

I have 250 bucks for someone that can shoot video documentation of a video
installation at the University of California, Irvine on Friday April 4. Just
a couple hours of work.

HD strongly preferred, but contact me and we can talk.

Any takers? Please contact me off-list.

Thanks,

Tim
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[videoblogging] cool job in nyc: Etsy

[T . Whid]

*Video Editor Plus!*

Etsy.com < http://etsy.com/>, the online marketplace for all things
handmade,
has an online magazine, the Storque, for which we are hiring an experienced
videographer/podcaster to produce, shoot, edit our online video content.
http://www.etsy.com/storque

Full-time, permanent position, health benefits and stock options after one
month. Position available immediately. Must be NYC-based, & able to work out

of Etsy Labs at 325 Gold st 6th fl, Brooklyn, NY (fun, non-corporate
atmosphere).

JOB DESCRIPTION We are looking for a creative self-starter with a
documentary or news background who wants to trail-blaze Etsy's online video
content and make it a DIY destination. We just hired videoblogging guru Bre
Pettis of MAKEzine's weekend projects and we're looking for a shooting
buddy/editor to work with him.  Current programming includes producing a
monthly newscast, series of portraits/studio tours with Etsy sellers,
craft-oriented How-tos, and animated videos about
Etsy.com< http://etsy.com/>site features. We would like someone who can
seek out interesting people and
events in the DIY world and make videos that captivate, inform and connect
the Etsy community.

Editor on Mac Finalcut Pro system, AfterEffects or similar graphics and
post-production work, experience videoblogging, troubleshooting codex and
compressions for web, experience with HD cameras, lighting. Experience in
developing look and feel (branding) videos. Knowledge of animation
techniques a plus. Sound editing and even music composition skills are
great!  We are looking for a video/webby person!

  - Production:
 - Shoot videos with Bre Pettis, our videoblogger host/New Media
 guru
 - Editing:
 - monthly newscast
 - how-tos
 - site help videos
 - Take reviews & suggestions from other admin
  - Post-production:
 - develop a look and feel for videos
 - post-production color correction and graphics
 - make musical scores
  - Distribution:
 - upload video content to various sites
 - play with/encourage online video community/user-generated
 content
 - be involved in the forums and community section of Etsy in
 getting the word out about Storque & Videos

At least 3 years experience with the skills listed above

CHARACTER Basically, we want a digital age Renaissance person:
self-motivated, problem solver, Michel Gondry-esque aesthetic, technically
competent, hip to the blogosphere, with a great sense of humor, and the
drive to make Etsy the premiere DIY destination on the web.

More about Etsy: http://www.etsy.com/about.php

More about the Storque:
http://www.etsy.com/storque/section/etsyNews/article/about-the-storque/806/
Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] and say how you heard about the job.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [videoblogging] OT (sorta) - Huge Dreamhost billing screwup, check your accounts

[T . Whid]

My card was out of date so they tried and failed to charge me for two years
worth of service. What a bunch of dopes.

Dreamhost really bugs me awfully these days.

On Jan 15, 2008 11:40 AM, Brook Hinton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I'm just quitting autopay on anything, utility bills and all, period.
> This was a wakeup call. Checks and PayPal from here on out.
>
> Not sure about sticking with Dreamhost. My punkrock roots are
> screaming at me to go back to all free after this - blogger + blip.
>
> Brook
> --
> ___
> Brook Hinton
> film/video/audio art
> www.brookhinton.com
> studio vlog/blog: www.brookhinton.com/temporalab
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [videoblogging] what about the artists?

[T . Whid]

oops.

just a clarification... After Harris did the project depicted in the
trailer, he did another project in his own living space also called we live
in public. I didn't live in a pod :)

On Dec 30, 2007 5:04 PM, T. Whid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> FWIW
>
> Back at the end of the We Live In Public experiment I was part of a group
> of artists that took over the loft for the weekend. There is still a bit of
> documentation on-line here: http://www.treasurecrumbs.com/verbal/wlip/
>
> It was a pretty bizarre experience to be in that space with all those
> cameras. We made it impossible to forget that folks were watching constantly
> by projecting the chat rooms very large on the wall...
>
>
> On Dec 30, 2007 4:51 PM, Jay dedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > we talk about crass commercialism taking weaving itself through
> > mediawhat about if artists were in control?
> > http://www.vimeo.com/457221/
> >
> > Josh Harris' experiments from 1999-2000 are funny to see now.
> > lots of big thinking.
> >
> > Jay
> >
> > --
> > http://jaydedman.com
> > 917 371 6790
> > Professional: http://ryanishungry.com
> > Personal: http://momentshowing.net
> > Photos: http://flickr.com/photos/jaydedman/
> > Twitter: http://twitter.com/jaydedman
> > RSS: http://tinyurl.com/yqgdt9
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [videoblogging] what about the artists?

[T . Whid]

FWIW

Back at the end of the We Live In Public experiment I was part of a group of
artists that took over the loft for the weekend. There is still a bit of
documentation on-line here: http://www.treasurecrumbs.com/verbal/wlip/

It was a pretty bizarre experience to be in that space with all those
cameras. We made it impossible to forget that folks were watching constantly
by projecting the chat rooms very large on the wall...

On Dec 30, 2007 4:51 PM, Jay dedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> we talk about crass commercialism taking weaving itself through
> mediawhat about if artists were in control?
> http://www.vimeo.com/457221/
>
> Josh Harris' experiments from 1999-2000 are funny to see now.
> lots of big thinking.
>
> Jay
>
> --
> http://jaydedman.com
> 917 371 6790
> Professional: http://ryanishungry.com
> Personal: http://momentshowing.net
> Photos: http://flickr.com/photos/jaydedman/
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/jaydedman
> RSS: http://tinyurl.com/yqgdt9
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [videoblogging] youtube API

[T . Whid]

I would really love to figure out how to find h.264 files (not a FLV)
from youtube's ID#...

Or, failing that, the source code for this tool would be nice.

On Dec 10, 2007 1:13 PM, Jay dedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On another list, someone posted this:
>
> some time ago i wanted RSS2.0 Feeds with media
> > enclosures for youtube, looks like it is still working:
> > http://ctrl-c.org/api/youtube/
> >
> > you can search for i.e. pakistan:
> > http://ctrl-c.org/api/youtube/search/pakistan
> >
>
> a good resource if you're everything to search and get to the actual video
> files.
>
> jay

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Media Aggregator with P2P support

[T . Whid]

There's Miro of course:

http://www.getmiro.com/

On 10/15/07, tom_a_sparks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I am more looking for BitTorrent p2p
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Broadcatching
>
> --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Patrick Cook"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi everyone:
> >
> > On 10/14/07, tom_a_sparks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > I am looking for a media Aggregator (reader) with P2P (peer 2 peer
> > >  file sharing) support
> > >  do any of you know of any?
> >
> > If you're looking for a Napster-like P2P client with RSS capabilities,
> > you might try Deepnet Explorer, though last time I checked, the P2P
> > side was disabled but this may have changed.
> >
> > Cheers :D
> >
> > --
> > Pat Cook
> > Denver, Colorado
> > PODCASTS -
> > **NEW VLOG** AS MY WORLD TURNS - http://asmyworldturnstv.blogspot.com/
> > PAT'S REAL DEAL VIDEO BLOG - http://patsrealdeal.livejournal.com/
> > PAT'S HEALTH & MEDICAL WONDERS VIDEOCAST -
> > http://patshealthmedicalwondersvideocast.blogspot.com/
> > YOUTUBE CHANNEL - http://www.youtube.com/amwowttv/
> > THE PAT COOK SHOW  - http://www.livevideo.com/thepcshow
> > THE PAT COOK SHOW (Video Podcst) - http://thepctvshow.blogspot.com/
> > THE PAT COOK SHOW (Audio Podcast) - http://thepcradioshow.blogspot.com/
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [videoblogging] mp4 junk on Safari?

[T . Whid]

Depending on your host, you may be able to add the mime type yourself using
an .htaccess file entry.

See this for more info:
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/1.3/configuring.html.en


On 7/16/07, Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Your server is not configured correctly. It's sending the .mp4 file as
> text/plain instead of a more appropriate mime-type (video/mp4 for
> example).
>
> Contact your hosting provider and have them fix this.
>
> - Andreas
>
> Den 16.07.2007 kl. 16:04 skrev John Coffey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > I've been using Freevlog to the letter and would like
> > to see my stuff on my new  iPhone, but again, this mp4
> > just shows up as computer code on Safari. Any help as
> > I might have to change my last 6 vlogs. Thanks
> > Last mp4 upload
> > http://www.jchtv.com/?p=61
> > And it would have been nice if my girlfriend mentioned
> > back in March (when I changed settings that the stuff
> > didn't play on her  ipod anymore.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
> > Luggage? GPS? Comic books?
> > Check out fitting gifts for grads at Yahoo! Search
> > http://search.yahoo.com/search?fr=oni_on_mail&p=graduation+gifts&cs=bz
>
>
>
> --
> Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen
> http://www.solitude.dk/ >
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [videoblogging] The Cult of the Amateur

[T . Whid]

On 7/12/07, terry.rendon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> In the book The Cult of the Amateur   , Andrew
> Keen basically trashes 'Web 2.0'. Excerpt here 
> .
>
>
> I was wondering  what you  all thought of the premise of this book???



Keen is the biggest troll of all time.

I've heard him interviewed twice and both times he backtracks, makes
ridiculous statements (for example he said that there is no legitimate
reason to be anonymous on the web, tell that to dissidents, whistle blowers,
activists etc working around the world) and bravely battles his 'cult of the
amateur' straw man.

This guy is a complete joke.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [videoblogging] Drunk Underwear Karaoke Deathmatch

[T . Whid]

Yo,

Can I submit vids from KDM100??? We're not wearing any underwear (or we are,
but it's under the clothes we're also wearing).

http://www.mteww.com/kdm100/

(shameless self-promotion: now showing at Postmasters Gallery 19th @ 10th
Ave NYC)

LOL

On 7/12/07, Adam Quirk, Wreck & Salvage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> A new Vlog Deathmatch challenge:
>
> Drunk Underwear Karaoke.  You can choose to use any or all of those 3
> words
> as a basis for your video.
>
> For example, you could:
> 1. Get drunk
> 2. Put on some underwear
> 3. Sing a song
>
> Or you could:
> 1. Get drunk
>
> Or just:
> 1. Put on some underwear
>
> Or even:
> 1. Sing a song
>
> On Saturday, August 11 at 4pm there will be a screening of all the Drunk
> Underwear Karaoke entries at the Pioneer Two Boots theater in the East
> Village of New York City, followed by a Q&A discussion with any vloggers
> in
> attendance, followed by Vloggercue in Brooklyn: an evening of grilled
> meats
> and vegetables, great local beer, and possibly some friendly banter if
> we're
> lucky. Plus you'll get to meet my cat.
>
> Learn about it:
> http://vloggercue.pbwiki.com
> http://vloggercue.pbwiki.com/Vlog-Deathmatch-Screening
>
> This challenge was designed (by several high-ranking Blip staffers, the
> curator of the theater, and myself) to attract non-vloggers.  We figured
> those three things in any combination would be enough to entice any sane
> person into a theater.
>
> PS: Could someone please add Charles Hope and myself as authors on the
> Vlog
> Deathmatch blog?
>
> Ok,
> AQ
>
>
>
> --
> Adam Quirk
> Wreck & Salvage
> 551.208.4644
> Brooklyn, NY
> http://wreckandsalvage.com
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [videoblogging] Backing up data for Mac/StudioMX/ pesswords, keychains? Any thing else?

[T . Whid]

Do you need to send the HD? Is it a laptop? If not, it's easy to remove the
HD if it's not required to return it with the busted computer. Then you
could get a (relatively) cheap enclosure and be certain that you have all
your data.

Other than that, you could put the HD in an enclosure and use something like
carbon copy cloner or superduper to make a complete copy of the disk to
another drive (or disk image saved to a drive). You would need another
computer to make this happen of course.

Good luck

On 7/11/07, bordercollieaustralianshepherd <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Transitioning from a PPC to a Intel Mac...
>
> The computer I have must be returned. The replacement does not ship
> until the old one is in transit. Besides the logic board problems, the
> optical drive does not work so I cannot burn to disk or Start up from
> the disk.  I did a disk image of the Harddrive but I am not sure how
> this will work. The Mac I am returning is a PPC and the replacement is
> a Intel. Tips, tricks, or any advice to avoid data loss?
>
> Long time ago I switched from OS 9 to a new Mac with Panther or the
> first Tiger OS. When I set my Studio MX back up I had lost a lot of
> the details, (sign in to server, folder locations). Many of my videos
> were also corrupted or unable to play. I just did a search for
> {macromedia + studio + MX + backup + data} but not finding what I
> think I need. Is there a better search term? Or what (application
> specific support data?) files do I need to pay special attention to?
>
> Last question after this explaination - I also coppied my entire User
> folder, the Hard drive's System and Library folder to a external HD.
> However not all data would copy and I have no idea which files. The
> messege that I got was along the lines of "the file cannot be copied I
> do not have the privilage". I was in Admin and had to enter the
> authorization password, it just did not allow some files to be copied.
> I recieved three of those alerts. Maybe they are locked?
>
> Because I cannot start up from system disks is this normal, that is,
> some files are in use and could not be copied for that reason? Or is
> this a wrinkle with the logic board acting hinky?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Hey PodTech - What's up with Lan's image?

[T . Whid]

hi everybody,

I've been lurking on this thread and watching this whole thing develop. I
thought I might add my 2¢...

Is US$3k unreasonable for this photo? We on this list don't know.

I'm not in the field, but my wife is a commercial illustrator and I assume
the markets work similarly. The price for usage is based on many factors
that we don't have the specifics for. Mr. Bui isn't selling the photo, he's
selling usage rights. Generally prices are negotiated around size of
reproduction, exclusivity, distribution (how many eyeballs will see it), how
many times it can be used, it what regions it can be used, etc, etc. We
don't have any of these specifics so it's very hard to make a judgment on
whether or not the price is reasonable.

IMHO if what Mr. Bui is selling is the right to use this photo 1 time
non-exclusively on this printed banner at the conference then 3k seems high
to me. But, as he said, it's been used so he is now in the more powerful
negotiating position.

