Re: [Vo]:Superconductivity at temperatures around 77 degrees Fahrenheit

[John Berry]

Thanks God!  Good job we can dispense with the experimenting and theory, we
just have to ask you!

On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 12:12 AM Brian Ahern  wrote:

> Room temp SC is impossible
>
> --
> *From:* Axil Axil 
> *Sent:* Friday, February 22, 2019 11:25 PM
> *To:* vortex-l
> *Subject:* [Vo]:Superconductivity at temperatures around 77 degrees
> Fahrenheit
>
> https://techlinkcenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/RTSC.pdf
> 
>
> The Navy's patent application has been made public by the U.S. Patent and
> Trademark Office describing a plasmonic based room-temperature
> superconductor capable of exhibiting superconductivity at temperatures of
> around 77 degrees Fahrenheit.
>
> Read more at:
> https://phys.org/news/2019-02-navy-patent-room-temperature-superconductor.html#jCp
> 
>

RE: [Vo]:Superconductivity at temperatures around 77 degrees Fahrenheit

[bobcook39...@hotmail.com]

Brian—

Your comment seems a little dogmatic IMHO.

Bob Cook

Sent from Mail for Windows 10


From: Brian Ahern 
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2019 2:57:20 AM
To: Axil Axil; vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Superconductivity at temperatures around 77 degrees Fahrenheit

Room temp SC is impossible


From: Axil Axil 
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2019 11:25 PM
To: vortex-l
Subject: [Vo]:Superconductivity at temperatures around 77 degrees Fahrenheit

https://techlinkcenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/RTSC.pdf

The Navy's patent application has been made public by the U.S. Patent and 
Trademark Office describing a plasmonic based room-temperature superconductor 
capable of exhibiting superconductivity at temperatures of around 77 degrees 
Fahrenheit.

Read more at: 
https://phys.org/news/2019-02-navy-patent-room-temperature-superconductor.html#jCp

RE: [Vo]:D. Alexandrov, Proposal for the development of an LENR reactor

[bobcook39...@hotmail.com]

Several leading questions about “heavy electrons”:


  *   Do heavy electrons fit in the standard Model?
  *   If so, what is their relativistic KE?
  *   If relativistic. What keeps them from leaving the semi conductor surface?

Bob Cook



From: Jones Beene 
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2019 6:28:44 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:D. Alexandrov, Proposal for the development of an LENR reactor

Interesting.

Alexandrov's concept of providing "heavy electrons" as apparently are seen in 
semiconductor technology - in order to catalyze the fusion of hydrogen and 
deuterium sounds a lot like muon catalyzed fusion.

In fact the muon is sometimes referred to as a "heavy electron" since it is a 
heavy lepton. Curious that he does not emphasize that connection as it would 
add to the credibility of his concept. Muon catalyzed fusion was proved over 
fifty years ago beyond any doubt.

However, muon catalyzed fusion is "hot". This has no gammas. Is this something 
in between ?

Jones


Jed Rothwell wrote:


See:

http://canadiancor.com/proposal-for-the-development-of-an-lenr-reactor/

QUOTE

Proposal for the development of an LENR reactor

Introduction:

Canadian researcher, Dr. Dimiter Alexandrov, Lakehead University, in his 
semiconductor research laboratory, performed successful replicable LENR (Low 
Energy Nuclear Reaction) experiments considering interactions of both deuterium 
and hydrogen gases with certain metals in a vacuum chamber. The products of 
these LENR experiments were helium (both stable isotopes He-3 and He-4) and 
heat. No radiation above the normal background was detected during the 
experiments. He also developed a theory explaining the observed experimental 
outcomes. Based on this early work he has prepared the following proposal to 
develop a LENR reactor which is being submitted for the next stage of his R 
. . .

Re: [Vo]:D. Alexandrov, Proposal for the development of an LENR reactor

[Jones Beene]

 Interesting. 

Alexandrov's concept of providing "heavy electrons" as apparently are seen in 
semiconductor technology - in order to catalyze the fusion of hydrogen and 
deuterium sounds a lot like muon catalyzed fusion.
In fact the muon is sometimes referred to as a "heavy electron" since it is a 
heavy lepton. Curious that he does not emphasize that connection as it would 
add to the credibility of his concept. Muon catalyzed fusion was proved over 
fifty years ago beyond any doubt.
However, muon catalyzed fusion is "hot". This has no gammas. Is this something 
in between ?

Jones


Jed Rothwell wrote:  
 
 See:
http://canadiancor.com/proposal-for-the-development-of-an-lenr-reactor/

QUOTE
Proposal for the development of an LENR reactor

Introduction:

Canadian researcher, Dr. Dimiter Alexandrov, Lakehead University, in his 
semiconductor research laboratory, performed successful replicable LENR (Low 
Energy Nuclear Reaction) experiments considering interactions of both deuterium 
and hydrogen gases with certain metals in a vacuum chamber. The products of 
these LENR experiments were helium (both stable isotopes He-3 and He-4) and 
heat. No radiation above the normal background was detected during the 
experiments. He also developed a theory explaining the observed experimental 
outcomes. Based on this early work he has prepared the following proposal to 
develop a LENR reactor which is being submitted for the next stage of his R 
. . .
  

