[videoblogging] Re: 1920x1080 conversion for web video???
Nice find, Mike. :) --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "mjcarrasquillo2002" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > Caleb, great to meet you, digitally... Instead of memorizing everything and just get things > done, you could grab the aspect ratio calculator... > > http://www.wideopendoors.net/design/aspect_ratio_calculator.html > > --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Caleb J. Clark" wrote: > > > > Does does anyone have online resource for the math, or dimensions that > > will scale correctly so I can pick any size I want and change it. And > > is putting letter box into normal res smarter? etc. > > > > I've been feeling like such an idiot working with getting my new Canon > > 1920x1080 footage to the web (YouTube, Blip) without messing up the > > aspect ratio. Using FCE 4, the drop down compression is > > confusing...There's 16x9 and 4x3 settings for 720x480, etc. Then > > there's the "preserve aspect ratio" options, and more often then not > > my video ends up squeezed. > > > > I just came up this post here, and I'm trying it. > > > > http://www.foureyedmonsters.com/distributing-your-videos-on-the-web/ > > Heath Says: > > November 11th, 2007 at 9:04 pm > > Thanks, Arin, you rock. If anyone is using ***HDV 1080i/p footage, > > your frame size in QuickTime Pro/Conversion can be 600 x 338.*** This > > was given to me by Jon Fordham, who shot parts of Four Eyed Monsters > > and my feature film 9:04 AM. It's been GREAT! > > >
[videoblogging] Re: 1920x1080 conversion for web video???
My pleasure. ___ Michael J. Carrasquillo Director | Filmmaker | Musician MY SITECAST: http://www.michaelcarrasquillo.com MY VIDEOCAST: http://www.thetrialsofbeingmike.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Caleb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Big help, thanks. The video's aspect ratio is intact and it looks > better (http://www.lakeplacidfilmforum.com/) > > ~ > ~ Caleb J. Clark > ~ Portfolio: http://www.plocktau.com > ~ "The problem with communication is the assumption it has been > accomplished." - G. B. Shaw. > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >
[videoblogging] Re: 1920x1080 conversion for web video???
Big help, thanks. The video's aspect ratio is intact and it looks better (http://www.lakeplacidfilmforum.com/) ~ ~ Caleb J. Clark ~ Portfolio: http://www.plocktau.com ~ "The problem with communication is the assumption it has been accomplished." - G. B. Shaw. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[videoblogging] Re: 1920x1080 conversion for web video???
Hello everyone, Caleb, great to meet you, digitally... Instead of memorizing everything and just get things done, you could grab the aspect ratio calculator... http://www.wideopendoors.net/design/aspect_ratio_calculator.html --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Caleb J. Clark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Does does anyone have online resource for the math, or dimensions that > will scale correctly so I can pick any size I want and change it. And > is putting letter box into normal res smarter? etc. > > I've been feeling like such an idiot working with getting my new Canon > 1920x1080 footage to the web (YouTube, Blip) without messing up the > aspect ratio. Using FCE 4, the drop down compression is > confusing...There's 16x9 and 4x3 settings for 720x480, etc. Then > there's the "preserve aspect ratio" options, and more often then not > my video ends up squeezed. > > I just came up this post here, and I'm trying it. > > http://www.foureyedmonsters.com/distributing-your-videos-on-the-web/ > Heath Says: > November 11th, 2007 at 9:04 pm > Thanks, Arin, you rock. If anyone is using ***HDV 1080i/p footage, > your frame size in QuickTime Pro/Conversion can be 600 x 338.*** This > was given to me by Jon Fordham, who shot parts of Four Eyed Monsters > and my feature film 9:04 AM. It's been GREAT! >
Re: [videoblogging] Re: 1920x1080 conversion for web video???
As I understand it - it is advisable to have both dimensions divisible by 16 for the best encode by YouTube etc, so 480x272 might be preferable to 480x270 and 640x352 preferable to 640x360. Can anyone confirm? joly "Bill Cammack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >wrote: >> >> Hey Caleb. Long time no see. :) >> >> the dimensions are 16x9, across the board: >> >> 1920x1080 >> 1280x720 >> 960x540 >> 720x400 > >error. This should read 640x360. >> 600x360 > >> 480x270 >> --- WWWhatsup NYC http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com ---
[videoblogging] Re: 1920x1080 conversion for web video???
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Bill Cammack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hey Caleb. Long time no see. :) > > the dimensions are 16x9, across the board: > > 1920x1080 > 1280x720 > 960x540 > 720x400 error. This should read 640x360. > 600x360 > 480x270 > > If you're using AppleTV, the dimensions are dependent upon your frame > rate: > > 1280x720 @ 24fps > 960x540 @ 30fps > > Cheers! > Bill > http://billcammack.com > > > --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Caleb J. Clark" > wrote: > > > > Does does anyone have online resource for the math, or dimensions that > > will scale correctly so I can pick any size I want and change it. And > > is putting letter box into normal res smarter? etc. > > > > I've been feeling like such an idiot working with getting my new Canon > > 1920x1080 footage to the web (YouTube, Blip) without messing up the > > aspect ratio. Using FCE 4, the drop down compression is > > confusing...There's 16x9 and 4x3 settings for 720x480, etc. Then > > there's the "preserve aspect ratio" options, and more often then not > > my video ends up squeezed. > > > > I just came up this post here, and I'm trying it. > > > > http://www.foureyedmonsters.com/distributing-your-videos-on-the-web/ > > Heath Says: > > November 11th, 2007 at 9:04 pm > > Thanks, Arin, you rock. If anyone is using ***HDV 1080i/p footage, > > your frame size in QuickTime Pro/Conversion can be 600 x 338.*** This > > was given to me by Jon Fordham, who shot parts of Four Eyed Monsters > > and my feature film 9:04 AM. It's been GREAT! > > >
[videoblogging] Re: 1920x1080 conversion for web video???
Hey Caleb. Long time no see. :) the dimensions are 16x9, across the board: 1920x1080 1280x720 960x540 720x400 600x360 480x270 If you're using AppleTV, the dimensions are dependent upon your frame rate: 1280x720 @ 24fps 960x540 @ 30fps Cheers! Bill http://billcammack.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Caleb J. Clark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Does does anyone have online resource for the math, or dimensions that > will scale correctly so I can pick any size I want and change it. And > is putting letter box into normal res smarter? etc. > > I've been feeling like such an idiot working with getting my new Canon > 1920x1080 footage to the web (YouTube, Blip) without messing up the > aspect ratio. Using FCE 4, the drop down compression is > confusing...There's 16x9 and 4x3 settings for 720x480, etc. Then > there's the "preserve aspect ratio" options, and more often then not > my video ends up squeezed. > > I just came up this post here, and I'm trying it. > > http://www.foureyedmonsters.com/distributing-your-videos-on-the-web/ > Heath Says: > November 11th, 2007 at 9:04 pm > Thanks, Arin, you rock. If anyone is using ***HDV 1080i/p footage, > your frame size in QuickTime Pro/Conversion can be 600 x 338.*** This > was given to me by Jon Fordham, who shot parts of Four Eyed Monsters > and my feature film 9:04 AM. It's been GREAT! >
