RE: [Vo]:Higgs Wins Nobel

[MarkI-ZeroPoint]

I thought the Nobel was for things that had a large (positive) impact on
human society; how one can even begin to make that argument for some like
this is beyond me.  Or is it just one more sign that even the Nobel
organization has succumbed to mainstream scientific groupthink...

-mark iverson

-Original Message-
From: Terry Blanton [mailto:hohlr...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2013 9:00 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: [Vo]:Higgs Wins Nobel

http://www.foxnews.com/science/2013/10/08/englert-and-higgs-win-nobel-physic
s-prize/

Francois Englert of Belgium and Peter Higgs of Britain won the 2013 Nobel
Prize in physics on Tuesday for their theoretical discoveries on how
subatomic particles acquire mass.

Their theories are key to explaining the building blocks of matter and the
origins of the universe. They were confirmed last year by the discovery of
the so-called Higgs particle, also known as the Higgs boson, at CERN, the
Geneva-based European Organization for Nuclear Research, the Royal Swedish
Academy of Sciences said.

[Vo]:ECAT Active Cooling Control

[David Roberson]

I finally got around to checking my ECAT model performance with active cooling 
control and the results were very interesting.   First, I applied normal 
heating to the device which leads to thermal run away conditions if allowed to 
go beyond a certain critical core temperature.   As expected, the model showed 
that the ECAT began a path toward melt down.

The path to destruction would proceed even when the original drive is removed 
since the critical temperature was exceeded.  Then, I allowed the model to 
continue heating for a period of time and applied the brakes quickly with a new 
load that withdraws a significant amount of extra heat power from the system.  
This might be possible in real life if for instance a phase change coolant were 
sprayed onto the core directly.  The extra cooling must be applied continuously 
while the temperature drops and until an optimum trip temperature is reached.  
The turn around point must be above the normal critical temperature since no 
additional heating is required to achieve a condition where thermal run away 
can begin anew.

The model demonstrated that this type of cycle could be repeated indefinitely 
while the total power being generated by the device is significantly above that 
safely obtained by heating control alone.  I would assume that a cooling method 
similar to that suggested above would take less input power than the standard 
heating process that I have modeled earlier so this type of control would 
result in a higher COP for the system.

The model also demonstrated that a continual application of the extra cooling 
resulted in the cores return to room temperature as desired.  Actually, the 
powerful cooling was not required to be applied once the critical run away 
point was passed.  In this case, the core would be subjected to positive 
feedback that forces it toward turn off by itself.

It is evident that a hybrid type of control system that uses both power 
resistive heating as well as active cooling would perform the function.  If 
both techniques were available it might be possible to keep the ECAT 
temperature very near the critical point in which case the COP would be 
extremely high.  For this type of tight control to work the loading as well as 
all the other parameters which cause the critical temperature to vary must be 
kept under tight control.  This might be possible.

Dave

Re: [Vo]:Palladium in present-day conventional energy and cold fusion energy

[Jed Rothwell]

Axil Axil  wrote:


> superatoms are chemically similar to their respective single atoms.
> "Platinum is used in nearly all catalytic converters in automobiles, but it
> is very expensive," said Castleman. "In contrast, tungsten carbide, which
> mimics platinum, is cheap.
>

Whoa! That's neat. I wonder if some kind of synthetic palladium-like
substance can be made for cold fusion? Some people have reported that
tungsten does work. Mizuno, Biberian and others have made high temperature
superconductor material that reportedly works, as a proton conductor (like
gas phase electrolysis).

A few years ago some Japanese researchers were talking about powerful
magnets made from ordinary materials instead of rare earths. It was some
similar synthetic material, designed to mimic another element. I don't
recall the details. Could be this:

http://energy.gov/sites/prod/files/Session_A7_Hono_NIMS.pdf

- Jed

Re: [Vo]:Palladium in present-day conventional energy and cold fusion energy

[Axil Axil]

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/12/091228152348.htm

*Superatoms Mimic Elements: Research Gives New Perspective On Periodic Table
*


Castleman and his team --  used a technique, called photoelectron imaging
spectroscopy, to examine similarities between titanium monoxide and nickel,
zirconium monoxide and palladium, and tungsten carbide and platinum.