Re: [Vo]:D. Alexandrov, Proposal for the development of an LENR reactor

[Jed Rothwell]

See:

http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/Alexandrovheavyelect.pdf

[Vo]:D. Alexandrov, Proposal for the development of an LENR reactor

[Jed Rothwell]

See:

http://canadiancor.com/proposal-for-the-development-of-an-lenr-reactor/

QUOTE

Proposal for the development of an LENR reactor

Introduction:

Canadian researcher, Dr. Dimiter Alexandrov, Lakehead University, in his
semiconductor research laboratory, performed successful replicable LENR
(Low Energy Nuclear Reaction) experiments considering interactions of both
deuterium and hydrogen gases with certain metals in a vacuum chamber. The
products of these LENR experiments were helium (both stable isotopes He-3
and He-4) and heat. No radiation above the normal background was detected
during the experiments. He also developed a theory explaining the observed
experimental outcomes. Based on this early work he has prepared the
following proposal to develop a LENR reactor which is being submitted for
the next stage of his R . . .

Re: [Vo]:The EMC effect and proton disintegration

[Axil Axil]

https://journals.aps.org/prd/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevD.98.124043

Bosons falling into a black hole: A superfluid analogue

Ultra dense hydrogen is a superfluid as Holmlid describes. A superfluid as
a Bose condensate acts like a black hole. As such, a superfluid most likely
will generate hawking radiation. This is were the connection to the "dynamical
Casimir effect" comes from.

On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 9:11 AM Jones Beene  wrote:

> Robin
>
> Here is a thesis of interest on the "dynamical Casimir effect" where the
> force is converted into energy. There are others in the following cite -
> this is a relatively hot topic at Universities.
>
> http://publications.lib.chalmers.se/records/fulltext/206176/206176.pdf
>
> https://www.technologyreview.com/s/428648/engineers-unveil-first-casimir-chip-that-exploits-the-vacuum-energy/
>
> Curiously, this particular thesis comes from another respected University
> located in Holmlid's home town. Aside from that coincidence, there is no
> obvious connection between the two. It was mentioned as a possible way that
> laser power could become amplified (as was the "grape" metaphor)...
> grasping at straws, as it were.
>
> mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
>
> >> Why would the Casimir force have a maximum, and why would it be 2 nm?
>
> >This comes from actual measurement in the laboratory, usually stated as
> 2-10 nm with the peak at the lesser value.
> >Why? Above my pay grade.  It has to do with "vacuum expectation value"
> and other intricacies of nature.
>
> I suspect this was the smallest separation distance at which they could
> measure
> the force, not any theoretical value. Although, perhaps it has to do with
> the
> fact that surfaces become uneven at the atomic level?
>
>
>

Re: [Vo]:Off Topic: climatologist Judith Curry testified this month

[Andrew Meulenberg]

AMEN

On Sun, Feb 24, 2019 at 9:06 AM H LV  wrote:

> This month before congress climatologist Judith Curry  argued for a
> pragmatic approach to climate change based on her assesment of the actual
> uncertainties and confidence levels contained in the IPCC reports. (Video
> is about 5 minutes)
>
> https://youtu.be/5RIepllnjFA
>
> Harry
>

Re: [Vo]:The EMC effect and proton disintegration

[Jones Beene]

 Robin
Here is a thesis of interest on the "dynamical Casimir effect" where the force 
is converted into energy. There are others in the following cite - this is a 
relatively hot topic at Universities.

http://publications.lib.chalmers.se/records/fulltext/206176/206176.pdfhttps://www.technologyreview.com/s/428648/engineers-unveil-first-casimir-chip-that-exploits-the-vacuum-energy/
Curiously, this particular thesis comes from another respected University 
located in Holmlid's home town. Aside from that coincidence, there is no 
obvious connection between the two. It was mentioned as a possible way that 
laser power could become amplified (as was the "grape" metaphor)... grasping at 
straws, as it were.

mix...@bigpond.com wrote:  
>> Why would the Casimir force have a maximum, and why would it be 2 nm? 

>This comes from actual measurement in the laboratory, usually stated as 2-10 
>nm with the peak at the lesser value.
>Why? Above my pay grade.  It has to do with "vacuum expectation value" and 
>other intricacies of nature.   
I suspect this was the smallest separation distance at which they could measure
the force, not any theoretical value. Although, perhaps it has to do with the
fact that surfaces become uneven at the atomic level?


  

Re: [Vo]:Superconductivity at temperatures around 77 degrees Fahrenheit

[Brian Ahern]

Room temp SC is impossible


From: Axil Axil 
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2019 11:25 PM
To: vortex-l
Subject: [Vo]:Superconductivity at temperatures around 77 degrees Fahrenheit

https://techlinkcenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/RTSC.pdf

The Navy's patent application has been made public by the U.S. Patent and 
Trademark Office describing a plasmonic based room-temperature superconductor 
capable of exhibiting superconductivity at temperatures of around 77 degrees 
Fahrenheit.

Read more at: 
https://phys.org/news/2019-02-navy-patent-room-temperature-superconductor.html#jCp