[VO]: Coining the New Science of Post Reality
Howdy Vorts, Scientists at the Dime Box Saloon research Labs now believe there is evidence pointing toward post Reality. Proof of existence of Post reality has been theorized but never proven because the laws of human nature prohibit such a happening. This belief is supported by several new technology breakthroughs that include NIST's proof of anti-gravity, FEMA's new food distribution model for hurricane relief, and the Fed's financial rescue plan for born losers. We have yet to assess NASA, DARPA, PETA and several other promising areas but the evidence is now sufficent to believe we are now entering an era of Camelot where nobody has to work, nobody needs to worry and everybody gets everything they want handed to them. A team of scientists are enroute to Houston, Washington and Wall Street to poll intellectuals on their reaction. Richard
RE: [Vo]:NIST caught in huge Lie
Did anyone notice that on one of the tower collapse videos that one corner column remained standing for a moment after the collapse before it dropped vertically, probably due to buckling near the base. I'm not sure what the significance of this is, only that it means something. Jeff -Original Message- From: Stephen A. Lawrence [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, September 14, 2008 2:37 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:NIST caught in huge Lie Jones Beene wrote: - Original Message From: Stephen A. Lawrence Whether any of my comments apply to WTC7 is not clear, as its collapse looked rather different on video. That is becasue it was completely different in the details, and your understanding of the first two as being freefall is incorrect, but understandable. They were not freefall during any significant portiion of their fall AFAIK. Close but no cigar. Videos of the Two Towers (1 2) clearly show large chunks of debris falling separately and unconnected from the main structure. This debris - which includes one 10 ton chunk of the exterior skin, is shown to descend at an acceleration which noticeably faster than that of the main portion of the collapse (perhaps 20% faster). Whoa -- good point! I recall seeing bits of junk arcing away from the towers in the videos and descending faster than the collapse wave, but I never made the connection -- it shows that they were not moving at full free-fall speed, no matter what was claimed about them.
Re: [Vo]:RIP: DFW
And how could you possibly forget: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terrance_McKenna ?!? Terry On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 10:38 PM, Jones Beene [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Correction: I am told, rather quickly in fact (indicating that some people rally do read these posts) that DFW cannot be really considered a former resident of Berkeley as his stay was too short. They do have a penchant, over there (is there really a' there' over there?) for claiming as their own -- everyone who spend a few months, pen-in-hand ... including Mark Twain, Jack London, and Bret Harte, etc ...
Re: [Vo]:RIP: DFW
- Original Message From: Terry Blanton And how could you possibly forget: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terrance_McKenna Ah! the stoned ape hypothesis ... what a trip.
Re: [Vo]:RIP: DFW
On Sep 15, 2008, at 9:00 AM, Terry Blanton wrote: And how could you possibly forget: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terrance_McKenna ?!? Terry I think that's: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terence_McKenna Best regards, Horace Heffner http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/
[Vo]:citizendium.org/wiki
I copied the Knol cold fusion article to citizendium.org: http://en.citizendium.org/wiki/Cold_Fusion This is easier to work with then Knol. I did not insert the footnotes because I think they can soon be made links to the rest of this wiki. I like citizendium's organizing principles, such as the fact that they demand authors use their real names. See: http://en.citizendium.org/wiki/CZ:About I had a lot of fun modifying this article: http://en.citizendium.org/wiki/Reproducibility This is how it was before I go to it: http://en.citizendium.org/wiki?title=Reproducibilityoldid=100165204 Quite different now. I hope the original author is not upset. - Jed
Re: [VO]: Coining the New Science of Post Reality
In reply to R C Macaulay's message of Mon, 15 Sep 2008 06:47:02 -0500: Hi Richard, [snip] Howdy Vorts, Scientists at the Dime Box Saloon research Labs now believe there is evidence pointing toward post Reality. Proof of existence of Post reality has been theorized but never proven because the laws of human nature prohibit such a happening. This belief is supported by several new technology breakthroughs that include NIST's proof of anti-gravity, FEMA's new food distribution model for hurricane relief, and the Fed's financial rescue plan for born losers. We have yet to assess NASA, DARPA, PETA and several other promising areas but the evidence is now sufficent to believe we are now entering an era of Camelot where nobody has to work, nobody needs to worry and everybody gets everything they want handed to them. A team of scientists are enroute to Houston, Washington and Wall Street to poll intellectuals on their reaction. Richard Not quite yet. First someone has to take a gamble on my fusion device. Then we will effectively have (almost) free energy indefinitely. ;) Regards, Robin van Spaandonk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [Vo]:citizendium.org/wiki
By the way, if anyone on this list would like to suggest a change or correction to the citizendium articles, and you do not want to bother to sign up with citizendium.org, just send the change directly to me. I will (probably) implement it. There are too many websites with too many sign-up procedures. - Jed
Re: [VO]: Coining the New Science of Post Reality
Post loser society. harry - Original Message - From: Robin van Spaandonk [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Monday, September 15, 2008 6:17 pm Subject: Re: [VO]: Coining the New Science of Post Reality In reply to R C Macaulay's message of Mon, 15 Sep 2008 06:47:02 - 0500:Hi Richard, [snip] Howdy Vorts, Scientists at the Dime Box Saloon research Labs now believe there is evidence pointing toward post Reality. Proof of existence of Post reality has been theorized but never proven because the laws of human nature prohibit such a happening. This belief is supported by several new technology breakthroughs that include NIST's proof of anti-gravity, FEMA's new food distribution model for hurricane relief, and the Fed's financial rescue plan for born losers. We have yet to assess NASA, DARPA, PETA and several other promising areas but the evidence is now sufficent to believe we are now entering an era of Camelot where nobody has to work, nobody needs to worry and everybody gets everything they want handed to them. A team of scientists are enroute to Houston, Washington and Wall Street to poll intellectuals on their reaction. Richard Not quite yet. First someone has to take a gamble on my fusion device. Then we will effectively have (almost) free energy indefinitely. ;) Regards, Robin van Spaandonk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [Vo]:RIP: DFW
Right. Tery On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 12:48 PM, Horace Heffner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sep 15, 2008, at 9:00 AM, Terry Blanton wrote: And how could you possibly forget: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terrance_McKenna ?!? Terry I think that's: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terence_McKenna Best regards, Horace Heffner http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/
[Vo]:[OT] Capitulation
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/capitulation Capitulation A military term. Capitulation refers to surrendering or giving up. In the stock market, capitulation is associated with giving up any previous gains in stock price as investors sell equities in an effort to get out of the market and into less risky investments. True capitulation involves extremely high volume and sharp declines. It usually is indicated by panic selling. Investopedia Commentary After capitulation selling, it is thought that there are great bargains to be had. The belief is that everyone who wants to get out of a stock, for any reason (including forced selling due to margin calls), has sold. The price should then, theoretically, reverse or bounce off the lows. In other words, some investors believe that true capitulation is the sign of a bottom. end Get me out regardless of the cost. Brokers across the board are saying they are seeing signs of capitulation. I moved to T Bills over a year ago. Will they survive? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wall_Street_Crash_of_1929 Tery
