[volt-nuts] 3458a RAM batteries - longer life if unit is continually powered?

2014-03-26 Thread new
The question is... if the 3458 RAMs store the calibration "magic" numbers 
if the ac (main) power is turned off, does it mean the RAM batteries are now 
under load to preserve the data?

If this is the case, would it be best to leave the unit on a UPS and keep it on 
24/7/365? (But... will this kill the display?)

That way, it would never lose the cal magic, right?

If the cal constants are in the RAMs and the RAM batteries go dead, the 3458 
needs to go back to Loveland, right?

Does any "RAM" error, HI, LO, etc. mean that it's time to go to Loveland?

Sorry for all the questions, I'm sure they were answered in the past - I'm new 
here!

Willy, owner of one working and one sick 3458...
___
volt-nuts mailing list -- volt-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volt-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


[volt-nuts] 3458a RAM batteries - longer life if unit is continually powered?

2014-03-27 Thread Frank Stellmach

Hi,

the DALLAS datasheet specifies 10 years data retention. Quite obviously, 
that's the unpowered time.


That time includes self discharge and RAM sustaining currents.

self discharge and RAM supply current will be of the same order, i.e. < 
1µA, I assume from experience.
And I assume also, that those currents will vary over samples, i.e. over 
samples of battery and RAM.


Recently, there was the case, where the CAL RAM was still alive after 24 
years (instrument vintage 1989, same DALLAS date code!), but with 
unknown powering history.


Additionally, a typical 10 years of lifetime is given also for those 
batteries.


Therefore, in practise there will be no pronounced difference between 
powered / unpowered state.
On the other hand, DALLAS implemented an electronic seal, so that the 
RAM inside the package is initially powered only after first power up. 
But there's no parameter in the datasheet, specifying data retention 
according to date code or to initial power up.



The waste of energy just to extend the batteries lifetime, does not pay off.
On the contrary, the MTBF time of the instrument will be consumed, the 
display will get bad, and here in Germany, this energy consumption would 
cost a fortune (meanwhile: 25+ Cents / kWh, crazy).



Yes, as long the instrument is powered, the CAL RAM will not lose its 
content.. but what about unexpected power outages?



If you save the CAL RAM and repogram a fresh one after failure, there's 
no need to send it to agilent.



No, not any RAM error needs recalibration.
Those error messages are not documented.

So I've scanned the text fragments in the firmware file:

RAM TEST 1
RAM TEST 2

probably refer to either to the configuration RAMs (2x32kB), andthe CAL 
RAM (8kB).


Eror messages are:
NONVOLATILE RAM HiGH /LOW
CAL RAM FAILURE

and known ones from other users:

RAM TEST 1 HIGH / LOW

So I assume, that a real failure of the cal constants only apply on 
message: CAL RAM FAILURE and perhaps RAM TEST 2 , as RAM TEST 1 
should refer to the configuration RAMs only, HIGH to the high byte RAM, 
LOW to the low byte RAM.


Errors of the cal RAM will manifest in additional ACAL or CAL failures.


Frank
___
volt-nuts mailing list -- volt-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volt-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


[volt-nuts] 3458a RAM batteries - longer life if unit is continually powered?

2014-03-27 Thread Mark Sims
The 3458A does have a vacuum fluorescent display and they do go bad over time.  
I've seen lots of them with bad displays.  Replacements are expensive... they 
are a custom HP part only available from HP.  
No vacuum fluorescent disply to worry about 
  
___
volt-nuts mailing list -- volt-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volt-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [volt-nuts] 3458a RAM batteries - longer life if unit is continually powered?

2014-03-26 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message , "new" writes:

>If the cal constants are in the RAMs and the RAM batteries go dead,
>the 3458 needs to go back to Loveland, right?

The CALRAM can trivially be backed up via GPIB.

The backup can either be written into new NVRAM chips using a programmer
or it can with some difficulty be written back via GPIB.

I've explained the details in previous emails to the list (see archives)
and there is software to do the backup in my "Pylt" github project.

In the meantime, keeping it power on means the battery only drain
by their self-discharge.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp   | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
p...@freebsd.org | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer   | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
___
volt-nuts mailing list -- volt-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volt-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [volt-nuts] 3458a RAM batteries - longer life if unit is continually powered?

2014-03-27 Thread Robert Atkinson
Always best to keep it on. No vacuum fluorescent disply to worry about so it's 
only the cost of power. The back up battery will last much longer. It may even 
be less than the shelf life as there will be a very tiny "charge" current due 
to the reverse leakage of the isolation diode.
 
Robert G8RPI.
 


 From: Poul-Henning Kamp 
To: Discussion of precise voltage measurement ; new 
 
Sent: Wednesday, 26 March 2014, 17:58
Subject: Re: [volt-nuts] 3458a RAM batteries - longer life if unit is   
continually powered?
  