Select chemical compounds can replace various LENR type elements.

Castleman explained that the molecules titanium monoxide, zirconium
monoxide, and tungsten carbide are superatoms of nickel, palladium, and
platinum, respectively. Superatoms are clusters of atoms that exhibit some
property of elemental atoms. Former work in Castleman's lab has involved
investigating the notion of superatoms. One of his previous experiments
showed that a cluster of 13 aluminum atoms behaves like a single iodine
atom. Adding a single electron to this aluminum-atom system results in the
cluster behaving like a rare-gas atom. Further, he showed that a cluster of
14 aluminum atoms has a reactivity similar to an alkaline earth atom.

superatoms are chemically similar to their respective single atoms.
"Platinum is used in nearly all catalytic converters in automobiles, but it
is very expensive," said Castleman. "In contrast, tungsten carbide, which
mimics platinum, is cheap. A significant amount of money can be saved if
catalytic-converter manufacturers are able to use tungsten carbide instead
of platinum. Likewise, palladium is used in certain combustion processes,
yet it is mimicked by zirconium monoxide, which is less expensive by a
factor of 500. Our new findings are exciting from both a scientific as well
as a practical point of view."


On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 5:52 PM, Jed Rothwell  wrote:

> Palladium and other platinum group metals are used in catalytic converters
> in automobiles and trucks. Years ago, roughly half of all palladium
> production was used for this purpose. A large fraction of all of energy in
> the world is used in automobiles and trucks. Most of that energy is wasted.
> Roughly 80% of it escapes as hot exhaust gas. This gas flows past the
> surface of the catalytic converter where it comes in contact with
> palladium. This reduces nitrogen compounds, breaking NO into N and O. In
> the next stage of the converter there is an oxidizing catalyst.
>
> I do not know how things are today, but years ago, most converters used
> palladium rather than other platinum group metals.
>
> The point is, a significant fraction of all the primary heat from energy
> production in the world flows past palladium. I think it is roughly 10% or
> 12%. I will go over the numbers below.
>
> It is unclear whether palladium would be needed at all in a cold fusion
> powered world. We hope that nickel, titanium or some other more abundant,
> cheaper element can be used instead. Rossi's results indicate that may be
> the case. However, palladium might be useful for some applications. The
> power density from it is high. It might be useful for small devices, such
> as thermoelectric batteries in watches, hearing aids, pacemakers or cell
> phones.
>
> People have often claimed that there is not enough palladium in the world
> to produce all the energy we need with cold fusion. The first person I
> heard say that was Martin Fleischmann. I recall he estimated that one-third
> of our primary energy (heat, that is) might be produced with cold fusion.
> Based on the amount of palladium in catalytic converters, and the amount of
> heat that flows through them, I think this is a reasonable estimate. It is
> crude, but in the ball park. Palladium probably could not supply 100% of
> our energy, or ten times more than we presently consume, but on the other
> hand it can supply much more than 5%. I have heard other people estimate 5%.
>
> Let me list a few assumptions here, and then go over the numbers. I assume
> that --
>
> * Some sort of palladium thin film or powder will be used in a practical
> device, with a great deal of surface area.
>
> * The total exposed surface will be increased to the limit, just as it is
> with a catalytic converter.
>
> * The device will be optimized to use the smallest amount of palladium
> possible, just as catalytic converters are today.
>
> * The temperature will be as high as possible, where the limiting factor
> is the melting point of palladium. We will learn how to make intense
> reactions on demand. A tiny but intense heat source would not be safe for a
> hearing aid battery, but it might work for a cell phone. Consumer
> electronics such as cell phones and laptop computers have components that
> get quite hot to the touch.
>
> In short, a cold fusion cell is similar in many ways to a catalytic
> converter. Many of the engineering problems that have been solved in
> catalytic converters will apply to cold fusion. The upper limit of heat per
> gram of palladium that a catalytic converter can survive is probably about
> the same as the upper limit of hea

[Vo]:Palladium in present-day conventional energy and cold fusion energy

[Jed Rothwell]

Palladium and other platinum group metals are used in catalytic converters
in automobiles and trucks. Years ago, roughly half of all palladium
production was used for this purpose. A large fraction of all of energy in
the world is used in automobiles and trucks. Most of that energy is wasted.
Roughly 80% of it escapes as hot exhaust gas. This gas flows past the
surface of the catalytic converter where it comes in contact with
palladium. This reduces nitrogen compounds, breaking NO into N and O. In
the next stage of the converter there is an oxidizing catalyst.