Having said that it would probably be best for everyone to resolve it using
a mediator that knows the market and have both parties agree to abide by
whatever price this mediator comes up with.

Good luck to everyone involved :)

On 6/30/07, Lan Bui <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Robert, I'm sorry about the miscommunication on negotiation.
>
> I only come to you now because you offered yourself, I never thought
> you were one to make executive decisions at PodTech (correct me if I'm
> wrong). I know John is someone that can make executive decisions.
>
> I know how hard it must be for him to deal with his mother death. It
> is a horrible time for me to be asking anything of him.
>
> I keep posting to the group in reply to posts, but I want to talk to
> John when he is ready; or talk to someone else that can make decisions
> for PodTech.
>
> -Lan
> www.LanBui.com
>
> --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Robert Scoble"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > You told me on the phone that you did not want to negotiate. At
> least that's
> > how I remember hearing it. Sorry if I heard wrong. You told me
> specifically
> > that PodTech was not in position to negotiate.
> >
> >
> >
> > The problem is I'm getting in between you and John Furrier. John's
> mom died
> > this week which is causing problems figuring out where things are.
> >
> >
> >
> > I'll get him to answer you.
> >
> >
> >
> > Regarding photo prices, I talked with photographers who work for
> Associated
> > Press, Business Week and other magazines.
> >
> >
> >
> > I agree that we dropped the ball. No excuses there, but I wasn't
> involved
> > back then and am trying to clean up a mess and having trouble getting it
> > cleaned up because of John's mom's death.
> >
> >
> >
> > Robert Scoble
> >
> >
> >
> > ###
> >
> >
> >
> > From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > On Behalf Of Lan Bui
> > Sent: Friday, June 29, 2007 10:51 PM
> > To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: [videoblogging] Re: Hey PodTech - What's up with Lan's image?
> >
> >
> >
> > Robert, thank you for finally coming out and saying something for
> > PodTech to the community.
> >
> > First, I must say that your statement:
> >
> > "He believes his work is worth that and believes that there isn't room
> > for negotiation on this issue."
> >
> > Is a lie.
> >
> > One of the points in my blog post was that I wanted, at minimum, to be
> > contacted to negotiate. In the last couple days I did negotiate down a
> > lot less than $3000 and even sent an updated invoice for it. So how is
> > this not negotiating on the issue? Remember we talked about this on
> > the phone, so I'm not sure why you left that out.
> >
> > PodTech had the chance to ask to purchase a license to use the
> > photograph before it was used, at which time they would be able to set
> > the terms. That didn't happen. Now that they have used the photograph
> > already, who should set the terms?
> >
> > I gave PodTech over a month to respond to my terms and they didn't.
> > When it was just me that was involved PodTech didn't care. When others
> > started to blog about it and it was giving them a bad name, then
> > PodTech started to care. Remember, that blog post was up for about a
> > month before others started take notice to it. So PodTech showed to me
> > they don't care about me, they only care about their image in the
> > public eye.
> >
> > Next, I am not Thomas Hawk. Wait... Thomas Hawk? I will be the
> > professional and not discuss the prices that PodTech pays him.
> > Remember Robert, you told me how much PodTech pays him and that
> > reinforced my price even more!
> >
> > You also said:
> >
> > "It was easy to see how a mistake was made since usually people in the
> > community who, when invited to an event we held usually give us photos
> > that were snapped at our events for free"
> >
> > I was not contacted... so how could there be a mistake regarding
> > permission? I also never gave (if you meant sent in to PodTe

Re: [videoblogging] Article In WSJ on how to be a star on youtube.

[T . Whid]

My wife did the illustration for it :-)

3 cheers for my wife!

I don't think you can get it online unless you have a paid account :(

On 5/14/07, Ed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> There is an article in today's Wall Street Journal on page R1 entitled
> "How To Be A Star In A Youtube World".  It contains a series of tips
> on how to make your youtube vid stand out.
>
> OK, thanks, Ed Smith
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [videoblogging] RSS feed

[T . Whid]

Hi,

Two ways that I know of.

You need to subscribe the podcast then...

1) select the little 'i' icon on the podcast once it's subbed and it's
listed under the title and above the description. You can't copy and paste
it tho!
2) drag the podcast out of iTunes and onto your desktop. This will create a
.pcast file on the desktop, which is just xml. Open that file in a text
editor (TextEdit works) and it's there as the 'href' attribute of the 'link'
tag. And you can copy and paste :-) (I've only tested that on OS X, don't
know if it works on Windows.)



On 4/17/07, Steve Garfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>   good question!
>
> On Apr 17, 2007, at 8:18 PM, lintoncitos wrote:
>
> > How do you determine the RSS feed of a podcast on itunes?
> >
> > With friendly greetings,
> >
> >
> > Linton
> >
> > http://counselingexam.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> Steve Garfield
> http://SteveGarfield.com
>
>  
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [videoblogging] tape reader

[T . Whid]

The only VTRs for mini DV tape that I'm aware of are much more
expensive than consumer grade cameras.

Someone should come out with an inexpensive consumer-grade VTR. If
anyone knows of one, I would be very interested to hear about it as
well :)


On 4/17/07, Bev Sykes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
I have a Canon mini DVD camcorder which takes a mini DV tape.  The
>  connection to the computer is on the side of the camera and I could
>  see after I started working with it that there was a real danger in it
>  becoming loose.
>
>  Thanks to my dog, who bumped the camera, it did.  Now the computer
>  won't read the camera and though the CAMERA works fine, I can't
>  transfer tapes to my computer without finding a camera to borrow.  I
>  can send the camera it for repairs, but I can see that there is a
>  great danger of this happening again and I'm wondering if it's worth
>  paying for repairs.  I can't afford a new camera, but I'm wondering if
>  there exists such a thing as a tape reader, like we have card readers
>  for digital cameras, which could just be plugged into the computer
>  permanently and eliminate the need for having the camera near the
>  computer at all.
>
>  A search on the internet yielded only mini DVD players, which I can't
>  use, or it yielded something that was in the >$1,000 range.  I was
>  hoping for something significantly more affordable.
>
>  Any ideas?
>
>  If it's possible to e-mail me privately ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) I would
>  really appreciate it, since I am going out of town for the next two
>  days and any response might get buried in the deluge that is this
>  group!
>
>  Thanks so much for your help.
>
>  --
>  Bev Sykes

Re: [videoblogging] Re: when posting a podcast wich format should I use? _apple?_Rating?

[T . Whid]

IMHO, don't listen to Apple or Microsoft or Adobe when picking your
format. They want you to believe there is a standard format, that's
how they make money, but it isn't the case.

There is no one holy grail video format on the web. There is no MP3 of
video presently. To reach the most people you need to deploy multiple
formats.

It seems to me that the current consensus opinion is that 3 formats
cover most bases: .FLV for in-browser viewing (all those Flash players
you see on the video sites). For downloading and feed readers:
QuickTime (iPod/Apple TV/iTunes-compatible) and Windows Media (Media
Center and other devices).

Good luck!

On 4/16/07, Daryl Urig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> if I chose .QuickTime what primary directories would I limit myself from?
>
>  if I chose .swf what primary directories would I limit myself from?
>
>
>  Daryl
>
>  --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Rupert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  >
>  > Wow, I thought this was a brilliant post, Gena.
>  >
>  > We should save cool things like this on the Wiki.
>  > http://videoblogginggroup.pbwiki.com/
>  >
>  > Looking at it, there's not an immediately apparent space for How To
>  > stuff like this that I can see.  There's resources: links to other
>  > sites, and there's links on the front page to Freevlog and Feevlog.
>  >
>  > I thought we should set up a section which can hold pages of info
>  > like this with titles like "When making a podcast which format should
>  > I use" (which itself links to Freevlog, but has other context &
>  > opinion as well)?
>  >
>  > But I don't want to go messing with the wiki format that's been
>  > carefully laid out already, and make it all messy.
>  >
>  > Rupert
>  >
>  > On 15 Apr 2007, at 22:07, Gena wrote:
>  >
>  > Ok, Let me take a shot at this. You can have any size you want. If
>  > you want to post postage size video that is fine. The following
>  > pertains to vlogs, web video and video on the Internet.
>  >
>  > Back in the day when more folks were on dial-up you had to balance
>  > many factors such as the dimensions, file size, video resolution and
>  > quality. I pulled out one of my old video books and these were the
>  > suggested sizes in the past:
>  >
>  > Delivery/Dimension/Frames Per Second/Audio
>  > E-mail 160x120 10fps Mono 22.05kHz
>  > Web video 240x180 12fps Stereo 22.05 kHz
>  > CD-ROM 320x240 15fps Stereo 44.1kHz
>  >
>  > If you were placing video on a web site circa 1999 the above would
>  > have been fine. But technology has moved forward.
>  >
>  > In 2005 the recommended/suggested/used (pick one)dimension of video on
>  > blogs was 320x240. Video placed on blogs/vlog at 320x240 best meet
>  > those needs of the viewers and content producers. It is still used.
>  > But it isn't the only way to do this.
>  >
>  > It is now 2007. Times have changed. You still have to balance the
>  > factors however more people are on high speed connections. There is
>  > also the introduction of digital camcorders that can record in
>  > different aspect ratios or recording dimensions.
>  >
>  > For example, 640x480 and 320x240 are in the 4:3 aspect ratio or
>  > more square like video. Same shape as an Analog TV screen.
>  >
>  > The newer digital camcorders have the ability to record 16:9 or more
>  > rectangular, like the way it looks like when you view DVD movies on
>  > analog TV sets. Your Apple TV screen is in the 16:9 aspect ratio.
>  >
>  > It is a matter of choice. Your choice on what will best serve the kind
>  > of video you are delivering.
>  >
>  > I'm really simplifying here folks so if the techies want to jump in
>  > feel free. I just want to provide a conceptual understanding.
>  >
>  > Over at Freevlog there are videos that might make it clear to you what
>  > is going on.
>  >
>  > Ryanne has her favorite compression settings
>  > http://www.freevlog.org/index.php/2007/01/14/screencast-ryannes-
>  > favorite-compression-settings/
>  >
>  > If you just want to output to the iPod format then view
>  > http://www.freevlog.org/index.php/2007/03/19/41-compress-for-the-web-
>  > imovie/
>  >
>  > If you are on Windows check out Michael's example. Even if you are a
>  > Mac person check it out.
>  > http://www.freevlog.org/index.php/2007/03/19/4-compress-for-the-web-
>  > windows-movie-maker/
>  >
>  > Keep asking questions,
>  >
>  > Gena
>  >
>  > http://outonthestoop.blogspot.com
>  > http://pcclibtech.blogspot.com
>  >
>  > --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Daryl Urig"  wrote:
>  >  >
>  >  > I am confused. Can someone read my setting's below in previous
>  > question osted?
>  >  >
>  >  > I am told apple tv is: 640 x 480, 30 frames per sec.,
>  >  >
>  >  > and I am also told this:
>  >  >
>  >  > Yes. The standard resolution for ANY videoblog should be 320x240.
>  >  > Anything else and you're really making it rather difficult for those
>  >  > of who watch via the PC.
>  >  >
>  >  > Can someone make this clear for me? Also see question bel

[videoblogging] new videoblog: Karaoke DeathMatch 100 (AKA KDM100)

[T . Whid]

Hi Videobloggers,

Some of you may know me for my work with TVTonic, but I'm also a bit of an
artist and have been active with the net art scene since 1997. I work with a
collaborator and we call ourselves MTAA (more info: http://mtaa.net).

We're very happy to announce that our new piece, Karaoke DeathMatch 100 (
http://www.mteww.com/kdm100/) is online. It's a videoblog with 2 new videos
posted everyday for the next 50 days. The videos are of my collaborator,
M.River, and myself in a karaoke competition that we taped in our studio. We
get more and more drunk as the piece progresses :)

We encourage to visit the web site daily, vote and discuss (there's also
feeds available).

Hype & more info below...

Best,

T.Whid

+++

Karaoke DeathMatch 100 (AKA KDM100)

New rounds daily from April 15 2007 - June 4, 2007!

on the web:
http://www.mteww.com/kdm100/

+++

hype:
Artist collaborative M.River & T.Whid Art Associates face off in the most
brutal performance art smack down of the new millennium… Karaoke Deathmatch
100! This alcohol-fueled blood feud features 50 rounds of sing-along fury
(taped live over an 8-hour period with hardly any pee breaks). No Carpenters
hit too cheesy, no heavy metal lyric too trite for these teleprompter
warriors to hurl in a battle to the end. Who will emerge victorious? Only
YOU can decide.

description:
MTAA's Karaoke DeathMatch 100 is a video blog performance that takes place
over 50 days starting April 15th, 2007 and ending June 4th, 2007. Each day,
a new round is posted pitting M.River & T.Whid against each other in drunken
karaoke competition. Visit the web site daily to view the sets of videos,
vote for your favorite and discuss the artists' performances. At the end of
the competition, the votes will decide who is the Karaoke DeathMatch 100
Champion.

The web version of KDM100 is an official selection of Visual 07. 7º Festival
De Creación Audiovisual Ciudad De Majadahonda (http://www.visual-ma.com/).
The gallery version of KDM100 premiered at the Leonart '05 (
http://www.leonding.at/leonart/05/) art festival in Leonding, Austria.

KDM100 was shot in May 2005 over 8 hours.

+ credits +

video production:
Bill Hallinan, Andre Sala and George Su

web production:
MTAA; developed using open-source software: Wordpress (http://wordpress.org),
X-Poll (http://www.hotscripts.com/Detailed/41118.html ) and embedthevideo (
http://embedthevideo.com/).

URLs:
web site: http://www.mteww.com/kdm100/
QuickTime feed: http://feeds.feedburner.com/kdm100m4v
Windows Media feed: http://feeds.feedburner.com/kdm100wmv

also available in iTunes...


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Re: [videoblogging] My(The?) Most Visually Intensive HD Blog Ever. From Kyle Fasanella

[T . Whid]

Lesson one:

Don't put spaces in your URLs. All the '%20' in your URL are space
characters.

It's best to use underscores '_' or hyphens '-'



On 23 Mar 2007 20:12:06 -0700, kylefasanella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>   Need critique on newest HD videoBlog from Florida,New York,
>
> Hey guys,
>
> I just finished my newest creation of the video bloging world. It is a
> montage of last
> summer. There are shots from Chicago, New York, and Florida. I would Love
> to hear what you
> think Honestly. Love to hear any corrections that can be made with
> editing. I love to hear the
> negative more than the positive because it helps me improve. But the
> positive is nice too.
>
> Here is the link
>
> http://www.vilekyle.com/Vid%20Blogs/A%20Summer%20I
> 'l%20Never%20See%20Again/
> index.htm
>
>  
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [videoblogging] Clipser.com

[T . Whid]

love the panic exit button :-)


>
> There went another new video portal online over the last weekend
> called Clipser.
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[videoblogging] Video Vortex: Responses to YouTube (event & discussion list)

[T . Whid]

-- Forwarded message --
From: Geert Lovink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Video Vortex Conference: November 30 and December 1 2007, Amsterdam (NL)
Organized by the Institute of Network Cultures

First announcement, March 15, 2007

Event: http://www.networkcultures.org/videovortex/
List info:
http://listcultures.org/mailman/listinfo/videovortex_listcultures.org

In response to the increasing potential for video to become a
significant form of personal media on the Internet, this conference
examines the key issues that are emerging around the independent
production and distribution of online video content. What are artists
and activists responses to the popularity of 'user-generated content'
websites? Is corporate backlash eminent?

After years of talk about digital conversions and crossmedia platforms
we are now witnessing the merger of the Internet and television at a
pace that no one predicted. For the baby boom generation, that
currently forms the film and television establishment, the media
organisations and conglomerates, this unfolds as a complete nightmare.
Not only because of copyright issues but increasingly due to the shift
of audience to vlogging and video-sharing websites as part of the
development of a broader participatory culture.

The opening night will feature live acts, performances and lectures
under the banner of video slamming. We will trace the history from
short film to one-minute videos to the first experiments with streaming
media and online video, along with exploring the way VJs and media
artists are accessing and using online archives.

The Video Vortex conference aims to contextualize these latest
developments through presenting continuities and discontinuities in the
artistic, activist and mainstream perspective of the last few decades.
Unlike the way online video presents itself as the latest and greatest,
there are long threads to be woven into the history of visual art,
cinema and documentary production. The rise of the database as the
dominant form of storing and accessing cultural artifacts has a rich
tradition that still needs to be explored. The conference aims to raise
the following questions:

- How are people utilising the potential to independently produce and
distribute independent video content on the Internet?
- What are the alternatives to the proprietary standards currently
being developed?
- What are the commercial objectives that mass media is imposing on
user-generated content and video-sharing databases?
- What is the underlying economics of online video in the age of
unlimited uploads?
- How autonomous are vloggers within the broader domain of mass media?
- How are cinema, television and video art being affected by the
development of a ubiquitous online video practice?
- What type of aesthetic and narrative issues does the database pose
for online video practice?

Conference themes:

Viral Video critique
Vlogging Critique
Participatory Culture, Participatory Video
Real World Tools and Technologies
Theory & History of the Database
Narrative and the Cinematic
Database Taxonomy and Navigation
Internet Video: Art, Activism, and Public Media
Evening Programme / Exhibition


Viral Video critique

YouTube made 2006 the year of Internet video. The video content
produced bottom-up, with an emphasis on participation, sharing and
community networking. But inevitably like Flickr being consumed by
Yahoo, Google purchased YouTube. What is the future for the production
and distribution of independent online video content? How can a
participatory culture achieve a certain degree of autonomy and
diversity outside mass media? What other motives does Google have for
Internet video in terms of searching and advertising? After the
purchase of YouTube, Google was asked to remove a number of clips that
breached copyright laws. What comparisons can be made between the
Napster incident with audio and video-sharing websites?

Vlogging Critique

This section will deal with vlogging criticism. Is video blogging a
form of text-based blogging with other means? How can we develop a form
of criticism, and a critical practice, that is not derogative and yet
surpasses the anecdotal diary level? Is vlogging the next stage of ego
boosting of the blogger, who wants to raise his or her ranking status?
What is a video diary and how can this emerging genre be shaped? Can
there be sophistication in 'vlogging'? How can we overcome the
evangelical that stresses the possibilities of gadget features? And how
can we overcome the amateurish aesthetics of this new genre?

Participatory Culture, Participatory Video

The Web 2.0 holds the promise to create a participatory culture that
can renew the stagnated democracies in the West. In this utopian
approach, the user has the historical task to overcome the old regime
of top down broadcast media and create decentralised dialogues. To what
extent can user-generated video content be energized by presenting the
material as citizen journalism? Is the incr

Re: [videoblogging] Re: p.s., deduct your video equip $$ on your taxes

[T . Whid]

My own personal story FWIW,

I've been losing money on my outside business as a sole proprietor for years
(I'm an artist). My accountant told me that until I'm earning lots of
cheese, incorporating is more trouble than it's worth.

He also said that as long as I show growth year over year it doesn't matter
how much money I dump into it and can continue to lose money for years. It
takes a lot of losses and time to grow high-risk businesses (like being an
artist or for-profit vlogger). The rewards can be pretty significant if you
stick it out. Luckily this year I made a thousands on the biz, mostly from
one big grant.

I would suggest getting a good accountant that knows your business (in NYC,
where I am, it's easy to find accountants that deal exclusively with
creatives/artists).

You should also be careful about being flip about earning income. You are
serious about it, it's a business.

On 2/15/07, Tony <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>   The IRS only knows two types of businesses, C-corps and S-Corps.
> S-Corps are usually the sole proprietorships.
>
> States know businesses as profit, non-profit, and LLC. I know many
> people that have registered S-Corps and haven't had a problem with the
> IRS.
>
> --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com ,
> "wtftoadsoup" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > It might be better to form an LLC for your business. Operating as a
> > sole proprietor that loses money sometimes looks just like a hobby to
> > the IRS.
> >
> >
> > here is a bit of information on both entity types
> >
> >
>
> http://aridni.com/2007/01/the-lowdown-on-the-llp-and-the-llc-for-any-company/
> > http://aridni.com/2007/01/the-good-the-bad-and-the-sole-proprietorship/
>
>


-- 
www.mteww.com


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [videoblogging] is Creative Commons bulshit...Part 2

[T . Whid]

I'm very, very curious...

+++

Ms. Vogel states:

[...] CC licenses are legally enforceable contracts. While I believe it's
almost *always* better to find community-based, practical, business or
technical solutions before weilding the hammer of "The Law", it shouldn't be
forgotten that those CC licenses can be enforced if the content owner
ultimately choses to do so.

+++

Is there any precedent yet? Has anyone infringed a CC license, been taken to
court and lost?

Plus, Mr. Lessig has said over and over that one of the reasons he created
CC was because tho there is fair use and etc theoretically available to
independent producers but the practical economics of it make it impossible
for small producers to fight for these rights. If one has to take a corp to
court to defend one's CC licenses, don't these same economic restrictions
come into play?

On 2/2/07, Jay dedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>   Colette Vogel co-wrote the Podcasting Legal Guide:
> http://wiki.creativecommons.org/Podcasting_Legal_Guide
>
> She sent this email to the group, but it wont go through because she's
> not a member.
> she makes some good points below.
>
> Jay
> __
>
> This is a great discussion going on here, and I'm grateful to be on
> the cc line and be able to read along and chime in.
>
> Being the lawyer that I am, I do want to raise one point that I hope
> is not overlooked: Creative Commons licenses are not just a nice
> statement of what a content owner would prefer people do with the
> content they own, the CC licenses are legally enforceable contracts.
> While I believe it's almost *always* better to find community-based,
> practical, business or technical solutions before weilding the hammer
> of "The Law", it shouldn't be forgotten that those CC licenses can be
> enforced if the content owner ultimately choses to do so.
>
> Business ethics and good manners aside, and absent a fair use
> defense, the blatant violation of the non-commercial use requirement
> or the attribution requirement (just to name 2) of a CC license is
> not just a bad thing to do from an ethics stand point, it's not
> legal. Businesses who hinge their worth on such violations run a
> serious risk that instead of spending their investor's money on
> creating innovative Web 2.0 new media companies, they will spend that
> money on defending federal copyright litigation. Not such a great
> business plan, imho.
>
> I really encourage the community to resolve these disputes in a
> manner that respects the creator's rights and choices, encourages
> free speech and free culture, and permits the true innovators in this
> new media revolution to succeed. If we can do that, then we'll be on
> our way to a more balanced copyright system and a whole host of other
> good things. It's not necessarily going to be easy, but the law does
> provide some baselines that we can start with.
>
> And, for any of you interested in the nitty gritty legal side of
> this, the latest episode of This Week In Law has a great discussion
> on the legalities of RSS-feed aggregation with some legal and
> business powerhouses. The episode is available from this link: http://
> www.twit.tv/twil.
>
> On that, I do look forward to further discussion and hopefully real-
> world solutions to these issues. (And, no, Creative Commons is not BS!)
>
> Colette
> ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
> Colette Vogele, Esq.
> Vogele & Associates
> 580 California Street
> Suite 1600
> San Francisco, CA 94104
> office 415.751.5737
> mobile 415.205.5737
> email [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> skype colettevogele
> blog http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/blog/colette-vogele
> podcast: www.rulesfortherevolution.com
>  
>



-- 
www.mteww.com


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[videoblogging] Producers Institute For New Technologies

[T . Whid]

Sounds like some folks on this list might be interested in this. Apologies
if it's a dupe.

+++

WITH $450,000 INVESTMENT FROM THE MACARTHUR FOUNDATION, BAVC LAUNCHES THE
PRODUCERS INSTITUTE FOR NEW TECHNOLOGIES

San Francisco, CA -- The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation has
awarded the Bay Area Video Coalition (BAVC) a grant of  $450,000 over two
years to fund the Producers Institute for New Media Technologies, a program
that will help public broadcasters and independent producers develop
socially relevant media projects for emerging digital media platforms.

"We are very excited to bring together the independent filmmaking community,
the digital industry, and future-thinking foundation support," said Ken
Ikeda, Executive Director. "As media technology changes so do audience
viewing habits. The independent media field must be responsive and adopt
cross-platform and mobile media platforms in order to remain relevant."

A national Call for Entries for the Institute will be announced at the 2007
Sundance Film Festival.  Through the Institute, eight production teams of up
to 3 people each will be selected to come to BAVC's San Francisco facility
for ten days. Producers will participate in high-level industry roundtables,
intense one-on-one project development with technical mentors, new media
storytelling workshops, and hands-on prototyping of their ideas. The
participants will be adapting and developing award-winning film and video
content for delivery using interactive formats, including video game
applications, interactive, web-based experiences, mobile streaming,
multi-user communities, and new educational software. They may choose a
range of delivery strategies, including cell phones, other hand-held
devices, set-tops, Internet, portable software and more.

"The Producer's Institute intends to provide a first-of-its kind incubator
for independent filmmakers in new media technologies, and a unique
opportunity for industry to greenlight innovative content for these new
distribution models," says Wendy Levy, BAVC's Director of Media Arts and
Education, who will oversee the Institute.  The Institute will take place
June 1 – 10, 2007 at BAVC in San Francisco. Applications will be available
online beginning January 15th, with a February 15th deadline to apply.
Institute participants will be notified by March 1st.

-- 
www.mteww.com


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Venice Project invites?

[T . Whid]

I filled it out on Monday but have heard naught.

:-(

On 12/21/06, Bill Cammack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Invite?
>
> Why not just fill out the application form?
>
> http://www.theveniceproject.com/apply.html
>
> --
> Bill C.
> http://ReelSolid.TV
>
> --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Deirdre Straughan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > FWIW, it's not all that exciting. So far nothing of interest to vloggers.
> > If/when I get any invite tokens, I'll keep you guys in mind.
> >
> > On 12/20/06, robert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >   Same here - Looking for an invite.
> > >
> > > Rob @ podCast411
> > >
> > > http://www.podcast411.com
> > >
> > > On Dec 19, 2006, at 9:36 AM, T.Whid wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > Anyone want to give me a Venice Project invite?
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > www.mteww.com
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > best regards,
> > Deirdré Straughan
> >
> > www.beginningwithi.com (personal)
> > www.tvblob.com (work)
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>


-- 
www.mteww.com

[videoblogging] Venice Project invites?

[T . Whid]

Hi,

Anyone want to give me a Venice Project invite?

-- 
www.mteww.com

[videoblogging] Digg's new 'Podcasts' feature

[T . Whid]

http://digg.com/podcasts
http://digg.com/podcasts-faq

-- 
www.mteww.com

Re: [videoblogging] Re: question for Macbook Pro owners

[T . Whid]

I suppose if you had a device with only one firwire port and you needed to connect two.Lots of hard drives come with only one firewire 800 port.On 6/1/06, 
David Howell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
When one can "daisy chain" firewire...why would one need another port?Am I missing something here?Davidhttp://www.davidhowellstudios.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, T.Whid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:>> Hi all,>> Has anyone tried or seen any reviews for this product:>
> *2-Port NitroAV FireWire800/1394b Professional Express Card> *(http://www.nitroav.com/product/444/)*>> *It puts two Firewire 800 ports on the MBP.
>> Thanks for any info :-)>> --> www.mteww.com> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-->
Protect your PC from spy ware with award winning anti spy technology. It's free.http://us.click.yahoo.com/97bhrC/LGxNAA/yQLSAA/lBLqlB/TM~->
Yahoo! Groups Links<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/-- www.mteww.com





  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Fireant
  
  
Individual
  
  
Typepad
  
  


Use
  
  
Explains
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



   Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. 
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  

[videoblogging] question for Macbook Pro owners

[T . Whid]

Hi all,Has anyone tried or seen any reviews for this product:2-Port NitroAV FireWire800/1394b Professional Express Card(http://www.nitroav.com/product/444/
)It puts two Firewire 800 ports on the MBP.Thanks for any info :-)-- www.mteww.com





  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Fireant
  
  
Individual
  
  
Typepad
  
  


Use
  
  
Explains
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



   Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. 
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  

Re: [videoblogging] Flash Video question for Actionscripters

[T . Whid]

I ran into this problem and never found a fix.:-(I'm unsure if there is a way without re-encoding/injecting metadata.I believe the upload sites get around the issue coz they use the Flash server to stream it.
Good luck, hope someone gives some good advice on this thread.On 6/1/06, Joshua Kinberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:This is a question for the Flash developers out there...I'm creating a little side-project Flash application that plays Flash
Video files (FLV) from a playlist.I've run into a documented bug in FLV versions prior to Flash 8 wherethe duration metadata is incorrect. This screws up the time progressbar and seeking functionality of my video controller. There must be a
trick to get the duration for older versions of FLV since its obviousthat other Flash video controllers can do this. Any advice from theActionscripters out there?Here's some documentation of the bug (scroll to the bottom):
and here: <
http://www.sti-media.com/blog/archives/000111.html>This documented bug is quite common since most video upload sitesautomatically compress with Sorensen (Flash Video 6/7 codec).I've used a tool called FLV Metadata Injector to correct the FLV metadata:
This does work, but I'd rather be backwards compatible with Flash Video 6/7.-Josh Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-->
Home is just a click away. Make Yahoo! your home page now.http://us.click.yahoo.com/DHchtC/3FxNAA/yQLSAA/lBLqlB/TM~->
Yahoo! Groups Links<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/-- www.mteww.com





  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Fireant
  
  
Individual
  
  
Typepad
  
  


Use
  
  
Explains
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



   Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. 
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  

[videoblogging] vloggers who use BBEdit

[T . Whid]

Barebones is helping you out:http://www.barebones.com/products/bbedit/embedtag.shtml-- 
www.mteww.com





  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Fireant
  
  
Individual
  
  
Typepad
  
  


Use
  
  
Explains
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



   Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. 
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  

Re: MacBook Pro VS Powerbook 15"/17" for video-podcasting? [ was Re: [videoblogging] 17 inch Powerbook to a good home, cheap?

