Re: [volt-nuts] Short term "standard" cell?
FYI, I bought two of these used 3458A reference boards for $85 each a few years ago and they both experience noise bursts. I plan on replacing the LTZ1000 chips on them (sometime in the near future). Randy Evans AE6YG On Sun, Mar 12, 2017 at 10:53 AM, m kwrote: > > > On 12/03/17 17:27, Dr. David Kirkby (Kirkby Microwave Ltd) wrote: > > On Sun, 12 Mar 2017 at 17:03, Frank Stellmach < > frank.stellm...@freenet.de> > > wrote: > > > >> Hi Chris, > >> > >> > >> > >> Therefore, instead of poking around with these mediocre 10V > >> "references", I'd look for a possibility to get access to a 3458A, maybe > >> there's a friendly volt-nuts nearby. > >> > >> Frank > >> > > There are a number of reference boards supposedly removed from 3458As on > > eBay. Assuming they are non counterfeit (not necessarily a valid > assumption > > for items on eBay), how easy would they be to integrate into a box to > make > > a stable reference? > > > > The LTZ1000A chip is about $50 new, but to make a stable reference you > need > > quite expensive resistors, so a used 3458A reference is attractive. But I > > don't know if problems making low thermal EMF joints might totally ruin > the > > potential performance. > > > > > > > > > The suspicion is that they may be genuine, but were rejects because of > noise bursts. I bought one a while ago, but still not sure of its long term > stability. > ___ > volt-nuts mailing list -- volt-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/ > mailman/listinfo/volt-nuts > and follow the instructions there. > ___ volt-nuts mailing list -- volt-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volt-nuts and follow the instructions there.
Re: [volt-nuts] Short term "standard" cell?
On 12/03/17 17:27, Dr. David Kirkby (Kirkby Microwave Ltd) wrote: > On Sun, 12 Mar 2017 at 17:03, Frank Stellmach> wrote: > >> Hi Chris, >> >> >> >> Therefore, instead of poking around with these mediocre 10V >> "references", I'd look for a possibility to get access to a 3458A, maybe >> there's a friendly volt-nuts nearby. >> >> Frank >> > There are a number of reference boards supposedly removed from 3458As on > eBay. Assuming they are non counterfeit (not necessarily a valid assumption > for items on eBay), how easy would they be to integrate into a box to make > a stable reference? > > The LTZ1000A chip is about $50 new, but to make a stable reference you need > quite expensive resistors, so a used 3458A reference is attractive. But I > don't know if problems making low thermal EMF joints might totally ruin the > potential performance. > > > > The suspicion is that they may be genuine, but were rejects because of noise bursts. I bought one a while ago, but still not sure of its long term stability. ___ volt-nuts mailing list -- volt-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volt-nuts and follow the instructions there.
[volt-nuts] Short term "standard" cell?
>There are a number of reference boards supposedly removed from 3458As on eBay. >Assuming they are non counterfeit (not necessarily a valid assumption for items on eBay), how easy would they be to integrate into a box to make a stable reference? >The LTZ1000A chip is about $50 new, but to make a stable reference you need quite expensive resistors, so a used 3458A reference is attractive. >But I don't know if problems making low thermal EMF joints might totally ruin the potential performance. David, these 3458A reference boards are also quite expensive, they sell for about 150-200$. They may have problems with high drift and high noise, that's why they show up on the 2nd hand market. It's been demonstrated that it's possible to easily build such stable references with an 40$ LTZ1000 (non A), and 5 precision wire wound resistors ( <10$ each), and an LT1013, so BOM cost < 100$. The emfs are not the biggest problem, can be mitigated by proper design and thermal shielding. The biggest problem with the 3458A and the DIY references is to amplify precisely to around 10V. These resistive dividers usually drift too much over time and temperature to give reasonably stable 10V references. I dfesigned an auto-calibration-divider, similar to the 720As 1st decade, which amplifies the 7,15V exactly by 10/7, which is mostly sufficient to calibrate the 10V range of a DMM. Other solutions require these ultra- expensive Vishay hermetically sealed, oil filled VHP resistors, which easily double the BOM cost. Frank ___ volt-nuts mailing list -- volt-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volt-nuts and follow the instructions there.
Re: [volt-nuts] Short term "standard" cell?
The navel is not just for collecting lint, you can also temp stabilize a silver or mercury button cell there. Or in the armpit. Or up in other cavities of the body. Preferrably measure very quick or at least at the same time of day. Hendrik ___ volt-nuts mailing list -- volt-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volt-nuts and follow the instructions there.
[volt-nuts] Short term "standard" cell?
