Re: [Vo]:Testing

[Terry Blanton]

Yes.

On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 2:06 PM JonesBeene  wrote:
>
>
>
> Is vortex down?
>
>
>
>

[Vo]:Old data of interest

[Jones Beene]

Worth mentioning in the "mystery radiation" inquiry, is this old data which 
presents a possible connection of LENR to dark matter by way of the purported 
characteristic soft x-ray emission at 3.6 keV. The citation below is a high 
quality 25 year old paper from Mitsubishi written by Iwamura, presented at ICCF 
'96.

It can be found at the LENR-CANR library but has been largely overlooked, since 
it came out many years before the astrophysics of dark matter - which now 
purportedly link to a soft x-ray peak, found in hundreds of galaxies.

At this time (early 1990s) Iwamura had no clue what they had found, and never 
got back to the same line of research despite mentioning that it was of high 
importance. The paper in question is: Iwamura, Y., et al. "Correlation between 
behavior of deuterium in palladium and occurrence of nuclear reactions"... 
Sixth International Conference on Cold Fusion,1996.
http://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/IwamuraYcorrelatio.pdf
The relevant data is easy to miss (I hope that I have not misinterpreted it). 
Please have a look at the second graph (Fig 4) on page 6 - the lower one which 
correlates the energy of the mystery radiation to the count rate over about one 
week of run time. 

As you can see, the low end of the energy scale is exponentially higher in 
counts, and the range seems to be highest at the detector threshold, so with 
more modern detection, one can imagine that it could even have been higher (due 
to the steepness of the line at cutoff). For instance,there appears to be about 
1000 counts at 50 keV but 100,000 counts at the low end, which is arguably 
around the dark matter signature at 3.6 keV.

In short, the range which has the highest count rate is consistent with dark 
energy photons but the authors did not recognize that, of course, and made no 
mention of what it could be except to note its importance. So essentially this 
partial finding which now looks important in retrospect, was not pursued. 

Fortunately, the data is here and stands on its own... at least in the 
imagination of LENR optimists.
Jones

(having survived recent California wild fires and electrical power 
disruption...)

[Vo]:Science discoveries how LENR works

[Axil Axil]

It was only a matter of time before science discovered the basic process
upon which LENR energy is generated. The few highly capable LENR reactors
produce Extreme ultraviolet radiation (EUV or XUV)  as their primary output
energy product.

https://physicsworld.com/a/electrons-passing-over-nanophotonic-materials-could-create-synchrotron-like-light/

Electrons passing over nanophotonic materials could create synchrotron-like
light

https://physicsworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Illustration-of-passive-light-emission-635x216.jpg

Electron flyby: illustration of how encounters between relativistic
electrons and vacuum fluctuations can generate X-rays. (Courtesy: Nicholas
Rivera et al/Nature Physics)

The interaction between electrons and a rough metal surface produce high
energy photons derived from the vacuum. These photons come from the vacuum
as mediated by polariton condensation. This experiment could be a proof of
principle for the generation of Hawking radiation from polariton
condensation.

In Hawking radiation, the polariton condensate  produces low energy
infrared photons as a "positive energy" product having a positive
frequency, but high energy EUV photons as "negative energy" having a
negative frequency.  As in this case, zero vacuum energy is balanced when
negative vacuum energy is created to offset positive vacuum energy
production, but that negative vacuum energy is not permanently sequestered
by gravity.

The high energy EUV photons produced in high powered LENR reactors like
Rossi's SK reactor, Mills SunCell, and the SAFIRE project could be
generated as negative vacuum energy photons.

ReplyForward

Re: [Vo]:Testing

[Axil Axil]

message received

On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 2:06 PM JonesBeene  wrote:

>
>
> Is vortex down?
>
>
>
>
>

[Vo]:Testing

[JonesBeene]

Is vortex down?