[VIHUELA] Re: The Quito vihuela

2005-12-06 Thread Alexander Batov
On Monday, December 05, 2005 1:58 PM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 ... I have a similar
 problem with the bridge of my guitar!  The slots for the 1st, 2nd and 3rd
 courses have worn away so that is is dificult to tie the two strings of a
 course so that they stay apart.  I have to use a litle strip of card board
 underneath them!  Will have to have a new bridge one day...

This can be easily resolved by replacing the top part of the bridge, instead 
of fitting a new one. With some care the slots in this top part can even be 
shaped to resemble those of the Quito bridge - very practical idea indeed!

 ...  I wonder if it could be slightly older that the early
 17th century.  St. Mariana might have inherited from a predecessor, and 
 just
 used it to  just pick out the melody or second part as she sung.  that 
 would
 explain  why it is not a female-friendly instrument!

Difficult to say at the moment. From constructional point of view, however, 
it may most certainly mirror earlier, flat-back models of the vihuela (i.e. 
from late 16th century), in particularly such features as two-bar 
arrangement on the soundboard and one-piece neck / neck block / peg head 
construction. In fact these are also featured on some surviving early - mid 
17th century Italian guitars which is, in a way, hardly surprising.

Alexander 



To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[VIHUELA] Re: The Quito vihuela

2005-11-30 Thread Rob MacKillop
Thanks to Alexander and Ariel, these are great photos. It is an enigmatic
instrument. It needs a luthier like Alexander to give it a professional
analysis. Maybe you could get an arts council grant, Alexander, to look at
it 'in the flesh'?  

The animal heads are very interesting. Did the Quito vihuela start life in
Cadiz?

Rob MacKillop
www.musicintime.co.uk





To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html