Re: [Vo]:CBCNews Canada: Why the controversial science of cold fusion is getting hot again

2016-09-23 Thread Frank Znidarsic
They also have my book.  Maybe, for once, someone read it.


We begin to see the harm Rossi and Defkalion caused. I hope this will not have 
an impact on the Congress but I fear that it will.


- Jed





-Original Message-
From: Jed Rothwell 
To: vortex-l 
Sent: Fri, Sep 23, 2016 5:54 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:CBCNews Canada: Why the controversial science of cold fusion 
is getting hot again




Alain Sepeda  wrote:


ethan siegel bash LENR as fraud based on Rossi and Defkalion story, ignoring 
the science


I'm tired



You're tired, and I am apprehensive. This is what I feared might happen. We 
begin to see the harm Rossi and Defkalion caused. I hope this will not have an 
impact on the Congress but I fear that it will.


- Jed











[Vo]:Progress in LENR theory

2016-09-23 Thread Axil Axil
The D(0) (metalized hydrogen) is a cluster of atoms that oftentimes number
from under 100 to maybe in an exception as much as a thousand. Under the
influence of Rydberg blockade provided by alkali catalysts (potassium,
lithium) , the D(0) forms a Hole superconductor that has a core of positive
charges in the core and a electron/boson spin wave of negative charges that
cover the surface of the cluster. This surface is organized as a spin wave
that is coherent and contains Surface Plasmon Polaritons (SPP) as a
component of the spin wave. The SPP is a bubble of many entangled electrons
and photons that store energy in a whispering gallery wave format in the
giga electron volt range. The photon/electron entangled pairs start out in
the infrared energy range but as energy is added, the SPPs advance into the
XUV and x-ray energy range. All the SPPs are entangled and share energy
that form the spin wave. Any D(0) can store a vast amount of energy in the
spin wave. The SPPs are analog monopoles who becomes easily entangled by
their nature. The energy that is added to the spin wave Bose condensate is
stored as a magnetic flux line cover that converts the D(0) into a analog
monopole. The monopole trails of D(0) have been seen in photo emulsions
where their energy has been calculated to get into the Giga electron volt
range as determined by ionization trail calculations.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pRKblAn8lLI

This patterned magnetic field extends out and destabilizes protons and
neutrons inside of nuclei that are near the D(0) and brings some of the
nuclear energy into the spin wave via entanglement but most of the nucleon
decay energy forms mesons that are entangled with the D(0) spin wave. As
the meson decays into many other sub-atomic particles, they all remain
energetically entangled with the D(0) that produced the meson(s) no matter
how far away from the D(0) those decaying particles happens to be away from
the decaying remnants of the nucleons. This process of entanglement with
the D(0) is how the muon bubble forms.

The D(0) can be thought of as an extended wave of energy that can extend
out many meters, with other nuclear reactions produced in superposition
with the muon waves that are connected to the D(0) monopole magnetic
quasiparticle. This magnetic spin wave cover makes the D(0) indestructible
and no amount of heat and pressure can penetrate into the D(0) to disrupt
it.

The D(0) keeps bring in energy until a limit is reached and this
quasiparticle explodes into a Bosenova of XUV and x-ray light and magnetism
where the stored energy is converted into a magnetic proton supercurrent.
This proton supercurrent is the source of intense magnetic fields that have
been seen in some LENR systems.

First ever supercurrent observed at room temperature

http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/2016/aug/02/first-ever-supercurrent-observed-at-room-temperature

The factor that causes the proton and the neutron to decay is CP violation.
Ordinarily, the proton and neutron are in their lowest energy color force
state, but when a rotating magnetic field is applied, these nucleons become
excited and the weak force becomes activated and can produce nucleon decay.
The spin wave on the surface of the D(0) produces a properly formatted
magnetic field that excites the nucleons.

In other types of LENR systems, crystal filters generate the properly
formatted rotating magnetic fields.

Like the specific shape of a key opens a lock, if the stimulus for the LENR
reaction within the nucleon is a specific moire patterning of a monopole
magnetic field, that would explain why certain crystal configurations
induce the LENR reaction.

See

Hexagonal Crystals and LENR (Axil Axil)

http://www.e-catworld.com/2016/01/16/hexagonal-crystals-and-lenr-axil-axil/


Possibly, metalized hydrides produce the proper magnetic pattern without
crystal based filtering, but other materials can produce the proper
magnetic pattern through filtering of a monopole magnetic field through the
appropriate crystal structure.

For example, Dennis Cravens Golden balls

http://www.infinite-energy.com/images/pdfs/NIWeekCravens.pdf[/quote]

"To assure a strong magnetic field in the active material the spheres
contain a ground samarium cobalt (Sm2Co7) magnet, which stays magnetized at
higher temperatures. This was powdered and the powder is mostly random but
it should provide a strong magnetic field within the sample"

The Sm2Co7 magnet produces the required anisotropic magnetic field
lines(monopole like magnetic field).

Deuterium is used as the gas envelope

Activated charcoal produces the graphite like hexagonal crystal structure
that formats the magnetic field to the proper specific moire patterning of
a monopole magnetic field.

