Re: [Vo]:The appearance of muons are explained by SPP theory.
With the detection of muons in fusion processes related to Rydberg matter reported by Leif Holmlid, I wonder if the tracks reported in the cloud chamber experiments of Dr. Piantelli were actually tracks produced by muons of the appropriate enemy levels rather than tracks produced by protons? On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 5:37 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote: Regarding: http://scitation.aip.org/content/aip/journal/rsi/86/8/10.1063/1.4928109 Muon detection studied by pulse-height energy analysis: Novel converter arrangements The detection of muons produced by Rydberg hydrogen matter supports the Surface Plasmon Polariton (SPP) theory of LENR. This theory specifically described how muons are produced and how these muons result in the production of fusion among the full range of atomic elements. This theory has been recorded in posts written by AxilAxil in the Vortex L, EGO OUT blog, and the EcatWorld blog over many months. The SPP behavior that has not yet been recognized by plasmonic science is the ability of SPPs to produce a positive feedback loop that compensates for the energy losses due to diffusion through the offsetting gains produced by non linear energy production. This ability to amplify the chemistry based catalytic activity of SPPs is not yet in the province of plasmonic research. When nano-particles setup the SPP to amplify their power and force SPP wave forms to loop onto themselves in a vortex, it produces a short lived “Dark Mode” configuration that acts just like a celestial black hole that draws energy into itself from its surroundings. This ability to attract, concentrate and store new energy involves at least two distinct although related mechanisms. First, SPPs concentrate and reorient the spin of photons then project the magnetic single pole beam so formed from one of the poles of the vortex. This beam both destabilizes and then transports energy from the affected matter back along the path of the beam through the action of quantum teleportation. This anapole magnetic beam mechanism can act at a considerable distance away from the vortex. The magnetic beam is energetic enough to produce mesons from condensation from the vacuum which the decays into muons which act to produce muon canalize fusion. Next, the SPP soliton can share, transfer and accumulate energy through quantum mechanical entanglement with clusters of matter of arbitrary size. This instantaneous gleaning of energy from many distinct sources occurs within a spherical zone around the vortex.This duality of causation in the results observed in the LENR reaction leads to understandable confusion. But this multiplicity in the results as produced by the fundamental cause of LENR are unified by a commonality of characteristics linked to a common origin of the effect.. These common and universal conditions include the thermalization of gamma radiation, the rapid to instantaneous stabilization of radioactive isotopes, lack of neutron emissions, and the wide variation of seemingly random transmutation results which includes fusion of light elements into heavier elements and fission of heavy elements into lighter ones, remote reaction at a distance from the location of the LENR reaction, and instantaneous cluster fusion involving huge numbers of sub-reactions that occur instantly and collectively. Even though the LENR reaction oftentimes occurs concurrent with the presence of hydrogen isotopes, hydrogen in not required as a fundamental cause of the reaction as shown in the experiments done at Proton 21 where a ball of copper is blasted with a high powered arc discharge, and the carbon dust experiments performed using microwaves conducted by George Egely, the new editor of infinite magazine. In the Proton 21 experiments in nano-particles involved are copper based and in the Egely case the nano-particles are based on carbon. In the Papp reaction. The nano particles are based on chlorine and noble gases. LENR has made itself known in our world ever since the days of young Tesla when electricity has be made powerful enough to generate nano particles from matter. Since we have brought Egely’s name up, Egely has written a wonderful series of articles explaining how SPPs have produced LENR for over a century in many diverse and now long forgotten systems going back to the times and work by Tesla. They are well worth a read and as follows: http://www.egely.hu/letoltes/Fusion-by-Pseudo-Particles-Part1.pdf http://www.egely.hu/letoltes/Fusion-by-Pseudo-Particles-Part2.pdf http://www.egely.hu/letoltes/Fusion-by-Pseudo-Particles-Part3.pdf
[Vo]:The VA-111Shkval
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VA-111_Shkval The VA-111Shkval (fromRussian: шквал— squall) The favorite method used to undercut the work of Joe Papp is making a joke about his work on his 300 MPH submarine. Such a system was not hew back in the 1960s. Russa began work on this device in the 1960s. Joe Papp or his father might have worked on that system before he came to the US.
