Re: [Videolib] thanks for all the help with my Swank

2010-09-18 Thread Steffen, James M
Sorry, I forgot to paste in the correct subject.

 As much as I appreciate 35mm, I generally recommend that my film programmers 
 avoid booking old 35mm prints, because the large distributors can't easily 
 control  or guarantee the quality of the print shipped.

Sandra, that's an excellent point. If I were a programmer, I would steer away 
from renting such prints altogether for precisely the reasons you describe. 
However, instructors usually have very specific reasons why they want to show 
particular films when they're tied to a course. By now they realize it's a crap 
shoot.

 I'm not sure that Swank always gets easy access to new prints of old films, 
 even on new reissues.

Actually, that's true. The studios maintain completely separate print pools for 
theatrical and non-theatrical venues. For example, there are always 
good-looking 35mm prints of 2001: A SPACE ODYSSEY that theatrical venues can 
rent, but the last I heard it was no longer possible to obtain *any* 35mm print 
of 2001 non-theatrically. Just because there's a new print showing in theaters 
does not mean that's what you'll get if you're a non-theatrical outfit. Swank 
probably has no say in this.

At some point in the future, we'll all be able to show pristine 2K or 4K 
digital versions of many older (and newer) films. But for now I think most 
colleges are stuck with 35mm, and still more can show only DVDs. I suspect that 
relatively few can handle even Blu-ray discs at this point.

--
James M. Steffen, PhD
Film and Media Studies Librarian
Theater and Dance Subject Liaison
Marian K. Heilbrun Music and Media Library
Emory University
540 Asbury Circle
Atlanta, GA 30322-2870
Phone: (404) 727-8107
FAX: (404) 727-2257

--

Message: 1
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 19:45:20 -0400
From: Jackson, Sandra F. jackso...@uncw.edu
Subject: Re: [Videolib] thanks for all the help with my Swank
question!
To: videolib@lists.berkeley.edu videolib@lists.berkeley.edu
Message-ID:
88185c1f3afb384bb1bcc3de86115581150a76d...@uncwexmb1.dcs.uncw.edu
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

I've run 35mm theaters for the past decade and am a skilled projectionist, as 
well as a manager.As much as I appreciate 35mm, I generally recommend that 
my film programmers avoid booking old 35mm prints, because the large 
distributors can't easily control  or guarantee the quality of the print 
shipped.You could get lucky and get a good print.  Or the color may be 
washed out.  Or the print could be dirty.   Or the sound will be damaged.  Or 
the print may have scene jumps caused by numerous splices required after 
unfortunate brain wraps,  tail wraps, or other projection disasters. Older 
films are far more likely to be brittle and prone to breakage than new prints.


Your best bet is to create a very good relationship with your booker, in hopes 
that that person will manage the shipment with a bit more detail, rather than 
letting the depot send the print that is handy.  Unfortunately, the depot and 
the distributor may not always know a print is bad.Some theaters do not 
report the damage that occurred in their facilities, for fear of incurring 
large charges.  Distributors do not have time to watch every film that is 
shipped back to them, so they rely  on the report of the theater that just 
received the print for the first time.  In fact,  a Criterion rep told me that 
it is nearly impossible to make sure the depot sends a good print regardless of 
the age.  He said he just does not have control over what they ship, regardless 
of his requests. Make sure you build the print in ample time to preview it, 
report problems to the distributor and  get a replacement reel or order a 
replacement print.

It's not fun having an old film break during a show, then having to spice it 
while 300 audience members are staring with hostility at the projection booth.  
The audiences still thinks that a 35mm runs the same way as a VHS tape.  If you 
get it fixed, some bright person in the audience will ask you to do the 
impossible and rewind the film to show it without the break.  Younger audience 
members probably think that it runs like a DVD and have even less tolerance for 
technical difficulties.

If you do decide to show an old 35mm, educate your audience about the possible 
challenges, so they will be patient if you experience technical difficulties.

