Re: Where to find 7.1a patchlevels & runtimes? (Was: patch 7.1a.001)
Bram Moolenaar wrote: Tony Mechelynck wrote: [...] I notice this patch modifies one runtime file. This reminds me that runtime updates are not always reflected in patches. Do the files in ftp://ftp.vim.org/pub/vim/runtime/ (and the equivalent rsync repository, ftp.nluug.nl::Vim/runtime/ ) apply to 7.0 only, or to both 7.0 and 7.1? (The latest changes there are for a large number of spelling dictionaries.) They are for both. There are no (recent) source code changes that are required for the updated runtime files. On thinking back, I would suspect they /aren't/ the same, since the first line of each helpfile mentions either 7.0 or 7.1a -- so at least the contents of the doc/ subfolders are different. So -- will runtime upgrades for 7.1 beta be always reflected in patches, or else will there be a runtime server -- and where? [...] Well, then for 7.1a I suppose I can use the same rsync command, but with --exclude="/doc/" in addition to --exclude="/dos/" so the "new" helpfiles (with 7.1a in the first line) won't all be replaced, and the ":help version-7.1" section won't be deleted. This makes it (please remove spurious linebreaks added by my mailer or by yours, and correct me if I'm wrong) cd ~/.build/vim/vim71a rsync -avzcP --delete --exclude="/dos/" --exclude="/doc/" ftp.nluug.nl::Vim/runtime/ ./runtime/ 2>&1 |tee rsync.log But won't this roll back the 7.1a.001 change in autoload/spellfile.vim ? Best regards, Tony. -- You can make it illegal, but you can't make it unpopular.
Re: Where to find 7.1a patchlevels & runtimes? (Was: patch 7.1a.001)
Tony Mechelynck wrote: > Bram Moolenaar wrote: > > Patch 7.1a.001 > > Problem:Crash when downloading a spell file. (Szabolcs Horvat) > > Solution: Avoid that did_set_spelllang() is used recursively when a new > > window is opened for the download. > > Also avoid wiping out the wrong buffer. > > Files: runtime/autoload/spellfile.vim, src/buffer.c, src/ex_cmds.c, > > src/spell.c > [...] > > After a little hunting, I found this patch on the ftp server too (with > README, MD5 and MD5SUMS): > > ftp://ftp.vim.org/pub/vim/unstable/patches/7.1a/ That's right. > Note: I prefer not to feed the email itself to the patch program, because: > - my ISP's routers sometimes autoconvert the contents between 8-bit and > quoted-printable; and the latter make the patch program choke; > - if I see several patches published while I was away or asleep, by FTP I can > get them all to where "patch" will find them. > - the patch directory on FTP includes a table of contents, README > > I notice this patch modifies one runtime file. This reminds me that runtime > updates are not always reflected in patches. Do the files in > ftp://ftp.vim.org/pub/vim/runtime/ (and the equivalent rsync repository, > ftp.nluug.nl::Vim/runtime/ ) apply to 7.0 only, or to both 7.0 and 7.1? (The > latest changes there are for a large number of spelling dictionaries.) They are for both. There are no (recent) source code changes that are required for the updated runtime files. > On thinking back, I would suspect they /aren't/ the same, since the > first line of each helpfile mentions either 7.0 or 7.1a -- so at least > the contents of the doc/ subfolders are different. So -- will runtime > upgrades for 7.1 beta be always reflected in patches, or else will > there be a runtime server -- and where? > (ftp://pub/vim/unstable/runtime/ contains only one item yet: a > softlink to the main "spell" subfolder.) There were runtime files here during the 7.0 beta testing, but I don't think they are useful now. > Hm... I see a "snapshot zip", > http://ftp.vim.org/pub/vim/unstable/snapshot/vim-7.1a.zip ,but it's > more than 24h older than the patch, while it's only about 2h "younger" > than the 7.0.000 tar.gz and tar.bz2 archives so I guess it's 7.1a.000 > in one big economy package... It's almost the same. I had trouble getting the CVS server updated, and this snapshot went together with that update. I don't think it adds anything now, it was for when there was no 7.0x release yet. -- hundred-and-one symptoms of being an internet addict: 77. The phone company asks you to test drive their new PBX system /// Bram Moolenaar -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\ ///sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\ \\\download, build and distribute -- http://www.A-A-P.org/// \\\help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org///
Where to find 7.1a patchlevels & runtimes? (Was: patch 7.1a.001)
Bram Moolenaar wrote: Patch 7.1a.001 Problem:Crash when downloading a spell file. (Szabolcs Horvat) Solution: Avoid that did_set_spelllang() is used recursively when a new window is opened for the download. Also avoid wiping out the wrong buffer. Files: runtime/autoload/spellfile.vim, src/buffer.c, src/ex_cmds.c, src/spell.c [...] After a little hunting, I found this patch on the ftp server too (with README, MD5 and MD5SUMS): ftp://ftp.vim.org/pub/vim/unstable/patches/7.1a/ Note: I prefer not to feed the email itself to the patch program, because: - my ISP's routers sometimes autoconvert the contents between 8-bit and quoted-printable; and the latter make the patch program choke; - if I see several patches published while I was away or asleep, by FTP I can get them all to where "patch" will find them. - the patch directory on FTP includes a table of contents, README I notice this patch modifies one runtime file. This reminds me that runtime updates are not always reflected in patches. Do the files in ftp://ftp.vim.org/pub/vim/runtime/ (and the equivalent rsync repository, ftp.nluug.nl::Vim/runtime/ ) apply to 7.0 only, or to both 7.0 and 7.1? (The latest changes there are for a large number of spelling dictionaries.) On thinking back, I would suspect they /aren't/ the same, since the first line of each helpfile mentions either 7.0 or 7.1a -- so at least the contents of the doc/ subfolders are different. So -- will runtime upgrades for 7.1 beta be always reflected in patches, or else will there be a runtime server -- and where? (ftp://pub/vim/unstable/runtime/ contains only one item yet: a softlink to the main "spell" subfolder.) Hm... I see a "snapshot zip", http://ftp.vim.org/pub/vim/unstable/snapshot/vim-7.1a.zip ,but it's more than 24h older than the patch, while it's only about 2h "younger" than the 7.0.000 tar.gz and tar.bz2 archives so I guess it's 7.1a.000 in one big economy package... Best regards, Tony. -- If you don't have a nasty obituary you probably didn't matter. -- Freeman Dyson