I do not know how things are today, but years ago, most converters used
palladium rather than other platinum group metals.

The point is, a significant fraction of all the primary heat from energy
production in the world flows past palladium. I think it is roughly 10% or
12%. I will go over the numbers below.

It is unclear whether palladium would be needed at all in a cold fusion
powered world. We hope that nickel, titanium or some other more abundant,
cheaper element can be used instead. Rossi's results indicate that may be
the case. However, palladium might be useful for some applications. The
power density from it is high. It might be useful for small devices, such
as thermoelectric batteries in watches, hearing aids, pacemakers or cell
phones.

People have often claimed that there is not enough palladium in the world
to produce all the energy we need with cold fusion. The first person I
heard say that was Martin Fleischmann. I recall he estimated that one-third
of our primary energy (heat, that is) might be produced with cold fusion.
Based on the amount of palladium in catalytic converters, and the amount of
heat that flows through them, I think this is a reasonable estimate. It is
crude, but in the ball park. Palladium probably could not supply 100% of
our energy, or ten times more than we presently consume, but on the other
hand it can supply much more than 5%. I have heard other people estimate 5%.

Let me list a few assumptions here, and then go over the numbers. I assume
that --

* Some sort of palladium thin film or powder will be used in a practical
device, with a great deal of surface area.

* The total exposed surface will be increased to the limit, just as it is
with a catalytic converter.

* The device will be optimized to use the smallest amount of palladium
possible, just as catalytic converters are today.

* The temperature will be as high as possible, where the limiting factor is
the melting point of palladium. We will learn how to make intense reactions
on demand. A tiny but intense heat source would not be safe for a hearing
aid battery, but it might work for a cell phone. Consumer electronics such
as cell phones and laptop computers have components that get quite hot to
the touch.

In short, a cold fusion cell is similar in many ways to a catalytic
converter. Many of the engineering problems that have been solved in
catalytic converters will apply to cold fusion. The upper limit of heat per
gram of palladium that a catalytic converter can survive is probably about
the same as the upper limit of heat production from a cold fusion cell per
gram of palladium. The limit will be defined by materials and engineering,
not the nuclear physics of cold fusion. With cold fusion, you can drive the
temperature high enough to vaporize the metal, as Fleischmann and Pons
inadvertently demonstrated.

Cold fusion researchers should be talking to the engineers who design
catalytic converters.

Here are other important points:

* Only about half of palladium is use for catalytic converters.

* After cold fusion replaces other energy sources, we will not need any
more catalytic converters. The whole supply of palladium will be freed up
for cold fusion -- if we need it.

* If the palladium transmutes into other elements we will lose it, but if
that can be prevented, we can probably recycle a larger fraction of
palladium that we do with converters. So the total amount available will
increase.

* Cold fusion itself will lower the cost of extraction and recycling of
palladium, as well as all other materials. It will bootstrap up the supply
of its own catalyst and fuel (heavy water).

* The operating conditions inside a cold fusion cell are likely to be more
benign than inside a catalytic converter. There will not be gale force
winds of toxic gas blasting past the surface. The palladium will not
sublime and get blown out into the surroundings, and thereby lost. It will
stay inside the cell until the day it is recycled. (Assuming it does not
transmute, as I said.)

* The palladium sitting in a catalytic converted is idle most hours of the
day. The car is parked, the motor is off. If palladium is used as a primary
energy source, and no other metal can be used, most of the palladium would
end up in central generators where it is used many hours of the day. The
duty cycle is longer.

Now, let me go over the basis of my estimate that ~10% of the world's
pri

Re: [Vo]:Some Interesting Calculations

[David Roberson]

I have been extending the reach of my model over the last few days as time 
permits and have found that a tantalizing bit of data has arisen.  DGT uses a 
spark discharge within the hydrogen gas as a form of activation mechanism.   
Also, the recent discussions of power being directly generated by some unknown 
effect within the Rossi device left me wondering about the magnitude of DC 
current that could originate within.  Many months ago I came to the conclusion 
that a moderate amount of DC power could be extracted in the event of charges 
particles being generated by the fusion process.

