Re: [Vo]:ni and ca

[Jürg Wyttenbach]

Just to remind you: We produce/measure LENR reactions with up to 10x 
background signal in total. With individual lines much higher.


The data is from an experiment of last year. I just wrote a piece of 
software to analyze the tons of spectra as CERN does too.
Of course the figure I gave is just an extrapolation (low end..) as we 
all can only do this until we have more simple and reliable systems to 
break down all details.


Jürg Wyttenbach

PS: of course 3kW...


Am 03.08.19 um 22:09 schrieb JonesBeene:


*From: *Jürg Wyttenbach 

Of course! How else should I be able to give you an estimate??

Well in the case of Rossi he was able to borrow or invent numbers,
while claiming they were measured with SEM and then when he has to
swear to it in a court proceedings – he admits that the fake
isotope date did not come from real measurements,  but were
invented for the purpose of “competitive advantage”.

I have read your paper- “Does the quantization of the proton
magnetic moment explain LENR?” and I like the premise -  but  do
not find data wrt a  silver isotope being transmuted from Pd.
Could you steer me to the data for this kind of transmutation ?

TIA  Jones

I



--
Jürg Wyttenbach
Bifangstr.22
8910 Affoltern a.A.
044 760 14 18
079 246 36 06

Re: [Vo]:ni and ca

[Jürg Wyttenbach]

Unluckily there are some exceptions with Cu/W and there may be more.

J.W.


Am 04.08.19 um 00:45 schrieb mix...@bigpond.com:

In reply to  Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Sat, 3 Aug 2019 19:00:53 +0200:
Hi,
[snip]

Adding H* to any useful isotope would result in a much better energy
gain in  the range of 1..8 MeV at best. Adding H* is neutron like and
not always harmless...

I would have thought that adding H* would only be neutron like when addition of
a neutron would result in a more stable nucleus than addition of a proton. IOW,
I think nature prefers to create stable nuclei, when possible.
In the case of H* it can either add both the proton & the electron in an
enhanced electron capture reaction, or just add the proton, and eject the
electron. IOW it has a choice, and I suspect it will usually choose the path
that leads to a stable nucleus.

[snip]
Regards,


Robin van Spaandonk

local asymmetry = temporary success





--
Jürg Wyttenbach
Bifangstr.22
8910 Affoltern a.A.
044 760 14 18
079 246 36 06

RE: [Vo]:ni and ca

[Arnaud Kodeck]

Do you mean that you witnessed decays of (Cu64 or Cu66) AND (W185 or W187) in 
Russ experiment ?
Arnaud

-Original Message-
From: Jürg Wyttenbach  
Sent: Sunday, 4 August 2019 13:52
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:ni and ca

Unluckily there are some exceptions with Cu/W and there may be more.

J.W.


Am 04.08.19 um 00:45 schrieb mix...@bigpond.com:
> In reply to  Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Sat, 3 Aug 2019 19:00:53 +0200:
> Hi,
> [snip]
>> Adding H* to any useful isotope would result in a much better energy
>> gain in  the range of 1..8 MeV at best. Adding H* is neutron like and
>> not always harmless...
> I would have thought that adding H* would only be neutron like when addition 
> of
> a neutron would result in a more stable nucleus than addition of a proton. 
> IOW,
> I think nature prefers to create stable nuclei, when possible.
> In the case of H* it can either add both the proton & the electron in an
> enhanced electron capture reaction, or just add the proton, and eject the
> electron. IOW it has a choice, and I suspect it will usually choose the path
> that leads to a stable nucleus.
>
> [snip]
> Regards,
>
>
> Robin van Spaandonk
>
> local asymmetry = temporary success
>
>
>

-- 
Jürg Wyttenbach
Bifangstr.22
8910 Affoltern a.A.
044 760 14 18
079 246 36 06

Re: [Vo]:ni and ca

[mixent]

In reply to  Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Sun, 4 Aug 2019 13:52:03 +0200:
Hi,
[snip]
>Unluckily there are some exceptions with Cu/W and there may be more.
>
>J.W.
It's not clear whether you mean Cu/W is the input to the reaction, or the output
from the reaction.

Could you provide an example?

Regards,


Robin van Spaandonk

local asymmetry = temporary success