Sci. Am. attacks CF again

2005-03-25 Thread Jed Rothwell
The Sci. Am. has attacked cold fusion again, two months in a row. See the 
illustration to the April fools editorial, print edition page 10.

- Jed



Re: Sci. Am. attacks CF again

2005-03-25 Thread Edmund Storms
Well Jed, if this the worst they can do, I'm not worried.  In fact, they 
might have also said that my next car would run on hydrogen or 
french-fry grease with as much sarcasm.  Actually, I expect my next car 
will be a hybrid Diesel running on biofuel mixed with a fuel made from 
oil and coal.

Ed
Jed Rothwell wrote:
The Sci. Am. has attacked cold fusion again, two months in a row. See 
the illustration to the April fools editorial, print edition page 10.

- Jed




C. Beaudette responds to DoE

2005-03-25 Thread Jed Rothwell
See:
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/BeaudetteCresponseto.pdf
- Jed



Re: OFF TOPIC Important Changes to Your Citizenship Agreement

2005-03-25 Thread Jed Rothwell
This is especially funny:
SECTION 16
This amendment affects the Right to Privacy section of your agreement. 
Under the new terms, the Right to Privacy must be applied for on an 
individual basis. To apply for your Right to Privacy, you must send your 
full credit history, a copy of your party registration and church 
membership, a complete set of fingerprints, a DNA sample, and two (2) 
passport-size photographs of your bedroom to: National Privacy Registry, 
Washington, DC, 20012-3006, att: Doris.




Re: ****NEWS CONFERENCE AT THE NATIONAL PRESS CLUB

2005-03-25 Thread Jed Rothwell
I assume these quotes from scientists at UNISYS and NASA are genuine. I 
have to admit it is impressive that Newman has convinced such people. It is 
even more impressive knowing the sort of person he is. I have had one phone 
conversation with him. He seemed about as unconvincing as anyone could be. 
If these scientists are convinced despite his personality, he must have 
compelling evidence.

There is just enough seemingly real substance to Newman's claims to put 
them in the regrettable category. This category is for claims which may 
just be real, but we will never know because the inventor is a lunatic, or 
dead, or both.

There are many categories of over unity machines. Here are some of the 
common ones, from bad to good:

Preposterous. There are hundreds of these claims.
Extremely unlikely with no evidence as far as anyone knows. Hundreds more. 
It is best to ignore them.

Extremely unlikely with anecdotal evidence only. There is no point to 
investigating or pursuing these claims.

Extremely unlikely with anecdotal evidence and lousy experiments only, that 
were never independently confirmed or replicated. Somewhat regrettable but 
mainly a farce. Correa fall in this category, in my opinion.

Extremely unlikely but for some reason a few apparently legitimate experts 
are convinced. Regrettable. Newman is the best example.

Unlikely with anecdotal evidence. A few experiments are reported that would 
be interesting if anyone had any good documentation for them.

Unlikely but interesting. A few good experiments but not enough widespread 
replications to be convincing. Mills fits in this category in my opinion.

Unlikely, yet reportedly replicated but not within the last 10 years. 
Fading away because all the people who replicated are dead or out of 
contact. The Griggs gadget is approaching this status. As far as I know it 
is real but I have no way to prove that conclusively. Unless something is 
done to rescue cold fusion, it will eventually enter this condition, as the 
researchers become incapacitated and die off. Ed Storms and some others are 
optimistic that it will be rescued, but I am not.

Dead certain. Only CF is in this category as far as I know. I am certain of 
it, but if I and all the others who know about it grow old and die, it will 
be lost. A person who has met with the cold fusion researchers and who 
understands actuarial tables will not feel confident about the outcome. 
People have a tendency to act as if they will live forever, but I am 
acutely aware that 'art is long and life is short.'

- Jed



Re: ****NEWS CONFERENCE AT THE NATIONAL PRESS CLUB

2005-03-25 Thread Mike Carrell
Jed wrote: 



 I assume these quotes from scientists at UNISYS and NASA are genuine. 

The Hastings quote is quite old. I don't know about the others. 

Mike Carrell