To efficiently extract this particle power, a large reverse voltage was 
required for the particle to overcome and insulation was needed to eliminate 
any sneak paths for the returning current to follow.  All of these nasty 
requirements made the technique look less promising, but some good may have 
come out of that effort.  I calculated that a few milliamps of current was all 
that would arise from the process which was generating the many kilowatts of 
heat energy.

So, I made an interesting calculation of the effective current needed to supply 
protons only to the nickel surface that are freed as a result of breakdown of 
hydrogen gas into protons and electrons by the high voltage sparks of DGT.  
Using the parameters below as initial conditions, I obtained a value of 2 
milliamps.   This is well within the range of the spark supply discussed by DGT 
in their latest demonstration.

Perhaps this information is irrelevant since DGT believes that the expanded 
hydrogen slips into a nickel nucleus disguised as a neutron under ideal 
conditions.  The high energy hydrogen is derived as a result of their spark, 
but maybe there is another explanation.   The nickel matrix might absorb bare 
protons much easier than molecules of hydrogen.  After all, a proton is far 
smaller than a hydrogen atom.  And, the electric field iminating from the 
nickel surface is in a direction to attract the free protons while repelling 
electrons.  For these reasons I hypothesize that much more proton fuel is 
available to supply the active fusion mechanism whatever it might turn out to 
be when sparks occur.

This may be a blind lead, but perhaps not.

Dave


-Original Message-
From: David Roberson 
To: vortex-l 
Sent: Fri, Oct 4, 2013 7:13 pm
Subject: [Vo]:Some Interesting Calculations


I have been playing with math and wanted to share some interesting calculations 
that I have generated.  This work involves progress toward my search for a 
coupling mechanism which leads to a slow form of chain reaction based upon 
phonons or heat.  There are some interesting bits of data that have been 
uncovered, where some of the conclusions may seem obvious after the fact.  My 
current model is of a simple design and assumes that an ECAT like device uses 
100 grams of Nickel with a density of 8.908 grams per cubic centimeter.  I have 
assumed that each LENR reaction yields 5 MeV of energy but this can be adjusted 
freely to match any desired level.  Also, the diameter of the nickel spheres is 
adjustable with an initially assumed size of 10 micrometers.

The excess power generated by the modeled system is initially 10,000 watts and 
this can be adjusted freely.  Energy leaves the spheres through the surface 
area and therefore I have concentrated most of my effort on power per square 
centimeter behavior.  Rossi's device appears to operate at a level of 
approximately .150 watts per square centimeter which is not too excessive.

Calculations which assume .150 watts exiting each square centimeter show that 
the size of the spheres is inversely proportional to the power being generated. 
 In other words, a collection of spheres 10 micrometers in diameter should 
generate 1/10 the power released by a collection of spheres that are 1 
micrometer in diameter.   This particular model assumes a constant total mass 
of nickel of 100 grams and a type of reaction that occurs upon the surface of 
the spheres.  I am pursuing reactions that occur throughout the entire mass of 
the spheres as well, but this particular note is restricted to surface effects 
only.
 
It is interesting to see that each tiny reaction surface area can be broken 
into squares whose sides are approximately 100 atoms each which in this case 
calculates to be  26.2 nanometers per reaction per second.  This of course is 
the average value over all of the small spheres of an ECAT like device.  The 
calculated size throws a bone to the vorts that have strong feelings about nano 
plasmonics.

It would be interesting to obtain data concerning the excess power generated 
versus average size of the spheres of nickel.   If the power varies inversely 
with diameter then additional support will be shown that we are seeking a 
surface effect in this version of LENR.

I have interesting additional material to share at a latter date, and I feel 
that calculations of this nature might lead to import

Re: [Vo]:Higgs Wins Nobel

[Axil Axil]

The Higgs field is a superconductor where energy condenses around
topological defects to form matter.  These Topological defects might well
be the origin of EMF crystallization into EMF based vortex based
quasiparticles (solitons) inside the nucleus much in the same way that a
snowflake begins when a tiny dust or pollen particle comes into contact
with water vapor high in Earth's atmosphere. The water vapor coats the tiny
particle and freezes(Kibble-Zurek effect) into a tiny crystal of ice. This
tiny crystal will be the "seed" from which a snowflake will grow.

 Mass is resistance of these solitons to the Higgs superconductive field.


On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 11:59 AM, Terry Blanton  wrote:

>
> http://www.foxnews.com/science/2013/10/08/englert-and-higgs-win-nobel-physics-prize/
>
> Francois Englert of Belgium and Peter Higgs of Britain won the 2013
> Nobel Prize in physics on Tuesday for their theoretical discoveries on
> how subatomic particles acquire mass.
>
> Their theories are key to explaining the building blocks of matter and
> the origins of the universe. They were confirmed last year by the
> discovery of the so-called Higgs particle, also known as the Higgs
> boson, at CERN, the Geneva-based European Organization for Nuclear
> Research, the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences said.
>
> 
>
>

Re: [Vo]:REVERSE ENGINEERING AND A ROMANIAN STORY

[Axil Axil]

A Rube Goldberg machine performs a very simple task in a very complex
fashion, usually including a chain reaction.

Over the years, the expression has expanded to mean any confusing or
complicated system. LENR is the quintessential Rube Goldberg machine.

Just like high temperature superconductivity, LENR is a chain reaction
involving scores of complex quantum mechanical interactions replete with
incomprehensible and inscrutable effects that interact in complex and
obscure ways.

Understanding the quantum mechanical complexities of the LENR process may
currently be beyond the scope of our current science. But like anything in
which huge amounts of money can be made, the desire for enormous profits
and the competition and interest that this desire engenders will drive
reverse engineering of LENR to miraculous levels.

Just to give an idea of how weird that the LENR process might be, I just
ran across a completely unexpected quantum mechanical process that might
greatly complicate and obscure the LENR effect in the Ni/H reactor.

http://arstechnica.com/science/2013/09/snobbish-photons-forced-to-pair-up-and-get-heavy/

Snobbish photons forced to pair up and get heavy

This counterintuitive Nanoplasmonic effect seems to fit nicely into the
wheelhouse of the quantum mechanical zoo operating inside the Ni/H reactor
where Rydberg matter and heat play major roles.

We now suspect that Rydberg matter does play a central role in the Ni/H
reactor. In fact, the primary activity produced by the “secret sauce” is to
produce Rydberg matter in a cold plasma hydrogen condensate.

It now appears that Rydberg matter can turn light (infrared) into photonic
matter through the Rydberg blockade effects.

The effects inside the Ni/H reactor mimic ultra-cold physics since the same
quantum mechanical principles applies in both low temperature physics and
the effects seen in condensing cold plasmas.

What happens to these entangled infrared photons trapped inside this cold
plasma? Do they form atoms? Do they form photonic nanoparticles? Do they
combine with electrons and/or magnetism to form a new state of EMF?

To answer these other worldly type quantum mechanical questions that will
advance our science, we need to whip up the frenzied competitive forces
engendered in the profit motive so that unlimited money and scientific
talent can be redirected to this subject.

There is one thing for sure; clearly LENR is no place for sissies.







On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 5:04 AM, Peter Gluck  wrote:

> My dear Friends,
>
> May I ask your help again? I have decided to write a second series
> of 100 septoes (see
> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2012/06/100-septoes.html) in order to
> develop my basic concept of the interestingness of the world.
> The first Septoe from the new series is one of paramount importance
> and it sounds so:
>
> *
> *
>
> *Interesting: things are not what they seem**. *
>
> Can you give me some examples from the realm of cold  fusion- LENR- HENI?
> Thank you.
>
> *I have just published:*
>
> *
> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2013/10/reverse-engineering-is-not-for-techno.html
> *
>
> *two very true stories, one old and one very new, both instructive.*
>
> Peter
>
>
>
>
>
> *
> *
> --
> Dr. Peter Gluck
> Cluj, Romania
> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
>

[Vo]:Higgs Wins Nobel

[Terry Blanton]

http://www.foxnews.com/science/2013/10/08/englert-and-higgs-win-nobel-physics-prize/

Francois Englert of Belgium and Peter Higgs of Britain won the 2013
Nobel Prize in physics on Tuesday for their theoretical discoveries on
how subatomic particles acquire mass.

Their theories are key to explaining the building blocks of matter and
the origins of the universe. They were confirmed last year by the
discovery of the so-called Higgs particle, also known as the Higgs
boson, at CERN, the Geneva-based European Organization for Nuclear
Research, the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences said.

Re: [Vo]:ICCF-18 lecture presentation videos for Tuesday uploaded

[pagnucco]

I believe Swartz said the USPTO would not accept it.

However. quite a bit of technical information is available at the URLs -

JET Energy home page
http://jet.xvm.mit.edu/

Youtube videos of 2012 LANR-CF course
http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL7rx5Nfge9peX1w95K7l82o0HaRZb89iQ


Teslaalset wrote:
> Can anyone find the Patent Applications of them which Swartz is claiming?
> I can't find any, using Swartz as inventor, Jet Energy or Nanortech as
> assignees.
> [...]

RE: [Vo]:ICCF-18 lecture presentation videos for Tuesday uploaded

[Jones Beene]

 

 

From: Teslaalset 

 

Can anyone find the Patent Applications of them which Swartz is claiming? 

I can't find any, using Swartz as inventor, Jet Energy or Nanortech as
assignees.

 

 

https://www.google.com/?tbm=pts#q=ininventor%3A%22Mitchell+R.+Swartz%22
 &start=10&tbm=pts

 

Re: [Vo]:Robert Park...LENR Critic and Health Status

[Alain Sepeda]

Note that, JP Biberian sadly annouced the death of Georges Longchampt.

http://blogde-jeanpaulbiberian.blogspot.fr/2013/10/georges-lonchampt.html

http://www.lenr-forum.com/showthread.php?2455-Georges-Longchampt-best-replicator-of-F-amp-P-died

One funeral at a time... 8(


2013/10/8 Ron Kita 

> Greetings Vortex-L,
>
> I just saw an update on the health status of Robert Park,long time
> critic of LENR Cold Fusion:
> http://www.bobpark.org/
>
> Perhaps there are one or two Cold Fusion Researchers that
> would like to send him a Get Well Card.
>
> Ron Kita, Chiralex
>

[Vo]:A Quantum Jewel

[Terry Blanton]

https://www.simonsfoundation.org/quanta/20130917-a-jewel-at-the-heart-of-quantum-physics/

Physicists have discovered a jewel-like geometric object that
dramatically simplifies calculations of particle interactions and
challenges the notion that space and time are fundamental components
of reality.

“This is completely new and very much simpler than anything that has
been done before,” said Andrew Hodges, a mathematical physicist at
Oxford University who has been following the work.

The revelation that particle interactions, the most basic events in
nature, may be consequences of geometry significantly advances a
decades-long effort to reformulate quantum field theory, the body of
laws describing elementary particles and their interactions.
Interactions that were previously calculated with mathematical
formulas thousands of terms long can now be described by computing the
volume of the corresponding jewel-like “amplituhedron,” which yields
an equivalent one-term expression.

“The degree of efficiency is mind-boggling,” said Jacob Bourjaily, a
theoretical physicist at Harvard University and one of the researchers
who developed the new idea. “You can easily do, on paper, computations
that were infeasible even with a computer before.”



Also:

http://www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2013/09/space-time-illusion-amplituhedron

[Vo]:Robert Park...LENR Critic and Health Status

[Ron Kita]

Greetings Vortex-L,

I just saw an update on the health status of Robert Park,long time
critic of LENR Cold Fusion:
http://www.bobpark.org/

Perhaps there are one or two Cold Fusion Researchers that
would like to send him a Get Well Card.

