[Vo]:Polaritons can have negative mass

2018-01-12 Thread Axil Axil
http://www.newsweek.com/particle-physics-mind-bending-negative-mass-device-lasers-778495


Also see


http://www.rochester.edu/newscenter/vamivakas-microcavity-negative-mass-generate-lasers-290202/


Also see


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negative_mass


Also see


https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/are-wormholes-a-dead-end-for-faster-than-light-travel/


That's right: mass, but negative. A ring of negative-mass material could be
used to construct a fully functional and useful wormhole. Since the exotic
nature of negative mass warps spacetime in a unique way, it "inflates" the
entrance to the wormhole outside the boundary of the event horizon, and
stabilizes the throat of the wormhole against instabilities. It’s not an
intuitive result but the math checks out.


[Vo]:The KERR effect and LENR

2018-01-12 Thread Axil Axil
There are claims that LENR extracts energy from the vacuum. The question
naturally arises about how can such an improbable thing can possibly happen.


A experiment done using a optical cavity shows how the vacuum can tap into
the vacuum fluctuations that occur in empty space to produce real effects.


http://www.pnas.org/content/110/11/4234.full.pdf


Dynamical Casimir effect in a Josephson metamaterial


This experiment shows how an optical cavity can be tuned electrically using
the KERR effect in such a way to convert virtual photons into real photons
through the adjustment of the index of refraction of the vacuum in the
cavity to produce a resonance based casimir effect.


The KERR effect is a mechanism to adjust the speed of light in the vacuum
so that the cavity can be modified into a resonance condition in such a way
as to use the casimir effect to extract real photons from the vacuum.


This KERR effect adjustment mechanism might be operable in LENR as well as
the EMDRIVE.


Quote

The zero-point energy stored in the modes of an electromagnetic cavity has
experimentally detectable effects, giving rise to an attractive interaction
between the opposite walls, the static Casimir effect. A dynamical version
of this effect was predicted to occur when the vacuum energy is changed
either by moving the walls of the cavity or by changing the index of
refraction, resulting in the conversion of vacuum fluctuations into real
photons.


Here, we demonstrate the dynamical Casimir effect using a Josephson
metamaterial embedded in a microwave cavity at 5.4 GHz. We modulate the
effective length of the cavity by flux-biasing the metamaterial based on
superconducting quantum interference devices (SQUIDs), which results in
variation of a few percentage points in the speed of light. We extract the
full 4 × 4 covariance matrix of the emitted microwave radiation,
demonstrating that photons at frequencies symmetrical with respect to half
of the modulation frequency are generated in pairs. At large detunings of
the cavity from half of the modulation frequency, we find power spectra
that clearly show the theoretically predicted hallmark of the Casimir
effect: a bimodal, “sparrow-tail” structure. The observed substantial
photon flux cannot be assigned to parametric amplification of thermal
fluctuations;
its creation is a direct consequence of the noncommutativity structure of
quantum field theory.


RE: [Vo]:Ferrous alloys and spin energy transfer - mostly overlooked in LENR

2018-01-12 Thread Arnaud Kodeck
Like Mizuno but Mu metal instead of Ni.

 

From: JonesBeene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net] 
Sent: Friday, 12 January 2018 19:35
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Ferrous alloys and spin energy transfer - mostly overlooked 
in LENR

 

To clarify:

 

Variance of good catalysts from the ideal 2Ry = 27.2 eV in ionization potential 
(the catalytic “hole”)
 
1)  Molybdenum  .07
2)  Potassium   .09
3)  Rubidium.09
 
BTW - palladium has a fit at 27.77 eV (.57 variance) which is much further from 
an ideal catalytic value than moly. But moly is a poor proton conductor.
 
This may indicate that hydrogen absorption is more important than catalytic 
fit. 
 
AFAIK – no one has ever tried the tactic of alloying or electroplating Pd onto 
Mu metal to optimize both goals.

 

---

 

… which brings to mind Claytor’s statement that the best alloy he has found for 
LENR was a Mu metal alloy. 

 

The use of Mu Metal as the active matrix for LENR could turn out to be the most 
valuable detail relative to spin and LENR if Claytor is correct … using “ 
Co-Netic” as the matrix alloy. Mu-metal is a nickel-iron alloy, and the 
proprietary alloy  in question, Co-Netic - has high added molybdenum. 

 

http://custommagneticshielding.magneticshield.com/category/co-netic-sheet-and-foil

 

The high permeability makes mu-metal useful not only for shielding against 
static and low-frequency magnetic fields but also in converting most of the 
energy of an anomalous self-generated field into heat. This is a "soft" 
magnetic material that saturates at low magnetic fields and that is the key to 
the coupling magnons into heat. The high number of inherent Rydberg levels in 
the ionization potential of this alloy could be the key. BTW – it should be 
noted that  Molybdenum is the closest Rydberg ionization fit to Mills theory of 
all metals. That could be another key to understanding. No other metal is as 
close to the precise value.