The basic chemical structure of activated carbon is closely approximated by
the structure of pure graphite. The graphite crystal is composed of layers
of fused hexagons held by weak van de Waals forces. The layers are held by

Re: [Vo]:CBCNews Canada: Why the controversial science of cold fusion is getting hot again

2016-09-23 Thread Jed Rothwell
Alain Sepeda  wrote:

ethan siegel bash LENR as fraud based on Rossi and Defkalion story,
> ignoring the science
>
> I'm tired
>

You're tired, and I am apprehensive. This is what I feared might happen. We
begin to see the harm Rossi and Defkalion caused. I hope this will not have
an impact on the Congress but I fear that it will.

- Jed


Re: [Vo]:CBCNews Canada: Why the controversial science of cold fusion is getting hot again

2016-09-23 Thread Alain Sepeda
ethan siegel bash LENR as fraud based on Rossi and Defkalion story,
ignoring the science

I'm tired

2016-09-23 0:04 GMT+02:00 Jones Beene :

> Two slime jobs in New Scientist in response to this
>
>
>
> https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg23130910-300-cold-
> fusion-sciences-most-controversial-technology-is-back/
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Alain Sepeda
>
> An article on LENR, relative to  U.S. House of Representatives committee
> on armed services  with reference to rossi, Larsen, open skepticism, open
> curiosity...
>
> http://www.cbc.ca/news/technology/congress-cold-fusion-briefing-1.3772873
>
>
>
>
>
> I launched a post for debate on lenr-forum
>
> https://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/index.php/Thread/3827-CBCNews-Canada/
>
>
>
> I seen an occasion to spread informations
>


Re: [Vo]:Morrison paper

2016-09-23 Thread Ruby


Thanks for this paper, Jed.  I like the timeline it holds.
I am collecting timelines and dates for a history project.
Ruby

On 9/22/16 1:34 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:

I found a paper copy of this, and converted it.
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/MorrisonDRreviewofco.pdf

- Jed

--
Ruby Carat
Eureka, CA USA
r...@coldfusionnow.org
www.coldfusionnow.org
lenrexplained.com




[Vo]:stop to repetitions

2016-09-23 Thread Peter Gluck
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/09/sep-23-206-lenr-stop-to-repetition.html

s lot to read and answer

peter

-- 
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com


Re: [Vo]:Morrison paper

2016-09-23 Thread Jed Rothwell
Here are some other papers from Morrison:

http://newenergytimes.com/v2/archives/DROM/DROM.shtml

- Jed


Re: [Vo]:CBCNews Canada: Why the controversial science of cold fusion is getting hot again

2016-09-23 Thread ROGER ANDERTON
New Scientists just gets lots wrong and keeps repeating its mistakes ad 
infinitum
example:

https://www.newscientist.com/article/2106321-reality-guide-the-essential-laws-of-cosmology/
 
 New Scientist: "Back in the 1860s, James Clerk Maxwell was melding electricity 
and magnetism into one unified theory of electromagnetism. But however he 
sliced the equations, they only made sense if light travelled through space at 
the same constant speed, regardless of the speed of its source. This is odd. If 
someone fires a bullet from a moving car, to a bystander the bullet travels at 
the sum of its speed and the car’s speed. Yet when 20 years later US physicists 
Albert Michelson and Edward Morley were looking for the luminiferous ether, a 
medium supposed to carry light, they reached the same conclusion: however you 
look at it, the speed of light is a constant." 


http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/1743/2/Norton.pdf
John Norton: "The Michelson-Morley experiment is fully compatible with an 
emission theory of light that CONTRADICTS THE LIGHT POSTULATE."





 

On Thursday, 22 September 2016, 23:08, Jones Beene  
wrote:
 

 #yiv5817438683 #yiv5817438683 -- _filtered #yiv5817438683 
{font-family:Calibri;panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;} _filtered #yiv5817438683 
{font-family:Tahoma;panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}#yiv5817438683 
#yiv5817438683 p.yiv5817438683MsoNormal, #yiv5817438683 
li.yiv5817438683MsoNormal, #yiv5817438683 div.yiv5817438683MsoNormal 
{margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;font-size:12.0pt;}#yiv5817438683 a:link, 
#yiv5817438683 span.yiv5817438683MsoHyperlink 
{color:blue;text-decoration:underline;}#yiv5817438683 a:visited, #yiv5817438683 
span.yiv5817438683MsoHyperlinkFollowed 
{color:purple;text-decoration:underline;}#yiv5817438683 
span.yiv5817438683EmailStyle17 {color:#1F497D;}#yiv5817438683 
.yiv5817438683MsoChpDefault {} _filtered #yiv5817438683 {margin:1.0in 1.0in 
1.0in 1.0in;}#yiv5817438683 div.yiv5817438683WordSection1 {}#yiv5817438683 Two 
slime jobs in New Scientist in response to this  
https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg23130910-300-cold-fusion-sciences-most-controversial-technology-is-back/
      From: Alain Sepeda

An article on LENR, relative to  U.S. House of Representatives committee on 
armed services  with reference to rossi, Larsen, open skepticism, open 
curiosity...http://www.cbc.ca/news/technology/congress-cold-fusion-briefing-1.3772873
    I launched a post for debate on 
lenr-forumhttps://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/index.php/Thread/3827-CBCNews-Canada/
  I seen an occasion to spread informations