Problem with digraphs through Putty

[Jeenu V]

Hi Vimmers,

I'm using VIM (version 6.2) through putty. The digraphs that are
displayed (either through :dig command or CTRL-K insertions) are all
weird characters. When I tried to use digraphs as fold markers, it
worked, but the fold markers inserted are still those weird
characters. Does any body ever experienced this kind of problem? Any
configurations to be done on putty?

Thanks
Jeenu V

A loud thought

[Jeenu V]

Hi Vimmers,

I'm thinking something aloud.

When I work, I largely use tag-jumps (CTRL-] and CTRL-T). Also, I rely
on the on the ordinary jumps (CTRL-O and CTRL-I). When I jump to a
tag, the target tag is displayed in the same window. At the same time
it also happens that the current buffer (%) is changed to the buffer
in which the tag is diaplayed and alternate buffer (#) is the previous
buffer from which i did a CTRL-].

Now I have two ways to go back: CTRL-^ and CTRL-T. Once I'm back, I
can revisit the tag in two ways: by issuing :tag command and pressing
CTRL-O. As a result, my ordinary jump list is mixed with the tag
stack. Wouldn't it be more convinient, if it were like both (jump list
and tag stack) are kept separate, so that CTRL-O/CTRL-I would result
in a tag visit? Let the tag stack show only tag visits, and the
ordinary jump list show just the jumps.

Is such a feature already there, if not, isn't it possible if that
worth it? Does any body know a solution for this?

Thanks
Jeenu

Re: Caseless tag matching

[Jeenu V]

Hi Tony,

That helped me a lot. Thanks, though a bit late.

On 2/20/07, A.J.Mechelynck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Jeenu V wrote:
> I'm using ctags and I want to do case less matching for tags. I tried
> setting the 'ignorecase' and 'infercase', but that doesn't give me the
> actual tag I need to insert. The word, it completes is correct, but they
> are
> wholly either in upper case or lower case. Any way to go?
>
> Thanks
> Jeenu
>

There is an option in Exuberant Ctags to generate a case-folded tagfile. See
also ":help tags-option".


Best regards,
Tony.
--
Any time things appear to be going better, you have overlooked
something.

Re: How to: display only the lines that have a matching pattern and fold /hide others.

[Jeenu V]

If you pattern happens to be word, then you can place cursor over the
word and then press [I or [i. See also ":h [I"

On 2/21/07, Muddassirali Mirzani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

 Is there a way to display only the lines that match
 a search pattern and hide/fold others.
 Any help appreciated.
 Thanks ..






Food fight? Enjoy some healthy debate
in the Yahoo! Answers Food & Drink Q&A.
http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396545367

Re: Insert mode and arrow keys philosophy

[Jeenu V]

I agree that using h/j/k/l is most efficient and its hard to follow
them in insert mode. But, if you are aware of the command CTRL-O in
insert mode that will get you to a temporary-normal mode, you can
execute one normal mode command, after which you will be taken back to
insert mode. Once you are in normal mode, you could use [count]
w/b/W/B commands, instead of h/j/k/l, if that is appropriate.

On 2/20/07, Pavel Shevaev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Hi folks!

AFAIK usage of arrow keys in vim should be avoided at all costs since
h/j/k/l allows one to be more efficient in command mode. But how about
insert mode? Should one avoid using arrow keys in insert mode as well
and switch to command mode and then back to insert mode instead?

--
Best regards, Pavel

Caseless tag matching

[Jeenu V]

I'm using ctags and I want to do case less matching for tags. I tried
setting the 'ignorecase' and 'infercase', but that doesn't give me the
actual tag I need to insert. The word, it completes is correct, but they are
wholly either in upper case or lower case. Any way to go?

Thanks
Jeenu