[PATCH v11 0/2] s390: virtio: let arch validate VIRTIO features
Hi all, The goal of the series is to give a chance to the architecture to validate VIRTIO device features. The tests are back to virtio_finalize_features. No more argument for the architecture callback which only reports if the architecture needs guest memory access restrictions for VIRTIO. I renamed the callback to arch_has_restricted_virtio_memory_access, the config option to ARCH_HAS_RESTRICTED_VIRTIO_MEMORY_ACCESS, and VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM to VIRTIO_F_ACCESS_PLATFORM. Regards, Pierre Pierre Morel (2): virtio: let arch advertise guest's memory access restrictions s390: virtio: PV needs VIRTIO I/O device protection arch/s390/Kconfig | 1 + arch/s390/mm/init.c | 10 ++ drivers/virtio/Kconfig| 6 ++ drivers/virtio/virtio.c | 15 +++ include/linux/virtio_config.h | 10 ++ 5 files changed, 42 insertions(+) -- 2.17.1 Changelog to v11: - replaced VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM with VIRTIO_F_ACCESS_PLATFORM to v10: - removed virtio_config.h unnecessary include - wording (Connie) to v9: - move virtio tests back to virtio_finalize_features (Connie) - remove virtio device argument to v8: - refactoring by using an optional callback (Connie) to v7: - typo in warning message (Connie) to v6: - rewording warning messages (Connie, Halil) to v5: - return directly from S390 arch_validate_virtio_features() when the guest is not protected. (Connie) - Somme rewording (Connie, Michael) - moved back code from arch/s390/ ...kernel/uv.c to ...mm/init.c (Christian) to v4: - separate virtio and arch code (Pierre) - moved code from arch/s390/mm/init.c to arch/s390/kernel/uv.c (as interpreted from Heiko's comment) - moved validation inside the arch code (Connie) - moved the call to arch validation before VIRTIO_F_1 test (Michael) to v3: - add warning (Connie, Christian) - add comment (Connie) - change hook name (Halil, Connie) to v2: - put the test in virtio_finalize_features() (Connie) - put the test inside VIRTIO core (Jason) - pass a virtio device as parameter (Halil) ___ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
Re: [PATCH v11 0/2] s390: virtio: let arch validate VIRTIO features
On Mon, 7 Sep 2020 11:39:05 +0200 Pierre Morel wrote: > Hi all, > > The goal of the series is to give a chance to the architecture > to validate VIRTIO device features. Michael, is this going in via your tree? ___ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
Re: [PATCH v11 0/2] s390: virtio: let arch validate VIRTIO features
On Tue, 8 Sep 2020 00:39:51 +0200 Halil Pasic wrote: > On Mon, 7 Sep 2020 11:39:05 +0200 > Pierre Morel wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > The goal of the series is to give a chance to the architecture > > to validate VIRTIO device features. > > Michael, is this going in via your tree? > I believe Michael's tree is the right place for this, but I can also queue it if I get an ack on patch 1. ___ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
Re: [PATCH v11 0/2] s390: virtio: let arch validate VIRTIO features
On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 12:39:51AM +0200, Halil Pasic wrote: > On Mon, 7 Sep 2020 11:39:05 +0200 > Pierre Morel wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > The goal of the series is to give a chance to the architecture > > to validate VIRTIO device features. > > Michael, is this going in via your tree? I guess so. Still not really happy about second-guessing the hypervisor, but this got acks from others so maybe I'm wrong in this instance. Won't be the first time. -- MST ___ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
Re: [PATCH v11 0/2] s390: virtio: let arch validate VIRTIO features
On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 08:55:21AM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Tue, 8 Sep 2020 00:39:51 +0200 > Halil Pasic wrote: > > > On Mon, 7 Sep 2020 11:39:05 +0200 > > Pierre Morel wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > The goal of the series is to give a chance to the architecture > > > to validate VIRTIO device features. > > > > Michael, is this going in via your tree? > > > > I believe Michael's tree is the right place for this, but I can also > queue it if I get an ack on patch 1. I think Halil pointed out some minor issues, so a new version is in order. -- MST ___ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
