Re: [Vo]:Antivirus Wetware

2020-07-31 Thread Jones Beene
 New strain is now showing up which is several times more transmissible than 
the original version.
https://www.sfchronicle.com/health/article/A-new-strain-of-the-coronavirus-is-dominant-now-15447508.php
The implications of the new dynamic in rapid spreading are seriously 
threatening even with quarantines, so lets hope it is less deadly. 

Perhaps the new strain will be mild - yet almost everyone will get it -- and 
then be inoculated against the deadly version, "for free" as it were. 

That would be bad for Big Pharma... but they seem to find a way to monetize any 
threat.


  Terry Blanton  wrote:

If we were as vulnerable to virus as many believe, humanity would not have 
survived as long as we have.  Other than antibodies, we have developed other 
defenses over the eons.  This article:
https://www.bath.ac.uk/announcements/we-are-mutating-sars-cov-2-but-it-is-evolving-back/
 
describes how humans weaken a virus over time.  Indeed, along with good 
quarentining (preventing the survival of more fit mutations), the SARS virus 
was taken down in this manner.  Antibody stimulating vaccines are good; but, 
attacking that one thing which makes the virus our enemy, its RNA, is better. 

  

Re: [Vo]:Antivirus Wetware

2020-07-31 Thread Terry Blanton
Tired of waiting?  Make your own vaccine:  https://radvac.org/white-paper/

On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 12:22 PM Terry Blanton  wrote:

> If we were as vulnerable to virus as many believe, humanity would not have
> survived as long as we have.  Other than antibodies, we have developed
> other defenses over the eons.  This article:
>
>
> https://www.bath.ac.uk/announcements/we-are-mutating-sars-cov-2-but-it-is-evolving-back/
>
>
> describes how humans weaken a virus over time.  Indeed, along with good
> quarentining (preventing the survival of more fit mutations), the SARS
> virus was taken down in this manner.  Antibody stimulating vaccines are
> good; but, attacking that one thing which makes the virus our enemy, its
> RNA, is better.
>