In message , "new" writes:

>If the cal constants are in the RAMs and the RAM batteries go dead,
>the 3458 needs to go back to Loveland, right?

The CALRAM can trivially be backed up via GPIB.

The backup can either be written into new NVRAM chips using a programmer
or it can with some difficulty be written back via GPIB.

I've explained the details in previous emails to the list (see archives)
and there is software to do the backup in my "Pylt" github project.

In the meantime, keeping it power on means the battery only drain
by their self-discharge.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
p...@freebsd.org         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.

___
volt-nuts mailing list -- volt-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volt-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
___
volt-nuts mailing list -- volt-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volt-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [volt-nuts] 3458a RAM batteries - longer life if unit is continually powered?

2014-03-27 Thread Chuck Harris

Frank Stellmach wrote:

Hi,

the DALLAS datasheet specifies 10 years data retention. Quite obviously, that's 
the
unpowered time.


It is also the time at the maximum storage temperature... where the silicon
has the most leakage current, and the lithium cells self discharge the most
quickly.

In my experience, they last easily twice to 3 times that long.

-Chuck Harris
___
volt-nuts mailing list -- volt-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volt-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [volt-nuts] 3458a RAM batteries - longer life if unit is continually powered?

2014-03-27 Thread Tom Knox
Date Codes can be misleading because most of this style of chip does not 
connect to the battery until the first power up cycle. So evl

Thomas Knox



> Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 17:33:17 +0100
> From: frank.stellm...@freenet.de
> To: volt-nuts@febo.com
> Subject: [volt-nuts] 3458a RAM batteries - longer life if unit is 
> continually powered?
> 
> Hi,
> 
> the DALLAS datasheet specifies 10 years data retention. Quite obviously, 
> that's the unpowered time.
> 
> That time includes self discharge and RAM sustaining currents.
> 
> self discharge and RAM supply current will be of the same order, i.e. < 
> 1µA, I assume from experience.
> And I assume also, that those currents will vary over samples, i.e. over 
> samples of battery and RAM.
> 
> Recently, there was the case, where the CAL RAM was still alive after 24 
> years (instrument vintage 1989, same DALLAS date code!), but with 
> unknown powering history.
> 
> Additionally, a typical 10 years of lifetime is given also for those 
> batteries.
> 
> Therefore, in practise there will be no pronounced difference between 
> powered / unpowered state.
> On the other hand, DALLAS implemented an electronic seal, so that the 
> RAM inside the package is initially powered only after first power up. 
> But there's no parameter in the datasheet, specifying data retention 
> according to date code or to initial power up.
> 
> 
> The waste of energy just to extend the batteries lifetime, does not pay off.
> On the contrary, the MTBF time of the instrument will be consumed, the 
> display will get bad, and here in Germany, this energy consumption would 
> cost a fortune (meanwhile: 25+ Cents / kWh, crazy).
> 
> 
> Yes, as long the instrument is powered, the CAL RAM will not lose its 
> content.. but what about unexpected power outages?
> 
> 
> If you save the CAL RAM and repogram a fresh one after failure, there's 
> no need to send it to agilent.
> 
> 
> No, not any RAM error needs recalibration.
> Those error messages are not documented.
> 
> So I've scanned the text fragments in the firmware file:
> 
> RAM TEST 1
> RAM TEST 2
> 
> probably refer to either to the configuration RAMs (2x32kB), andthe CAL 
> RAM (8kB).
> 
> Eror messages are:
> NONVOLATILE RAM HiGH /LOW
> CAL RAM FAILURE
> 
> and known ones from other users:
> 
> RAM TEST 1 HIGH / LOW
> 
> So I assume, that a real failure of the cal constants only apply on 
> message: CAL RAM FAILURE and perhaps RAM TEST 2 , as RAM TEST 1 
> should refer to the configuration RAMs only, HIGH to the high byte RAM, 
> LOW to the low byte RAM.
> 
> Errors of the cal RAM will manifest in additional ACAL or CAL failures.
> 
> 
> Frank
> ___
> volt-nuts mailing list -- volt-nuts@febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volt-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
  
___
volt-nuts mailing list -- volt-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volt-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [volt-nuts] 3458a RAM batteries - longer life if unit is continually powered?

2014-03-27 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <533452cd.10...@freenet.de>, Frank Stellmach writes:

>So I've scanned the text fragments in the firmware file:

I have the firmware reverse engineered, and it is a fair deal
more complicated than you posit, there are both checksums
and hardware mechanisms involved.


-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp   | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
p...@freebsd.org | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer   | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
___
volt-nuts mailing list -- volt-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volt-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [volt-nuts] 3458a RAM batteries - longer life if unit is continually powered?

2014-03-27 Thread John Phillips
Is there a command to turn the display Off?


