Re: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Superconducting Metal Hydride

[Jürg Wyttenbach]

I think Mills was accurate about self catalyzing of fractional hydrogen 
when trapped in a lattice, like cheerleaders forming a pyramid with the 
lattice as just the ground floor I suspect they can dilate out from the 
3d base structure of the metal lattice and form blankets of fractional 
hydrogen in either temporal direction from the lattice.


The restriction for Mills/hydrino like condensation is given by the 
symmetry of the fields and space. Orbits with same mass and topology can 
condensate what means start a common rotation what classically frees 
space-time what is equivalent to releasing energy.


As said: In the Holmlid case we see such orbit pairing going downhill 
from 8 H* --> 2 4-He (8-Be) with a proton finally taking over the excess 
energy. This has nothing in common with Mills model as there always must 
be a final state with a higher stability/density = number of flux rotations.


There is just one more rotation possible for one symmetric mass pair and 
thus there is only one H*-H* state fora a pair of protons where as D*-D* 
can have 4 bonds.
Consequently the next H*-H* condensation only works if you have 2 H*-H* 
and does not work not for a single pair. This is what Mills missed.


J.W.

Am 07.02.20 um 16:54 schrieb bobcook39...@hotmail.com:


Fran—

You seem to imply that nature changes depending on your observation 
position—at the center of a local hydrogen at 3^rd base of a lattice 
nuclet or far away in the batter’s box. Is my inference correct?


Also you suggest more than one temporal (time) direction.  This 
suggests 3 or maybe 6 possible time directions relative to 3^rd 
base—up, down, back front left or right.  Can you explain temporal 
direction in more detail?  Is there _no_ global time that applies to 
all points in space, once that point is created?


Bob Cook

*From: *Roarty, Francis X 
*Sent: *Thursday, February 6, 2020 10:37 PM
*To: *vortex-l@eskimo.com 
*Subject: *RE: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Superconducting Metal Hydride

Hi Jones, I still suspect Casimir geometry is actually relativistic 
and the math they are using is giving the dimensions from  local 
hydrogen perspective while from our perspective the hydrogen inside 
the hydride dilates becoming both faster and “relatively” smaller, 
packing out further and further on the temporal axis while 
simultaneously getting harder and harder to detect from the macro 
world. I think Mills was accurate about self catalyzing of fractional 
hydrogen when trapped in a lattice, like cheerleaders forming a 
pyramid with the lattice as just the ground floor I suspect they can 
dilate out from the 3d base structure of the metal lattice and form 
blankets of fractional hydrogen in either temporal direction from the 
lattice.


Fran

*From:* Jones Beene 
*Sent:* Tuesday, February 04, 2020 9:19 AM
*To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
*Subject:* EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Superconducting Metal Hydride

I was hoping that this new discovery would show much tighter hydrogen 
spacing - in keeping with the various theories for dense hydrogen.


However, the spacing is far from pico and not extremely compact at 
all, and therefore this may result may not be related to LENR.


Fortunately, there is a lot of work going on in superhydrides - and 
this work aligns with the long-held suspicion that a transient form of 
superconductivity at greater than room temperature - and the 
occurrence of LENR are somehow related.


Here is a related paper on another superhydride with a massive 9:1 
atomic ratio. Ratios of nine or ten to one are possible with high 
pressure.


https://phys.org/news/2019-10-impossible-superconductor.html

It is only a matter of time until a breakthrough occurs in this field 
and the extreme pressures now being used, become superfluous.


Terry Blanton wrote:

*/An international team of researchers has discovered the hydrogen 
atoms in a metal hydride material are much more tightly spaced than 
had been predicted for decades — a feature that could possibly 
facilitate superconductivity at or near room temperature and pressure./*


https://scitechdaily.com/room-temperature-superconductor-breakthrough-at-oak-ridge-national-laboratory/



--
Jürg Wyttenbach
Bifangstr.22
8910 Affoltern a.A.
044 760 14 18
079 246 36 06

RE: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Superconducting Metal Hydride

[bobcook39...@hotmail.com]

Fran—

You seem to imply that nature changes depending on your observation position—at 
the center of a local hydrogen at 3rd base of a lattice nuclet or far away in 
the batter’s box.  Is my inference correct?

Also you suggest more than one temporal (time) direction.  This suggests 3 or 
maybe 6 possible time directions relative to 3rd base—up, down, back front left 
or right.  Can you explain temporal direction in more detail?  Is there no 
global time that applies to all points in space, once that point is created?

Bob Cook


From: Roarty, Francis X
Sent: Thursday, February 6, 2020 10:37 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Superconducting Metal Hydride

Hi Jones, I still suspect Casimir geometry is actually relativistic and the 
math they are using is giving the dimensions from  local hydrogen perspective 
while from our perspective the hydrogen inside the hydride dilates becoming 
both faster and “relatively” smaller, packing out further and further on the 
temporal axis while simultaneously getting harder and harder to detect from the 
macro world. I think Mills was accurate about self catalyzing of fractional 
hydrogen when trapped in a lattice, like cheerleaders forming a pyramid with 
the lattice as just the ground floor I suspect they can dilate out from the 3d 
base structure of the metal lattice and form blankets of fractional hydrogen in 
either temporal direction from the lattice.
Fran


From: Jones Beene 
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2020 9:19 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Superconducting Metal Hydride

I was hoping that this new discovery would show much tighter hydrogen spacing - 
in keeping with the various theories for dense hydrogen.

