Re: [PATCH] vduse: Use proper spinlock for IRQ injection

2023-07-25 Thread Jason Wang
On Wed, Jul 5, 2023 at 7:45 PM Maxime Coquelin
 wrote:
>
> The IRQ injection work used spin_lock_irq() to protect the
> scheduling of the softirq, but spin_lock_bh() should be
> used.
>
> With spin_lock_irq(), we noticed delay of more than 6
> seconds between the time a NAPI polling work is scheduled
> and the time it is executed.
>
> Fixes: c8a6153b6c59 ("vduse: Introduce VDUSE - vDPA Device in Userspace")
> Cc: xieyon...@bytedance.com
>
> Suggested-by: Jason Wang 
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Coquelin 

Acked-by: Jason Wang 

Thanks


> ---
>  drivers/vdpa/vdpa_user/vduse_dev.c | 8 
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_user/vduse_dev.c 
> b/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_user/vduse_dev.c
> index dc38ed21319d..df7869537ef1 100644
> --- a/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_user/vduse_dev.c
> +++ b/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_user/vduse_dev.c
> @@ -935,10 +935,10 @@ static void vduse_dev_irq_inject(struct work_struct 
> *work)
>  {
> struct vduse_dev *dev = container_of(work, struct vduse_dev, inject);
>
> -   spin_lock_irq(>irq_lock);
> +   spin_lock_bh(>irq_lock);
> if (dev->config_cb.callback)
> dev->config_cb.callback(dev->config_cb.private);
> -   spin_unlock_irq(>irq_lock);
> +   spin_unlock_bh(>irq_lock);
>  }
>
>  static void vduse_vq_irq_inject(struct work_struct *work)
> @@ -946,10 +946,10 @@ static void vduse_vq_irq_inject(struct work_struct 
> *work)
> struct vduse_virtqueue *vq = container_of(work,
> struct vduse_virtqueue, inject);
>
> -   spin_lock_irq(>irq_lock);
> +   spin_lock_bh(>irq_lock);
> if (vq->ready && vq->cb.callback)
> vq->cb.callback(vq->cb.private);
> -   spin_unlock_irq(>irq_lock);
> +   spin_unlock_bh(>irq_lock);
>  }
>
>  static bool vduse_vq_signal_irqfd(struct vduse_virtqueue *vq)
> --
> 2.41.0
>

___
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

[PATCH] vduse: Use proper spinlock for IRQ injection

2023-07-05 Thread Maxime Coquelin
The IRQ injection work used spin_lock_irq() to protect the
scheduling of the softirq, but spin_lock_bh() should be
used.

With spin_lock_irq(), we noticed delay of more than 6
seconds between the time a NAPI polling work is scheduled
and the time it is executed.

Fixes: c8a6153b6c59 ("vduse: Introduce VDUSE - vDPA Device in Userspace")
Cc: xieyon...@bytedance.com

Suggested-by: Jason Wang 
Signed-off-by: Maxime Coquelin 
---
 drivers/vdpa/vdpa_user/vduse_dev.c | 8 
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_user/vduse_dev.c 
b/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_user/vduse_dev.c
index dc38ed21319d..df7869537ef1 100644
--- a/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_user/vduse_dev.c
+++ b/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_user/vduse_dev.c
@@ -935,10 +935,10 @@ static void vduse_dev_irq_inject(struct work_struct *work)
 {
struct vduse_dev *dev = container_of(work, struct vduse_dev, inject);
 
-   spin_lock_irq(>irq_lock);
+   spin_lock_bh(>irq_lock);
if (dev->config_cb.callback)
dev->config_cb.callback(dev->config_cb.private);
-   spin_unlock_irq(>irq_lock);
+   spin_unlock_bh(>irq_lock);
 }
 
 static void vduse_vq_irq_inject(struct work_struct *work)
@@ -946,10 +946,10 @@ static void vduse_vq_irq_inject(struct work_struct *work)
struct vduse_virtqueue *vq = container_of(work,
struct vduse_virtqueue, inject);
 
-   spin_lock_irq(>irq_lock);
+   spin_lock_bh(>irq_lock);
if (vq->ready && vq->cb.callback)
vq->cb.callback(vq->cb.private);
-   spin_unlock_irq(>irq_lock);
+   spin_unlock_bh(>irq_lock);
 }
 
 static bool vduse_vq_signal_irqfd(struct vduse_virtqueue *vq)
-- 
2.41.0

___
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization