Re: [volt-nuts] AC calibration

2014-08-26 Thread acbern
Dave,

the title is: 
Thermal Voltage Converters and Comparator for Very Accurate AC Voltage 
Measurements
by E.S.Williams.

Adrian


 Gesendet: Montag, 25. August 2014 um 19:32 Uhr
 Von: Dave M dgmin...@mediacombb.net
 An: Discussion of precise voltage measurement volt-nuts@febo.com
 Betreff: Re: [volt-nuts] AC calibration

 Adrian,
 Do you have a link or title for the NIST paper that you mentioned?
 
 Dave M
 
 
 acb...@gmx.de wrote:
  fred,
  generally you raise a good point, I had the same issue of calibrating
  an ac voltage to a high level of accuracy. you need this e.g. to
  validate the self.cal of a 3458a or other precison stuff like the
  8506a0.   
  
  what i would recommend to do if you want to keep costs down is:
  in a nutshell, get a thermal converter in the lowest range you need
  and a second one on range above. build a set of resistor range
  extenders (rf type with appropriate connectors and housings) to
  expand the range to where you need to be max. get one of the thermal
  converter calibrated (the higher one usually, and you need to havr 
  good cal lab, should be 10ppm accuracy) and use it to calibrate the
  rest. generally, up to 20khz, the accuracy is some 20 ppm anyway for
  thermal converters! at higher frequencies, due to reflections and
  stray capacitance/inductance influences, the accuracy decreases. the
  resistor range extenders though, if build up correctly, only have a
  few ppm impact (there is a paper from nist on that, but this is only
  typical). you can calibrate all converters to the one you got
  externally calibrated. do some research in the web, when you do the
  calibration, you need to determine the so-called constant N. then do
  an ac, dc+, ac, dc-, ac measurement between the the two and establish
  the deviation, also establish the error propagation. the end result
  will be a set of highly precise (low inaccuracies9 thermal converters
  good enough to calibrate a 3458a an better devices. if you want to
  spend the money, you could also buy a set of converters/range
  resistors (with/without a 540), that typically is a few k altogether,
  while a single device sometimes is available for below 100 bucks. you
  need to have a stable 7.5 digit nanovoltmeter though for the
  measurements of the tvcs (34420a or 2182 typically ) and precision
  (stable) dc and ac sources. but in the end, all you need is a single
  calibrated thermal converter.
  
  adrian
  
  
  
  Gesendet: Montag, 25. August 2014 um 18:38 Uhr
  Von: Dave M dgmin...@mediacombb.net
  An: Discussion of precise voltage measurement volt-nuts@febo.com
  Betreff: Re: [volt-nuts] AC calibration
  
  Well, you sort of answered your own question.  The equipment is
  called a Thermal Transfer Standard, but instead of thermistors, it
  uses a thermocouple.  Look at the manual for the Fluke 540B
  (http://bama.edebris.com/manuals/fluke/540b/) and you'll see how
  it's done. Basically, the AC source is input into the transfer
  standard, and the standard's internal reference voltage is adjusted
  for a null on the galvanometer.  Leaving the reference voltage
  setting alone, a DC voltage is input into the unit, and the DC
  source is adjusted for a null on the galvanometer.  At that point,
  the AC voltage source is equal to that of the DC voltage source.
  
  Ther are thermocouple-type thermal converters used for RF voltage
  measurements with the transfer standard.  They aren't cheap, and you
  have to have a converter for each range of voltages that you need to
  measure.  The thermal converters used with this type of transfer
  standard isn't great (50 MHz or so typical), but their accuracy far
  surpasses that of the thermistor type sensors.
  
  There are other brands and models of thermal transfer standards, but
  I have a Fluke model 540 and a few thermal converters.  That's why I
  referred you to the manual for it.
  
  Cheers,
  Dave M
  
  
  pa4...@gmail.com wrote:
  Is there a way to link an AC voltage to a DC source for compare. I
  can check my calibrators (like a Fluke 332, 760 , 731 and a Philips)
  against standardcells. But for AC I can not do that. I have two
  AC+DC TRMS 7,5 digit meters but the last calibration was 2 years
  ago. 
  
  My idea is in theory simple. It is based on the thermal converters
  used in RF powermeters. Two resistors, two high resolution
  temperature meters. AC on the first en DC on the second. If both are
  the same temperature the AC voltage is the same as the DC voltage.
  But I'm sure some people here have done this in the past. I would
  like to use it for 50 to 100 kHz (or less) and something like for
  1V, 10V and 100V (and use several resistors/heaters.)
  
  Or mabey there is an other way to convert AC (for RF it can be done
  with lightbubs but I never tryed that)  I do not mind if it is slow
  etc, I like this sort of experiments. You can learn a lot from it.
  
  Fred, pa4tim
  
  
  

Re: [volt-nuts] AC calibration

2014-08-26 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp

In message trinity-9076c25b-a0a9-4b28-b29a-20f9e06039a3-1409072175101@3capp-gm
x-bs56, acb...@gmx.de writes:

Tellurium/copper is used because it machines much better than pure
copper, (20% - 90%) without ruining the conductivity too much.

Most other metals which can improve its machinability has big
negative impacts on the conductivity of copper.


-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp   | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
p...@freebsd.org | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer   | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
___
volt-nuts mailing list -- volt-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volt-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Re: [volt-nuts] 732A and Prologix received

2014-08-26 Thread Randy Evans
Bill,

I measured the time between SMPL symbols with NPLC set to 1000 and it is
approximately 33 seconds. It takes an hour to complete 100 readings.

Randy


On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 10:01 PM, Bill Gold wpgold3...@att.net wrote:

 Not that I know of.  Just wait and when you don't see a SMPL on the
 display it is done.  But then with 1000 PLC that is around 16.66 seconds
 per
 reading times 100 readings is somewhere around 28 minutes and there is
 probably some overhead time so around 30 minutes.  Not from the front panel
 at any rate.

 Bill

 - Original Message -
 From: Randy Evans randyevans2...@gmail.com
 To: Discussion of precise voltage measurement volt-nuts@febo.com
 Sent: Monday, August 25, 2014 9:23 PM
 Subject: Re: [volt-nuts] 732A and Prologix received


  Is there any way to tell when the function key routine is complete?  In
 the
  case of taking multiple readings using the DEFKEY and MATH function, I
  don't see any indication when the routine is complete.  In one particular
  case, I am taking a 100 readings with NLPC set for 1000 so its a long
 while
  before it's complete, but i have to guess when it's done.
 
  Thanks,
 
  Randy
 
 
  On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 6:04 PM, Randy Evans randyevans2...@gmail.com
  wrote:
 
   Bill,
  
   I am trying to figure out the MATH function without much success.  I
 input
   the sequence you said (I looked up the instructions to understand what
 you
   did - seems logical), BLUE DEFKEY BLUE F1 MATH 14;NRDGS 40;TRIG 4;TRIG;
 and
   it shows up on the display when I input BLUE F1.  I hit ENTER and it
 takes
   the 40 measurements and the MATH symbol shows on the display during the
   measurements.  After the SMPL symbol no longer blinks I hit MATH 2 and
 I
   get a MATH ERR symbol on the display.  I tried it a couple of times and
 the
   same result so I am doing something wrong.  Is there a better source
 for
   explaining how to do front panel masurements than the User Guide, which
   seems oriented at programming automatic rather than manual
 measurements.
  
   Randy
  
  
  
   On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 4:46 PM, Bill Gold wpgold3...@att.net wrote:
  
   Randy:
  
   The MATH function is accessible from the keypad.  I don't have an
 IEEE
   interface right now that works.  You can also program the numeric
 keypad
   keys to have preprogrammed functions.  DEFKEY
  
   I have made my own low thermal measurement leads from Pomona
 #4892
   banana plugs and Belden #9272 wire.  Why 9272, because it was handy at
 the
   time.  It is tin plated copper, shielded twisted pair 20 ga.  I have
 plans
   to do custom cables with 16 ga. bare copper wire that I will twist and
   then
   put a braided shield over it.  I simply cannot find what I want so I
 will
   build my own cable.  I have done something like this before and it
 worked
   fine.  When I get a round toit.
  
