Re: [PATCH v3 [resend] 14/18] smp, x86, xen: kill SMP single function call interrupt

2013-12-16 Thread Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 04:24:41AM +, Liu, Jinsong wrote:
> Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 12:36:36AM +0800, Jiang Liu wrote:
> >> Commit 9a46ad6d6df3b54 "smp: make smp_call_function_many() use logic
> >> similar to smp_call_function_single()" has unified the way to handle
> >> single and multiple cross-CPU function calls. Now only one interrupt
> >> is needed for architecture specific code to support generic SMP
> >> function 
> >> call interfaces, so kill the redundant single function call
> >> interrupt. 
> >> 
> >> Cc: Andrew Morton 
> >> Cc: Shaohua Li 
> >> Cc: Peter Zijlstra 
> >> Cc: Ingo Molnar 
> >> Cc: Steven Rostedt 
> >> Cc: Jiri Kosina 
> >> Cc: Thomas Gleixner 
> >> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" 
> >> Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk 
> > 
> > I presume this has been tested?
> > 
> 
> I have just test Jiang's patch, it works fine for dom0 booting.

Excellent! Please add Acked-by from me.

Thanks!

> 
> Thanks,
> Jinsong
> 
> 
___
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization


RE: [PATCH v3 [resend] 14/18] smp, x86, xen: kill SMP single function call interrupt

2013-12-15 Thread Liu, Jinsong
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 12:36:36AM +0800, Jiang Liu wrote:
>> Commit 9a46ad6d6df3b54 "smp: make smp_call_function_many() use logic
>> similar to smp_call_function_single()" has unified the way to handle
>> single and multiple cross-CPU function calls. Now only one interrupt
>> is needed for architecture specific code to support generic SMP
>> function 
>> call interfaces, so kill the redundant single function call
>> interrupt. 
>> 
>> Cc: Andrew Morton 
>> Cc: Shaohua Li 
>> Cc: Peter Zijlstra 
>> Cc: Ingo Molnar 
>> Cc: Steven Rostedt 
>> Cc: Jiri Kosina 
>> Cc: Thomas Gleixner 
>> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" 
>> Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk 
> 
> I presume this has been tested?
> 

I have just test Jiang's patch, it works fine for dom0 booting.

Thanks,
Jinsong


___
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization


Re: [PATCH v3 [resend] 14/18] smp, x86, xen: kill SMP single function call interrupt

2013-12-15 Thread Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 12:36:36AM +0800, Jiang Liu wrote:
> Commit 9a46ad6d6df3b54 "smp: make smp_call_function_many() use logic
> similar to smp_call_function_single()" has unified the way to handle
> single and multiple cross-CPU function calls. Now only one interrupt
> is needed for architecture specific code to support generic SMP function
> call interfaces, so kill the redundant single function call interrupt.
> 
> Cc: Andrew Morton 
> Cc: Shaohua Li 
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra 
> Cc: Ingo Molnar 
> Cc: Steven Rostedt 
> Cc: Jiri Kosina 
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner 
> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" 
> Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk 

I presume this has been tested?

> Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge 
> Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior 
> Cc: x...@kernel.org
> Cc: xen-de...@lists.xensource.com
> Cc: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
> Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu 
> ---
>  arch/x86/include/asm/xen/events.h |  1 -
>  arch/x86/xen/smp.c| 38 ++
>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/xen/events.h 
> b/arch/x86/include/asm/xen/events.h
> index 608a79d..a9e54dc 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/xen/events.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/xen/events.h
> @@ -4,7 +4,6 @@
>  enum ipi_vector {
>   XEN_RESCHEDULE_VECTOR,
>   XEN_CALL_FUNCTION_VECTOR,
> - XEN_CALL_FUNCTION_SINGLE_VECTOR,
>   XEN_SPIN_UNLOCK_VECTOR,
>   XEN_IRQ_WORK_VECTOR,
>   XEN_NMI_VECTOR,
> diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/smp.c b/arch/x86/xen/smp.c
> index c36b325..7cf1689 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/xen/smp.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/xen/smp.c
> @@ -46,12 +46,10 @@ struct xen_common_irq {
>  };
>  static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct xen_common_irq, xen_resched_irq) = { .irq = -1 
> };
>  static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct xen_common_irq, xen_callfunc_irq) = { .irq = -1 
> };
> -static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct xen_common_irq, xen_callfuncsingle_irq) = { 
> .irq = -1 };
>  static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct xen_common_irq, xen_irq_work) = { .irq = -1 };
>  static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct xen_common_irq, xen_debug_irq) = { .irq = -1 };
>  
>  static irqreturn_t xen_call_function_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id);
> -static irqreturn_t xen_call_function_single_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id);
>  static irqreturn_t xen_irq_work_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id);
>  
>  /*
> @@ -123,13 +121,6 @@ static void xen_smp_intr_free(unsigned int cpu)
>   kfree(per_cpu(xen_debug_irq, cpu).name);
>   per_cpu(xen_debug_irq, cpu).name = NULL;
>   }
> - if (per_cpu(xen_callfuncsingle_irq, cpu).irq >= 0) {
> - unbind_from_irqhandler(per_cpu(xen_callfuncsingle_irq, cpu).irq,
> -NULL);
> - per_cpu(xen_callfuncsingle_irq, cpu).irq = -1;
> - kfree(per_cpu(xen_callfuncsingle_irq, cpu).name);
> - per_cpu(xen_callfuncsingle_irq, cpu).name = NULL;
> - }
>   if (xen_hvm_domain())
>   return;
>  
> @@ -178,18 +169,6 @@ static int xen_smp_intr_init(unsigned int cpu)
>   per_cpu(xen_debug_irq, cpu).irq = rc;
>   per_cpu(xen_debug_irq, cpu).name = debug_name;
>  
> - callfunc_name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "callfuncsingle%d", cpu);
> - rc = bind_ipi_to_irqhandler(XEN_CALL_FUNCTION_SINGLE_VECTOR,
> - cpu,
> - xen_call_function_single_interrupt,
> - IRQF_PERCPU|IRQF_NOBALANCING,
> - callfunc_name,
> - NULL);
> - if (rc < 0)
> - goto fail;
> - per_cpu(xen_callfuncsingle_irq, cpu).irq = rc;
> - per_cpu(xen_callfuncsingle_irq, cpu).name = callfunc_name;
> -
>   /*
>* The IRQ worker on PVHVM goes through the native path and uses the
>* IPI mechanism.
> @@ -569,8 +548,7 @@ static void xen_smp_send_call_function_ipi(const struct 
> cpumask *mask)
>  
>  static void xen_smp_send_call_function_single_ipi(int cpu)
>  {
> - __xen_send_IPI_mask(cpumask_of(cpu),
> -   XEN_CALL_FUNCTION_SINGLE_VECTOR);
> + __xen_send_IPI_mask(cpumask_of(cpu), XEN_CALL_FUNCTION_VECTOR);
>  }
>  
>  static inline int xen_map_vector(int vector)
> @@ -582,10 +560,8 @@ static inline int xen_map_vector(int vector)
>   xen_vector = XEN_RESCHEDULE_VECTOR;
>   break;
>   case CALL_FUNCTION_VECTOR:
> - xen_vector = XEN_CALL_FUNCTION_VECTOR;
> - break;
>   case CALL_FUNCTION_SINGLE_VECTOR:
> - xen_vector = XEN_CALL_FUNCTION_SINGLE_VECTOR;
> + xen_vector = XEN_CALL_FUNCTION_VECTOR;
>   break;
>   case IRQ_WORK_VECTOR:
>   xen_vector = XEN_IRQ_WORK_VECTOR;
> @@ -663,16 +639,6 @@ static irqreturn_t xen_call_function_interrupt(int irq, 
> void *dev_id)
>   return IRQ_HANDLED;
>  }
>  
> -static irqreturn_t xen_call_function_single_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
> -{
> - irq_enter(