[T . Whid]

The FCP studio suite runs natively on the intel Macs. Not sure re: former macromedia apps Flash, etc. But other Adobe apps (photoshop et al) DO NOT run natively.On 5/18/06, 
Richard (Show) Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:



Michael,Couple of questions on software and the intel macs ...1) FCP works on the intel macs now? (I thought the pro applications did not yet run on these).2) It is still true that macromedia products (dreamweaver, flash, fireworks) don't run on these machines?
... RichardOn 5/18/06, Michael Verdi <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:



On 5/18/06, B Yen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:





I use a Powerbook 15", it's great for video-podcasting.I've seen the Apple promos for the Macbook Pro, it's slated to be video-podcast friendly.Can it run iMovie HD & export iPod compatible movies?
What is the story on the Intel-based MacBooks, is it still waiting for Software Developers to catch up?PhotoshopFinalCut ProAdobe Premiere Pro



I'd get one right now, if there were sufficient software compatibility: Image & video-editing programsI don't own one of these new Macs but I've been checking them out and spent some time yesterday playing with them at the apple store. Here are my impressions:
Even the low end Macbook (dual 1.83GHz) is faster than my 1.5GHz G4 PowerBook and should capable of running all the pro apps. It didn't have FCP studio loaded on it so my main concern would be with Motion which requires certain video cards.
Even the Macbooks run iMovie HD (intel native) very well - again, better than my current Powerbook. I believe all the Apple software are now universal binaries (anybody know if this is not true?).So what are the differences between the low end MacBook and the high end MacBook Pro? Basically...
CPU - ranges from dual 1.83GHz to dual 2.16GHzScreen size and surface - ranges from 13.3" 1280 X 800 to 17" 1680 X 1050. The Macbooks only come with the shiny screen (I'm not a fan). MacBook Pro have the choice of shiny or matte.
Video card - 64MB integrated vs 128MB or 256MB PCIe card.Optical drive - Combo Drive vs 4X DVD burner vs 8X Dual Layer DVD (17" only)All of these computers can hold 2GB of 667MHz DDR2 ram.All can run external monitors (mirroring and 2nd monitor). The Macbooks can run up to a 23" Apple display, the Macbook Pros can run the 30" display.
Macbook Pros have the option of running a 7200 rpm drive while the Macbooks can only have a 5400 rpm drive.All come with Wi-Fi and Bluetooth built inAll come with built in iSight camerasAll have Gigabit ethernet if you need it (though none come with a modem).
The 17" Macbook pro has a firewire 800 portThe Macbook pros have light up keyboardsThe Macbook pros have an Expresscard slot (don't know what you can buy to go in there yet).So in playing with them I felt like the Macbook was a pretty kick ass computer and is probably a great choice for most anybody. But here's why I want the MacBook Pro:
1. Larger screen. I like my current 15" 1280 X 854 screen and I'm looking forward to the 1440 X 900 screen on the 15" Macbook Pro.2. Matte screen. The shiny screen was less of a problem than I though it would be but I do spend all day working on my computer designing, editing and writing with a window behind me.
3. Video Card. I want to run Motion and Second Life really well. The 256MB video card makes this possible.4. Keyboard. The Macbook has a new keyboard which I typed on for a while and felt it was okay but not as nice as the Macbook pro keyboard (which is the same as my powerbook keyboard). The Macbook keys are flat instead of concave and they don't travel downward as far. Also when the hit the bottom they don't spring back the same way. I'm sure this is all a matter of pereference but I've always really like the Al Powerbook keyboards.
The one thing I wish the 15" Macbook pro had is the 8X dual layer DVD drive.Also, if you want to, you can run Windows on all of these at native speed.So if you don't want to run the most intensive 3D games and such on your laptop, the Macbook seems like it's by far the most bang for your buck. Certainly if your primary purpose is to edit video, audio and publish a blog the $1300 (the one with the 4x DVD burner - for back ups) Macbook is a pretty awesome computer.
-Verdi 
-- Author of the book Secrets Of VideobloggingMe --> http://michaelverdi.comLearn to videoblog --> 
http://freevlog.orgI'm Going To Vloggercon, June 10 & 11 --> 
http://vloggercon.com






  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  



Fireant
  
  


Individual
  
  


Typepad
  
  




Use
  
  


Explains
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



   Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.

 
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: 

[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject 

Re: [videoblogging] Bridging The Gap

[T . Whid]

on a related note, dumping Yahoo! would probably be a good idea. Supporting a company that has released private information to the chinese gov't that has led to journalists getting 10 years in prison sort of makes me ill.
On 5/9/06, David Meade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:



Yeah, I think I agree with Josh.  I think part of the issue is the volume of traffic in this list can be daunting.  New folks become lurkers because they cant possible catch/keep up :-PA forum where the more timid could find a specific area, and the more brave could just RSS subscribe to the whole thing, would be great.  If we could have a forum with an overall RSS subscribe, the community experience wouldn't really change for the core members (they'd still see everything in one list) ... but those trying to get started might feel more willing to post to a related topic than to 2000 people who seem to know everything anyway.
I always though a forum system with the following topics would be good:FAQs, Tips, and Tutorials (moderated to remove noise)Events and Meetups

Videoblogging in the newsCameras and HardwareEditing and CompressionBlogs and HostingRSS and PublicationAggregators and ReadersOther Support / Technical Help

Content and Creativity (Share and discuss your ideas!)Copyright and Legal Discussions (Your rights and the rights you violate.)
Social and Political Action (Issues that impact vloggers, or issues vloggers can impact.)The Business of vlogging (Advertising and Monetising via Vlogging.)
General / Off Topic chit chat.Forums Feedback: Issues with the forums (not vlogging)

And again, I think it would have to have an option to subscribe to the entire forum (or subsets) via RSS.  - Dave
http://www.davidmeade.com





  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  


Fireant
  
  

Individual
  
  

Use
  
  



Explains
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



   Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
 
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service
.



  








-- www.mteww.com





  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Fireant
  
  
Individual
  
  
Use
  
  


Explains
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



   Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. 
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  

Re: [videoblogging] Re: why i like videoblogging, Reason #147

[T . Whid]

actually I think Ali G would say, "Respek";-)On 5/5/06, Jay dedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:On 5/5/06, Jay dedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:> http://backinblakk.blogspot.com/2006/05/let-games-begin.htmlto give more explanationLukas says in her video how she reached her fundraising goal of 500$
to fly to Vloggercon.it was people in this community who donated.we did it in 2 days.makes me feel good because we put our money where our mouth is.as Ali G would say, Respect.Jay
--Adventures in VideobloggingCell: 917 371 6790 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-->Everything you need is oneclick away. Make Yahoo! your home pagenow.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/AHchtC/4FxNAA/yQLSAA/lBLqlB/TM~->Yahoo! Groups Links<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
-- www.mteww.com





  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Fireant
  
  
Individual
  
  
Typepad
  
  


Use
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



   Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. 
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Help with ActiveX

[T . Whid]

Nathan Miller's visitor was unclear about what the pop-up message was, but chances are very good that it is related to the Eolas patent thing since:[a] the visitor noticed and complained only *after* almost all versions of IE6 have been updated
[b] the prompt for ActiveX before this Eolas thing was an 'information bar, *not* an alert-style pop-up (which is much more annoying and happens everytime, you *can't* turn it off)MS's software can be confusing, and now IE is *especially* confusing with this Eolas thing, but my bet is that that is what Nathan's visitor was experiencing the eolas patent bug/patch.
On 4/21/06, Markus Sandy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:



  




tech support 101...

that's great if it works for you, but you are only demonstrating how
this and the eolas problem are separate issues on YOUR browser

now test it with the actual user and get back to me ;)

how do you know you are getting the same error message? 

how do you know s/he is only up against one issue?

how do you know that they have the updateded IE?  the odds are that
they do not.

the real issue here is to find out the EXACT error message

it may indeed be that the person is running into the eolas problem, but
I would not assume that every IE activeX issue is fixed by popups -
first i would check their settings - many corps turn these things off
(remember those custom IM install packs - lovely)


Michael Verdi wrote:

  
What settings are you changing? I went to internet options >
security > custom level - and changed all the active x stuff - and
still get the error. If you look at the source code on Nathan's page
he's using object and embed tags.
  
  
http://www.apple.com/qtactivex/qtplugin.cab
  ">
http://www.bicycle-sidewalk.com/vlog/b-s_4_20_2006.mov
">
    
  

    

    
http://www.bicycle-sidewalk.com/vlog/b-s_4_20_2006.mov"
AUTOPLAY="false" CONTROLLER="true" WIDTH="320"
HEIGHT="256">

  
  
That's the kind of code that will produce the ActiveX pop-up thing.
That's what the popup maker and vPIP plug-in address.
  
  
  
  
  
  On 4/21/06, 
Markus Sandy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
  
 probably not the same error message in your case - this is
definitely
an activex setting - i can make the message come or go based on the
settings in IE 6


Heath wrote:

  Be as it may the "New" pop up maker that appears at Freevlog should take care of the "error" message.  I was getting the same error message when microsoft released the security patch and since I used 
Freevlog new pop up maker I am not getting the message anymore.--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
, Markus Sandy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:  
  
exactly!Stephanie Bryant wrote:

  You should also let them know that it's not you, it's them. In   

  
  other  
  

  words-- you didn't change anything. Their web browser changed, andthey're going to get those popups on other sites as well.Then point them to a real web browser, like Firefox.--Stephanie
On 4/21/06, Nathan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:   
  
An avid watcher of my stuff dropped me this comment:Hey Nathan, do you realise you've got ActiveX employedon your Web site? It's causing these really annoyingpop-up messages to appear in my browser every time I
access your page. I use IE 6. Can you do somethingabout this?Can anyhow send me in the right direction.Any help will be rewarded.Nathan Miller

www.bicycle-sidewalk.com



Yahoo! Groups Links








   


  
  --Stephanie Bryant[EMAIL PROTECTED]Blogs, vlogs, and audioblogs at:http://www.mortaine.com/blogs




Yahoo! Groups Links








.

 

  

-- Markus Sandyhttp://apperceptions.org
http://spinflow.org


  
   Yahoo! Groups Links<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





  


-- Markus Sandyhttp://apperceptions.org
http://spinflow.org




 SPONSORED LINKS 

  

   
Fireant
  
   
Individual
  
   
Use
  

  




 YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "videoblogging"
on the web.
 

  To unsubscribe from this group,
send an email to:
 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is
subject to the Yahoo!
Terms of Service
.


 

  
  
  
  
  
-- 
Me: http://michaelverdi.com
R&D: http://evilvlog.com
Learn to videoblog: 
http://freevlog.org
Learn to videoblog in person: http://node101.org
  
   YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
  
  
  
 Visit your group "videoblogging"
on the web.
 
  To unsubscribe from this group, send
an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is

Re: [videoblogging] Help with ActiveX

[T . Whid]

you can also search this group for 'activex' or 'eolas' -- there were
two big threads about it a few days back

On 4/21/06, Michael Verdi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  Hey Nathan,
> You can use the Freevlog pop-up maker http://freevlog.org/popup
> or
> Enric's vPIP plug-in
> http://utilities.cinegage.com/videos-playing-in-place/
> Both of these address the ActiveX thing by embeded videos via an external
> _javascript_.
> -Verdi
>
>
>
> On 4/21/06, Nathan Miller < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > An avid watcher of my stuff dropped me this comment:
> >
> > Hey Nathan, do you realise you've got ActiveX employed
> > on your Web site? It's causing these really annoying
> > pop-up messages to appear in my browser every time I
> > access your page. I use IE 6. Can you do something
> > about this?
> >
> > Can anyhow send me in the right direction.
> >
> > Any help will be rewarded.
> >
> > Nathan Miller
> > www.bicycle-sidewalk.com
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Me: http://michaelverdi.com
> R&D: http://evilvlog.com
> Learn to videoblog: http://freevlog.org
> Learn to videoblog in person: http://node101.org
>
>  
>  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
>
>  Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
>
>
>  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
>
>  
>


--
www.mteww.com


  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



   Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. 
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  

[videoblogging] new video feed: rantapod

[T . Whid]

http://nujus.net/gh/rantapod/podcast.xml

Just a feed from GH Hovagimyan (http://nujus.net/gh_04/), no blog involved.

It's a series of performances where the artist rants to the camera.

You can find it on iTunes too.

--
www.mteww.com


 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Re: [videoblogging] Re: why you now have an error on all your pages

[T . Whid]

This is absolutely not true. You can do anything you were doing
before, you just need to code the site differently.