By the way, I have received excellent customer service from Swank for the past 
three years, even though our rep has changed three times, so if you have 
trouble with your rep, be sure to report the situation.
Sandra F. Jackson
Film Program Coordinator
Lumina Theater  Sharky's Box Office
Department of Campus Life
The University of North Carolina Wilmington
Phone 910.962.7971  Fax: 910-962-7438
jackso...@uncw.edu
http://www.uncw.edu/lumina
NOTICE: Emails sent and received in the course of university business are 
subject to the North 

Re: [Videolib] thanks for all the help with my Swank question!

2010-09-17 Thread Jackson, Sandra F.
I've run 35mm theaters for the past decade and am a skilled projectionist, as 
well as a manager.As much as I appreciate 35mm, I generally recommend that 
my film programmers avoid booking old 35mm prints, because the large 
distributors can't easily control  or guarantee the quality of the print 
shipped.You could get lucky and get a good print.  Or the color may be 
washed out.  Or the print could be dirty.   Or the sound will be damaged.  Or 
the print may have scene jumps caused by numerous splices required after 
unfortunate brain wraps,  tail wraps, or other projection disasters. Older 
films are far more likely to be brittle and prone to breakage than new prints.

I'm not sure that Swank always gets easy access to new prints of old films, 
even on new reissues.

Your best bet is to create a very good relationship with your booker, in hopes 
that that person will manage the shipment with a bit more detail, rather than 
letting the depot send the print that is handy.  Unfortunately, the depot and 
the distributor may not always know a print is bad.Some theaters do not 
report the damage that occurred in their facilities, for fear of incurring 
large charges.  Distributors do not have time to watch every film that is 
shipped back to them, so they rely  on the report of the theater that just 
received the print for the first time.  In fact,  a Criterion rep told me that 
it is nearly impossible to make sure the depot sends a good print regardless of 
the age.  He said he just does not have control over what they ship, regardless 
of his requests. Make sure you build the print in ample time to preview it, 
report problems to the distributor and  get a replacement reel or order a 
replacement print.

It's not fun having an old film break during a show, then having to spice it 
while 300 audience members are staring with hostility at the projection booth.  
The audiences still thinks that a 35mm runs the same way as a VHS tape.  If you 
get it fixed, some bright person in the audience will ask you to do the 
impossible and rewind the film to show it without the break.  Younger audience 
members probably think that it runs like a DVD and have even less tolerance for 
technical difficulties.

If you do decide to show an old 35mm, educate your audience about the possible 
challenges, so they will be patient if you experience technical difficulties.

By the way, I have received excellent customer service from Swank for the past 
three years, even though our rep has changed three times, so if you have 
trouble with your rep, be sure to report the situation.
Sandra F. Jackson
Film Program Coordinator
Lumina Theater  Sharky's Box Office
Department of Campus Life
The University of North Carolina Wilmington
Phone 910.962.7971  Fax: 910-962-7438
jackso...@uncw.edu
http://www.uncw.edu/lumina
NOTICE: Emails sent and received in the course of university business are 
subject to the North Carolina Public Records Act (N.C.G.S. ยง132-1 et seq.) and 
may be released to the public unless an exception applies.


From: videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu 
[mailto:videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu] On Behalf Of Jessica Rosner
Sent: Monday, September 13, 2010 11:55 AM
To: videolib@lists.berkeley.edu
Subject: Re: [Videolib] thanks for all the help with my Swank question!

I would not bet on the Swank salesperson being a big film buff. Things might 
have changed over the year, but that certainly was not their reputation in the 
past. My favorite of all Swank stories involved a school that had ordered a 
35mm print of classic film for which a studio had done a major reissue just 
about a year before. It was not a small reissue and I would bet several dozen 
new/restored prints were made. The programmer reminded the Swank booker to MAKE 
sure they got one the new prints as the old ones were known to be horrid. The 
day of the show the print arrived, it was red, splicy, and very beat up. It was 
clearly a decades old print. The irate programmer called up the Swank booker to 
complain as we could not even show the print. The Swank booker looked up the 
title in the Maltin TV/Movie book and pronounced  The film is 50 years old. 
What did you expect? Apparently they had no concept a NEW print of a 50 year 
old film.

On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 11:16 AM, Dennis Doros 
milefi...@gmail.commailto:milefi...@gmail.com wrote:

On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 10:59 AM, Maureen Tripp 
maureen_tr...@emerson.edumailto:maureen_tr...@emerson.edu wrote:
As Sandra Jackson said, it seems it depends a lot on the film, anticipated 
audience size, and other factors--but I now have a ballpark range of 
estimates--I appreciate it, everyone!


I should also mention that it depends a lot on how well you get along with the 
salesperson at the company. Most of us are in the business because we love 
films. If you discuss favorite films (and books and museums) and what's out 
that week and how's the family, you'll do well. If somebody comes and complains 

[Videolib] thanks for all the help with my Swank question!

2010-09-13 Thread Maureen Tripp
As Sandra Jackson said, it seems it depends a lot on the film, anticipated 
audience size, and other factors--but I now have a ballpark range of 
estimates--I appreciate it, everyone!

VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of issues 
relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic control, 
preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in libraries and 
related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as an effective 
working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of communication 
between libraries,educational institutions, and video producers and 
distributors.


Re: [Videolib] thanks for all the help with my Swank question!

2010-09-13 Thread Dennis Doros
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 10:59 AM, Maureen Tripp
maureen_tr...@emerson.eduwrote:

 As Sandra Jackson said, it seems it depends a lot on the film, anticipated
 audience size, and other factors--but I now have a ballpark range of
 estimates--I appreciate it, everyone!



I should also mention that it depends a lot on how well you get along with
the salesperson at the company. Most of us are in the business because we
love films. If you discuss favorite films (and books and museums) and what's
out that week and how's the family, you'll do well. If somebody comes and
complains that they are non-profit and we should treat them better, they
don't get as good a break. The retired Edith Kramer at the Pacific Film
Archive is a legend in this regard. She would spend two or three hours on
the phone charming the salesperson until she got the rate she could afford.
Funny thing is -- we had the same automatic friends rate for her for twenty
years and she still would spend an hour with us. One of our favorite
customers.

-- 
Best,
Dennis Doros
Milestone Film  Video/Milliarium Zero
PO Box 128
Harrington Park, NJ 07640
Phone: 201-767-3117
Fax: 201-767-3035
email: milefi...@gmail.com
www.milestonefilms.com
www.ontheboweryfilm.com
www.arayafilm.com
www.exilesfilm.com
www.wordisoutmovie.com
www.killerofsheep.com
AMIA Philadelphia 2010: www.amianet.org
Join Milestone Film on Facebook!
VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of issues 
relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic control, 
preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in libraries and 
related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as an effective 
working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of communication 
between libraries,educational institutions, and video producers and 
distributors.


Re: [Videolib] thanks for all the help with my Swank question!

2010-09-13 Thread Jessica Rosner
I would not bet on the Swank salesperson being a big film buff. Things might
have changed over the year, but that certainly was not their reputation in
the past. My favorite of all Swank stories involved a school that had
ordered a 35mm print of classic film for which a studio had done a major
reissue just about a year before. It was not a small reissue and I would bet
several dozen new/restored prints were made. The programmer reminded the
Swank booker to MAKE sure they got one the new prints as the old ones were
known to be horrid. The day of the show the print arrived, it was red,
splicy, and very beat up. It was clearly a decades old print. The irate
programmer called up the Swank booker to complain as we could not even show
the print. The Swank booker looked up the title in the Maltin TV/Movie book
and pronounced  The film is 50 years old. What did you expect? Apparently
they had no concept a NEW print of a 50 year old film.

On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 11:16 AM, Dennis Doros milefi...@gmail.com wrote:



 On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 10:59 AM, Maureen Tripp maureen_tr...@emerson.edu
  wrote:

 As Sandra Jackson said, it seems it depends a lot on the film, anticipated
 audience size, and other factors--but I now have a ballpark range of
 estimates--I appreciate it, everyone!



