Re: Why bottom-posting is preferred on Vim Mainling List?

2007-05-29 Thread russ
In the end, what's preferred is personal despite arguments pro and con.

However, the preponderant opinion and therefore usage in the Vim group
is bottom-posting, though many use interspersed posting and get away
with it. If you don't bottom-post, you get told about it by the other,
frequent Vim posters and that's enough to sway me to bottom-post in
this forum even if I personally don't like it.




Re: VimWiki - again - but with a brand new option

2007-05-09 Thread russ

  Original Message 
 Subject: RE: VimWiki - again - but with a brand new option
 From: Gene Kwiecinski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Wed, May 09, 2007 1:35 pm
 To: Tom Purl [EMAIL PROTECTED],  Vim Mailing List vim@vim.org
 
 [snip]
 Yeah, it's a good idea, but there are more important things I have for
 you to do...),
 [snip]

Wow, you had one of those guys too? We just barely got rid of ours a few
weeks ago. He moved on to greater opportunities. Bright guy, but to
follow his lead, you'd just never get to do anything!



Re: ...to shoot into oneelse feet...

2007-04-30 Thread russ

  Original Message 
 Subject: ...to shoot into oneelse feet...
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Mon, April 30, 2007 11:36 am
 To: vim vim@vim.org
 
 Hi,
 
  is it possible to get out of a started
  change command (dont know, whether this
  is this the correct naming...) with a single
  key pressed ?
 
  For example the text is
 
 Vim is a #eally$nice editor.
  
 
  # is marking my cursor position and $
  is the sign appearing after I have submitted
  cfn already.
 
  Since vim is really a nice editor, I do not
  want to change anything and pressed cfn by
  accident.
 
  HmmmESC kills everything between # and $...
  u would undo it...but this like do the wrong thing
  and repair it afterwards.
 
  What I want is to prevent doing wrong things by aborting
  them,..not to do them and saying ooops sorry...my fault
  afterwards and starting repairing the desaster then... :)
 
  Sohow can I _abort_ this ?

Just press ESC followed by u to undo. Or, press ESC follwed by :q! to
get out completely.




RE: need help with xml.vim plugin

2007-03-09 Thread russ

  Original Message 
 Subject: need help with xml.vim plugin
 From: Lev Lvovsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Fri, March 09, 2007 12:33 pm
 To: vim users list vim@vim.org
 
 I'm hoping someone can help me with this problem, as it would be  
 really nice to get the XML plugin working.
 
 I've downloaded the plugin described here:
 
 http://www.vim.org/scripts/script.php?script_id=301
 
 I've put the file both in my local ftplugin, and plugin directory,  
 and set ':ftplugin type on', however I'm still unable to do any of  
 the navigation between tags, or autocompletion that the plugin  
 promises.  I can load up the help file, however it seems like that's  
 the only part that's actually working.  Any bit of help would be  
 appreciated - I'm thinking it's a local config issue (perhaps it's  
 being overridden by the original xml.vim that gets installed with  
 vim?), but I'm not entirely sure.
 
 thanks in advance!
 -lev

Lev,

(I should probably know, but...) Can I use this with Vim 6.x? I'm one of
those who takes forever to get around to sharpening the saw and just
haven't bothered with 7 yet.

Russ



RE: :wq vs ZZ

2007-02-13 Thread russ
Hmmm... now I see it: I have to turn off HTML without which vim.org
rejects it anyway. Okay, well next time I'll repent (maxima mea culpa).

  Original Message 
 Subject: RE: :wq vs ZZ
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Tue, February 13, 2007 4:04 pm
 To: Gene Kwiecinski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Cc: Theerasak Photha [EMAIL PROTECTED], Vim ML vim@vim.org
 
  To boot, ZZ isn't Vim. I started using vi in 1983 and it was already
 there. In fact, I have never used :wq(Sorry guys, my web-based
 editor, which I must use at work becauseof IT paranoia about SMTP, simply
 will not let me reply at the end rather than beginning of the thread.)
  
 
   Original Message 
 Subject: RE: :wq vs ZZ
 From: Gene Kwiecinski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Tue, February 13, 2007 2:57 pm
  To: Theerasak Photha [EMAIL PROTECTED], Vim ML vim@vim.org
 
 I imagine there is a rationale for 'ZZ', but it's not readily
  apparent. (Something to do with C-z in DOS, or the end of the
 alphabet?)
 
  'z' is already used, and the shift and z keys are adjacent on
  Murrrcan keyboards, so you can easily just quit out of the editor in
 almost a single hand-action.
 
 I never liked :wq, because you gotta do
 
 depress shift
 :
 release shift
 w
 q
 enter
 
 instead of the nice, simple, easy bang-bang of
 
 depress shift
 ZZ
 
  and you're out.  Releasing the shift key doesn't even count.  :D
 
  Even ':' requires either 2 hands, or a weirdly-contorted 1-handed op.