RE: [Vo]:Transient superconductivity in palladium hydrides
From: mix...@bigpond.com ➢ If temporary superconducting states cycle frequently enough, and in sufficient number, then this could be the mechanism behind CF. Hi Robin, Yes, rapid cycling would seem to be required and especially in the case where photons interact with electrons in quantum cavities. There is a phenomenon known as the Eliashberg effect which seems to be relevant. There are many new papers like this one which ostensibly have nothing to do with LENR but provide much insight if transient HTSC is involved. https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.017401
RE: [Vo]:Transient superconductivity in palladium hydrides
FYI:
Here are the links to obtain the titled thesis, mentioned below:
https://research-repository.griffith.edu.au/handle/10072/367614
https://research-repository.griffith.edu.au/bitstream/handle/10072/367614/Muhammad%20Hasnain_2016_01Thesis.pdf
- Mark Jurich
From: JonesBeene
Sent: Friday, August 16, 2019 3:29 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: [Vo]:Transient superconductivity in palladium hydrides
For many years, a recurring theme on vortex involves the idea that a local
form of high temperature superconductivity could be the hidden underlying
modality which was needed to form a BEC condensate in palladium deuteride, and
that this condensate was necessary as a prerequisite for a nuclear reaction to
occur at elevated temperature,, even if the state lasted only picoseconds, as
opposed to stability at cryogenic conditions.
The argument could be worth renewed interest – given that transient HTSC has
been found and reported in an authoritative study not involving LENR. That
report turned up on LENR forum from poster Ahlfors - as the subject of a PhD
thesis by M. Syed from an Australian University.
http://web.tiscali.it/pt1963.home/publist.htm
“Transient High-Temperature Superconductivity in Palladium Hydride”
The nano-magnetism concept of Ahern, for instance, was predicated on
high-temperature local superconductivity for reducing randomness, arguably in
the form of a ‘transient condensate.’ As to why a pulse of magnetism would be
important – very simply this gets back to structural uniformity and Boson
statistics.
Two bound deuterons in a cavity exist at identical ‘compreture’ due to the
cavity containment but that is not enough. Magnetism can thereafter align spin,
so immediately you have a near-condensate in the sense of extreme DFR
("Divergence From Randomness") in the physical properties of those atoms in the
matrix. From this highly structured but non-cryogenic state – a “virtual BEC”
need last only picoseconds if there us sequential recurrence.
This is from one of the earlier threads on vortex - with a SPAWARS citation
linking to further details on LENR-CANR.org.
https://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg89480.html
Re: [Vo]:Transient superconductivity in palladium hydrides
In reply to JonesBeene's message of Fri, 16 Aug 2019 15:28:57 -0700:
Hi Jones,
In an early post on vortex - decades ago, I proposed that the reversion of a
superconducting state to normal, would result in a very fast magnetic field
collapse, which due to V = - L di/dt could produce a local high voltage pulse
that might accelerate particles enough to produce some fusion reactions.
(This is because when a section of the lattice becomes locally superconducting
it forms a local short circuit, and all local current flows through it, rather
than through the surrounding lattice. When it reverts to normal, the resistance
suddenly increases and the current tries to stop, but is forced to continue by
the collapsing magnetic field. High current x R => high voltage; another way of
looking at it.)
If temporary superconducting states cycle frequently enough, and in sufficient
number, then this could be the mechanism behind CF.
>For many years, a recurring theme on vortex involves the idea that a local
>form of high temperature superconductivity could be the hidden underlying
>modality which was needed to form a BEC condensate in palladium deuteride, and
>that this condensate was necessary as a prerequisite for a nuclear reaction
>to occur at elevated temperature,, even if the state lasted only picoseconds,
>as opposed to stability at cryogenic conditions.
>
>The argument could be worth renewed interest given that transient HTSC has
>been found and reported in an authoritative study not involving LENR. That
>report turned up on LENR forum from poster Ahlfors - as the subject of a PhD
>thesis by M. Syed from an Australian University.
>
>http://web.tiscali.it/pt1963.home/publist.htm
>
>Transient High-Temperature Superconductivity in Palladium Hydride
>
>The nano-magnetism concept of Ahern, for instance, was predicated on
>high-temperature local superconductivity for reducing randomness, arguably in
>the form of a transient condensate. As to why a pulse of magnetism would be
>important very simply this gets back to structural uniformity and Boson
>statistics.
>
>Two bound deuterons in a cavity exist at identical compreture due to the
>cavity containment but that is not enough. Magnetism can thereafter align
>spin, so immediately you have a near-condensate in the sense of extreme DFR
>("Divergence From Randomness") in the physical properties of those atoms in
>the matrix. From this highly structured but non-cryogenic state a virtual
>BEC need last only picoseconds if there us sequential recurrence.
>
>This is from one of the earlier threads on vortex - with a SPAWARS citation
>linking to further details on LENR-CANR.org.
>
>https://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg89480.html
>
>
>
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
local asymmetry = temporary success
[Vo]:Transient superconductivity in palladium hydrides
For many years, a recurring theme on vortex involves the idea that a local
form of high temperature superconductivity could be the hidden underlying
modality which was needed to form a BEC condensate in palladium deuteride, and
that this condensate was necessary as a prerequisite for a nuclear reaction to
occur at elevated temperature,, even if the state lasted only picoseconds, as
opposed to stability at cryogenic conditions.