On 4/16/06, David Meade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 4/16/06, Stephanie Bryant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I wanted a "you go to my site and
> > click play to play" interface. Microsoft has completely killed that as
> > an option. Completely.
>
> I'm not sure this is true.  On my site, when a user clicks (a false) play
> button, the embed suddenly appears and the video starts playing (fast
> start).  It's a one click to play interface.
>
>
> --
> http://www.DavidMeade.com
> feed:  http://www.DavidMeade.com/feed
>
>
>  
>  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
>
>  Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
>
>
>  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
>
>
>  
>


--
www.mteww.com


 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Re: [videoblogging] the activex/eolas patent bug in Explorer

[T . Whid]

That's a good question and looks like from what I can tell from doing
some quick research that it will affect IE 7.

See this:
http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2006/03/31/566068.aspx

I would plan on it happening with IE 7. Creating embeds and objects
via js is a pain to implement if you're not doing it that way already,
but it will be transparent to your viewers in the end. Except those
that surf with JS off of course...

On 4/16/06, Michael Verdi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  So this isn't a problem with IE 7? Will people be able to do the old way
> once everyone (not that it'll happen) upgrades to IE 7?
> -Verdi
>
>
> On 4/16/06, T. Whid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> Yes, it doesn't matter what plug-in you're using, it is *any* use of
> EMBED, OBJECT or APPLET tags within the actual HTML. To be clear: it
> only affects Internet Explorer 6 users on Windows.
>
> I haven't looked at Macromedia (Adobe)'s site but I think someone else
> posted a link to their official tip on how to fix the issue.
>
> On 4/16/06, robert a/k/a r <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Does the Microsoft problem extend to the embed for Flash?
> >
> > --
> > cheers
> > r
> >
> > Deconstructing the status quo, collaboratively
> >
> > my vlog: http://r.24x7.com
> > mighty fine hosting: http://foo.24x7.com
> >
> >
> >
> > On Apr 16, 2006, at 9:00 AM, T.Whid wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I had to deal with this pretty extensively at my day job andI have
> > > seen some some misinformation in other threads regarding this so I
> > > thought I'd try to make it clear. It seems like some of the scripts
> > > you guys are using already helping you avoid the annoying activex
> > > alert, but here's my 2¢.
> > >
> > > [1] If someone installed the Internet Explorer security update of
> > > April 11, 2006, they will see this problem if you use embed, object or
> > > applet tags in your HTML. This applies only to Windows, not Mac, and
> > > only to IE, not Firefox.
> > > [
> http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2006/04/11/573599.aspx]
> > >
> > > [2] To avoid the activex alert, you must write the embed, object or
> > > applet tag onto your page using javascript loaded from an external
> > > javascript file, ie, the javascript can't be in the head of the HTML.
> > >
> > > Microsoft has info and example scripts: http://tinyurl.com/aovax
> > >
> > > ++
> > >
> > > Have fun
> > >
> > > --
> > > www.mteww.com
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
>  www.mteww.com
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Me: http://michaelverdi.com
> R&D: http://evilvlog.com
> Learn to videoblog: http://freevlog.org
> Learn to videoblog in person: http://node101.org
>
>  
>  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
>
>  Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
>
>
>  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
>
>  
>


--
www.mteww.com


 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Re: [videoblogging] the activex/eolas patent bug in Explorer

[T . Whid]

Yes, it doesn't matter what plug-in you're using, it is *any* use of
EMBED, OBJECT or APPLET tags within the actual HTML. To be clear: it
only affects Internet Explorer 6 users on Windows.

I haven't looked at Macromedia (Adobe)'s site but I think someone else
posted a link to their official tip on how to fix the issue.

On 4/16/06, robert a/k/a r <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does the Microsoft problem extend to the embed for Flash?
>
> --
> cheers
> r
>
> Deconstructing the status quo, collaboratively
>
> my vlog: http://r.24x7.com
> mighty fine hosting: http://foo.24x7.com
>
>
>
> On Apr 16, 2006, at 9:00 AM, T.Whid wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I had to deal with this pretty extensively at my day job andI have
> > seen some some misinformation in other threads regarding this so I
> > thought I'd try to make it clear. It seems like some of the scripts
> > you guys are using already helping you avoid the annoying activex
> > alert, but here's my 2¢.
> >
> > [1] If someone installed the Internet Explorer security update of
> > April 11, 2006, they will see this problem if you use embed, object or
> > applet tags in your HTML. This applies only to Windows, not Mac, and
> > only to IE, not Firefox.
> > [http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2006/04/11/573599.aspx]
> >
> > [2] To avoid the activex alert, you must write the embed, object or
> > applet tag onto your page using javascript loaded from an external
> > javascript file, ie, the javascript can't be in the head of the HTML.
> >
> > Microsoft has info and example scripts: http://tinyurl.com/aovax
> >
> > ++
> >
> > Have fun
> >
> > --
> > www.mteww.com
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


--
www.mteww.com


 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

[videoblogging] the activex/eolas patent bug in Explorer

[T . Whid]

Hi all,

I had to deal with this pretty extensively at my day job andI have
seen some some misinformation in other threads regarding this so I
thought I'd try to make it clear. It seems like some of the scripts
you guys are using already helping you avoid the annoying activex
alert, but here's my 2¢.

[1] If someone installed the Internet Explorer security update of
April 11, 2006, they will see this problem if you use embed, object or
applet tags in your HTML. This applies only to Windows, not Mac, and
only to IE, not Firefox.
[http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2006/04/11/573599.aspx]

[2] To avoid the activex alert, you must write the embed, object or
applet tag onto your page using javascript loaded from an external
javascript file, ie, the javascript can't be in the head of the HTML.

Microsoft has info and example scripts: http://tinyurl.com/aovax

++

Have fun

--
www.mteww.com


 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Re: [videoblogging] Re: massive infringement (was: Veoh Transcoding Feeds...)

[T . Whid]

It's more complicated than you're making it sound Josh.

I've heard reports that folks at certain networks were uploading video
to these services at the same time their own lawyers were drafting the
cease and desists.

Plus, Lazy Sunday as an example, it hit YouTube and then was *free*
via iTunes, so obviousely NBC saw it as a promo opportunity -- which
it was. It was the best thing to ever happen to SNL. And all those
pirated Daily Show clips do nothing but help them.

I just don't see it as a black and white issue and it's not the time
to take a hard line on this stuff. There are folks busily creating
services and technologies to get independently produced content in
front of people, there's going to be bumps in the road and areas of
fog.

This may be too personal a question, please disregard if you think so.
I truly mean no offense. Do you have such a hard line because you feel
Fireant plays by the rules while these other services don't and
therefor they're competing unfairly?

On 4/8/06, Joshua Kinberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Let's also not forget that it is a right of the content owner to *not*
> allow someone to use their content if desired. This is the same as the
> "opt in" argument I made before. SNL was never given the choice to
> "opt in" on YouTube. They were forced into an "opt out" only
> situation.
>
> Now... several content owners may now opt in to YouTube at their own
> discretion. And this is fine. But YouTube had no right to broadcast
> their content without permission from the beginning. Same goes for
> Google Video, vSocial, and any other video clip sharing site out
> there.
>
> -Josh
>
>
> On 4/8/06, Joshua Kinberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > So how did SNL lose out when Veoh hosted their clips?
> >
> > Because SNL's content is owned by a corporate entity who is in the
> > business of licensing that content to other people in exchange for
> > money. Whenever you see SNL on TV anywhere, you can be sure that
> > someone is getting paid for that broadcast.
> >
> > This would be like CBS recording the broadcast of SNL on NBC one
> > night, and then showing it the next day on a 24 hour loop on their own
> > network and telling NBC they are doing them a favor by bringing more
> > attention to their content -- for free!
> >
> > And to be clear, the SNL example was a reference to YouTube and the
> > major traffic spike they got from the SNL "Lazy Sunday (Chronicles of
> > Narnia)" clip.
> >
> > -Josh
> >
> >
> > On 4/8/06, andrew michael baron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Apr 8, 2006, at 4:56 PM, Joshua Kinberg wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Otherwise, what's the problem? Is anyone that has been complaining
> > > >> about Veoh (including me once before) lost any money or viewers
> > > >> because of them?
> > > >
> > > > Um, yes, I think that argument can be made, especially for sites
> > > > hosting content that is normally syndicated, such as SNL clips.
> > > >
> > >
> > > So how did SNL lose out when Veoh hosted their clips? Because people
> > > could not get back to the SNL website? Yea, its lame and this is why
> > > Veoh doesn't have a chance in the long run - it ultimately takes
> > > shitty people to make a shitty business. Yet, this supported the fair
> > > use potential and supported change, especially because Veoh was
> > > likely just a drop in the bucket for where people otherwise illegally
> > > got that video.
> > >
> > >
> > > > But furthermore, I think its about a user agreeing to the terms of
> > > > service and opting in to participate. Veoh does not allow you to opt
> > > > in by choice. They take your content to seed their community and in
> > > > fact give you no real recourse to opt out. Any web service or
> > > > community like that should require you first to opt in to be a
> > > > participant. A user should always have the right to not participate if
> > > > they do not wish to do so, and Veoh takes that choice away from
> > > > content creators.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Yea, that really is pretty shitty.
> > >
> > >
> > > > -Josh
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 4/8/06, andrew michael baron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >> This is a strange argument and my feelings on copyrights are still
> > > >> developing but have changed alot over the last year while watching
> > > >> everything that is going on.
> > > >>
> > > >> Remember when iFilm was the biggest video website on the net? Not
> > > >> only did they hold as much copyrighted material as they could, they
> > > >> were the ones that populated it. iFilm even designed their activity
> > > >> to anticipate content and would create searchable landing pages for
> > > >> the copyrighted material before it was even released.
> > > >>
> > > >> iFilm was bought by MTV last year and to my astonishment, I just
> > > >> found out the other day that iFilm was never once sued. No, they were
> > > >> rewarded for being pirates by stealing and hosting all of the content
> > > >> where they had the most invasive an

Re: [videoblogging] Re: massive infringement (was: Veoh Transcoding Feeds...)

[T . Whid]

Well, that's debatable IMO. It wasn't an a priori assumption a few
years back that ISPs were not responsible for all traffic on their
networks. People made the arg that they should be treated more like a
phone company and that's become accepted (rightly IMO).


On 4/8/06, Enric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> An ISP is not in the business of gaining traffic based on popularity
> of content.  Providers like veoh, YouTube, etc. are closer to
> broadcast networks on this in that they provide media entertainment.
>
>   -- Enric
>
>
> --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, T.Whid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > would you agree that ISPs should be responsible for all traffic on
> > their network? IMO, that's a horrible idea.
> >
> > On 4/8/06, Joshua Kinberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > In my opinion, a good solution is for site providers to be
> responsible
> > > > with what they carry on their networks...
> > >
> > > Exactly! This is what I'm getting at.
> > >
> > >
> > > -Josh
> > >
> > >
> > > On 4/8/06, Devlon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > In my opinion, a good solution is for site providers to be
> responsible
> > > > with what they carry on their networks...
> > > >
> > > > On 4/8/06, Joshua Kinberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > >  I don't think looking the other way is a good solution.
> > > > >  Yes, a user could get a new email address and start again, or
> move on
> > > > >  to another service and do the same. But I think banning the
> user for
> > > > >  violating the terms of use (which likely forbid using the
> service for
> > > > >  infringment) is a start.
> > > > >
> > > > >  -Josh
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >  On 4/8/06, T. Whid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > >  > So what is the answer? More RIAA and MPAA lawsuits?
> > > > >  >
> > > > >  > I'm not excusing it, but if these people are banned on vSocial,
> > > > >  > they'll just move somewhere else. The genie is out of the
> bottle and
> > > > >  > etc first it was napster, then other p2p networks, then
> bittorrent
> > > > >  > and now it's these social sites. It will go on and on.
> > > > >  >
> > > > >  > You also say you don't buy their excuse that it's their
> users doing
> > > > >  > it, but it is really hard to police isn't it? Ban an
> infringing user,
> > > > >  > user gets a new email address and starts all over.. hell
> the smart
> > > > >  > ones would simply have a few dormant accounts laying around
> so that as
> > > > >  > they are banned they move to the new account not missing a
> step.
> > > > >  >
> > > > >  > I'm not excusing the infringers (be they users, corps or
> whatever) but
> > > > >  > the solution to this problem is the hard part. Maybe the US
> judicial
> > > > >  > system will be Flash out of bizness since it's allowing all
> this
> > > > >  > infringement ;-)
> > > > >  >
> > > > >  > On 4/8/06, Joshua Kinberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > >  > > And just to hammer home the point at how easy it is to
> track down
> > > > >  > > these infringing uses...
> > > > >  > > look at HH32 on vSocial, and then check out that user's
> network of
> > > > >  > > Friends, many of whom also engage in the same practice...
> and vSocial
> > > > >  > > looks the other way.
> > > > >  > >
> > > > >  > > Check out Ducksauce's videos:
> > > > >  > >
> > > > >
> <http://www.vsocial.com/user/?d=1397#pagekeep::p,new::b,NewContext::g,1>
> > > > >  > >
> > > > >  > > Almost all Family Guy clips, and has generated 3.5 over
> million views.
> > > > >  > >
> > > > >  > > Or Porshche911turbo:
> > > > >  > >
> > > > >
> <http://www.vsocial.com/user/?d=190#pagekeep::p,new::b,NewContext::g,1>
> > > > >  > >
> > > > >  > > Similarly filled with infringing content which has
>

Re: [videoblogging] Re: massive infringement (was: Veoh Transcoding Feeds...)

[T . Whid]

would you agree that ISPs should be responsible for all traffic on
their network? IMO, that's a horrible idea.