Re: [Vo]:The appearance of muons are explained by SPP theory.
Leif Holmlid states that the production of Muons in the nuclear reactions catalyzed by the fundamental cause of LENR are not caused by the fusion of deuterium. The fundamental LENR cause resides inside the Rydberg matter as explained in the SPP theory. In this discussion, it is excluded that the muons are formed from the fusion energy, but it is clear that they are formed from nuclear and decay processes starting in the D(0). On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 7:54 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote: With the detection of muons in fusion processes related to Rydberg matter reported by Leif Holmlid, I wonder if the tracks reported in the cloud chamber experiments of Dr. Piantelli were actually tracks produced by muons of the appropriate enemy levels rather than tracks produced by protons? On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 5:37 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote: Regarding: http://scitation.aip.org/content/aip/journal/rsi/86/8/10.1063/1.4928109 Muon detection studied by pulse-height energy analysis: Novel converter arrangements The detection of muons produced by Rydberg hydrogen matter supports the Surface Plasmon Polariton (SPP) theory of LENR. This theory specifically described how muons are produced and how these muons result in the production of fusion among the full range of atomic elements. This theory has been recorded in posts written by AxilAxil in the Vortex L, EGO OUT blog, and the EcatWorld blog over many months. The SPP behavior that has not yet been recognized by plasmonic science is the ability of SPPs to produce a positive feedback loop that compensates for the energy losses due to diffusion through the offsetting gains produced by non linear energy production. This ability to amplify the chemistry based catalytic activity of SPPs is not yet in the province of plasmonic research. When nano-particles setup the SPP to amplify their power and force SPP wave forms to loop onto themselves in a vortex, it produces a short lived “Dark Mode” configuration that acts just like a celestial black hole that draws energy into itself from its surroundings. This ability to attract, concentrate and store new energy involves at least two distinct although related mechanisms. First, SPPs concentrate and reorient the spin of photons then project the magnetic single pole beam so formed from one of the poles of the vortex. This beam both destabilizes and then transports energy from the affected matter back along the path of the beam through the action of quantum teleportation. This anapole magnetic beam mechanism can act at a considerable distance away from the vortex. The magnetic beam is energetic enough to produce mesons from condensation from the vacuum which the decays into muons which act to produce muon canalize fusion. Next, the SPP soliton can share, transfer and accumulate energy through quantum mechanical entanglement with clusters of matter of arbitrary size. This instantaneous gleaning of energy from many distinct sources occurs within a spherical zone around the vortex.This duality of causation in the results observed in the LENR reaction leads to understandable confusion. But this multiplicity in the results as produced by the fundamental cause of LENR are unified by a commonality of characteristics linked to a common origin of the effect.. These common and universal conditions include the thermalization of gamma radiation, the rapid to instantaneous stabilization of radioactive isotopes, lack of neutron emissions, and the wide variation of seemingly random transmutation results which includes fusion of light elements into heavier elements and fission of heavy elements into lighter ones, remote reaction at a distance from the location of the LENR reaction, and instantaneous cluster fusion involving huge numbers of sub-reactions that occur instantly and collectively. Even though the LENR reaction oftentimes occurs concurrent with the presence of hydrogen isotopes, hydrogen in not required as a fundamental cause of the reaction as shown in the experiments done at Proton 21 where a ball of copper is blasted with a high powered arc discharge, and the carbon dust experiments performed using microwaves conducted by George Egely, the new editor of infinite magazine. In the Proton 21 experiments in nano-particles involved are copper based and in the Egely case the nano-particles are based on carbon. In the Papp reaction. The nano particles are based on chlorine and noble gases. LENR has made itself known in our world ever since the days of young Tesla when electricity has be made powerful enough to generate nano particles from matter. Since we have brought Egely’s name up, Egely has written a wonderful series of articles explaining how SPPs have produced LENR for over a century in many diverse and now long forgotten systems going back to the times and work by Tesla. They are well worth a read and as follows:
Re: [Vo]:The appearance of muons are explained by SPP theory.