However, the spacing is far from pico and not extremely compact at all, and 
therefore this may result may not be related to LENR.

Fortunately, there is a lot of work going on in superhydrides - and this work 
aligns with the long-held suspicion that a transient form of superconductivity 
at greater than room temperature - and the occurrence of LENR are somehow 
related.

Here is a related paper on another superhydride with a massive 9:1 atomic 
ratio. Ratios of nine or ten to one are possible with high pressure.

https://phys.org/news/2019-10-impossible-superconductor.html

It is only a matter of time until a breakthrough occurs in this field and the 
extreme pressures now being used, become superfluous.



Terry Blanton wrote:

An international team of researchers has discovered the hydrogen atoms in a 
metal hydride material are much more tightly spaced than had been predicted for 
decades — a feature that could possibly facilitate superconductivity at or near 
room temperature and pressure.

https://scitechdaily.com/room-temperature-superconductor-breakthrough-at-oak-ridge-national-laboratory/

[Vo]:J. Condensed Matter Nuclear Science Vol. 31 uploaded

[Jed Rothwell]

See:

https://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/BiberianJPjcondensedzd.pdf

[Vo]:Anomaly in Moon's orbit.

[H LV]

The eccentricity of the Moon's orbit is growing at a faster rate than can
be explained using various models of the Earth and Moon interiors, possible
undetected planets, General Relativity and MOND gravity. The observation of
38 mm/year is based on laser range findings of the Moon's distance since
1970.
This 2011 paper surveys various explanations which all come up short.
https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article/415/2/1266/1036753


Harry

Re: [Vo]:[OT] Vipervirus Truth?

[Jonathan Berry]

https://www.ccn.com/alleged-tencent-leak-suggests-coronavirus-death-toll-spiraling-to-25000/

This has additional links to other videos:


There have been multiple reports of Wuhan officials cremating deceased
coronavirus victims before they could be added to the official death
toll. The Wall Street Journal noted that the coronavirus numbers
coming out of China are fishy.

Twitter is flooded with gloomy (albeit unverified) videos of corpses
piling up, police reloading their guns, hoards of officials being
deployed to contain a solo case of infection. You wouldn’t expect to
see things like this if this was just your average flu.

https://au.news.yahoo.com/china-cremates-bodies-in-secret-as-coronavirus-patients-spike-070222348.html
https://www.wsj.com/articles/relatives-wonder-whether-pneumonia-deaths-were-tied-to-coronavirus-11579915630
https://twitter.com/bitcoinization/status/1225058233871753217
https://twitter.com/jenniferatntd/status/1223689848642514944
https://twitter.com/maree_jun/status/1223894959951990784

Caijing’s (one of the most reputable outlets in China) report was
quickly censored:
https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=zh-CN=en=http%3A%2F%2Farchive.is%2FObawP

All in all, I don't believe it's 2.1%

The actions China are taking doesn't seem suited to a mere 2% or 3%
fatality rate.

On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 3:55 PM Jonathan Berry  wrote:
>
> But you are saying it can't be true because it would have leaked out...
> But it HAS leaked out!
>
> Also, there is a difference between tryig to cover up a single item of
> news .vs covering up a statistic which is kinda easy to cover up.
>
> And the number of dead is hardly huge by the numbers involved in the
> polulations of Chinese cities.
>
> On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 10:18 AM Jed Rothwell  wrote:
> >
> > I wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> I am pretty sure news of it would leak out. Many dreadful false rumors are 
> >> spreading. News that is both dreadful and true would leak out, I think.
> >
> >
> > Just now, Chinese and world mass media reported:
> >
> > A doctor who was among the first to warn about the coronavirus outbreak, 
> > only to be silenced by the police, died on Friday after himself becoming 
> > infected with the virus, the hospital treating him reported.
> >
> > The Wuhan City Central Hospital said at 3:48 a.m. Friday that the doctor, 
> > Li Wenliang, had just died. “We deeply regret and mourn this,” it said on 
> > the Chinese social media site Weibo.
> >
> > Just hours earlier, the hospital had said it was still fighting to save Dr. 
> > Li, 34.
> >
> >
> > People all over China were following this story.
> >
> > That is appalling yet true news. It came out right away. I am sure the 
> > authorities wish they could make it disappear, but they could not.
> >
> > Other recent examples include the photo of the dead man on the street, and 
> > the photo in today's news of the makeshift mass quarantine areas in 
> > stadiums and meeting halls, which Chinese people are comparing to the 
> > photos of arm camp treatment centers in the U.S. in 1918. See:
> >
> > https://www.nytimes.com/2020/02/06/world/asia/coronavirus-china.html
> >
> > This is bad news that is not being repressed. Not successfully repressed, 
> > in any case. Quote:
> >
> > Photographs taken inside the stadium showed narrow rows of simple beds 
> > separated only by desks and chairs typically used in classrooms. Some 
> > comments on Chinese social media compared the scenes to those from the 
> > Spanish flu in 1918.
> >
> > According to a widely shared post on Weibo, a popular social media site, 
> > “conditions were very poor” at an exhibition center that had been converted 
> > into a quarantine facility. There were power failures and electric blankets 
> > could not be turned on, the user wrote, citing a relative who had been 
> > taken there, saying that people had to “shiver in their sleep.”
> >