[Vo]:professors Leif Holmlid and Sveinn Olafsson cold fusion research since 2003 results in dozens of their competent reports in mainstream journals: Rich Murray 2016.06.10

2016-06-10 Thread Rich Murray
professors Leif Holmlid and Sveinn Olafsson cold fusion research since 2003
results in dozens of  their competent reports in mainstream journals: Rich
Murray 2016.06.10

http://rmforall.blogspot.com/2016/06/professors-leif-holmlid-and-sveinn.html




Today I happened to look into cold fusion research, which I have kept tabs
on since March 1989, and found that, finally, some real tangible vigorous
scientific progress is happening since 2003 with a few competent physicists
from Iceland and Norway, in a small system that allows a high level of
control and repetition and a variety of readily provable and surprising
results, along with an adequate theory --


will probably mean unlimited free safe energy from small to huge systems
that are inherently safe, light-weight, low-cost, non-polluting --


so I am finding and joining some forums about it, with up to 1800 members,
with people I already know, and writing up a summary review for my own
pleasure and my blog...



https://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/  1800 members


http://atom-ecology.russgeorge.net/2016/04/03/cold-fusion-real-revolutionary-ready/


[ gives a translation of a newspaper story in Norway ]


2016  April  03  COLD FUSION

Real, Revolutionary, and Ready.

Says Leading Scandinavian Newspaper


Aftenposten, a mainstream newspaper in Norway is publishing on Cold Fusion.


Here is a ‘translation patched up with contextual English/Physics parlance’
of the April 2, 2016, Norwegian report that features an interview with
physicist Sindre Zeiner-Gundersen, who revealed details of an operating
experimental cold fusion device in Norway, generating 20 times more energy
than required to activate it !


According to Scandinavian physicists, ‘cold fusion’ happens due to the
formation of ultra-dense hydrogen/deuterium as described in the widely
acclaimed work and theoretical understanding by Professor Sveinn Olafsson
(Sindre’s Phd. supervisor in Iceland) and Norway’s Professor Leif Holmlid.


Finally a proven testable theory for cold fusion that occurs in microscopic
"stars" inside ordinary metals!


[ many photos and details in a very enthusiastic, lively, multi-faceted
article... ]



[ http://www2.chem.gu.se/~holmlid/

photos, excellent brief summary, lists many key papers... ]



http://atom-ecology.russgeorge.net/2016/04/04/homlid-olafsson-rydberg-fusion/


 2016 April 04Holmlid and Olafsson  on Rydberg Fusion


long, detailed color slide show on research since 2011


[ slide show also available via:


http://hl.altervista.org/split.php?http://tempid.altervista.org/SRI.pdf  ]


Tags:

"cold fusion", muons, olafsson, homlid, rydberg fusion, rydberg matter,
slides, stanford



Professor Sveinn Olafsson of Iceland has shared this presentation of his
and Professor Leif Homlid’s work with Rydberg hydrogen and ‘cold fusion’


Get your Geek On if you like physics outside of the box…


Cold fusion now has a proven testable mainstream theory explaining why it
occurs and has occurred as originally announced in March 1989…


The skeptics, nare-do-wells, and dogmatics are revealed as fools or worse!


Welcome to the end of the fossil fuel age.


These slides are from a talk delivered at Stanford, spring 2016, walk
through the Rydberg fusion experiments and data.


This work offers both a demonstrably tested and proven theory for cold
fusion as well as detailed description of the work and how it relates to
other cold fusion studies going back to the March 1989 announcement of
Fleischmann and Pons in Utah.


One startling discovery in this work is the observation of the emission of
muons !


The key condition that enables this ‘cold fusion’ to occur is the
development of ultra-dense Rydberg hydrogen that forms on command within
microscopic domains inside of metals.


This ultra-dense hydrogen/deuterium is said to be at a density 1000 times
that found in the center of our Sun, perhaps attaining the density of a
neutron star, quark soup !


With the nuclei squashed so closely together, fusion readily takes place
and can be stimulated to become prolific by being simply illuminated with
an ordinary green laser.


This cold fusion occurs at a temperature that is very cold compared to that
of normal hot fusion and in a very unexpected neutron free form.


For those of us who were friends of the late great and much maligned Martin
Fleischmann, we can remember well his speaking all those years ago of
hydrogen density in his experiment far in excess of that of metallic
hydrogen and indeed of the role of ‘deep Dirac levels’ and Poynting vector
mysteries !


All, elements of a new age of science from outside the box.