As explained here before on this site, nuclear energy from fusion is carried to the SPP soliton via worm holes via teleportation and transformed into increased photonic energy and associated increases in an anapole magnetic field that produces muons through the Schwinger effect. http://www.phys.uconn.edu/~dunne/dunne_schwinger.html On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 11:32 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote: Leif Holmlid states that the production of Muons in the nuclear reactions catalyzed by the fundamental cause of LENR are not caused by the fusion of deuterium. The fundamental LENR cause resides inside the Rydberg matter as explained in the SPP theory. In this discussion, it is excluded that the muons are formed from the fusion energy, but it is clear that they are formed from nuclear and decay processes starting in the D(0). On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 7:54 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote: With the detection of muons in fusion processes related to Rydberg matter reported by Leif Holmlid, I wonder if the tracks reported in the cloud chamber experiments of Dr. Piantelli were actually tracks produced by muons of the appropriate enemy levels rather than tracks produced by protons? On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 5:37 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote: Regarding: http://scitation.aip.org/content/aip/journal/rsi/86/8/10.1063/1.4928109 Muon detection studied by pulse-height energy analysis: Novel converter arrangements The detection of muons produced by Rydberg hydrogen matter supports the Surface Plasmon Polariton (SPP) theory of LENR. This theory specifically described how muons are produced and how these muons result in the production of fusion among the full range of atomic elements. This theory has been recorded in posts written by AxilAxil in the Vortex L, EGO OUT blog, and the EcatWorld blog over many months. The SPP behavior that has not yet been recognized by plasmonic science is the ability of SPPs to produce a positive feedback loop that compensates for the energy losses due to diffusion through the offsetting gains produced by non linear energy production. This ability to amplify the chemistry based catalytic activity of SPPs is not yet in the province of plasmonic research. When nano-particles setup the SPP to amplify their power and force SPP wave forms to loop onto themselves in a vortex, it produces a short lived “Dark Mode” configuration that acts just like a celestial black hole that draws energy into itself from its surroundings. This ability to attract, concentrate and store new energy involves at least two distinct although related mechanisms. First, SPPs concentrate and reorient the spin of photons then project the magnetic single pole beam so formed from one of the poles of the vortex. This beam both destabilizes and then transports energy from the affected matter back along the path of the beam through the action of quantum teleportation. This anapole magnetic beam mechanism can act at a considerable distance away from the vortex. The magnetic beam is energetic enough to produce mesons from condensation from the vacuum which the decays into muons which act to produce muon canalize fusion. Next, the SPP soliton can share, transfer and accumulate energy through quantum mechanical entanglement with clusters of matter of arbitrary size. This instantaneous gleaning of energy from many distinct sources occurs within a spherical zone around the vortex.This duality of causation in the results observed in the LENR reaction leads to understandable confusion. But this multiplicity in the results as produced by the fundamental cause of LENR are unified by a commonality of characteristics linked to a common origin of the effect.. These common and universal conditions include the thermalization of gamma radiation, the rapid to instantaneous stabilization of radioactive isotopes, lack of neutron emissions, and the wide variation of seemingly random transmutation results which includes fusion of light elements into heavier elements and fission of heavy elements into lighter ones, remote reaction at a distance from the location of the LENR reaction, and instantaneous cluster fusion involving huge numbers of sub-reactions that occur instantly and collectively. Even though the LENR reaction oftentimes occurs concurrent with the presence of hydrogen isotopes, hydrogen in not required as a fundamental cause of the reaction as shown in the experiments done at Proton 21 where a ball of copper is blasted with a high powered arc discharge, and the carbon dust experiments performed using microwaves conducted by George Egely, the new editor of infinite magazine. In the Proton 21 experiments in nano-particles involved are copper based and in the Egely case the nano-particles are based on carbon. In the Papp reaction. The nano particles are based on chlorine and noble gases. LENR has made itself known in our world ever since the
Re: [Vo]:The appearance of muons are explained by SPP theory.