On 4/8/06, Joshua Kinberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > In my opinion, a good solution is for site providers to be responsible
> > with what they carry on their networks...
>
> Exactly! This is what I'm getting at.
>
>
> -Josh
>
>
> On 4/8/06, Devlon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > In my opinion, a good solution is for site providers to be responsible
> > with what they carry on their networks...
> >
> > On 4/8/06, Joshua Kinberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >  I don't think looking the other way is a good solution.
> > >  Yes, a user could get a new email address and start again, or move on
> > >  to another service and do the same. But I think banning the user for
> > >  violating the terms of use (which likely forbid using the service for
> > >  infringment) is a start.
> > >
> > >  -Josh
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >  On 4/8/06, T. Whid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >  > So what is the answer? More RIAA and MPAA lawsuits?
> > >  >
> > >  > I'm not excusing it, but if these people are banned on vSocial,
> > >  > they'll just move somewhere else. The genie is out of the bottle and
> > >  > etc first it was napster, then other p2p networks, then bittorrent
> > >  > and now it's these social sites. It will go on and on.
> > >  >
> > >  > You also say you don't buy their excuse that it's their users doing
> > >  > it, but it is really hard to police isn't it? Ban an infringing user,
> > >  > user gets a new email address and starts all over.. hell the smart
> > >  > ones would simply have a few dormant accounts laying around so that as
> > >  > they are banned they move to the new account not missing a step.
> > >  >
> > >  > I'm not excusing the infringers (be they users, corps or whatever) but
> > >  > the solution to this problem is the hard part. Maybe the US judicial
> > >  > system will be Flash out of bizness since it's allowing all this
> > >  > infringement ;-)
> > >  >
> > >  > On 4/8/06, Joshua Kinberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >  > > And just to hammer home the point at how easy it is to track down
> > >  > > these infringing uses...
> > >  > > look at HH32 on vSocial, and then check out that user's network of
> > >  > > Friends, many of whom also engage in the same practice... and vSocial
> > >  > > looks the other way.
> > >  > >
> > >  > > Check out Ducksauce's videos:
> > >  > >
> > > <http://www.vsocial.com/user/?d=1397#pagekeep::p,new::b,NewContext::g,1>
> > >  > >
> > >  > > Almost all Family Guy clips, and has generated 3.5 over million 
> > > views.
> > >  > >
> > >  > > Or Porshche911turbo:
> > >  > >
> > > <http://www.vsocial.com/user/?d=190#pagekeep::p,new::b,NewContext::g,1>
> > >  > >
> > >  > > Similarly filled with infringing content which has generated over 2
> > >  > > million views.
> > >  > >
> > >  > > Why aren't these user accounts banned? Its pretty obvious that they
> > >  > > are generating a huge amount of viewers for almost exclusively
> > >  > > infringing content.
> > >  > >
> > >  > > Sorry to specifically pick on vSocial, because I know they are not 
> > > the
> > >  > > only ones doing this, but its just very easy to go there and
> > >  > > immediately see where much of the infringing content originates. I'm
> > >  > > certain its the same with many other video clip sharing sites as 
> > > well.
> > >  > >
> > >  > > -Josh
> > >  > >
> > >  > >
> > >  > > On 4/8/06, Joshua Kinberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >  > > > The thing with Veoh is only the latest example of something that 
> > > has
> > >  > > > been pretty rampant and very troubling with many of the new 
> > > "Flickrs
> > >  > > > of video" -- and that's the institutional disregard for copyright 
> > > and
> > >  > > > the massive amount of infringement that is tolerate

Re: [videoblogging] Re: massive infringement (was: Veoh Transcoding Feeds...)

[T . Whid]

Not only is it in their interest not to remove an infringing video
because of the traffic it gives them, but it's also probably legally
ass-covering not to until the cease and desist comes.

The thing is, sure, it's simple to remove the obvious infringers, but
then that makes one responsible for all infringment happening on the
site. It's the same as ISPs not being responsible for all the content
going over their network... or at least someone could make a
reasonable argument to that.

On 4/8/06, Joshua Kinberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please, its dead easy to recognize where most of the infringement
> occurs and to cut it down. Simply banning the accounts of those users
> would likely eliminate much of the infringing cases.
>
> You could also sample a user's first several uploads to see if they
> have a pattern of infringement. Or check the clips that generate the
> most traffic and weed out the infringing cases. Its really not so
> difficult, and if these services are worth their salt they are
> tracking EVERYTHING!
>
> I think its the duty of these services to enforce their terms of use
> and to eliminate violations. Especially high profile violations that
> are getting millions of views.
>
> The top viral clip on vSocial has over 20 million remote views. Its a
> clip from Family Guy ("Peanut BUtter Jelly Time"). It should be
> removed of course, it is not in the interest of the service to
> remove its top performing clip. This is where the problem lies.
>
> These services directly benefit from the traffic generated by prolific
> infringement. In fact, vSocial goes so far as to feature infringing
> content all over the front of their website, thus further encouraging
> these cases.
>
> And you're telling me they can't identify what is infringing and where
> its coming from? Give me a break! They have a duty to enforce their
> terms of use and they strategically look the other way. YouTube did
> the same thing with "Lazy Sunday," and its what catapulted their
> traffic into a surging upswing.
>
> -josh
>
>
> On 4/8/06, T. Whid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > But it may be these web sites only option if they are going to provide
> > tools to allow users to upload videos. Once one institutes a policy of
> > policing every user video, it seems you could open yourself up to all
> > sorts of legal complications. It would also be very costly.
> >
> > My point here isn't that it's OK for a company to grab enclosures from
> > feeds and use it as content for their site. But if a company is
> > providing tools for users to upload video, there may be no business
> > model that allows that service with the amount of policing it would
> > require to make sure those videos aren't infringing on people's IP and
> > copyrights.
> >
> >
> >
> > On 4/8/06, Joshua Kinberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I don't think looking the other way is a good solution.
> > > Yes, a user could get a new email address and start again, or move on
> > > to another service and do the same. But I think banning the user for
> > > violating the terms of use (which likely forbid using the service for
> > > infringment) is a start.
> > >
> > > -Josh
> > >
> > >
> > > On 4/8/06, T. Whid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > So what is the answer? More RIAA and MPAA lawsuits?
> > > >
> > > > I'm not excusing it, but if these people are banned on vSocial,
> > > > they'll just move somewhere else. The genie is out of the bottle and
> > > > etc first it was napster, then other p2p networks, then bittorrent
> > > > and now it's these social sites. It will go on and on.
> > > >
> > > > You also say you don't buy their excuse that it's their users doing
> > > > it, but it is really hard to police isn't it? Ban an infringing user,
> > > > user gets a new email address and starts all over.. hell the smart
> > > > ones would simply have a few dormant accounts laying around so that as
> > > > they are banned they move to the new account not missing a step.
> > > >
> > > > I'm not excusing the infringers (be they users, corps or whatever) but
> > > > the solution to this problem is the hard part. Maybe the US judicial
> > > > system will be Flash out of bizness since it's allowing all this
> > > > infringement ;-)
> > > >
> > > > On 4/8/06, Joshua Kinberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > 

Re: [videoblogging] Re: massive infringement (was: Veoh Transcoding Feeds...)

[T . Whid]

But it may be these web sites only option if they are going to provide
tools to allow users to upload videos. Once one institutes a policy of
policing every user video, it seems you could open yourself up to all
sorts of legal complications. It would also be very costly.

My point here isn't that it's OK for a company to grab enclosures from
feeds and use it as content for their site. But if a company is
providing tools for users to upload video, there may be no business
model that allows that service with the amount of policing it would
require to make sure those videos aren't infringing on people's IP and
copyrights.



On 4/8/06, Joshua Kinberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't think looking the other way is a good solution.
> Yes, a user could get a new email address and start again, or move on
> to another service and do the same. But I think banning the user for
> violating the terms of use (which likely forbid using the service for
> infringment) is a start.
>
> -Josh
>
>
> On 4/8/06, T. Whid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > So what is the answer? More RIAA and MPAA lawsuits?
> >
> > I'm not excusing it, but if these people are banned on vSocial,
> > they'll just move somewhere else. The genie is out of the bottle and
> > etc first it was napster, then other p2p networks, then bittorrent
> > and now it's these social sites. It will go on and on.
> >
> > You also say you don't buy their excuse that it's their users doing
> > it, but it is really hard to police isn't it? Ban an infringing user,
> > user gets a new email address and starts all over.. hell the smart
> > ones would simply have a few dormant accounts laying around so that as
> > they are banned they move to the new account not missing a step.
> >
> > I'm not excusing the infringers (be they users, corps or whatever) but
> > the solution to this problem is the hard part. Maybe the US judicial
> > system will be Flash out of bizness since it's allowing all this
> > infringement ;-)
> >
> > On 4/8/06, Joshua Kinberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > And just to hammer home the point at how easy it is to track down
> > > these infringing uses...
> > > look at HH32 on vSocial, and then check out that user's network of
> > > Friends, many of whom also engage in the same practice... and vSocial
> > > looks the other way.
> > >
> > > Check out Ducksauce's videos:
> > > <http://www.vsocial.com/user/?d=1397#pagekeep::p,new::b,NewContext::g,1>
> > >
> > > Almost all Family Guy clips, and has generated 3.5 over million views.
> > >
> > > Or Porshche911turbo:
> > > <http://www.vsocial.com/user/?d=190#pagekeep::p,new::b,NewContext::g,1>
> > >
> > > Similarly filled with infringing content which has generated over 2
> > > million views.
> > >
> > > Why aren't these user accounts banned? Its pretty obvious that they
> > > are generating a huge amount of viewers for almost exclusively
> > > infringing content.
> > >
> > > Sorry to specifically pick on vSocial, because I know they are not the
> > > only ones doing this, but its just very easy to go there and
> > > immediately see where much of the infringing content originates. I'm
> > > certain its the same with many other video clip sharing sites as well.
> > >
> > > -Josh
> > >
> > >
> > > On 4/8/06, Joshua Kinberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > The thing with Veoh is only the latest example of something that has
> > > > been pretty rampant and very troubling with many of the new "Flickrs
> > > > of video" -- and that's the institutional disregard for copyright and
> > > > the massive amount of infringement that is tolerated.
> > > >
> > > > Veoh just set up an automated infringement process that seems targeted
> > > > towards videobloggers since it utilizes RSS. But many of these other
> > > > services include a lot of infringing content pulled from TV and other
> > > > places on the web. They do not automate this process, but instead they
> > > > hide behind their terms of use and say they are not liable for what
> > > > users happen to post. I've heard as much as 65% of the content on
> > > > YouTube comes from TV. This is very different from Flickr where over
> > > > 90% of the images are uploaded by original creators.
> > > >
> > > > So, I'm calling 

Re: [videoblogging] Re: massive infringement (was: Veoh Transcoding Feeds...)

[T . Whid]

typing too fast.. in my last email I meant to say in the last line:

Maybe the US judicial system will ban Flash since it's allowing all
this infringement ;-)


On 4/8/06, T. Whid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So what is the answer? More RIAA and MPAA lawsuits?
>
> I'm not excusing it, but if these people are banned on vSocial,
> they'll just move somewhere else. The genie is out of the bottle and
> etc first it was napster, then other p2p networks, then bittorrent
> and now it's these social sites. It will go on and on.
>
> You also say you don't buy their excuse that it's their users doing
> it, but it is really hard to police isn't it? Ban an infringing user,
> user gets a new email address and starts all over.. hell the smart
> ones would simply have a few dormant accounts laying around so that as
> they are banned they move to the new account not missing a step.
>
> I'm not excusing the infringers (be they users, corps or whatever) but
> the solution to this problem is the hard part. Maybe the US judicial
> system will be Flash out of bizness since it's allowing all this
> infringement ;-)
>
> On 4/8/06, Joshua Kinberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > And just to hammer home the point at how easy it is to track down
> > these infringing uses...
> > look at HH32 on vSocial, and then check out that user's network of
> > Friends, many of whom also engage in the same practice... and vSocial
> > looks the other way.
> >
> > Check out Ducksauce's videos:
> > <http://www.vsocial.com/user/?d=1397#pagekeep::p,new::b,NewContext::g,1>
> >
> > Almost all Family Guy clips, and has generated 3.5 over million views.
> >
> > Or Porshche911turbo:
> > <http://www.vsocial.com/user/?d=190#pagekeep::p,new::b,NewContext::g,1>
> >
> > Similarly filled with infringing content which has generated over 2
> > million views.
> >
> > Why aren't these user accounts banned? Its pretty obvious that they
> > are generating a huge amount of viewers for almost exclusively
> > infringing content.
> >
> > Sorry to specifically pick on vSocial, because I know they are not the
> > only ones doing this, but its just very easy to go there and
> > immediately see where much of the infringing content originates. I'm
> > certain its the same with many other video clip sharing sites as well.
> >
> > -Josh
> >
> >
> > On 4/8/06, Joshua Kinberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > The thing with Veoh is only the latest example of something that has
> > > been pretty rampant and very troubling with many of the new "Flickrs
> > > of video" -- and that's the institutional disregard for copyright and
> > > the massive amount of infringement that is tolerated.
> > >
> > > Veoh just set up an automated infringement process that seems targeted
> > > towards videobloggers since it utilizes RSS. But many of these other
> > > services include a lot of infringing content pulled from TV and other
> > > places on the web. They do not automate this process, but instead they
> > > hide behind their terms of use and say they are not liable for what
> > > users happen to post. I've heard as much as 65% of the content on
> > > YouTube comes from TV. This is very different from Flickr where over
> > > 90% of the images are uploaded by original creators.
> > >
> > > So, I'm calling bullshit on this. Infringement is not a viable
> > > business practice, and it is not possible to continue claiming
> > > ignorance and paying lip service to "respecting copyright."
> > >
> > > If you are getting millions of views to a clip owned and produced by
> > > NBC-Universal, then you know you are infringing the rights of another
> > > entity and benefitting from such actions. Its the same for NBC as it
> > > is for any videoblogger.
> > >
> > > Moreover, I would bet that much of the infringing content comes from a
> > > relatively small proportion of users who can be easily tracked... take
> > > HH32 for example on vSocial:
> > > <http://www.vsocial.com/user/?d=451#pagekeep::p,new::b,NewContext::g,1>
> > >
> > > Here's a user who's uploaded over 800 clips and generated over 3
> > > million remote views. Over 95% of this user's uploaded content comes
> > > from television. Some of it is clips from TV news, but most of it is
> > > the Simpsons, Family Guy, South Park, Daily Show, and Colbert Report.
> > > How i

Re: [videoblogging] Re: massive infringement (was: Veoh Transcoding Feeds...)

[T . Whid]

So what is the answer? More RIAA and MPAA lawsuits?

I'm not excusing it, but if these people are banned on vSocial,
they'll just move somewhere else. The genie is out of the bottle and
etc first it was napster, then other p2p networks, then bittorrent
and now it's these social sites. It will go on and on.

