[VIHUELA] Re: Private Musicke and Kozuna (was: Foscarini on Radio 3)

2010-08-30 Thread jean-michel Catherinot
Dear Monica, I'm not sure I understood your message correctly. Do you
   mean that they might have hired Private Musicke without Kozena?
   --- En date de : Sam 28.8.10, Monica Hall mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk a
   A(c)crit :

 De: Monica Hall mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk
 Objet: [VIHUELA] Re: Private Musicke and Kozuna (was: Foscarini on
 Radio 3)
 A: wikla wi...@cs.helsinki.fi
 Cc: Vihuelalist vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu
 Date: Samedi 28 aoAt 2010, 11h12

   Interesting indeed!
   I though Odi Euterpe was one of the better things she sang - but I
   don't
   know it as well as some of the other songs.
   I listened to the whole broadcast last night.   Perhaps it is simply
   that
   balence of the recording is all wrong.   She is too prominent.  But I
   though
   her interpretation of  many of the songs was often too operatic and
   emotional.   They did a slightly different programme in Edinburgh
   I guess it's the first time early music has much attention at  the
   Edinburgh
   Festival too.   But they might not have hired Private Musicke without
   Magdalena Kozuna.   Who knows.
   Monica
   - Original Message -
   From: wikla [1]wi...@cs.helsinki.fi
   To: Vihuelalist [2]vihu...@cs.dartmouth.edu
   Sent: Friday, August 27, 2010 10:03 PM
   Subject: [VIHUELA] Private Musicke and Kozuna (was: Foscarini on Radio
   3)
   
Interesting!
   
I just happened to hear the Private Musicke and Kozuna just before
   the
talks here. They happened to have the opening concert here in the
Helsinki
Festival: Love Madrigals of the 17th century. Great! Clearly the
   first
time early music gets that much attention in this festival.
   
I happened to hear the beginning of the concert's direct broadcast on
   my
car radio: on that time she was singing the Odi Euterpe by Caccini
   that
I
know well. Something was wrong there... Then to home with better
   audio.
The
program continued. Here is the list of all:
   
 Filippo Vitali: O bei lumi
 Sigismondo D'India: Cruda Amarilli
 Claudio Monteverdi: Si dolce A il tormento
 Giulio Caccini: Odi Euterpe
 Luis de Briceno: Caravanda Ciacona
 Tarquino Merula: Canzonetta Spirituale sopra alla nanna
 Gaspar Sanz: Canarios
 Sigismondo D'India: Ma che? Squallido e oscuro
 Biaggio Marini: Con le Stelle in Ciel
 Giovanni Girolamo Kapsberger: Felici gl'animi
 Giovanni de Macque: Capriccio stravagante
 Giovanni Girolamo Kapsberger: Aurilla mia
 Sigismondo D'India: Torna il sereno ZA(c)firo
 Giovanni Paolo Foscarini: Ciaccona
 Barbara Strozzi: L'Eraclito amoroso
 Ruiz de Ribayaz: Espanioletta
 Tarquino Merula: Folle A ben si crede
   
I knew most of the pieces. And have accopanied nearly all of the
   songs
many
times.
   
I really was happy that to me so dear repertoire got so important
   place in
the festival, and I was as much unhappy that the performance was not
good -
well I heard only the 3/4 of the concert and on radio broadcast...
   But I
got the feeling that the singer did not know the meaning of the
   words, and
so she couldn't perhaps so much express the message of the text. And
   she
did not always sound very pure and clean...
   
And to me the band did not make a very good impression either: If
   Merula's
sopra alla nanna is made to sound flamenco, I do not want to hear
   it.
Not to speak of one of the greatest pieces by Barbara Strozzi,
L'Eraclito amoroso. That was the biggest flop in their performance;
just singing the notes and improvising kitchen flamenco around -- no
   idea
of the story and text, even no idea of the sober(?) passagaglia in
   places.
Rubbish in that piece, spoiled possibilities...
   
But when that repertoire is taken to the wide public, perhaps there
   will
be
more gigs also to a tiny theorbist with a big theorbo... ;-)
   
All the best,
   
Arto
   
   
   
   
On Fri, 27 Aug 2010 19:53:05 +0100, Monica Hall
   [3]mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk
wrote:
I am also a fan of Private Musicke and have several of their CDs.
   Magdalena Kozuna is not one of their regular singers as far as I
   am
   aware.
   