Posts combined revised and extended as follows: The appearance of muons in the LENR reaction are explained by SPP theory. Regarding: http://scitation.aip.org/content/aip/journal/rsi/86/8/10.1063/1.4928109 Muon detection studied by pulse-height energy analysis: Novel converter arrangements The detection of muons produced by Rydberg hydrogen matter supports the Surface Plasmon Polariton (SPP) theory of LENR. This theory specifically described how muons are produced and how these muons result in the production of fusion among the full range of atomic elements. This theory has been recorded in posts written by AxilAxil in the Vortex L, EGO OUT blog, and the E-cat World blog over many months. With the detection of muons in fusion processes related to Rydberg matter reported by Leif Holmlid, I wonder if the tracks reported in the cloud chamber experiments of Dr. Piantelli were actually tracks produced by muons of the appropriate 6 MeV enemy levels rather than tracks produced by protons? With the detection of muons in fusion processes related to Rydberg matter reported by Leif Holmlid, I wonder if the tracks reported in the cloud chamber experiments of Dr. Piantelli were actually tracks produced by muons of the appropriate enemy levels rather than tracks produced by protons? Leif Holmlid states that the production of Muons in the nuclear reactions catalyzed by the fundamental cause of LENR are not caused by the fusion of deuterium. The fundamental LENR cause resides inside the Rydberg matter as explained in the SPP theory. In this discussion, it is excluded that the muons are formed from the fusion energy, but it is clear that they are formed from nuclear and decay processes starting in the D(0). As explained here before on this site, nuclear energy from fusion is carried to the SPP soliton via worm holes via teleportation and transformed into increased photonic energy and associated increases in an anapole magnetic field that produces muons through the Schwinger effect. http://www.phys.uconn.edu/~dunne/dunne_schwinger.html The positive feedback loop between fusion reactions and production of magnetic fields and entanglement results is a transfer of that energy derived from fusion into the production of mesons, muons, pions and other subatomic particles. One result of this conversion of fusion based nuclear energy is the production of electrons from the decay of muons. We have suspected this electron production mechanism as informed from comments Rossi has made about his observation of electrical power production from the E-Cat. The Cat/Mouse interface may be using muons produced by the Mouse to activate the LENR reactions in the Cats when the Cats surround the Mouse to capture most of the Muon flux. On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 11:48 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote: As explained here before on this site, nuclear energy from fusion is carried to the SPP soliton via worm holes via teleportation and transformed into increased photonic energy and associated increases in an anapole magnetic field that produces muons through the Schwinger effect. http://www.phys.uconn.edu/~dunne/dunne_schwinger.html On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 11:32 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote: Leif Holmlid states that the production of Muons in the nuclear reactions catalyzed by the fundamental cause of LENR are not caused by the fusion of deuterium. The fundamental LENR cause resides inside the Rydberg matter as explained in the SPP theory. In this discussion, it is excluded that the muons are formed from the fusion energy, but it is clear that they are formed from nuclear and decay processes starting in the D(0). On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 7:54 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote: With the detection of muons in fusion processes related to Rydberg matter reported by Leif Holmlid, I wonder if the tracks reported in the cloud chamber experiments of Dr. Piantelli were actually tracks produced by muons of the appropriate enemy levels rather than tracks produced by protons? On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 5:37 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote: Regarding: http://scitation.aip.org/content/aip/journal/rsi/86/8/10.1063/1.4928109 Muon detection studied by pulse-height energy analysis: Novel converter arrangements The detection of muons produced by Rydberg hydrogen matter supports the Surface Plasmon Polariton (SPP) theory of LENR. This theory specifically described how muons are produced and how these muons result in the production of fusion among the full range of atomic elements. This theory has been recorded in posts written by AxilAxil in the Vortex L, EGO OUT blog, and the EcatWorld blog over many months. The SPP behavior that has not yet been recognized by plasmonic science is the ability of SPPs to produce a positive feedback loop that compensates for the energy losses due to diffusion through the offsetting gains produced by non linear energy production. This ability to amplify
[Vo]:The appearance of muons are explained by SPP theory.