You also say you don't buy their excuse that it's their users doing
it, but it is really hard to police isn't it? Ban an infringing user,
user gets a new email address and starts all over.. hell the smart
ones would simply have a few dormant accounts laying around so that as
they are banned they move to the new account not missing a step.

I'm not excusing the infringers (be they users, corps or whatever) but
the solution to this problem is the hard part. Maybe the US judicial
system will be Flash out of bizness since it's allowing all this
infringement ;-)

On 4/8/06, Joshua Kinberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And just to hammer home the point at how easy it is to track down
> these infringing uses...
> look at HH32 on vSocial, and then check out that user's network of
> Friends, many of whom also engage in the same practice... and vSocial
> looks the other way.
>
> Check out Ducksauce's videos:
> 
>
> Almost all Family Guy clips, and has generated 3.5 over million views.
>
> Or Porshche911turbo:
> 
>
> Similarly filled with infringing content which has generated over 2
> million views.
>
> Why aren't these user accounts banned? Its pretty obvious that they
> are generating a huge amount of viewers for almost exclusively
> infringing content.
>
> Sorry to specifically pick on vSocial, because I know they are not the
> only ones doing this, but its just very easy to go there and
> immediately see where much of the infringing content originates. I'm
> certain its the same with many other video clip sharing sites as well.
>
> -Josh
>
>
> On 4/8/06, Joshua Kinberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The thing with Veoh is only the latest example of something that has
> > been pretty rampant and very troubling with many of the new "Flickrs
> > of video" -- and that's the institutional disregard for copyright and
> > the massive amount of infringement that is tolerated.
> >
> > Veoh just set up an automated infringement process that seems targeted
> > towards videobloggers since it utilizes RSS. But many of these other
> > services include a lot of infringing content pulled from TV and other
> > places on the web. They do not automate this process, but instead they
> > hide behind their terms of use and say they are not liable for what
> > users happen to post. I've heard as much as 65% of the content on
> > YouTube comes from TV. This is very different from Flickr where over
> > 90% of the images are uploaded by original creators.
> >
> > So, I'm calling bullshit on this. Infringement is not a viable
> > business practice, and it is not possible to continue claiming
> > ignorance and paying lip service to "respecting copyright."
> >
> > If you are getting millions of views to a clip owned and produced by
> > NBC-Universal, then you know you are infringing the rights of another
> > entity and benefitting from such actions. Its the same for NBC as it
> > is for any videoblogger.
> >
> > Moreover, I would bet that much of the infringing content comes from a
> > relatively small proportion of users who can be easily tracked... take
> > HH32 for example on vSocial:
> > 
> >
> > Here's a user who's uploaded over 800 clips and generated over 3
> > million remote views. Over 95% of this user's uploaded content comes
> > from television. Some of it is clips from TV news, but most of it is
> > the Simpsons, Family Guy, South Park, Daily Show, and Colbert Report.
> > How is it possible that this user continues to have an account at
> > vSocial? Shouldn't this user be banned from the service as s/he is
> > repeatedly using vSocial for infringing purposes?
> >
> > If you're vSocial, you probably sit back and smile at the amount of
> > views this one user is generating, which is obviously a benefit to
> > your service and pumping up your Alexa rankings. Who knows when this
> > user is going to uncover the next viral "Lazy Sunday" video? Oh, if
> > only we had more users like HH32! Heck, I don't put it past YouTube
> > and some others to be paying or specifically rewarding/encouraging
> > users to engage in this type of activity. Maybe they could win a free
> > iPod!
> >
> > Now, I'm happy to watch South Park as much as the next 27 year old
> > guy. But that doesn't make it right for these companies to host and
> > distribute content for which they do not have permission... maybe they
> > should talk to South Park's syndicate and I'm sure they'd be happy to
> > cut a deal, though it might cost a pretty penny.
> 

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Who owns culture?

[T . Whid]

I've not watched this video but I've heard Lessig say many times that
he's not *against* copyright or other IP laws in general. He is
against certain laws in the USA pertaining to these issues.

He's also against how copyright in a practical sense is the province
of rich corps and their lawyers. That is, he argues that tho something
may fall under 'fair use,' in a practical sense fair use doesn't exist
because most individuals can't afford to make a fair use arg before a
court of law.

On 4/7/06, David Dundas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Maybe that's his general argument, but in this talk, which is a
> challenge to incite discussion he does question the premise of copyright.
>
> Did you get the opportunity to watch it?
>
> --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Bill Streeter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> wrote:
> >
> > I think your misrepresenting Lessig slightly. He doesn't really
> > argue against copyright, he argues against the way they are
> > currently written. There's a difference.
> >
> > Bill Streeter
> > LO-FI SAINT LOUIS
> > www.lofistl.com
> >
> > --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "David Dundas" 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Group,
> > >
> > > I don't typically post videos from YouAreTV in forums, but I think
> > this
> > > one is very pertinent.
> > >
> > > Lawrence Lessig did an introductory talk at the New York Public
> > Library
> > > about copyright law and technology on April 7, 2005.
> > >
> > > http://www.youare.tv/watch.php?id=534
> > > 
> > >
> > > He says that copyright laws stifle creativity, and democracy.
> > It's an
> > > idea that begs the question. Would you stop creating what you
> > create if
> > > someone could just take it and do whatever they wanted with it?
> > The
> > > content creators I talk to are seeking exposure today, so they are
> > > willing to place their content wherever they can.  As some of them
> > grow
> > > in popularity, I am sure that we'll see them become more
> > protective over
> > > their work.
> > >
> > > It's a great presentation.  Lessig is a very smart guy.
> > >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


--
www.mteww.com


 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Re: [videoblogging] Microsoft orders you to change your web-pages

[T . Whid]

More on this:http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1895,1944867,00.aspOn 3/31/06, Michael Sullivan
 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:



Actually, what we really need is SMIL support.
i  work with SMIL.if interested you can see SMIL being used to render 'vodcast playlists' on 
vlogdir.com.it converts RSS to SMIL, taking only the Quicktime compatible media enclosures (dependent on mime type specified in RSS at the moment) and inserting embedded hyperlinks to the permalinks (click the video).
most vodcasts use quicktime compatible media (especially since the viPod came out) so this helps.  As more people have better compressed mp4 video, i've even noticed buffer issues become less common.  

as much as i think smil is cool i'm also preparing an flv vodcast playlist generator, since this is a web based experience.  sull
On 3/30/06, Charles Iliya Krempeaux
 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:




Hello,On 3/30/06, Michael Verdi <

[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:





http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=30643Does this affect videobloggers? What do ActiveX controls do?
In IE, ActiveX controls let you play video right in your web page.  (So, no more doing that I suppose.)What we really need is native/built-in Video (and Audio) support, built right into the browser.  (And not need plug-ins for it.)
Actually, what we really need is SMIL support.  (SMIL is a markup language similar to HTML, but adds video, audio, and timing.)  
SMIL's actually a perfect fit for us vloggers, vidcasters, vodcasters, Internet TV makers, etc.
See ya-- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, 
B.Sc.charles @ 

reptile.ca
supercanadian @ gmail.com

developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/


___ 

Make Television
http://maketelevision.com/






  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  



Individual
  
  


Fireant
  
  


Use
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



   Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.

 
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: 

[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service

.



  








-- Sull
http://vlogdir.com http://SpreadTheMedia.org


  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



   Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
 
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service
.



  








-- www.mteww.com


  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



   Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. 
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Microsoft orders you to change your web-pages

[T . Whid]

FYI,

In MSIE 7, the xmlhttprequest object will be built-in:
http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2006/01/23/516393.aspx

On 3/31/06, Enric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Humm, haven't looked at Ajax.  But if it can load the activex control
> from an external javascript, it's supposed to work.
>
>   -- Enric
>
> --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Michael Sullivan"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > and how about this-
> >
> http://blog.thinkphp.de/archives/43-AJAX-redesign-your-PHP-applications.html
> >
> >
> > On 3/30/06, Enric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Yea, I just downloaded IE 7 Beta 2 and saw the problem on a sample
> > > page with embeded quicktime.  According to the MSDN docs, you can
> > > still automaticaly load an embedded object like quicktime, windows
> > > media, flash, etc.  It needs to be loaded through an external
> > > javascript file.  The procedures and examples are at:
> > >
> > >
> http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/workshop/author/dh...
> > > http://tinyurl.com/aovax
> > >
> > > vPIP is an external javascript that uses one of the procedures
> > > Microsoft provides for automatically embedding.  I tested it on IE 7
> > > and it works as in IE 6 and Firefox.
> > >
> > >   -- Enric
> > >   --
> > >
> > > P.S.  I mistakenly entered earlier a response through the google
> > > groups view which doesn't show up on yahoo groups.  So if your viewing
> > > through google groups you'll see a prior similar responses.
> > >
> > > --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, T.Whid  wrote:
> > > >
> > > > This is for real, I've been seeing the issue on some MSIE
> installs but
> > > > can't seem to pin down why some browsers exhibit the 'Click to
> run an
> > > > ActiveX control on this webpage" alert and some don't. I have tested
> > > > with the exact same versions on different machines and have seen
> > > > different behavior.
> > > >
> > > > Here is Microsoft's official workaround:
> > > > http://tinyurl.com/8ntst
> > > >
> > > > And here's some more info re: timetable etc:
> > > > http://tinyurl.com/rb9lg
> > > >
> > > > Note, it's a problem not only with object tags but also embed
> tags and
> > > > applet tags. And if users have a  certain advanced checkbox
> unchecked
> > > > (see the first url above) they'll see the alert anyway no matter
> what
> > > > web page authors do (except force their users to use another browser
> > > > of course).
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 3/30/06, Devlon  wrote:
> > > > > On 3/30/06, Markus Sandy  wrote:
> > > > > >  they load your videos!!!
> > > > > >
> > > > > >  this looks like there's going to have to be some workarounds
> > > > >
> > > > > I can think of one real easy one :)
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >  Michael Verdi wrote:
> > > > > >  http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=30643
> > > > > >
> > > > > >  Does this affect videobloggers? What do ActiveX controls do?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >  -Verdi
> > > > > >
> > > > > >  --
> > > > > >  Me: http://michaelverdi.com
> > > > > >  R&D: http://evilvlog.com
> > > > > >  Learn to videoblog: http://freevlog.org
> > > > > >  Learn to videoblog in person: http://node101.org
> > > > > >
> > > > > >  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >  Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > > > > >   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > >
> > > > > >  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> > > Service.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Markus Sandy
> > > > > >
> > > > > > http://apperceptions.org
> > > > > > http://spinflow.org
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >  
> > > > > >  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >  Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > > > > >  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > >
> > > > > >  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> > > Service.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >  
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > ~Devlon
> > > > > http://loadedpun.com - blogs, vlogs and video goodness
> > > > > http://mefeedia.com - The easiest way to find free video podcasts
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > www.mteww.com
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Sull
> > http://vlogdir.com
> > http://SpreadTheMedia.org
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


--
www.mteww.com


 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
  

Re: [videoblogging] Microsoft orders you to change your web-pages

[T . Whid]

This is for real, I've been seeing the issue on some MSIE installs but
can't seem to pin down why some browsers exhibit the 'Click to run an
ActiveX control on this webpage" alert and some don't. I have tested
with the exact same versions on different machines and have seen
different behavior.

Here is Microsoft's official workaround:
http://tinyurl.com/8ntst

And here's some more info re: timetable etc:
http://tinyurl.com/rb9lg

Note, it's a problem not only with object tags but also embed tags and
applet tags. And if users have a  certain advanced checkbox unchecked
(see the first url above) they'll see the alert anyway no matter what
web page authors do (except force their users to use another browser
of course).


On 3/30/06, Devlon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/30/06, Markus Sandy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >  they load your videos!!!
> >
> >  this looks like there's going to have to be some workarounds
>
> I can think of one real easy one :)
>
> >
> >
> >
> >  Michael Verdi wrote:
> >  http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=30643
> >
> >  Does this affect videobloggers? What do ActiveX controls do?
> >
> >  -Verdi
> >
> >  --
> >  Me: http://michaelverdi.com
> >  R&D: http://evilvlog.com
> >  Learn to videoblog: http://freevlog.org
> >  Learn to videoblog in person: http://node101.org
> >
> >  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
> >
> >
> >  Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
> >
> >  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> >   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> >
> > Markus Sandy
> >
> > http://apperceptions.org
> > http://spinflow.org
> >
> >
> >
> >  
> >  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
> >
> >
> >  Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
> >
> >  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> >  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
> >
> >  
> >
>
>
> --
> ~Devlon
> http://loadedpun.com - blogs, vlogs and video goodness
> http://mefeedia.com - The easiest way to find free video podcasts
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


--
www.mteww.com


 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Re: [videoblogging] Fhameless

[T . Whid]

That. was. super. funny.On 3/17/06, Adam Quirk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:



To make this easier for you, I've changed all the following S's into F's, and all the F's into types of tea:Hello,Iearlgray you enjoy watching The PAN, darjeelingeel greenree to fteal one of our badgef from thif page:
http://thepan.org/badges/And ienglishbreakfast you enjoy reading about what the orangepekoeuck we're up to, then you may alfo enjoy reading our blog:

http://thepan.org/blog/That'f all for now.Pleafe watch the neweft Carp Caviar and the lateft Finging Woodchuck on today'f PAN!Oolongorever yourf,AQ
thepan.org






  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  


Individual
  
  

Fireant
  
  

Use
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



   Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
 
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service
.



  








-- www.mteww.com





  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Individual
  
  
Fireant
  
  
Use
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



   Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. 
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  

Re: [videoblogging] Technical Challange

[T . Whid]

re: regular ethernet as crossover

I have no idea :-)

On 3/7/06, Pete Prodoehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> T.Whid wrote:
> > I vote crossover cable.
> >
> > Then mount either the PC volume on the mac or vice versa and copy over
> > the data. If you don't have a crossover cable you can use the ipod to
> > transfer the stuff. You'll need to decide if it will take longer to
> > copy the data twice or got and get a crossover cable.
> >
> > You have to make sure to get a crossover cable, not a regular ethernet 
> > cable.
>
> Hmmm, actually, didn't the recent PowerBooks have the ability to use any
> ethernet cable as a crossover cable by switching internally via software?
>
> Pete
>
> --
> http://tinkernet.org/
> videoblog for the future...
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


--
www.mteww.com


 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Re: [videoblogging] Technical Challange

[T . Whid]

I vote crossover cable.