On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 10:28 AM, Mark Sims  wrote:

> The 3458A does have a vacuum fluorescent display and they do go bad over
> time.  I've seen lots of them with bad displays.  Replacements are
> expensive... they are a custom HP part only available from HP.
> No vacuum fluorescent disply to worry about
> ___
> volt-nuts mailing list -- volt-nuts@febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to
> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volt-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
>



-- 
John Phillips
___
volt-nuts mailing list -- volt-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volt-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [volt-nuts] 3458a RAM batteries - longer life if unit is continually powered?

2014-03-27 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message , Mark Sims writes:

>The 3458A does have a vacuum fluorescent display and they do go
>bad over time.  I've seen lots of them with bad displays.  Replacements
>are expensive... they are a custom HP part only available from HP.

The hardware interface is pretty simple though, so it wouldn't be hard
to create a replacement.


-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp   | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
p...@freebsd.org | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer   | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
___
volt-nuts mailing list -- volt-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volt-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [volt-nuts] 3458a RAM batteries - longer life if unit is continually powered?

2014-03-27 Thread Dr. Frank

Hi Poul-Henning,

you've misunderstood, what I've done..

I simply searched the text fragments directly in the binary file, with a 
HEX-editor.

I did no SW-reverse-engineering!

I just wanted to identify, which failure (text) messages come up, when 
either the config RAMs, or the cal RAM fail...


Nobody up to now reported the correct failure messages in case of 
failure of the 8kB CAL RAM.


But perhaps you can tell from your reverse enginieering, what the error 
message would be?


regards Frank

Am 27.03.2014 19:11, schrieb Poul-Henning Kamp:

In message <533452cd.10...@freenet.de>, Frank Stellmach writes:


So I've scanned the text fragments in the firmware file:

I have the firmware reverse engineered, and it is a fair deal
more complicated than you posit, there are both checksums
and hardware mechanisms involved.




___
volt-nuts mailing list -- volt-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volt-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [volt-nuts] 3458a RAM batteries - longer life if unit is continually powered?

2014-03-27 Thread Tom Miller
Only on the newer (AB & AD) Dallas (Maxim) parts. All the old ones (Y) do 
not have that feature.


Tom M.

- Original Message - 
From: "Tom Knox" 

To: "Discussion of precise voltage measurement" 
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2014 12:59 PM
Subject: Re: [volt-nuts] 3458a RAM batteries - longer life if unit is 
continually powered?



Date Codes can be misleading because most of this style of chip does not 
connect to the battery until the first power up cycle. So evl


Thomas Knox




Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 17:33:17 +0100
From: frank.stellm...@freenet.de
To: volt-nuts@febo.com
Subject: [volt-nuts] 3458a RAM batteries - longer life if unit is 
continually powered?


Hi,

the DALLAS datasheet specifies 10 years data retention. Quite obviously,
that's the unpowered time.

That time includes self discharge and RAM sustaining currents.

self discharge and RAM supply current will be of the same order, i.e. <
1µA, I assume from experience.
And I assume also, that those currents will vary over samples, i.e. over
samples of battery and RAM.

Recently, there was the case, where the CAL RAM was still alive after 24
years (instrument vintage 1989, same DALLAS date code!), but with
unknown powering history.

Additionally, a typical 10 years of lifetime is given also for those
batteries.

Therefore, in practise there will be no pronounced difference between
powered / unpowered state.
On the other hand, DALLAS implemented an electronic seal, so that the
RAM inside the package is initially powered only after first power up.
But there's no parameter in the datasheet, specifying data retention
according to date code or to initial power up.


The waste of energy just to extend the batteries lifetime, does not pay 
off.

On the contrary, the MTBF time of the instrument will be consumed, the
display will get bad, and here in Germany, this energy consumption would
cost a fortune (meanwhile: 25+ Cents / kWh, crazy).


Yes, as long the instrument is powered, the CAL RAM will not lose its
content.. but what about unexpected power outages?


If you save the CAL RAM and repogram a fresh one after failure, there's
no need to send it to agilent.


No, not any RAM error needs recalibration.
Those error messages are not documented.

So I've scanned the text fragments in the firmware file:

RAM TEST 1
RAM TEST 2

probably refer to either to the configuration RAMs (2x32kB), andthe CAL
RAM (8kB).

Eror messages are:
NONVOLATILE RAM HiGH /LOW
CAL RAM FAILURE

and known ones from other users:

RAM TEST 1 HIGH / LOW

So I assume, that a real failure of the cal constants only apply on
message: CAL RAM FAILURE and perhaps RAM TEST 2 , as RAM TEST 1
should refer to the configuration RAMs only, HIGH to the high byte RAM,
LOW to the low byte RAM.

Errors of the cal RAM will manifest in additional ACAL or CAL failures.


Frank
___
volt-nuts mailing list -- volt-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to 
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volt-nuts

and follow the instructions there.


___
volt-nuts mailing list -- volt-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to 
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volt-nuts
and follow the instructions there. 


___
volt-nuts mailing list -- volt-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volt-nuts
and follow the instructions there.