Regarding: http://scitation.aip.org/content/aip/journal/rsi/86/8/10.1063/1.4928109 Muon detection studied by pulse-height energy analysis: Novel converter arrangements The detection of muons produced by Rydberg hydrogen matter supports the Surface Plasmon Polariton (SPP) theory of LENR. This theory specifically described how muons are produced and how these muons result in the production of fusion among the full range of atomic elements. This theory has been recorded in posts written by AxilAxil in the Vortex L, EGO OUT blog, and the EcatWorld blog over many months. The SPP behavior that has not yet been recognized by plasmonic science is the ability of SPPs to produce a positive feedback loop that compensates for the energy losses due to diffusion through the offsetting gains produced by non linear energy production. This ability to amplify the chemistry based catalytic activity of SPPs is not yet in the province of plasmonic research. When nano-particles setup the SPP to amplify their power and force SPP wave forms to loop onto themselves in a vortex, it produces a short lived “Dark Mode” configuration that acts just like a celestial black hole that draws energy into itself from its surroundings. This ability to attract, concentrate and store new energy involves at least two distinct although related mechanisms. First, SPPs concentrate and reorient the spin of photons then project the magnetic single pole beam so formed from one of the poles of the vortex. This beam both destabilizes and then transports energy from the affected matter back along the path of the beam through the action of quantum teleportation. This anapole magnetic beam mechanism can act at a considerable distance away from the vortex. The magnetic beam is energetic enough to produce mesons from condensation from the vacuum which the decays into muons which act to produce muon canalize fusion. Next, the SPP soliton can share, transfer and accumulate energy through quantum mechanical entanglement with clusters of matter of arbitrary size. This instantaneous gleaning of energy from many distinct sources occurs within a spherical zone around the vortex.This duality of causation in the results observed in the LENR reaction leads to understandable confusion. But this multiplicity in the results as produced by the fundamental cause of LENR are unified by a commonality of characteristics linked to a common origin of the effect.. These common and universal conditions include the thermalization of gamma radiation, the rapid to instantaneous stabilization of radioactive isotopes, lack of neutron emissions, and the wide variation of seemingly random transmutation results which includes fusion of light elements into heavier elements and fission of heavy elements into lighter ones, remote reaction at a distance from the location of the LENR reaction, and instantaneous cluster fusion involving huge numbers of sub-reactions that occur instantly and collectively. Even though the LENR reaction oftentimes occurs concurrent with the presence of hydrogen isotopes, hydrogen in not required as a fundamental cause of the reaction as shown in the experiments done at Proton 21 where a ball of copper is blasted with a high powered arc discharge, and the carbon dust experiments performed using microwaves conducted by George Egely, the new editor of infinite magazine. In the Proton 21 experiments in nano-particles involved are copper based and in the Egely case the nano-particles are based on carbon. In the Papp reaction. The nano particles are based on chlorine and noble gases. LENR has made itself known in our world ever since the days of young Tesla when electricity has be made powerful enough to generate nano particles from matter. Since we have brought Egely’s name up, Egely has written a wonderful series of articles explaining how SPPs have produced LENR for over a century in many diverse and now long forgotten systems going back to the times and work by Tesla. They are well worth a read and as follows: http://www.egely.hu/letoltes/Fusion-by-Pseudo-Particles-Part1.pdf http://www.egely.hu/letoltes/Fusion-by-Pseudo-Particles-Part2.pdf http://www.egely.hu/letoltes/Fusion-by-Pseudo-Particles-Part3.pdf
Re: [Vo]:Rossi's 1 MW Thermal LENR plant trial. What's the current consensus?