Imagine how much better the world would be today if the mis- and
dis-information campaign against cold fusion had not been so successfully
waged for the past quarter of a century !


Vastly reduced fossil fuel emissions would have put climate change under
control and infinite low cost energy would have allowed trillions to be
spent on the betterment of mankind, to

[Vo]:Gears in 4-Dimensions?

2016-06-10 Thread H LV
This video shows how three interlocking gears in 2-D cannot turn each
other, but three interlocking gears in 3-D can. Some of the commentators
wondered if interlocking gears could work in  4-D? I did a quick google
search and could not find anything on the concept of gears in 4-D. It would
be interesting to know if the question has been explored mathematically.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Mf0JpTI_gg

Harry


[Vo]:LENR and technological illiteracy (i)

2016-06-10 Thread Peter Gluck
I want to be peaceful and to focus, for example on Chukichev's
LENR theory but due to the limitless fierceness of the Rossi-IH dispute
I cannot.
The worst will come only tomorrow.

http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/06/june-10-2016-lenr-and-technological.html

Peter
-- 
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com


Re: [Vo]:bye bye nukes

2016-06-10 Thread Bob Higgins
IMHO, the attention being given to CO2 is misplaced.  A study of the
Earth's cyclic climate history (mostly from ice cores) shows that today,
the climate should be in the beginning of a slow temperature decline into
ice age due to solar and precessional cycles.  The anthropogenic CO2 may
have slightly forestalled that cold temperature slide.  If suddenly the CO2
were eliminated at great economic impact, the protesters would have a sign
change in a few decades to read - Stop Global Cooling!  We should let
economics make the right decision.  The very idea of a carbon tax is
absurd.  With the coming ice age there will be substantial demand for LENR
heating.

I also believe the nuclear industry should be responsible for their own
liability, liability insurance, fuel disposal costs, and decommissioning
costs in escrow  - with none subsidized by the government.  This is a
commercially fair proposition that the nuclear industry would not survive.
If the nuclear industry cannot compete now, with their true cost being
substantially subsidized (liability and decommissioning), then they are far
from being economically competitive in anything but their CO2 emission.  Of
course, a fully deployed LENR would fix the economics of the big energy
industry by removing the huge liability danger, reducing the cost of
liability insurance, eliminating fuel disposal costs, and eliminating
decommissioning costs.  Note that some of these costs would remain in big
energy hot fusion if it ever became viable as currently envisioned - it
would still have liability costs for possibility of huge tritium release,
and decommissioning costs for the activated hardware.  Hot fusion may be as
expensive as the true cost of present nuclear fission, particularly if the
R&D cost were amortized.

Also, the other energy industries should be responsible for their own,
sometimes hidden costs.  Frackers should be liable for earthquake damage
they cause and should have liability insurance to cover it.  They should
also pay for restoration to any water systems - public or private.  The
coal industry should have to pay an escrow for every cubic meter of soil
they remove for future restoration of the site after they are done mining.
The coal mining industry also has liability issues for which they bear
responsibility - Ex. I believe there is an underground coal mine that has
been on fire for 30 years that caused a whole town (in Pennsylvania?) to be
permanently evacuated because no one has been able to extinguish the fire
that has grown under the town.

On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 7:20 AM, Jed Rothwell  wrote:

> Axil Axil  wrote:
>
>
>> Many old paid for nuclear plants are shutting down due to competition,
>>
>
> That is a shame. I do not favor subsidizing inefficient technology, but on
> the other hand we need to reduce carbon emissions. Nukes are better than
> natural gas for that reason. Perhaps a carbon tax would make these plants
> more competitive. That is a subsidy too, but it is more neutral or
> even-handed. It would give some advantage to natural gas versus coal. A
> subsidy for old nuke plants only gives the nukes an advantage, with no
> advantage to gas versus coal.
>
> - Jed
>
>


Re: [Vo]:bye bye nukes

2016-06-10 Thread Jed Rothwell
Axil Axil  wrote:


> Many old paid for nuclear plants are shutting down due to competition,
>

That is a shame. I do not favor subsidizing inefficient technology, but on
the other hand we need to reduce carbon emissions. Nukes are better than
natural gas for that reason. Perhaps a carbon tax would make these plants
more competitive. That is a subsidy too, but it is more neutral or
even-handed. It would give some advantage to natural gas versus coal. A
subsidy for old nuke plants only gives the nukes an advantage, with no
advantage to gas versus coal.

- Jed