Then mount either the PC volume on the mac or vice versa and copy over
the data. If you don't have a crossover cable you can use the ipod to
transfer the stuff. You'll need to decide if it will take longer to
copy the data twice or got and get a crossover cable.

You have to make sure to get a crossover cable, not a regular ethernet cable.

On 3/7/06, Pete Prodoehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Frida Kahlo wrote:
> > hi guys
> >
> > I have a technical problem for the mac boys.
> > (its ten years since I last played with macs)
> >
> > In the left corner we have an IBM laptop running windows XP pro. In the 
> > right corner a brand new powerbook running OS X. In the centre a day old 
> > ipod + various cables.  Optional extras,a digital camera , a packet of 
> > blank cds, a pdf of ipod instructions and an OS X manual.
> >
> > Q. How to transfer 8 gig of image and video files from pc to mac in the 
> > most efficient manner.
>
> Ethernet crossover cable. It creates a network between two computers.
> You just need to set up the networking on each machine, and you should
> be able to mount the Mac volume on the Windows machine if you turn on
> 'Windows Sharing' in the Sharing Preference Pane.
>
>
> Pete
>
> --
> http://tinkernet.org/
> videoblog for the future...
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


--
www.mteww.com


 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Re: [videoblogging] iTunes one-click subscribe button

[T . Whid]

I found this tidbit as well:http://www.podcast411.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=98 (scroll down a little over halfway to the post about itpc)It talks about using an itpc protocal (instead of pcast). Not sure which version of iTunes it works with or if it works on both Windows and Mac. 
Works on my Mac with iTunes 6.0.2 using Firfox 1.5, Safari 2 and IE 5.2. I'll test tomorrow with a PC.re: the phobus URLs, they only work if you have the feed included in the iTMS already.
On 2/26/06, André Sala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:



>From the iTunes Podcasting FAQ:


http://www.apple.com/itunes/podcasts/faq.html

  How do I link to my podcast page on iTunes? Right-click
or Ctrl-click on your podcast image in iTunes to copy the URL for your
podcast page. The URL will begin "http://phobos.apple.com/" When a
user clicks on this link, the http:// prefix calls the default browser,
and the phobos prefix calls the iTunes application.


I believe that should work for Macs and PCs...

I've seen many different badges for the iTunes one click, and as far as
I can tell, there is no official one.  Here are a few nice ones I
found around the web: (you might want to get permission from these
sites before re-using these badges, as they may have created them)

http://www.magicalmountain.net/images/rss/badge_itunes.gif
http://www.innovationtip.com/badge_itunes.gif
http://homepage.mac.com/stevegarfield/.Pictures/badge_itunes.gif
http://digitallifetv.com/themes/blogs/digitallifetv/images/feeds/button_itunes.gif

http://www.leanbackvids.com/i/images/meta/itunes.png

And don't forget to make FireAnt and TVTonic one-click buttons too!

http://fireant.tv/buttonmaker

http://tvtonic.com/partners/promote/

- AndréOn 2/26/06, wazman_au <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
Hello vloggers,I'm trying to figure out how to add one of those one-click iTunessubscribe buttons.Mefeedia says you need two buttons - one mac, one PC - but it seemsthere's another way of doing it that works on both platforms, and the
button looks like an official Apple thing so I guess Apple are behind it.If anyone could let me know (off-list if preferred) it would be great.Waz

www.crashtestkitchen.com







  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  


Individual
  
  

Fireant
  
  

Use
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



   Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
 
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service
.



  








-- www.mteww.com





  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Individual
  
  
Fireant
  
  
Use
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



   Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. 
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  

Re: [videoblogging] Re: how to make a "feed" page redirect to feedburner?

[T . Whid]

dreamhost allows you to use .htaccess files.On 2/23/06, Deirdre Straughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:


I've been struggling with this as well. I don't think I have access to my .htaccess on DreamHost, so I'm using a manual approach. I wanted to get the iTunes people moved over, so I put this into my feed (per instructions from somewhere on the Apple site, which I found in this group I think):
http://feeds.feedburner.com/DeirdrStraughan
I changed my real feed (the one I give FeedBurner as a source) to a new, non-publicized address, and  changed the old feed to have only one item, which asks subscribers to subscribe to the FeedBurner feed instead.
Each of these steps bumped up my FB subscriptions a bit, though it's still nothing to shout about... I'm still getting a lot of pings on the old feed. Presumably those are from people who aren't actually reading/watching anyway, or don't care enough to change the address so they can keep up with new stuff.
-- best regards,Deirdré Straughanwww.beginningwithi.com
 (personal)www.tvblob.com (work)





  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  


Individual
  
  

Fireant
  
  

Use
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



   Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
 
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service
.



  








-- www.mteww.com





  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Individual
  
  
Fireant
  
  
Use
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



   Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. 
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  

Re: [videoblogging] how to make a "feed" page redirect to feedburner?

[T . Whid]

I posted this to the original thread but here it is again:.htaccess method to redirect to feedburner from your own domain:http://www.stopdesign.com/log/2005/04/20/feedburning.html
On 2/22/06, Richard Show <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:



... first ... thanks!... second, I changed the subject, because I would really like to know about this redirect thing, since it helps feed my illusion of permanence ... below
On 2/22/06, 
Michael Verdi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

3.) I say yes - and do that for the wordpress vlogs that I have. There is also some redirect thing that you can do so that you can use feedburner without using the feedburner address so that in case you decided to drop feedburner you could do so without messing up your feed (how's that for a long sentence?). I don't know how this works but I know that Clint Sharp knows.
... second ... I would like to know aobut this last thing, I'm assuming it would be something like... 
mydomain.com/feed  ... and that page would automatically go to feedburner ... which would use the wordpress feed to make a good 
2.0 enclosures feed... there would be something on mydomain.com/feed that would make it go to the feedburner address - something in the html header perhaps? that simple?

-- Richard http://www.richardshow.com





  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  


Individual
  
  

Fireant
  
  

Use
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



   Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
 
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service
.



  








-- www.mteww.com





  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Individual
  
  
Fireant
  
  
Use
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



   Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. 
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  

Re: [videoblogging] wordpress feeds questions

[T . Whid]

Two things:

1) good instructions on how to use feedburner with a url on your own domain:
http://www.stopdesign.com/log/2005/04/20/feedburning.html

2) wordpress will only pick up enclosures if the mime type is being
sent correctly from the server. In other words, if you're using a m4v
or mp4 the server might not be set-up correctly. You can fix this if
you can use .htaccess files on your video server.

hope this helps


On 2/22/06, Arnþór Snær <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wordpress still seems to have issues with putting some video filetypes
> in enclosures.
>
> A plugin called Podpress promises to fix that, but i havent tried it.
>
> To have the video link in the enclosures, i add a custom field when
> posting, called "enclosure" and include the link and the bytesize of
> the video.
>
>
> I thought at first feedburner would take care of this for me when it
> picked up the wordpress feed but no.
>
> -A
>


--
www.mteww.com


 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Re: [videoblogging] Apple ditching its OS and going to Windows???

[T . Whid]

This is the stupidest thing I've ever heard.Dvorak started this rumor.http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1895,1923151,00.asp
On 2/22/06, Paul Knight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


Scary, I am afraid though if this happens I will dump my computer and go and live in the woods.Can't they devolop a virus to wipe out Windows for good.  It's slow buggy and a pile of plop.  Apple is how a computer should be, easy.
2pOn 22 Feb 2006, at 20:57, Its A Mystery and So Im I wrote:I found this interesting item on another yahoogroup.
  --   "The idea that Apple would ditch its own OS for Microsoft Windows came  to me from Yakov Epstein, a professor of psychology at Rutgers  University, who wrote to me convinced that the process had already 
 begun."   http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,185221,00.html   
SPONSORED LINKS
  
Individual  
Fireant  
Use YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
  Visit your group "videoblogging
" on the web.    To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]    Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the 
Yahoo! Terms of Service. 





  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  


Individual
  
  

Fireant
  
  

Use
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



   Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
 
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service
.



  







-- www.mteww.com





  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Individual
  
  
Fireant
  
  
Use
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



   Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. 
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  

Re: [videoblogging] Get Democracy: free and open-source internet TV

[T . Whid]

FYIThere is no public_html directory on dreamhost, it would be the directory that is named as your domain.On 2/22/06, Deirdre Straughan <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


Having some trouble with this. Let me put on my bitchy hat...When I try to submit my RSS feed as a new channel, clicking the Submit a New Channel button (green) just keeps reloading the same page.I find it a bit questionable that your toolbar seems to be copied from iTunes. This does not inspire confidence. Get your own graphics!
As to installing Broadcast Machine, I tried to do this months ago on my old webhost, and they wouldn't let me - probably didn't like the idea of me putting some script they'd never heard of on their servers (and who can blame them?).
Your instructions now say:Installing Broadcast Machine


Download Broadcast Machine and open the zip file.Copy the folder "bm" to the public_html directory on your website.
Point your browser to 
www.yourwebsite.com/bmIf you see a login screen, you're ready to go.  Just create your first account.
I know a little about managing my site via DreamHost (my new provider), but this seems to be aimed at users more expert than myself - I can't find any directory labeled public_html. 
So... not quite as easy as it needs to be if you want this to be truly broad-based and democratic.On 2/22/06, 
cooperwef <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Hi VideoBloggers,Tiffiniy with Participatory Culture here. Big news, good news: we've just released the beta
version for Windows of our flagship video player (formerly known as DTV)!We're also announcing a new name for this free and open-source internet TV platform:Democracy. It's perfect for videobloggers and independent publishers -- covers everything
from publishing videos, to watching them in fullscreen, to sharing them over the net.You can download the Democracy player for Windows right now, free of charge as always,on our new community website:

http://www.getdemocracy.com/Mac users: you can grab an updated version 0.8 of Democracy for Mac on GetDemocracyas well. There's a version for Linux users also, so Democracy is now officially cross-platform.
On GetDemocracy.com, you'll find lots of new materials: case studies of how the platformflows together, buttons for you to post on your website to help promote open internet TV,testimonials from actual internet users, help documentation, user forums, and more.
Tthere's an opportunity for all of us to build a new, open mass medium of onlinetelevision. We're developing the Democracy internet TV platform so that watching internetvideo channels will be as easy as watching TV and broadcasting a channel will be open to
everyone, and unlike traditional TV, everyone will have a voice.The Democracy platform encompasses four open-source and open-standards tools we'vereleased over the past year:1. Democracy player. Now available in beta for Windows, Mac, and Linux. New features
include built-in video search— just type your search terms into Democracy and see whatthere is to watch out there on the web. Also, Videobomb integaration—you can now"bomb" videos you like from within Democracy player, linking up with the 
Videobomb.comwebsite. It's all coming together.2. Democracy Channel Guide. Recently re-designed, a welcoming home base for internet
TV. Now features over 300 channels (yes!!!) of fascinating internet video with more being
added every day. Please feel free to submit your channel (an RSS feed with videos) bygoing here, it's entirely free:
https://channelguide.participatoryculture.org/?q=submitchannel
3. Broadcast Machine. Free video publishing software. Provides instant video capacity forindividuals and organizations -- it's easy publishing for videoblogs, the interface is justlike blogging software. Optional BitTorrent publishing makes broadcasting video
affordable for anyone.4. Videobomb.com. The new social bookmarking website for video. Watch and support the
best video on the web. Share with friends & family. It's like Digg + 
del.icio.us for video.Please forward this widely, write about us, tell your friends about us, and write back to this
e-mail with your feedback, we welcome your thoughts on the Democracy platform.
Thanks!Participatory Culture – Holmes, Nicholas, Tiffiniy, Nick, David, Geoff, Matt, Colin, Luc, andfriends.
www.getdemocracy.com
Yahoo! Groups Links<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:

http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/-- best regards,Deirdré Straughan
www.beginningwithi.com (personal)
www.tvblob.com (work)





  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  


Individual
  
  

Fireant
  
  

Use
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



   Visit your group "videoblogging" on th

[videoblogging] new video aggregator for Windows

[T . Whid]

>From the press release:

Participatory Culture is excited to announce that we've just released
the beta version for Windows of our video player. With this last piece
falling into place, we're also announcing a new name for this free and
open-source internet TV platform: Democracy.

You can download the Democracy player for Windows right now, free as
always, on our new community website:

http://www.getdemocracy.com/


--
www.mteww.com


 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

[videoblogging] iPod video owners: check a vid for me?

[t . whid]

Hi all,

If any iPod video owners would like to do me a favor and test a video 
for me -- i need to ensure it plays on an iPod -- that would be lovely.

Please email me offlist and I'll send you a download URL.

Thanks!

===
http://www.mteww.com
===



 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--> 
Get Bzzzy! (real tools to help you find a job). Welcome to the Sweet Life.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/A77XvD/vlQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
~-> 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

[videoblogging] multiple feeds with Wordpress?

[t . whid]

Hi videobloggers,

Wondering if anyone knows a simple technique, method or plugin that 
allows a single Wordpress installation to create multiple feeds.

I want to have one installation create a feed for QuickTime and a feed 
for Windows Media.

If there isn't a solution already, perhaps I'll create one.

Thanks,

===
http://www.mteww.com
===



 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--> 
Get Bzzzy! (real tools to help you find a job). Welcome to the Sweet Life.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/A77XvD/vlQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
~-> 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

[videoblogging] CPU cannot handle h264

[t . whid]

Found this via digg.com

http://theinquirer.net/?article=24954

"We were shocked when we found out that the Athlon 64, FX, dual core 
X2, Pentium 4 or even dual core Pentium D won't be able to play this 
content for you. It's simply too complicated for the poor CPU to play 
back."

===
http://www.mteww.com
===







  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Individual
  
  
Fireant
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



   Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. 
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  

[videoblogging] iTunes storage of XML?

[t . whid]

Hi everyone,

Slightly off-topic, but, close enough to kiss the topic IMHO.

Does anyone know where iTunes stows the XML (RSS) it downloads for 
feeds? Looking for the location on a Mac system.

Thanks,

===
http://www.mteww.com
===




  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



   Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. 
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.