Ron Kita, Chiralex

RE: [Vo]:REVERSE ENGINEERING AND A ROMANIAN STORY

[Roarty, Francis X]

Peter,
Reverse engineering is what convinced me that anomalous heat is 
for real, I knew the math was beyond my skill set as an electronics technician 
with some undergrad classes in physics but reverse engineering often pays off 
in electronics when the theory eludes us. I ASSUMED for that purpose that the 
Black Light's claims of anomalous heat with Rayney nickel were true and worked 
backwards while comparing it to similar claims by researchers working with ni 
nano powders.. I was excited to discover the geometry formed by the powder 
grains and the voids formed by leaching out Al to make Rayney nickel, a 
skeletal catalyst were very similar. Also these geometries in the powder result 
in stiction via casimir force which suggests that similar forces are 
unrequetted in the Rayney ni  voids formed when the softer aluminum is leached 
out and are responsible for the forces acting on the hydrogen in these 
experiments.
Fran

From: Peter Gluck [mailto:peter.gl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2013 5:05 AM
To: akira shirakawa; Arik El Boher; Brian Ahern; CMNS; Dagmar Kuhn; doug 
marker; Dr. Braun Tibor; eCatNews; Gabriel Moagar-Poladian; Gary; Haiko Lietz; 
jeff aries; Lewan Mats; Nicolaie N. Vlad; Peter Mobberley; Pierre Clauzon; 
Roberto Germano; Roy Virgilio; Steven Krivit; Sunwon Park; Tsirlin, Mark; vlad; 
VORTEX
Subject: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:REVERSE ENGINEERING AND A ROMANIAN STORY

My dear Friends,

May I ask your help again? I have decided to write a second series
of 100 septoes (see http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2012/06/100-septoes.html) 
in order to develop my basic concept of the interestingness of the world.
The first Septoe from the new series is one of paramount importance
and it sounds so:



Interesting: things are not what they seem.

Can you give me some examples from the realm of cold  fusion- LENR- HENI? Thank 
you.

I have just published:

http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2013/10/reverse-engineering-is-not-for-techno.html

two very true stories, one old and one very new, both instructive.

Peter










--
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com

Re: [Vo]:ICCF-18 lecture presentation videos for Tuesday uploaded

[Teslaalset]

Can anyone find the Patent Applications of them which Swartz is claiming?
I can't find any, using Swartz as inventor, Jet Energy or Nanortech as
assignees.



On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 8:02 AM,  wrote:

> Ruby,
>
> Excellent work.
>
> I was especially surprised at how far JET Energy has taken the Nanor.
> From the ICCF-18 Entrepreneurial Efforts panel video you posted  -
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jdVYvgdrabg
> - they may be one of the earliest entries into the commercial market.
>
> A full interview with Mitchell Swartz would be very welcome.
> Especially interesting would be his analysis of the Nanor material change
> that accompanied the large boost in energy gain after the magnetic
> stimulus.
>
> -- Lou Pagnucco
>
> Ruby wrote:
> >
> > Greetings,
> >
> > Eli has finished editing and uploading the Tuesday lecture videos that
> > we have permission to make public.
> >
> > A Tuesday playlist is here:
> > http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL7rx5Nfge9pdxoDJMrc7b9FAgIdMc8M3V
> >
> > The ColdFusionNow Youtube channel video upload page is here:
> > http://www.youtube.com/user/ColdFusionNow/videos
> >
> > A blog post on ColdFusionNow.org is here:
> >
> http://coldfusionnow.org/iccf-18-presentation-videos-for-tuesday-july-23/
> >
> > Monday's playlist is here:
> > http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL7rx5Nfge9pciRw_jDdP1SYvTaf47RCux
> >
> > Any suggestions or comments are welcome.
> >
> > I think Eli is going to take care of some other stuff through the end of
> > the week, and resume editing next week.
> >
> > Thanks for your support,
> > Ruby
> >
> >
> > --
> > Ruby Carat
> > r...@coldfusionnow.org 
> > Skype ruby-carat
> > www.coldfusionnow.org 
> >
> >
>
>
>

[Vo]:REVERSE ENGINEERING AND A ROMANIAN STORY

[Peter Gluck]

My dear Friends,

May I ask your help again? I have decided to write a second series
of 100 septoes (see http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2012/06/100-septoes.html)
in order to develop my basic concept of the interestingness of the world.
The first Septoe from the new series is one of paramount importance
and it sounds so:

*
*

*Interesting: things are not what they seem**. *

Can you give me some examples from the realm of cold  fusion- LENR- HENI?
Thank you.

*I have just published:*

*
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2013/10/reverse-engineering-is-not-for-techno.html
*

*two very true stories, one old and one very new, both instructive.*

Peter





*
*
-- 
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com