 I should also mention that it depends a lot on how well you get along with
 the salesperson at the company. Most of us are in the business because we
 love films. If you discuss favorite films (and books and museums) and what's
 out that week and how's the family, you'll do well. If somebody comes and
 complains that they are non-profit and we should treat them better, they
 don't get as good a break. The retired Edith Kramer at the Pacific Film
 Archive is a legend in this regard. She would spend two or three hours on
 the phone charming the salesperson until she got the rate she could afford.
 Funny thing is -- we had the same automatic friends rate for her for twenty
 years and she still would spend an hour with us. One of our favorite
 customers.

 --
 Best,
 Dennis Doros
 Milestone Film  Video/Milliarium Zero
 PO Box 128
 Harrington Park, NJ 07640
 Phone: 201-767-3117
 Fax: 201-767-3035
 email: milefi...@gmail.com
 www.milestonefilms.com
 www.ontheboweryfilm.com
 www.arayafilm.com
 www.exilesfilm.com
 www.wordisoutmovie.com
 www.killerofsheep.com
 AMIA Philadelphia 2010: www.amianet.org
 Join Milestone Film on Facebook!


 VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of issues
 relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic control,
 preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in libraries and
 related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as an effective
 working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of communication
 between libraries,educational institutions, and video producers and
 distributors.


VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of issues 
relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic control, 
preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in libraries and 
related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as an effective 
working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of communication 
between libraries,educational institutions, and video producers and 
distributors.


Re: [Videolib] thanks for all the help with my Swank question!

2010-09-13 Thread Steffen, James M
All too true, Jessica. *Unlike* independent distributors such as Janus, Kino, 
New Yorker and Milestone, the staff at Swank have little knowledge of their 
35mm inventory. The prints are very hit-or-miss. Sometimes they're pristine (as 
was a print OUT OF THE PAST), but other times they're virtually unprojectable 
(ask me offline about our KUNDUN disaster). There's literally no way to find 
out in advance what you're getting.

I think the problem is twofold. Swank has not been investing very much in new 
35mm prints, because it's cheaper and easier for them to rent out DVDs of older 
titles. Also, the major studios themselves are not striking as many prints as 
they used to--many recent restorations are available *only* in digital formats. 
We're seeing fewer and fewer old films available on 35mm, period. It's a shame, 
because most academic institutions lack the equipment to show high definition 
video, effectively leaving them out of the loop apart from lower resolution DVD 
versions. Call me old-fashioned, but there isn't very much magic in watching a 
DVD blown up on a big screen.

--James

--
James M. Steffen, PhD
Film and Media Studies Librarian
Theater, Dance, ILA/IDS and LGBT Subject Liaison
Marian K. Heilbrun Music and Media Library
Emory University
540 Asbury Circle
Atlanta, GA 30322-2870
Phone: (404) 727-8107
FAX: (404) 727-2257
Email: jste...@emory.edu

--

Message: 4
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 11:54:38 -0400
From: Jessica Rosner jessicapros...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [Videolib] thanks for all the help with my Swank
question!
To: videolib@lists.berkeley.edu
Message-ID:
aanlkti=vgy_jxepexyij=7qqb8wyt4hxp0ybz3a1_...@mail.gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

I would not bet on the Swank salesperson being a big film buff. Things might
have changed over the year, but that certainly was not their reputation in
the past. My favorite of all Swank stories involved a school that had
ordered a 35mm print of classic film for which a studio had done a major
reissue just about a year before. It was not a small reissue and I would bet
several dozen new/restored prints were made. The programmer reminded the
Swank booker to MAKE sure they got one the new prints as the old ones were
known to be horrid. The day of the show the print arrived, it was red,
splicy, and very beat up. It was clearly a decades old print. The irate
programmer called up the Swank booker to complain as we could not even show
the print. The Swank booker looked up the title in the Maltin TV/Movie book
and pronounced  The film is 50 years old. What did you expect? Apparently
they had no concept a NEW print of a 50 year old film.

