[VIHUELA] Re: What is the historical vihuela?

2005-11-10 Thread Alexander Batov
On 05 Nov 2005 14:17 Monica Hall wrote:

 Yes.  The question in my mind was whether the instrument could be
 confidently dated from the  1620s or whether it might actually date from 
 the
 second half of the 18th century.

It would be most unusual for a guitar from the second half of the 18th 
century to have its string length as long as the Quito. As you probably 
know, with virtually universal adaptation of open-wound and close-wound 
strings for plucked and bowed instruments in the second part of the 18th 
century the tendency was heading in the opposite direction - to shorter 
string length on guitars. In absolute figures, anything longer than 67cm 
would be rather unusual. The earliest recorded use of overspun strings I 
have come across so far in Spanish sources is in the 'Inventory of Theodosio 
Dalp's property ...'  of 26 February 1715 that lists One lathe to wind 
strings with silver ... (Un torno de torzer cuerdas de plata thasado todo 
en cuarenta ...)

At least one of the ways to date the Quito instrument more precisely is to 
conduct dendrological analysis of its soundboard wood; looking for wear 
marks on the bridge can also give some idea how the instrument was used etc 
.. A similar research that was conducted with the Chambure and 
Jaquemart-Andre instruments in Paris would be ideal (the results are 
published in 'Aux origines de la guitare: la vihuela de mano', Cite de la 
Museque, 2004) would be ideal. And not only for the Quito but for the Dias 
too but I'd better not start ...

 The string length however is only really relevant in so far as this has 
 any
 bearing on its authenticity.  I would question whether a female player, 
 who
 probably didn't have the technical ability of Rolf Lislevand, would have
 been able to play anything meaningful on an instrument of that size.

I've put an image of a lady here who plays a rather large guitar:
www.vihuelademano.com/current/pages/large-guitar.htm
However, whether she was able to play anything meaningful or just posing is 
hardly possible to assess.

 In the mean time I have had a lengthy and very helpful reply from Antonio
 which has answered all my questions in so far as this is possible.

???

 I am aware that a number of baroque guitars have long string lengths.  I
 don't know how people manage to play them.I understand that Linda 
 Sayce
 had an exact copy of the Stradivarius guitar made which has a string 
 length
 of 74.1 and she found it unplayable.

Apparently there is at least one more guitar by Stradivarius (made in 1681) 
with the same body dimensions as the one in Oxford (i.e. made on the same 
mould as is often the case with other instruments of Stradivarius) and so 
would have been its original string length (the guitar have been altered to 
6 strings with subsequent shortening of the neck). It was commissioned by 
the Guistiliani, aristocratic Venetian family, so it may perhaps give some 
idea what sort of music was played on it (hopefully it wasn't only used to 
pose with).

 It would be interesting to hear the views of the gentlemen on this list as
 to the optimum string lengths for vihuelas and guitars.

Not a problem. As for the string lengths of modern reproductions of 
vihuelas, common sense would be the best guide, supposedly this was also the 
case in 16th century Spain.

Most vihuela  players nowadays will be happy with c. 60cm string length for 
the most demanding vihuela repertoire although some might prefer c.56 - 58cm 
depending I suppose on their skills. The vast majority of the vihuela solo 
pieces can be played on c.64 - 66cm but this can go up to 70cm and more for 
fairly basic song accompaniments. Considering that this was one of the main 
uses of the instrument during the 16th century, c.68 - 72cm could well be 
the string length range for a typical 16th century vihuela. I personally 
feel comfortable with a good number of vihuela pieces, for instance, on my 
66cm string vihuela in E and it still remains in my plans to make a 72 - 73 
cm string vihuela, to use it for a larger instrument in Valderrabano duets 
(a fifth apart).

Nobody can ever be sure of the precise figures for the string lengths of 
historic vihuelas but it doesn't seem unreasonable to expect a great deal of 
discrepancy in the sizes of the consort of 16th century vihuelas (for 
example of the four sizes which are needed to perform the above mentioned 
Valderrabano duets) from that of mid - late 16th century Italian lutes. So 
the upper limit could well be extended to c.80cm or more (i.e. close to 
the-would-be original string length of the Jaquemart-Andre vihuela). 
Although largely speculative, there is at least one important reason (apart 
from similarity in repertoire and functions of the two instruments) that led 
me to such a broad speculation: that the makers and players of 16th vihuelas 
and lutes (either in Italy or in Spain) could well have been relying on the 
same string suppliers, from places such as Munich, Rome and 

[VIHUELA] Doc Rossi's webpage

2005-11-10 Thread Rob MacKillop
Doc Rossi's webpage can now be found on the www.musicintime.co.uk website.
There can be found an introductory overview of various citterns, with tuning
chart, an academic essay on the cittern/guittar in Colonial America, the
Forward from his cittern tutor, and links to his recordings. More scores and
mp3 files will follow in time, so stay tuned.