Hi Chris, I remember getting an 1.5V mercury cell with a 4 1/2 digit DVM kit, so that's about the level of stability you can achieve with such a battery. Alcaline batteries, and so on, forget about it. For a Fluke 332A, you need on the order of 5ppm uncertainty for a proper adjustment of the 10V range, so all other "references" are just gimmicks. Drift and T.C. are way too high. The only reasonable reference from Joe Geller (about 5ppm uncertainty, T.C. trimmed to near zero) is long gone, that's pityful. Anyhow, a 10V reference alone is also not sufficient for calibration. In general, you'll need linearity adjustment (requires a Kelvin Varley divider like the 720A, or a 3458A ), and 100V and 1kV range adjustment require a Reference Divider like the 752A, or again a 3458A. Therefore, instead of poking around with these mediocre 10V "references", I'd look for a possibility to get access to a 3458A, maybe there's a friendly volt-nuts nearby. Frank ___ volt-nuts mailing list -- volt-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volt-nuts and follow the instructions there.
Re: [volt-nuts] Short term "standard" cell?
How do silver oxide cells compare to mercury cells for voltage stability? When I last looked into this, I concluded that there were two different silver oxide chemistries with a slight variation in voltage between them. On Sat, 11 Mar 2017 09:21:02 -0800, you wrote: >Hi Chris: > >I think it was my Heathkit VTVM that said to get a fresh AA battery and use it >as a 1.52 Volt standard to calibrate the >meter. An even better way was to use a Mercury coin cell since they were 1.35 >volts and very stable. They were used for >light meters and voltage references because of the very flat discharge curve. > >But when you are looking for many more digits of accuracy/precision then a >battery may not be the best choice since >pretty much everything will cause a variation. Maybe in order of importance: >temperature, atmospheric pressure, >humidity, impedance of measuring equipment, > >There are a few low cost voltage standards available where the maker has an HP >3458. For example by Geller and Malone: >http://www.prc68.com/I/MTE.shtml#DCVR > >The care and feeding of chemical standard cells is such a pain and they are >inferior to the modern electronic standards >so they have become obsolete. The label on my Eppley shows 5 digits (4 >printed and the last hand written). Note since >there's liquid involved there is also an "Up" direction. >http://www.prc68.com/I/Eppley.html#Standard_Cell > >http://www.prc68.com/I/Fluke332B.html ___ volt-nuts mailing list -- volt-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volt-nuts and follow the instructions there.
Re: [volt-nuts] Short term "standard" cell?
Hi Chris: I think it was my Heathkit VTVM that said to get a fresh AA battery and use it as a 1.52 Volt standard to calibrate the meter. An even better way was to use a Mercury coin cell since they were 1.35 volts and very stable. They were used for light meters and voltage references because of the very flat discharge curve. But when you are looking for many more digits of accuracy/precision then a battery may not be the best choice since pretty much everything will cause a variation. Maybe in order of importance: temperature, atmospheric pressure, humidity, impedance of measuring equipment, There are a few low cost voltage standards available where the maker has an HP 3458. For example by Geller and Malone: http://www.prc68.com/I/MTE.shtml#DCVR The care and feeding of chemical standard cells is such a pain and they are inferior to the modern electronic standards so they have become obsolete. The label on my Eppley shows 5 digits (4 printed and the last hand written). Note since there's liquid involved there is also an "Up" direction. http://www.prc68.com/I/Eppley.html#Standard_Cell http://www.prc68.com/I/Fluke332B.html -- Have Fun, Brooke Clarke, N6GCE http://www.PRC68.com http://www.end2partygovernment.com/2012Issues.html Original Message In preparation of (hopefully!) Getting that fluke 332A running and sticker shock of what the 732A and similar references go for, I wonder about normal, every day alkaline or lithium batteries and their short term stability. Here's the half baked idea. A fresh, standard 1.5V, or 3V lithium, alkaline, or silver oxide button cell battery, or even an AA sized cell, measured by someone/some place with a known accurate precision meter. Invisioning 6 or so decimal places. Could that cell then be shipped, and used as a reference in another altitude? I haven't spent a ton of time looking, but haven't yet found anything on the web about stability of these types of batteries. Regards, Chris Sent from my SMRTphone ___ volt-nuts mailing list -- volt-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volt-nuts and follow the instructions there. ___ volt-nuts mailing list -- volt-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volt-nuts and follow the instructions there.
[volt-nuts] Short term "standard" cell?
In preparation of (hopefully!) Getting that fluke 332A running and sticker shock of what the 732A and similar references go for, I wonder about normal, every day alkaline or lithium batteries and their short term stability. Here's the half baked idea. A fresh, standard 1.5V, or 3V lithium, alkaline, or silver oxide button cell battery, or even an AA sized cell, measured by someone/some place with a known accurate precision meter. Invisioning 6 or so decimal places. Could that cell then be shipped, and used as a reference in another altitude? I haven't spent a ton of time looking, but haven't yet found anything on the web about stability of these types of batteries. Regards, Chris Sent from my SMRTphone ___ volt-nuts mailing list -- volt-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volt-nuts and follow the instructions there.