On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 11:16 AM, Dennis Doros milefi...@gmail.com wrote:



 On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 10:59 AM, Maureen Tripp maureen_tr...@emerson.edu
  wrote:

 As Sandra Jackson said, it seems it depends a lot on the film, anticipated
 audience size, and other factors--but I now have a ballpark range of
 estimates--I appreciate it, everyone!



 I should also mention that it depends a lot on how well you get along with
 the salesperson at the company. Most of us are in the business because we
 love films. If you discuss favorite films (and books and museums) and what's
 out that week and how's the family, you'll do well. If somebody comes and
 complains that they are non-profit and we should treat them better, they
 don't get as good a break. The retired Edith Kramer at the Pacific Film
 Archive is a legend in this regard. She would spend two or three hours on
 the phone charming the salesperson until she got the rate she could afford.
 Funny thing is -- we had the same automatic friends rate for her for twenty
 years and she still would spend an hour with us. One of our favorite
 customers.

 --
 Best,
 Dennis Doros
 Milestone Film  Video/Milliarium Zero
 PO Box 128
 Harrington Park, NJ 07640
 Phone: 201-767-3117
 Fax: 201-767-3035
 email: milefi...@gmail.com
 www.milestonefilms.com
 www.ontheboweryfilm.com
 www.arayafilm.com
 www.exilesfilm.com
 www.wordisoutmovie.com
 www.killerofsheep.com
 AMIA Philadelphia 2010: www.amianet.org
 Join Milestone Film on Facebook!


 VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of issues
 relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic control,
 preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in libraries and
 related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as an effective
 working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of communication
 between libraries,educational institutions, and video producers and
 distributors.


-- next part --
An HTML attachment scrubbed and removed.
HTML attachments are only available in MIME digests.

--

Message: 5
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 12:50:29 -0500
From: Rudy Leon rudy.l...@gmail.com
Subject: [Videolib] Duplicate copies?
To: videolib videolib@lists.berkeley.edu

Re: [Videolib] thanks for all the help with my Swank question!

2010-09-13 Thread Dennis Doros
But a 4K or 6K scan off of Technicolor 3-strip negatives with proper color
balance and digital correction for registration can look absolutely
stunning! I know it's not at colleges now (though I think Indiana U and a
few others do have it) and I know that by the time that becomes commonplace
the technology will have changed again and it'll be more wasted dollars, but
at some point, the future will catch up with the technology and bad prints
will be a thing of the past. And of course, such as the Warner DVD-R
library, you'll be able to get a lot more obscure films to view. I'm very
sad about the death of 35mm as well, but there will be advantages such as
no more bad sprockets, scratched prints, and the cost of shipping 100 lb.
prints in dented and warped containers.

Did anyone read the NY Times today?

Herehttp://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/13/technology/13wifi.html?ref=technologyand
herehttp://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/13/technology/13broadband.html?_r=1ref=todayspaper.
My HD files for I AM CUBA (a 141-minute film) is about 200 gigabytes at most
so a 4K scan is probably about 4 terabytes. At a gigabyte per second, it
wouldn't take long to send it over home lines. Much less than three or four
days by Fed Ex and a hell of a lot cheaper.

Dennis



On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 2:33 PM, Steffen, James M jste...@emory.edu wrote:

 Call me old-fashioned, but there isn't very much magic in watching a DVD
 blown up on a big screen.

 --James

 --
 James M. Steffen, PhD
 Film and Media Studies Librarian
 Theater, Dance, ILA/IDS and LGBT Subject Liaison
 Marian K. Heilbrun Music and Media Library
 Emory University
 540 Asbury Circle
 Atlanta, GA 30322-2870
 Phone: (404) 727-8107
 FAX: (404) 727-2257
 Email: jste...@emory.edu

 --

 Message: 4
 Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 11:54:38 -0400
 From: Jessica Rosner jessicapros...@gmail.com
 Subject: Re: [Videolib] thanks for all the help with my Swank
question!
 To: videolib@lists.berkeley.edu
 Message-ID:
aanlkti=vgy_jxepexyij=7qqb8wyt4hxp0ybz3a1_...@mail.gmail.com
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

