Re: [PATCH] Lguest32 print hex on bad reads and writes

2007-04-05 Thread H. Peter Anvin
Rusty Russell wrote:
 On Wed, 2007-04-04 at 23:14 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
 On Wed, 2007-04-04 at 23:06 -0400, Kyle Moffett wrote:

 (Erk, I wonder what I was thinking when I wrote that?) Can I ask  
 for %#x (or 0x%x)?  I'm easily confused.
 How about %p for pointers?
 But that would require casting the numbers to pointers.
 
 And the kernel's printk doesn't put 0x on pointers anyway, last I
 checked 8(
 

That's really the bug.  Let's fix it.

-hpa
___
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization


Re: [PATCH] Lguest32 print hex on bad reads and writes

2007-04-05 Thread H. Peter Anvin
H. Peter Anvin wrote:
 Rusty Russell wrote:
 On Wed, 2007-04-04 at 23:14 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
 On Wed, 2007-04-04 at 23:06 -0400, Kyle Moffett wrote:

 (Erk, I wonder what I was thinking when I wrote that?) Can I ask  
 for %#x (or 0x%x)?  I'm easily confused.
 How about %p for pointers?
 But that would require casting the numbers to pointers.

 And the kernel's printk doesn't put 0x on pointers anyway, last I
 checked 8(

 
 That's really the bug.  Let's fix it.
 
 -hpa

Okay, git tree at:

http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/hpa/linux-2.6-printk.git;a=summary
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/hpa/linux-2.6-printk.git

... will do actual testing and post it to LKML tomorrow.

-hpa
___
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization


[PATCH] Lguest32 print hex on bad reads and writes

2007-04-04 Thread Steven Rostedt
Currently the lguest32 error messages from bad reads and writes prints a
decimal integer for addresses. This is pretty annoying. So this patch
changes those to be hex outputs.

This is applied on top of my debug patch.

Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Index: linux-2.6.21-rc5-mm2/drivers/lguest/core.c
===
--- linux-2.6.21-rc5-mm2.orig/drivers/lguest/core.c
+++ linux-2.6.21-rc5-mm2/drivers/lguest/core.c
@@ -220,7 +220,7 @@ u8 lgread_u8(struct lguest *lg, u32 addr
/* Don't let them access lguest binary */
if (!lguest_address_ok(lg, addr)
|| get_user(val, (u32 __user *)addr) != 0)
-   kill_guest(lg, bad read address %u, addr);
+   kill_guest(lg, bad read address %x, addr);
return val;
 }
 
@@ -231,7 +231,7 @@ u16 lgread_u16(struct lguest *lg, u32 ad
/* Don't let them access lguest binary */
if (!lguest_address_ok(lg, addr)
|| get_user(val, (u32 __user *)addr) != 0)
-   kill_guest(lg, bad read address %u, addr);
+   kill_guest(lg, bad read address %x, addr);
return val;
 }
 
@@ -242,7 +242,7 @@ u32 lgread_u32(struct lguest *lg, u32 ad
/* Don't let them access lguest binary */
if (!lguest_address_ok(lg, addr)
|| get_user(val, (u32 __user *)addr) != 0)
-   kill_guest(lg, bad read address %u, addr);
+   kill_guest(lg, bad read address %x, addr);
return val;
 }
 
@@ -250,7 +250,7 @@ void lgwrite_u32(struct lguest *lg, u32 
 {
if (!lguest_address_ok(lg, addr)
|| put_user(val, (u32 __user *)addr) != 0)
-   kill_guest(lg, bad write address %u, addr);
+   kill_guest(lg, bad write address %x, addr);
 }
 
 void lgread(struct lguest *lg, void *b, u32 addr, unsigned bytes)
@@ -259,7 +259,7 @@ void lgread(struct lguest *lg, void *b, 
|| copy_from_user(b, (void __user *)addr, bytes) != 0) {
/* copy_from_user should do this, but as we rely on it... */
memset(b, 0, bytes);
-   kill_guest(lg, bad read address %u len %u, addr, bytes);
+   kill_guest(lg, bad read address %x len %u, addr, bytes);
}
 }
 
@@ -268,7 +268,7 @@ void lgwrite(struct lguest *lg, u32 addr
if (addr + bytes  addr
|| !lguest_address_ok(lg, addr+bytes)
|| copy_to_user((void __user *)addr, b, bytes) != 0)
-   kill_guest(lg, bad write address %u len %u, addr, bytes);
+   kill_guest(lg, bad write address %x len %u, addr, bytes);
 }
 
 static void set_ts(unsigned int guest_ts)


___
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization


Re: [PATCH] Lguest32 print hex on bad reads and writes

2007-04-04 Thread Rusty Russell
On Wed, 2007-04-04 at 15:14 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
 Currently the lguest32 error messages from bad reads and writes prints a
 decimal integer for addresses. This is pretty annoying. So this patch
 changes those to be hex outputs.

(Erk, I wonder what I was thinking when I wrote that?)

Can I ask for %#x (or 0x%x)?  I'm easily confused.

Thanks!
Rusty.


___
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization


Re: [PATCH] Lguest32 print hex on bad reads and writes

2007-04-04 Thread Kyle Moffett
On Apr 04, 2007, at 23:01:30, Rusty Russell wrote:
 On Wed, 2007-04-04 at 15:14 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
 Currently the lguest32 error messages from bad reads and writes  
 prints a decimal integer for addresses. This is pretty annoying.  
 So this patch changes those to be hex outputs.

 (Erk, I wonder what I was thinking when I wrote that?) Can I ask  
 for %#x (or 0x%x)?  I'm easily confused.

How about %p for pointers?

Cheers,
Kyle Moffett


___
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization


Re: [PATCH] Lguest32 print hex on bad reads and writes

2007-04-04 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Wed, 2007-04-04 at 23:06 -0400, Kyle Moffett wrote:

  (Erk, I wonder what I was thinking when I wrote that?) Can I ask  
  for %#x (or 0x%x)?  I'm easily confused.
 
 How about %p for pointers?

But that would require casting the numbers to pointers.

-- Steve


___
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization