[volt-nuts] LTZ1000 VS LM399

2014-12-10 Thread Jan Fredriksson
I have been off the list for a while, but noticed that there where
some posts on the LTZ1000 and LM399 about a month ago.

I just have a comment; the requirements on these two references
(standard datasheet implementations) are very much opposites:

- LTZ1000 requires very stable resistors but is practically immune to
supply voltage variations.

- LM399 does not require high stability resistors but requirements on
stable supply voltage are high.

On the $ of one LTZ1000 board, you can get a number of LM399
paralelled  averaged.
But one LTZ1000 runs on less power than one LM399

my 2c
___
volt-nuts mailing list -- volt-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volt-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [volt-nuts] LTZ1000 VS LM399

2014-12-10 Thread Andreas Jahn


Am 10.12.2014 um 16:20 schrieb Jan Fredriksson:

But one LTZ1000 runs on less power than one LM399


Hello,

I cannot agree to the last statement.
It mainly depends if you use LTZ1000 or LTZ1000A and temperature 
setpoint and thermal isolation.


Just for comparison:
My two LTZ1000A with 50 deg C setpoint are using 20-21 mA each at 23 deg 
C and 14V stabilized supply (from 12 NiMH cells = 15V battery)
My LM399#3 uses 30mA at room temp and 9.35V stabilized supply (from 8 
NiMH cells = 10V battery)


so total power is around 300mW in both cases.

with best regards

Andreas

___
volt-nuts mailing list -- volt-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volt-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [volt-nuts] HP-419 and Fluke 845 Modifications

2014-12-10 Thread Randy Evans
Stan,

I working for a daughterboard design.  I will be using parts of the
existing circuitry and I am not worried about maintaining purity.  I just
want a functioning nullmeter.

Randy

On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 9:25 PM, Stan Katz stan.katz...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi Randy,

 I have a very pedestrian and naive question regarding the fab of the
 chopper eliminator board for the HP419A. Is it your intention to replace
 the A4 board with a board containing your new design? If so, you have to
 keep in mind the A4 board is a whopping .173 thick.  Expresspcb seems to
 only have one thickness in their fab of .062. I'm sure that wont mate well
 with the existing connector. There are other fab houses that can provide
 boards as thick as .125 stateside (sunstone.com), or pcbcart.com China
 (.126). Even using these other fabs leaves almost 50 mil short of the
 original A4 thickness. Maybe the connector can make up the 50 mil
 shortfall? If this is just a 2-sided board, you could split the layers onto
 two circuit boards with thicknesses that come close to the original A4
 board. These boards would have to be epoxied together by the end user.
 In any event, you may not get by using Expresspcb since two of their boards
 combined still leaves that 50 mil shortfall.

 All of the above is easily dismissed if you intend to mount a daughterboard
 onto the A4, cut the traces on the A4 down near the connector, and then
 wiring the daughter board onto the trace remnants still running to the
 connector. The only downside would be no resale to a purist who wants to
 run with the David Wise HP H11 linear optocoupler/photochopper replacement
 (see HP yahoo group for HP740b ).

 Just curious,
 Stan

 On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 12:18 PM, Randy Evans randyevans2...@gmail.com
 wrote:

  I have finished the design and analysis (LTSpice) and I am preparing the
  BOM and doing a PCB layout now (ExpressPCB).  I am hoping to finish the
  work over the Thanksgiving holidays but I wanted to see Dallas's 845A
  modifications before ordering parts and pulling the plug on PCB fab first
  but it hasn't shown up on K04BB's site yet (still in the upload section).
 
  Randy
 
  On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 4:06 AM, ludger.len...@gmx.de wrote:
 
   Hi Randy,
  
   did you finish the HP-419A modification with a modern chopper amp?
  
   I have to refurbish my HP-419A so it would make sense to replace the
   optical chopper. Any help or made expericance would perfect.
  
   BR
   Ludger / PeLuLe
  
   *Gesendet:* Samstag, 09. August 2014 um 03:23 Uhr
   *Von:* Randy Evans randyevans2...@gmail.com
   *An:* Discussion of precise voltage measurement volt-nuts@febo.com
   *Betreff:* Re: [volt-nuts] HP-419 and Fluke 845 Modifications
   For those interested, I have largely finished the design of the HP-419A
   modifications to replace the current active circuits with a more modern
   chopper amp; e.g., LTC2054. The LTSpice analysis shows the circuit
 draws
   0.3 mA at full scale meter readings using a single 6V battery. I think
 I
   will use a 6V 225mAH NiCad rechargeable battery (because I have some)
  that
   should last many many hours on one charge. I am still working out the
   board layout and unit mods but the circuit is extremely simple and will
  use
   all the existing range and mode switching circuits. The circuit should
   also work for the Fluke 845 also. Keep tuned.
  
   Randy
  
  
   On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 10:05 AM, Dave M dgmin...@mediacombb.net
 wrote:
  
From: Randy Evans randyevans2...@gmail.com
   
   
I am looking at modifying my (defective) HP419A and Fluke 845A Null
meters
using the LTC2054 zero drift op amp. I am planning on using a single
4.2 V
Lithium Ion battery to power them (no AC input required and may not
include, TBD). The LTC2054 has a very low bias current of typically
1pA at
room temp and the bias plots vs. temp show no appreciable increase
until
about 50C. Conceptually, it looks pretty straight forward and, based
on my
Fluke 887A modifications, likely will be very stable.
   
Since this is a very astute group, does anyone have any comments on
the
feasibility of this modification before I get too involved?
   
Regards,
   
Randy Evans
   
   
   
Hi Randy. Good to hear from you again.
I have modified two 883A models and one 887A model DMMs using your
details, with great results. I have a model 845A null meter that is
working fine right now, but who knows how long that will last. I
 would
surely welcome some research on modifying it with a zero-drift opamp.
  One
concern that I would have with that mod would be that some mechanism
   would
need to be added to retain the isolation of the recorder output and
  guard
integrity that's afforded by the photo-modulator/demodulator circuit.
Perhaps some kind of optically-isolated interface might be in order
   
Some Spice runs on the original circuit would be interesting to