   
   
   I suspect that she was co-opted for commercial considerations -
   in
   order to sell more tickets.   She is well know whereas Raquel and
   Stephan van Dyck and Marco Beasley are not - at least over here.
   All
   them are very accomplished singers in this repertoire.   So is
   Kozuna
   in the right repertoire - but the announcer did make the point
   that
she
   is better know for doing other things.
   
   
   
   Monica
   
   
   
   - Original Message -
   
   From: [1]jean-michel Catherinot
   
   To: [2]Martyn Hodgson ; [3]Monica Hall
   
   Cc: [4]Vihuelalist
   
   Sent: Friday, August 27, 2010 12:39 PM
   
   Subject: Re : 

[VIHUELA] Re: Bartolotti Videos performed by Lex Eisenhardt

2010-08-30 Thread michael.f...@notesinc.com
Dear List,

At this point I feel compelled to say something about parallel octaves. If
parallel octaves are continuous, they cease to be parallel octaves and
become orchestration (e.g., organ or harpsichord stops). The parallel
octaves that get red marks in a theory or counterpoint class are between two
adjacent consonances and are usually part of a 3- or 4-voice texture.
Sometimes they are hidden octaves: the same thing but with an intervening
note in one of the voices.

Sorry for the lecture.

Mike



Michael Fink
michael.f...@notesinc.com



-Original Message-
From: lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu [mailto:lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] On Behalf
Of Lex Eisenhardt
Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 1:15 PM
To: Vihuelalist
Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Bartolotti Videos performed by Lex Eisenhardt


   Today the
   vihuela is usually tuned in unison throughout but this may not have
   been so in the 16^th century. If the 5^th and 6^th courses were octave
   strung this might alter our perceptions of the music.

But to what extent? Early lutes had octaves, sometimes even on the 4th 
course. Certain organ stops have octaves too.
The whole problem seems to be how you reconstruct the polyphony in your 
mind.
The high octaves of the five-course guitar tend to be prominent indeed 
(although it depends also on how you touch them, and the string tension, and

even on how they relate in height to the bourdon, at the bridge) but I 
happen to think that it's not a matter of measuring decibels in the first 
place.


   The baroque guitar has nothing in common with the classical guitar.

Some people seem to shiver at the idea...


   most of the time it is difficult to hear the bourdon on the fifth
   course because all it is doing is creating parallel octaves in which
   the upper part is more audible.

For some listeners there are parallel octaves, for others the bass becomes 
brighter and stronger, as a result of the blending of the overtones of the 
two strings, like on the lute or the organ (the latter has of course no 
strings).


   In the Sarabande the bass line falls a
   7th at the cadence following the double bar - this big chord I comes
   out of nowhere!

I'm afraid that's what big chords do. It is guitar music after all, in this 
funny mixed battuto-pizzicato style.


   Paradoxically the bourdon on the fourth often sounds
   to me more prominent especially in odd places in the campanellas.

Maybe it's not a paradox, since there are more notes on the 4th course 
involved. It seems to be generally accepted that the bourdon on the 4th 
course is needed with Bartolotti, so this happens when you play what the 
tablature says.
In all 5 clips there are only 2 campanela runs, by the way, they are both in

the prelude. The section high up the neck in the courante, for instance, 
could be misleading, it is just a 'regular' texture.


   But neither is there any evidence that Italians thought of the guitar
   as having seven strings rather than five and that used  the separate
   strings of the fourth and fifth courses independently as a matter of
   course.

Again, it is not so much a matter of using the separate strings 
independently, but using your ears (and therefore also your hands) in a more

varied way. Or should we believe that the tablature obliges you to always 
play the two strings (the octave and the bourdon) in perfect balance? (This 
would then of course also apply  for the 4th course bourdon)


  It is also unfair to suggest that other people play the music
   the way that they do because it is fashionable and that they havent
   given careful thought to what they are doing.

Maybe. All the heavyly syncopated afterbeat strumming (and percussion) 
doesn't sound very 17th century to me. Wouldn't it be on purpose, as a 
'cross-over'?

Lex

 




To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html