 



RE: [Vo]:Ferrous alloys and spin energy transfer - mostly overlooked in LENR

2018-01-12 Thread JonesBeene
To clarify:

Variance of good catalysts from the ideal 2Ry = 27.2 eV in ionization potential 
(the catalytic “hole”)

1)  Molybdenum  .07
2)  Potassium   .09
3)  Rubidium.09

BTW - palladium has a fit at 27.77 eV (.57 variance) which is much further from 
an ideal catalytic value than moly. But moly is a poor proton conductor.

This may indicate that hydrogen absorption is more important than catalytic 
fit. 

AFAIK – no one has ever tried the tactic of alloying or electroplating Pd onto 
Mu metal to optimize both goals.

---

… which brings to mind Claytor’s statement that the best alloy he has found for 
LENR was a Mu metal alloy. 

The use of Mu Metal as the active matrix for LENR could turn out to be the most 
valuable detail relative to spin and LENR if Claytor is correct … using “ 
Co-Netic” as the matrix alloy. Mu-metal is a nickel-iron alloy, and the 
proprietary alloy  in question, Co-Netic - has high added molybdenum. 

http://custommagneticshielding.magneticshield.com/category/co-netic-sheet-and-foil

The high permeability makes mu-metal useful not only for shielding against 
static and low-frequency magnetic fields but also in converting most of the 
energy of an anomalous self-generated field into heat. This is a "soft" 
magnetic material that saturates at low magnetic fields and that is the key to 
the coupling magnons into heat. The high number of inherent Rydberg levels in 
the ionization potential of this alloy could be the key. BTW – it should be 
noted that  Molybdenum is the closest Rydberg ionization fit to Mills theory of 
all metals. That could be another key to understanding. No other metal is as 
close to the precise value.



[Vo]:Ferrous alloys and spin energy transfer - mostly overlooked in LENR

2018-01-12 Thread JonesBeene

There has been recent renewed interest in spin coupling in LENR as the m.o. of 
energy transfer at the atomic level.  

As it turns out – nickel is not optimum for the spin transfer  process -  while 
iron is the best, but iron is not good for absorption of hydrogen.

In fact Tom Claytor could be  several years ahead of the rest of the LENR world 
in utilizing spin (and ferrous alloys) but he has been largely ignored since it 
is assumed the ferromagnetic elements – iron nickel and cobalt would all 
transfer spin energy in the same way - and nickel is a good proton absorber.

If John Wallace is on the right track, he may have provided  a QM explanation 
of why steel or an iron alloy can transfer spin energy more robustly than 
nickel -- but they are not optimum without alloying elements which allow high 
loading. Iron is notorious for undergoing embrittlement, which is a type of 
hydrogen absorption but possibly one which is destructive in the long run and 
far from optimum without more…

… which brings to mind Claytor’s statement that the best alloy he has found for 
LENR was a Mu metal alloy. 

The use of Mu Metal as the active matrix for LENR could turn out to be the most 
valuable detail relative to spin and LENR if Claytor is correct … using “ 
Co-Netic” as the matrix alloy. Mu-metal is a nickel-iron alloy, and the 
proprietary alloy  in question, Co-Netic - has high added molybdenum. 

http://custommagneticshielding.magneticshield.com/category/co-netic-sheet-and-foil

The high permeability makes mu-metal useful not only for shielding against 
static and low-frequency magnetic fields but also in converting most of the 
energy of an anomalous self-generated field into heat. This is a "soft" 
magnetic material that saturates at low magnetic fields and that is the key to 
the coupling magnons into heat. The high number of inherent Rydberg levels in 
the ionization potential of this alloy could be the key. BTW – it should be 
noted that  Molybdenum is the closest Rydberg ionization fit to Mills theory of 
all metals. That could be another key to understanding. No other metal is as 
close to the precise value.

Jones

Wallace’s book can be ordered from his web site but it is not about LENR and is 
highly technical.

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&ved=0ahUKEwjh2qD909LYAhVr9IMKHS7sAggQjBAIMDAB&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.castinganalysis.com%2Ffiles%2Fprinciples.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3cKP8Mwz9vzuI7ZKQDl4lS






[Vo]:FW: CF/LANR/LENR Colloquium

2018-01-12 Thread JonesBeene
From: Dr. Mitchell Swartz 


The first ad hoc CF/LANR/LENR Colloquium of this year
will be at noon, January 12, 2018 at MIT, Cambridge, Friday.

If any CF/LANR/LENR experimentalist is interested in 
contributing, and also presenting some of their ongoing 
CF/LANR efforts, send email to me or Peter Hagelstein.

  ===

Dr. Mitchell Swartz, 
 “Monitoring Deep Hydrogen Loading and its Linkage to Excess Heat”

Prof. Peter Hagelstein
  "Update on steel plate experiments"

Florian Metzler 
"Metallurgical properties of steel relevant to phonon-nuclear coupling"

Jeff Driscoll 
 “Calibration of a Hydrogen/Argon Gas Phase LENR Experiment”

Dr. Mitchell Swartz
   “NanorSat Spacecraft”

=

"Discovery is dangerous… but so is life. 
  A man unwilling to take risk is doomed never to learn, 
  never to grow, never to live. "
  -  Planetologist Pardot Kynes