Re: [Vo]:Mylow motor -- the final cut

2009-05-18 Thread mixent
In reply to  Terry Blanton's message of Sun, 17 May 2009 19:08:55 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
If Eltimple (Clanzer) can't replicate it, no one can:

http://www.youtube.com/user/Eltimple

Terry

In Mylow's motor there is a gradient in the spacing of the magnets, though it
may be unintentional. This replication was too careful, and all the magnets
are neatly spaced.

Regards,

Robin van Spaandonk

http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/Project.html



Re: [Vo]:Mylow motor -- the final cut

2009-05-18 Thread Michel Jullian
but not necessarily zero money gained ;-)
Michel

2009/5/18 Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com:
 On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 8:45 PM, Mark S Bilk m...@cosmicpenguin.com
wrote:
 And no matter how many magnets or pieces
 of iron you use, the forces and energy (work) all add
 linearly, so the net result is zero energy gained per rotation
 of the thing.

 Yes.

 Terry




[Vo]:Combined tensor form off power in continuous media

2009-05-18 Thread David Jonsson
HI

Is there a way to write

p=torque*vorticity
and
p=force*(linear)speed

in a combined way? Seems like it could be done with a tensor?

David

David Jonsson, Sweden, phone callto:+46703000370


Re: [Vo]:Mylow motor -- the final cut

2009-05-18 Thread Terry Blanton
Leave him a comment saying so.  He is quite interactive.  He posts as
Clanzer on overunity.com's magnet threads (including a 300 page one on
Mylow).

Terry

On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 2:18 AM,  mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
 In reply to  Terry Blanton's message of Sun, 17 May 2009 19:08:55 -0500:
 Hi,
 [snip]
If Eltimple (Clanzer) can't replicate it, no one can:

http://www.youtube.com/user/Eltimple

Terry

 In Mylow's motor there is a gradient in the spacing of the magnets, though it
 may be unintentional. This replication was too careful, and all the magnets
 are neatly spaced.

 Regards,

 Robin van Spaandonk

 http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/Project.html





[Vo]:another better battery.

2009-05-18 Thread Harry Veeder

Canadian scientists create powerful new lithium battery material

Last Updated: Monday, May 18, 2009 | 1:00 PM ET Comments7Recommend14
CBC News 

Lithium batteries could deliver more than three times their usual 
power if they contained a new composite material invented by 
scientists at the University of Waterloo, a study suggests.

The material created by chemistry professor Linda Nazar and her 
research team contains sulphur, a cheap substance that scientists have 
been trying to incorporate into rechargeable lithium batteries for a 
long time, said a news release Monday.

The challenge had been to find a way to keep the electrically active 
sulphur in intimate contact with a conductor such as carbon, Nazar 
said in a statement.
She and her research group described their solution to the problem in 
a report published Sunday in the advance online edition of Nature 
Materials.

The researchers took mesoporous carbon, a material riddled with 
extremely fine channels that are about 1/20,000th of the width of a 
human hair. When it was put in contact with melted sulphur, the hot 
liquid was drawn by capillary forces into the channels, where it 
solidified into nanofibres.

The new carbon-sulphur composite was used as the cathode, the positive 
electrode of a test battery, and showed what the researchers called 
an impressive capacity.

This composite material can supply up to nearly 80 per cent of the 
theoretical capacity of sulphur, which is three times the energy 
density of lithium [traditional] transition metal oxide cathodes, 
Nazar said in a statement.

In addition, the material remained stable when recharged multiple 
times.
Nazar said a patent had been filed for the material and her team is 
continuing to study the material in an effort to refine the battery's 
performance.



RE: [Vo]:Mylow motor -- the final cut

2009-05-18 Thread Rick Monteverde
Yes, unless during the process the elements in motion somehow tap an energy
source. Fraudulently done with coils or a directed stream of air from stage
left. More interestingly achieved with temperature differences, or other
less obvious sources - variations in electric charge from the air and nearby
surfaces, or some even more mysterious reservoir of energy. The staggering
of the magnetic poles on the stator assembly and the uneven positioning of
the rotor magnets might be significant and kind of got my attention in the
videos. He even says that when things are arranged too regular it gets - I
forget his exact words, but it gets sticky or steppy.

 -Original Message-
 From: Mark S Bilk [mailto:m...@cosmicpenguin.com] 
 Sent: Sunday, May 17, 2009 3:46 PM
 To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
 Subject: Re: [Vo]:Mylow motor -- the final cut

snip

  And no matter how many magnets or pieces 
 of iron you use, the forces and energy (work) all add 
 linearly, so the net result is zero energy gained per 
 rotation of the thing.  Thus all magmos are BS.  I'll shut up now.)




RE: [Vo]:OT: Why Ice is Slippery

2009-05-18 Thread Rick Monteverde
This is interesting, and it sounds like oriented water. 

The resilience may be in the vertical range, but there may be variablilty of
friction in the horizontal domain, one that might be influenced with a broom
(or electric charge?).

 -Original Message-
 From: Harry Veeder [mailto:hvee...@ncf.ca] 
 Sent: Sunday, May 17, 2009 8:26 AM
 To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
 Subject: Re: [Vo]:OT: Why Ice is Slippery
 
snip
 
 Personally, I am interested in this work because it bears on 
 the controversy over why a curling stone curls. The motion of 
 a curling stone has been simulated on a computer using 
 Newton's law's motion and some  models of melting from 
 pressure and friction, but unless the ice actual melts 
 according to the models, the simulations demonstrate nothing.
 
 Here is another discussion the research which says a bit more 
 about the experiment itself.
 http://www.felixonline.co.uk/articles/2301/The_science_of_ice_skating
 Harry
 
 




Re: [Vo]:OT: Why Ice is Slippery

2009-05-18 Thread grok
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1


As the smoke cleared, Rick Monteverde r...@highsurf.com
mounted the barricade and roared out:

 This is interesting, and it sounds like oriented water. 

Gee. Maybe it's the long-(not)-sought-after Ice-9...

You mean water that carries a memory -- and hates you..?
;P


 
 The resilience may be in the vertical range, but there may be variablilty of
 friction in the horizontal domain, one that might be influenced with a broom
 (or electric charge?).

Or a large, polished, rotating granite rock.

It seems that there is a tendency for even surfaces/boundaries -- *especially*
surfaces/boundaries -- to be chaotic/non-linear/complex: in this case, 
involving 'one
(heretofore unsuspected) degree of freedom', apparently. Of course, such 'ideal'
states IMO are likely swamped by the larger structures/forces at work 
around/near/
beside/in/on/under them too. So like someone here (more or less) said earlier: 
'real
life' is somewhat different... YMMV.


- -- grok.









- -- 
Build the North America-wide General Strike.

TODO el poder a los consejos y las comunas.
TOUT le pouvoir aux conseils et communes.
ALL power to the councils and communes.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkoRtk8ACgkQXo3EtEYbt3EQbgCgrhgxHs7CbfjFcyZCJnIIMzW4
mhcAoO8+OwQ+jC60PTBFznZORo9F+0CC
=uIjQ
-END PGP SIGNATURE-