Hi All, 5-30-08
This news is exciting:
Jack Smith
Source: "john_e_barchak" ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 08:30:56
Subject: BlackLight Power, Inc. (BLP) today announced ...
``BlackLight Power, Inc. (BLP) today announced the
successful testing of a new energy source. BLP has
developed a prototype power system generating on demand
50,000 watts of thermal power using its solid fuel in a
batch process and has extensively characterized the hydrino
products - Commercializable Power Source from Forming New
States of Hydrogen.''
http://www.blacklightpower.com/papers/WFC052708webS.pdf
--
Mike Carrell wrote on 5-28-08:
``My take on BLP strategy. The publication of reports of
experiments and theory lets all see the R&D, especially the
patent department, a full log of reduction to practice over
many years. In the companion paper "Commercializable..."you
will find the approach is somewhat different from the
research effects. There will be a flood of imitators and
BLP has to protect its investors with strong patents. I
expect some royal battles to establish patent rights.
The performance of the solid fuel is spectacular, at 50
kW and rising. Reconstituting the fuel requires only
standard chemistry, but design of the automatic proces
will be interesting. The process is scalable, so there
will be automotive and possibly the proverbial household
water heater. New design everywhere. It will take time to
debug and optimize the applications.
The press release implies engagement of major construction
firms to built megawatt prototypes for utilities to
replace oil, coal and gas. This is perhaps a fulfillment
of promises made to some of the early investors, who
were/are utilities.
The world will change, mark this occasion. It is comparable
to activation of the first fission nuclear reactor in
Chicago.''
--
Jones Beene ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote on 5-28-08:
``Subject: BLP makes yet another announcment
Take this with a grain of sodium chloride, as it is merely
a first impression (for now), and comes from a Kibitzer
who "wants" to be a Mills-advocate, but keeps bumping into
those little obstacles called "facts".
But it is more than a bit curious - and I hope that this is
not sounding too cynical - since this "could be" a major
announcement from BLP, or not ...
... but it is worth mentioning that, among other things,
Mills now (but never before) goes to great lengths in
the preamble of this rather well-camouflaged expose' to
"shoehorn" the elements chlorine and sodium into the mix
as catalysts- all of which is following (just a bit too
closely) the Roy & Kanzius announcement.
It is worth noting that rampant rumors have been
circulating for about 5 weeks around two universities which
are in proximity to Mills (in PA) of actual OU being found
in that salt-water experiment!
Plus - where is the reactor in question? Where is the data
about its operation? I thought this paper was supposed to
be substantive about that, instead of thinly camouflaged
back-tracking (to take credit for something outside
the previous range of what is a hydrino)? (i.e. the
disappointment is found in lack of "details" but is
not obvious, as there is much (too much) superfluous
detail in the text, but little data-wise wrt the main
supposed-subject: the reactor itself: where's the beef?)...
CAVEAT: this Roy-Kanzius thing is now in the hands of major
players, with resources and reputations greater than Mills
- and was NOT ever announced as over-unity, and will not
be, until or unless there is absolute certainty; so it is
just high-level rumor thus far.
That episode could be unrelated to this new announcement
- or not- and is mentioned here with the caveat (and not
on the HSG forum) only in the context of the "surprise"
finding by Mills that the very same elements, which
are active in Kanzius' work under RF irradiation, are
"now" turning out to be hydrino catalysts. Surprise,
surprise. Kinda reminds one of the haste in which P&F made
their premature announcement in 1989.
Excuse me! but is not this the very FIRST TIME in the
past two decades of plodding hydrino-tech that sodium
and chlorine have been mentioned as catalysts ? They
certainly do not fit into the original formula very well -
PLUS give me a break - the way the two are shoehorned in -
there is little doubt that every element in the periodic
table could now be included as catalysts by manipulating
the numbers this way.
And coming on the heels of the Roy/Kanzium experiment,
well- red flags should be going up left and right and not
just among Mills' critics...
I hope that I am wrong on this, as I do admit that R.
Mills is a very accomplished, genius-level inventor;
therefore, I will now step=off my soap-box and let
one of Mills apologists come along with the obligatory:
"Mills is the new messiah" spiel - and he can do no wrong
so obviously his critics have not "done their homework"
LOL - and studied every word of "the Book" his CQM gosp