   I have 6 ea. Pomona 1756-48 spade lug low thermal leads that I
 have
   used
   in the past to verify my homemade low thermal leads as described
 above.
   Frankly I cannot see any difference between using the 1756 cables and
 my
   homemade cables once I give them a few minutes for the thermals to go
   away.
   As far as I can tell and measure the differences, if any, are below
 0.1
   ppm
   at 10 volts.
  
   Since the 10 volt, 1.0 volt and 1.018 volt outputs on the 732A are
 all
   adjustable you may be seeing a misadjusted 1 volt from the 732A.  As
 far
   as
   the instability of the readings it is hard to determine which is
 causing
   the
   problem.  I have programed (DEFKEY) a numeric keypad key #1 with the
   following code.  MATH 14;NRDGS 40;TRIG 4;TRIG ;   So what this does
 is
   set
   the MATH to Statistics (store high reading/low reading/ and mean of
 the
   readings) in the registers, the number of readings to 40, the
 trigger
 to
   hold (which keeps the meter from triggering until I press ENTER
 and
   then
   trigger the sequence of 40 readings when I push the ENTER button.
 You
   can
   do all of this manually from the keypads but since I use this sequence
 a
   lot
   I have preprogrammed it.  This is after I set digits to 8 and PLC to
   100.
   Once those 40 readings are finished then you can access the various
 MATH
   statistic registers, using the menu, by entering MATH and then a 2
 for
   low, a 4 for mean, and 13 for high.  Of course you could do all of
 this
   through the IEEE also.  The 3458A has a very rich set of measurement
   commands.  I am still learning all of them.  It depends upon what I am
   trying to accomplish.
  
   Since the 1.018 and 1.0 volt outputs are passive and derived from
   resistive dividers from the 10 volt, I don't see how they could
 contribute
   to the varying readings you are measuring.  I think I would put a
 short
 on
   the input of the 3458A and manually set the range to 1 volt and then
   observe
   the variations that way without the 732A involved.  When I do this I
 see a
   variation from low 

Re: [volt-nuts] AC calibration

2014-08-26 Thread Dave M

Great!!@! Many Thanks!!

Dave M


acb...@gmx.de wrote:

Dave,

the title is:
Thermal Voltage Converters and Comparator for Very Accurate AC
Voltage Measurements by E.S.Williams.

Adrian



Gesendet: Montag, 25. August 2014 um 19:32 Uhr
Von: Dave M dgmin...@mediacombb.net
An: Discussion of precise voltage measurement volt-nuts@febo.com
Betreff: Re: [volt-nuts] AC calibration

Adrian,
Do you have a link or title for the NIST paper that you mentioned?




___
volt-nuts mailing list -- volt-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volt-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Re: [volt-nuts] 732A and Prologix received

2014-08-26 Thread acbern
hi randy,

just for curiosity, why doing 100 measurements at nplc 1000. is this to sample 
a changing value?
when i am doing 10 measurements from a stable signal at nplc 100 (only there 
many subsequent measuremnts with statistics make sense) I am already getting a 
stanard deviation below 0.1ppm.
in a 30 minute test cycle, i would also be concerned about drifts (acal) unless 
the amb. temperature is really very stable (half a degree already adds about 
0.25ppm at 10v)

thanks




 Gesendet: Dienstag, 26. August 2014 um 04:23 Uhr
 Von: Randy Evans randyevans2...@gmail.com
 An: Discussion of precise voltage measurement volt-nuts@febo.com
 Betreff: Re: [volt-nuts] 732A and Prologix received

 Is there any way to tell when the function key routine is complete?  In the
 case of taking multiple readings using the DEFKEY and MATH function, I
 don't see any indication when the routine is complete.  In one particular
 case, I am taking a 100 readings with NLPC set for 1000 so its a long while
 before it's complete, but i have to guess when it's done.
 
 Thanks,
 
 Randy
 
 
 On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 6:04 PM, Randy Evans randyevans2...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 
  Bill,
 
  I am trying to figure out the MATH function without much success.  I input
  the sequence you said (I looked up the instructions to understand what you
  did - seems logical), BLUE DEFKEY BLUE F1 MATH 14;NRDGS 40;TRIG 4;TRIG; and
  it shows up on the display when I input BLUE F1.  I hit ENTER and it takes
  the 40 measurements and the MATH symbol shows on the display during the
  measurements.  After the SMPL symbol no longer blinks I hit MATH 2 and I
  get a MATH ERR symbol on the display.  I tried it a couple of times and the
  same result so I am doing something wrong.  Is there a better source for
  explaining how to do front panel masurements than the User Guide, which
  seems oriented at programming automatic rather than manual measurements.
 
  Randy
 
 
 
  On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 4:46 PM, Bill Gold wpgold3...@att.net wrote:
 
  Randy:
 
  The MATH function is accessible from the keypad.  I don't have an IEEE
  interface right now that works.  You can also program the numeric keypad
  keys to have preprogrammed functions.  DEFKEY
 
  I have made my own low thermal measurement leads from Pomona #4892
  banana plugs and Belden #9272 wire.  Why 9272, because it was handy at the
  time.  It is tin plated copper, shielded twisted pair 20 ga.  I have plans
  to do custom cables with 16 ga. bare copper wire that I will twist and
  then
  put a braided shield over it.  I simply cannot find what I want so I will
  build my own cable.  I have done something like this before and it worked
  fine.  When I get a round toit.
 
  I have 6 ea. Pomona 1756-48 spade lug low thermal leads that I have
  used
  in the past to verify my homemade low thermal leads as described above.
  Frankly I cannot see any difference between using the 1756 cables and my
  homemade cables once I give them a few minutes for the thermals to go
  away.
  As far as I can tell and measure the differences, if any, are below 0.1
  ppm
  at 10 volts.
 
  Since the 10 volt, 1.0 volt and 1.018 volt outputs on the 732A are all
  adjustable you may be seeing a misadjusted 1 volt from the 732A.  As far
  as
  the instability of the readings it is hard to determine which is causing
  the
  problem.  I have programed (DEFKEY) a numeric keypad key #1 with the
  following code.  MATH 14;NRDGS 40;TRIG 4;TRIG ;   So what this does is
  set
  the MATH to Statistics (store high reading/low reading/ and mean of the
  readings) in the registers, the number of readings to 40, the trigger to
  hold (which keeps the meter from triggering until I press ENTER and
  then
  trigger the sequence of 40 readings when I push the ENTER button.  You
  can
  do all of this manually from the keypads but since I use this sequence a
  lot
  I have preprogrammed it.  This is after I set digits to 8 and PLC to
  100.
  Once those 40 readings are finished then you can access the various MATH
  statistic registers, using the menu, by entering MATH and then a 2 for
  low, a 4 for mean, and 13 for high.  Of course you could do all of this
  through the IEEE also.  The 3458A has a very rich set of measurement
  commands.  I am still learning all of them.  It depends upon what I am
  trying to accomplish.
 
  Since the 1.018 and 1.0 volt outputs are passive and derived from
  resistive dividers from the 10 volt, I don't see how they could contribute
  to the varying readings you are measuring.  I think I would put a short on
  the input of the 3458A and manually set the range to 1 volt and then
  observe
  the variations that way without the 732A involved.  When I do this I see a
  variation from low reading to high reading of 0.125 uVolts and then
  another
  40 I get 0.155 uVolts.  This is without the GUARD connected to the low
  side
  of the measurment terminals, GUARD connected doesn't seem to affect