I'm really pleased with the way Music In Time is developing, and especially
pleased that we have contributors as esteemed as Doc Rossi.

Rob MacKillop
www.musicintime.co.uk




To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[VIHUELA] Re: vihuela and viola

2005-11-10 Thread Alexander Batov
- Original Message - 
From: Stuart Walsh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Alexander Batov [EMAIL PROTECTED]; vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu
Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2005 7:35 PM
Subject: Re: [VIHUELA] vihuela and viola


 Alexander,

 You say we have absolutely no idea what sort of barring arrangement violas 
 might have had. But surely  we - or makers like you - do have some idea. 
 Some violas look very similar to vihuelas, and were made at roughly the 
 same time, and not geographically distant and play the same sort of 
 sophisticated, polyphonic music. It would at least be reasonable 
 conjecture and certainly not idle speculation to bar a viola like a 
 vihuela, wouldn't it?

 I have the idea that early guitars (and for you there's no difference 
 between 16th/17th century guitars and vihuelas?) had a couple of bars on 
 the soundboard and a couple of bars (or three?) on the back. No doubt 
 there are a million subtleties of exactly how these bars are fashioned. So 
 there's  a tradtion of barring flat-backed, plucked instruments and violas 
 could just be part of that tradition.

I agree with most that you say here, Stuart. And my reasoning goes exactly 
along the same lines.

 Or, do you think there is a possibility that violas had la much more 
 complicated lute-like barring?

Yes, this possibility cannot be excluded. In particularly as regards those 
illustrations where somewhat 'lute-type' rose is depicted (as in our beloved 
dai Libri painting). I also like the two Japanese paintings:  however 
similar the instruments look like their bodies are of different depths, the 
ribs and pegheads are also different.

 (Or, Monica-style; we just don't know, will never know and it's all 
 (mere?) speculation... )

Not really. The very idea that the resonating box as such didn't change much 
(if at all!) from the time of the viola da mano / vihuela makes more sense 
to me than just abrupt rejection of 'we'll never know' style. I simply 
cannot imagine anything extraordinary in its construction (and I wonder if 
anybody will) that would set us back from re-creating a fairly reasonable 
reconstruction of either vihuela or viola da mano or 4-course guitar. A lot 
of makers do this already simply following their intuition; and this cannot 
be entirely wrong.

 But those deeper-bodied violas with deeply incurved sides - the ones that 
 look like they could be bowed as well as plucked; might they have a 
 different barring arrangement, more viol-like? ( I have no idea how viols 
 are barred.) I wonder what you think, as a maker, of the possibility of an 
 instrument that could equally be bowed or played with the fingers? It 
 somehow seems unlikely to me.

It doesn't seem likely to me either. Well viols were ocassionally plucked 
even in the early 18th century but that's different, if only in that sort of 
way. Perhaps that's why I don't like Jimmy Page's idea of bowing his guitar, 
sounds rather boring (in particularly on his early sessions) ...

Alexander 



To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[VIHUELA] Re: What is the historical vihuela?

2005-11-10 Thread Edward Martin
I have a friend, Tyler Kaiser, who owns a Dan Larson replica of the 74 cm 
guitar.  He has absolutely no problems at this length for the solo literature.

ed

At 07:19 PM 11/10/2005 +, Alexander Batov wrote:
  I am aware that a number of baroque guitars have long string lengths.  I
  don't know how people manage to play them.I understand that Linda
  Sayce
  had an exact copy of the Stradivarius guitar made which has a string
  length
  of 74.1 and she found it unplayable.



Edward Martin
2817 East 2nd Street
Duluth, Minnesota  55812
e-mail:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
voice:  (218) 728-1202




To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[VIHUELA] Re: What is the historical vihuela?

2005-11-10 Thread Alexander Batov

- Original Message - 
From: Edward Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Alexander Batov [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Monica Hall 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu
Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2005 11:25 PM
Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: What is the historical vihuela?


I have a friend, Tyler Kaiser, who owns a Dan Larson replica of the 74 cm
 guitar.  He has absolutely no problems at this length for the solo 
 literature.

 ed

 At 07:19 PM 11/10/2005 +, Alexander Batov wrote:
  I am aware that a number of baroque guitars have long string lengths. 
  I
  don't know how people manage to play them.I understand that Linda
  Sayce
  had an exact copy of the Stradivarius guitar made which has a string
  length
  of 74.1 and she found it unplayable.

Thank you for this information, Edward. Only what you quoted as my words are 
actually not my (they were in the context of my reply to Monica), or perhaps 
you didn't : ...
I know rather well that guitars with this sort of length are playable.

Alexander 



To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html