 I would not bet on the Swank salesperson being a big film buff. Things
 might
 have changed over the year, but that certainly was not their reputation in
 the past. My favorite of all Swank stories involved a school that had
 ordered a 35mm print of classic film for which a studio had done a major
 reissue just about a year before. It was not a small reissue and I would
 bet
 several dozen new/restored prints were made. The programmer reminded the
 Swank booker to MAKE sure they got one the new prints as the old ones
 were
 known to be horrid. The day of the show the print arrived, it was red,
 splicy, and very beat up. It was clearly a decades old print. The irate
 programmer called up the Swank booker to complain as we could not even show
 the print. The Swank booker looked up the title in the Maltin TV/Movie book
 and pronounced  The film is 50 years old. What did you expect? Apparently
 they had no concept a NEW print of a 50 year old film.

 On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 11:16 AM, Dennis Doros milefi...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 
 
  On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 10:59 AM, Maureen Tripp 
 maureen_tr...@emerson.edu
   wrote:
 
  As Sandra Jackson said, it seems it depends a lot on the film,
 anticipated
  audience size, and other factors--but I now have a ballpark range of
  estimates--I appreciate it, everyone!
 
 
 
  I should also mention that it depends a lot on how well you get along
 with
  the salesperson at the company. Most of us are in the business because we
  love films. If you discuss favorite films (and books and museums) and
 what's
  out that week and how's the family, you'll do well. If somebody comes and
  complains that they are non-profit and we should treat them better, they
  don't get as good a break. The retired Edith Kramer at the Pacific Film
  Archive is a legend in this regard. She would spend two or three hours on
  the phone charming the salesperson until she got the rate she could
 afford.
  Funny thing is -- we had the same automatic friends rate for her for
 twenty
  years and she still would spend an hour with us. One of our favorite
  customers.
 
  --
  Best,
  Dennis Doros
  Milestone Film  Video/Milliarium Zero
  PO Box 128
  Harrington Park, NJ 07640
  Phone: 201-767-3117
  Fax: 201-767-3035
  email: milefi...@gmail.com
  www.milestonefilms.com
  www.ontheboweryfilm.com
  www.arayafilm.com
  www.exilesfilm.com
  www.wordisoutmovie.com
  www.killerofsheep.com
  AMIA Philadelphia 2010: www.amianet.org
  Join Milestone Film on Facebook!
 
 
  VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of
 issues
  relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic control,
  preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in libraries
 and
  related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as an
 effective
  working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of 

Re: [Videolib] thanks for all the help with my Swank question!

2010-09-13 Thread Dennis Doros
Hmmm. They're doing at least 4K scans of some pretty obscure films
(Monogram's Charlie Chan's for example) off of archival prints so anything
is possible. Jessica, you're thinking film rental. They're thinking
preservation/streaming. If theaters want to rent a 4K scan, I suspect they
will be made available. Of course, I'm talking future Utopia, not
necessarily this year's programming.

Dennis

On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 5:27 PM, Jessica Rosner jessicapros...@gmail.comwrote:

 Not holding my breath for studios to make 4K  6K scans of anything but
 there top titles available while trashing the 35mm prints of everything.


 On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 4:54 PM, Dennis Doros milefi...@gmail.com wrote:

 But a 4K or 6K scan off of Technicolor 3-strip negatives with proper color
 balance and digital correction for registration can look absolutely
 stunning! I know it's not at colleges now (though I think Indiana U and a
 few others do have it) and I know that by the time that becomes commonplace
 the technology will have changed again and it'll be more wasted dollars, but
 at some point, the future will catch up with the technology and bad prints
 will be a thing of the past. And of course, such as the Warner DVD-R
 library, you'll be able to get a lot more obscure films to view. I'm very
 sad about the death of 35mm as well, but there will be advantages such as
 no more bad sprockets, scratched prints, and the cost of shipping 100 lb.
 prints in dented and warped containers.

 Did anyone read the NY Times today?