I don;t think that it is possible to build a Ni62 micro particle that is 100 microns in size that has been sintered together from 5 micron particles and still retain the commercial COTS catalytic surface treatment as seen in commercial 5 micron powders. The devil is in the details. On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 8:33 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote: *From:* Jed Rothwell I believe tax evasion is the national pastime in Italy…. And that makes it ok? Heck, just blame the prosecutor… somebody had it in for him, right? The point is that Rossi cheated when a lot of money was at stake. Not once, but many times. Would he do it again with scientific data, if lots of money was at stake? The important thing which matters to many scientists who are trying to understand this very important reaction, is that it is extremely likely that Rossi deliberately added a pure isotope to the ash of the Lugano testing. His motive for that is not clear, but someone did it (with the same probability of a DNA match). I’m sure his many supporters rationalize a way for Rossi to avoid blame for that as well…. after all, he doesn’t owe anyone a duty to provide honest data, so why not cheat?
Re: [Vo]:Lines of research related to the E-Cat: a review
Dear Adrian, It was announced on my blog EGO OUT, I try very had to signal new publications ASAP Vessy's blog is focused on he quality not the quantity of publications. I am focused on fastness. Peter On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 12:53 AM, a.ashfield a.ashfi...@verizon.net wrote: Interesting report on LENR research here. http://www.ecat-thenewfire.com/blog/ Adrian -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
Re: [Vo]:Rossi's 1 MW Thermal LENR plant trial. What's the current consensus?
Wikipedia uses a lot of poor, dated references in Cold Fusion and the editor this could be forgiven, but given more recent reference to mainstream article (like il corriere della serra, or justice) they refuse to update. this is what make the difference from error by incompetence, to disinformation by malice. of course it is the Cold Fusion/E-cat admin and influent mindguards who are to be blamed, Wikipedia head is just tolerating that, which is probably complicity at a lesser degree. It would be fun to sue them on that factual basis : 1- admin refusing to update with better data, and preventing others to 2- wikipedia tolerating admin to do #1 2015-08-07 0:38 GMT+02:00 a.ashfield a.ashfi...@verizon.net: Jed, My understanding was that after some 60 indictments were thrown out Rossi was convicted of tax evasion. This most popular sport in Italy is not the same was fraud. Wikipedia uses a lot of poor, dated references in Cold Fusion and the editor Andythegrump spends his life preventing others from updating it. He seems to think that if he believes something that is proof enough. Reminiscent? Adrian
[Vo]:The Russian LENR initiative
*While president Obama'sLENR-less, EU is silent re LENR, our Russian colleagues have the initiative of a full-scale national LENR RD plan.* *The Russian Example for all nations;* - Инициирован процесс разработки полномасштабной программы исследований НЭЯР http://lenr.seplm.ru/novosti/initsiirovan-protsess-razrabotki-polnomasshtabnoi-programmy-issledovanii-neyar http://lenr.seplm.ru/novosti/initsiirovan-protsess-razrabotki-polnomasshtabnoi-programmy-issledovanii-neyar *An example of effectiveness (to do the right things) and I hope it will be also an efficient plan (to do the the things right) and of selectivity (to not do the things that do not lead to applications and or understanding.)* *I will transklate the details available and publish them on Ego out.* *Best,* *Peter* -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
[Vo]:THE RUSSIAN NATIONAL LENR RESEARCH PLAN
A first document is translated in the appendix of this: http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2015/08/the-russian-national-lenr-research-plan.html Admirably rich experimental and theoretical LENR activity in Russia. Mission, vision, strategic priorities, core resaerch will be difficult to be defined. Which country will create the second national LENR research plan? Peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