The argument could be worth renewed interest – given that transient HTSC has
been found and reported in an authoritative study not involving LENR. That
report turned up on LENR forum from poster Ahlfors - as the subject of a PhD
thesis by M. Syed from an Australian University.
http://web.tiscali.it/pt1963.home/publist.htm
“Transient High-Temperature Superconductivity in Palladium Hydride”
The nano-magnetism concept of Ahern, for instance, was predicated on
high-temperature local superconductivity for reducing randomness, arguably in
the form of a ‘transient condensate.’ As to why a pulse of magnetism would be
important – very simply this gets back to structural uniformity and Boson
statistics.
Two bound deuterons in a cavity exist at identical ‘compreture’ due to the
cavity containment but that is not enough. Magnetism can thereafter align spin,
so immediately you have a near-condensate in the sense of extreme DFR
("Divergence From Randomness") in the physical properties of those atoms in the
matrix. From this highly structured but non-cryogenic state – a “virtual BEC”
need last only picoseconds if there us sequential recurrence.
This is from one of the earlier threads on vortex - with a SPAWARS citation
linking to further details on LENR-CANR.org.
https://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg89480.html
RE: [Vo]:are smartlists working? vortex-L test
EVERY THINK SEEMS OK Bob Cook From: Jonathan Berry Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2019 11:38:56 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:are smartlists working? vortex-L test Or, is that a dumb question? :) On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 7:38 PM Jonathan Berry mailto:aethe...@gmail.com>> wrote: Maybe, what's a "smartlist"? On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 6:32 PM William Beaty mailto:bi...@eskimo.com>> wrote: test (( ( ( ( ((O)) ) ) ) ))) William J. BeatySCIENCE HOBBYIST website billb at amasci com http://amasci.com EE/programmer/sci-exhibits amateur science, hobby projects, sci fair Seattle, WA 206-762-3818unusual phenomena, tesla coils, weird sci
Re: [Vo]:are smartlists working? vortex-L test
https://youtu.be/umj0gu5nEGs Rocky Horror Picture Show On Fri., Aug. 16, 2019, 8:58 a.m. JonesBeene, wrote: > > > Wow, for a second I thought I was in a time warp…. > > > > > > > > *From: *Rick Monteverde *.* > > *…* > > On Aug 15, 2019 at 8:32 PM, William Beaty wrote: > > Test > > > > >
Re: [Vo]:are smartlists working? vortex-L test
Maybe? Although.. how would we know? — http://linkedin.com/in/esaruoho // http://twitter.com/esaruoho // http://lackluster.bandcamp.com // +358403703659 // http://www.lackluster.org // skype:esajuhaniruoho // iMessage: esaru...@gmail.com // http://esaruoho.tumblr.com // http://facebook.com/LacklusterOfficial // http://youtube.com/c/LacklusterOfficial > On 16 Aug 2019, at 9.32, William Beaty wrote: > > > test > > (( ( ( ( ((O)) ) ) ) ))) > William J. BeatySCIENCE HOBBYIST website > billb at amasci com http://amasci.com > EE/programmer/sci-exhibits amateur science, hobby projects, sci fair > Seattle, WA 206-762-3818unusual phenomena, tesla coils, weird sci >
RE: [Vo]:are smartlists working? vortex-L test
Wow, for a second I thought I was in a time warp…. From: Rick Monteverde. … On Aug 15, 2019 at 8:32 PM, William Beaty wrote: Test
Re: [Vo]:are smartlists working? vortex-L test
Still works here. > > On Aug 15, 2019 at 8:32 PM, William Beatywrote: > > > test (( ( ( ( ( (O) ) ) ) ) ))) William J. > Beaty SCIENCE HOBBYIST website billb at amasci com http://amasci.com > EE/programmer/sci-exhibits amateur science, hobby projects, sci fair Seattle, > WA 206-762-3818 unusual phenomena, tesla coils, weird sci >
Re: [Vo]:are smartlists working? vortex-L test
Or, is that a dumb question? :) On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 7:38 PM Jonathan Berry wrote: > Maybe, what's a "smartlist"? > > On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 6:32 PM William Beaty wrote: > >> >> test >> >> (( ( ( ( ((O)) ) ) ) ))) >> William J. BeatySCIENCE HOBBYIST website >> billb at amasci com http://amasci.com >> EE/programmer/sci-exhibits amateur science, hobby projects, sci fair >> Seattle, WA 206-762-3818unusual phenomena, tesla coils, weird sci >> >>
Re: [Vo]:are smartlists working? vortex-L test
Maybe, what's a "smartlist"? On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 6:32 PM William Beaty wrote: > > test > > (( ( ( ( ((O)) ) ) ) ))) > William J. BeatySCIENCE HOBBYIST website > billb at amasci com http://amasci.com > EE/programmer/sci-exhibits amateur science, hobby projects, sci fair > Seattle, WA 206-762-3818unusual phenomena, tesla coils, weird sci > >
[Vo]:are smartlists working? vortex-L test
test (( ( ( ( ((O)) ) ) ) ))) William J. BeatySCIENCE HOBBYIST website billb at amasci com http://amasci.com EE/programmer/sci-exhibits amateur science, hobby projects, sci fair Seattle, WA 206-762-3818unusual phenomena, tesla coils, weird sci