 Herehttp://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/13/technology/13wifi.html?ref=technologyand
 herehttp://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/13/technology/13broadband.html?_r=1ref=todayspaper.
 My HD files for I AM CUBA (a 141-minute film) is about 200 gigabytes at most
 so a 4K scan is probably about 4 terabytes. At a gigabyte per second, it
 wouldn't take long to send it over home lines. Much less than three or four
 days by Fed Ex and a hell of a lot cheaper.

 Dennis



 On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 2:33 PM, Steffen, James M jste...@emory.eduwrote:

 Call me old-fashioned, but there isn't very much magic in watching a DVD
 blown up on a big screen.

 --James

 --
 James M. Steffen, PhD
 Film and Media Studies Librarian
 Theater, Dance, ILA/IDS and LGBT Subject Liaison
 Marian K. Heilbrun Music and Media Library
 Emory University
 540 Asbury Circle
 Atlanta, GA 30322-2870
 Phone: (404) 727-8107
 FAX: (404) 727-2257
 Email: jste...@emory.edu

 --

 Message: 4
 Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 11:54:38 -0400
 From: Jessica Rosner jessicapros...@gmail.com
 Subject: Re: [Videolib] thanks for all the help with my Swank
question!
 To: videolib@lists.berkeley.edu
 Message-ID:
aanlkti=vgy_jxepexyij=7qqb8wyt4hxp0ybz3a1_...@mail.gmail.com
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

 I would not bet on the Swank salesperson being a big film buff. Things
 might
 have changed over the year, but that certainly was not their reputation
 in
 the past. My favorite of all Swank stories involved a school that had
 ordered a 35mm print of classic film for which a studio had done a major
 reissue just about a year before. It was not a small reissue and I would
 bet
 several dozen new/restored prints were made. The programmer reminded the
 Swank booker to MAKE sure they got one the new prints as the old ones
 were
 known to be horrid. The day of the show the print arrived, it was red,
 splicy, and very beat up. It was clearly a decades old print. The irate
 programmer called up the Swank booker to complain as we could not even
 show
 the print. The Swank booker looked up the title in the Maltin TV/Movie
 book
 and pronounced  The film is 50 years old. What did you expect?
 Apparently
 they had no concept a NEW print of a 50 year old film.

 On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 11:16 AM, Dennis Doros milefi...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 
 
  On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 10:59 AM, Maureen Tripp 
 maureen_tr...@emerson.edu
   wrote:
 
  As Sandra Jackson said, it seems it depends a lot on the film,
 anticipated
  audience size, and other factors--but I now have a ballpark range of
  estimates--I appreciate it, everyone!
 
 
 
  I should also mention that it depends a lot on how well you get along
 with
  the salesperson at the company. Most of us are in the business because
 we
  love films. If you discuss favorite films (and books and museums) and
 what's
  out that week and how's the family, you'll do well. If somebody comes
 and
  complains that they are non-profit and we should treat them better,
 they
  don't get as good a break. The retired Edith Kramer at the Pacific Film
  Archive is a legend in this regard. She would spend two or three hours
 on
  the phone charming the salesperson until she got the rate she could
 afford.
  Funny thing is -- we had the same automatic friends rate for her for
 twenty
  years and she still would spend an hour with us. One of our favorite
  customers.
 
  --
  Best,
  Dennis Doros
  Milestone Film  

Re: [Videolib] thanks for all the help with my Swank question!

2010-09-13 Thread Jessica Rosner
Again I would not be so sure they will make them available for screening.
For YEARS WB refused to allow theaters to project DVDS of films they had
actually released on DVD. To be fair they will be no less helpful with 4K
material than they are with 35MM with the notable execption of Universal.

On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 5:50 PM, Dennis Doros milefi...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hmmm. They're doing at least 4K scans of some pretty obscure films
 (Monogram's Charlie Chan's for example) off of archival prints so anything
 is possible. Jessica, you're thinking film rental. They're thinking
 preservation/streaming. If theaters want to rent a 4K scan, I suspect they
 will be made available. Of course, I'm talking future Utopia, not
 necessarily this year's programming.

 Dennis


 On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 5:27 PM, Jessica Rosner 
 jessicapros...@gmail.comwrote:

 Not holding my breath for studios to make 4K  6K scans of anything but
 there top titles available while trashing the 35mm prints of everything.


 On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 4:54 PM, Dennis Doros milefi...@gmail.comwrote:

 But a 4K or 6K scan off of Technicolor 3-strip negatives with proper
 color balance and digital correction for registration can look absolutely
 stunning! I know it's not at colleges now (though I think Indiana U and a
 few others do have it) and I know that by the time that becomes commonplace
 the technology will have changed again and it'll be more wasted dollars, but
 at some point, the future will catch up with the technology and bad prints
 will be a thing of the past. And of course, such as the Warner DVD-R
 library, you'll be able to get a lot more obscure films to view. I'm very
 sad about the death of 35mm as well, but there will be advantages such as
 no more bad sprockets, scratched prints, and the cost of shipping 100 lb.
 prints in dented and warped containers.

 Did anyone read the NY Times today?

 Herehttp://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/13/technology/13wifi.html?ref=technologyand
 herehttp://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/13/technology/13broadband.html?_r=1ref=todayspaper.
 My HD files for I AM CUBA (a 141-minute film) is about 200 gigabytes at most
 so a 4K scan is probably about 4 terabytes. At a gigabyte per second, it
 wouldn't take long to send it over home lines. Much less than three or four
 days by Fed Ex and a hell of a lot cheaper.

 Dennis



 On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 2:33 PM, Steffen, James M jste...@emory.eduwrote:

 Call me old-fashioned, but there isn't very much magic in watching a DVD
 blown up on a big screen.

 --James

 --
 James M. Steffen, PhD
 Film and Media Studies Librarian
 Theater, Dance, ILA/IDS and LGBT Subject Liaison
 Marian K. Heilbrun Music and Media Library
 Emory University
 540 Asbury Circle
 Atlanta, GA 30322-2870
 Phone: (404) 727-8107
 FAX: (404) 727-2257
 Email: jste...@emory.edu

 --

 Message: 4
 Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 11:54:38 -0400
 From: Jessica Rosner jessicapros...@gmail.com
 Subject: Re: [Videolib] thanks for all the help with my Swank
question!
 To: videolib@lists.berkeley.edu
 Message-ID:
aanlkti=vgy_jxepexyij=7qqb8wyt4hxp0ybz3a1_...@mail.gmail.com
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

 I would not bet on the Swank salesperson being a big film buff. Things
 might
 have changed over the year, but that certainly was not their reputation
 in
 the past. My favorite of all Swank stories involved a school that had
 ordered a 35mm print of classic film for which a studio had done a major
 reissue just about a year before. It was not a small reissue and I would
 bet
 several dozen new/restored prints were made. The programmer reminded the
 Swank booker to MAKE sure they got one the new prints as the old ones
 were
 known to be horrid. The day of the show the print arrived, it was red,
 splicy, and very beat up. It was clearly a decades old print. The irate
 programmer called up the Swank booker to complain as we could not even
 show
 the print. The Swank booker looked up the title in the Maltin TV/Movie
 book
 and pronounced  The film is 50 years old. What did you expect?
 Apparently
 they had no concept a NEW print of a 50 year old film.

 On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 11:16 AM, Dennis Doros milefi...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 
 
  On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 10:59 AM, Maureen Tripp 
 maureen_tr...@emerson.edu
   wrote:
 
  As Sandra Jackson said, it seems it depends a lot on the film,
 anticipated
  audience size, and other factors--but I now have a ballpark range of
  estimates--I appreciate it, everyone!
 
 
 
  I should also mention that it depends a lot on how well you get along
 with
  the salesperson at the company. Most of us are in the business because
 we
  love films. If you discuss favorite films (and books and museums) and
 what's
  out that week and how's the family, you'll do well. If somebody comes
 and
  complains that they are non-profit and we should treat them better,
 they
  don't get as good a break. The retired Edith Kramer at the Pacific