Re: [Vo]:The Fate of Dr. Ning Li

[Frogfall]

> And then there's bug chitin:
> 
> http://www.rexresearch.com/grebenn/grebenn.htm

In the UK they have developed a way to synthesise this.
It is now widely used as a moulding compound.
https://img.milli.az/2020/04/09/840379_01.jpg

Re: [Vo]:The Fate of Dr. Ning Li

[Frogfall]

Have a look at this report:

NASA Breakthrough Propulsion Physics Program
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19980201240
Published 1998

This stuff was all quite open at the time.

In the UK, British Aerospace was also funding antigravity studies, in the shape 
of "Project Greenglow" - which was mainly Dr Ron Evans, who was based at their 
Warton aircraft plant, in Lancashire.  At around that time I went along to a 
talk Ron gave, organised by the Royal Aeronautical Society, at Warton.  He 
described various aspects of his own project, as well as the Evgeny Podkletnov 
work, and the NASA program.

This was all activity that you could imagine would be described as "top 
secret", if it cropped up in some fiction novel. However, the researchers 
seemed to be approaching it as a totally non-classified and open area of study. 
 For Ron Evans, it was just the continuation of a hobby interest, prior to 
retirement.  And, as far as I can remember, the actual budgets were tiny.

Re: [Vo]:Osamu Ide

[Frogfall]

Compare this with Hans Coler's devices (1940s) 

http://www.rexresearch.com/coler/colerb.htm

Also, the much older, Daniel McFarland Cook device of 1871

https://patents.google.com/patent/US119825A/en

FF

On Thu, 6 Jul 2023 13:54:36 -0400
Terry Blanton  wrote:

> Corrected
> 
> http://jnaudin.free.fr/meg/meg.htm
> 
> On Thu, Jul 6, 2023, 1:46 PM Terry Blanton  wrote:
> 
> > JL Naudin never found an OU device he didn't like.  He did tons on the MEG
> >
> > Https://www.jnaudin.free.fr/meg/meg.htm
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 6, 2023, 1:07 PM Terry Blanton  wrote:
> >
> >> Reminds me of Tom Bearden's MEG, motionless electromagnetic generator.
> >>
> >> As a EE since 1977,  my experience has shown "OU" on these devices are
> >> not measuring the area under the VxI waveform that is non-sinusoidal
> >> properly and have shown these flaws with a digital oscilloscope and a
> >> sampling resistor more than once.
> >>
> >> It does not please the "inventor".
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jul 6, 2023, 12:40 PM Chris Zell  wrote:
> >>
> >>> Can this be real?  One of those ‘hiding in plain sight” rarities?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> I see good journal articles and claims of replications and yet (cue
> >>> crickets sound)
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> *From:* Terry Blanton 
> >>> *Sent:* Thursday, July 06, 2023 12:27 PM
> >>> *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
> >>> *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Osamu Ide
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> A patent app on an OU transformer:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> US20130009625A1
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Jul 6, 2023, 12:06 PM Terry Blanton  wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Here's his original article from the Journal of Applied Physics
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Https://www.rexresearch.com/ide/jap77.pdf
> >>> <https://www.rexresearch.com/ide/jap77.pdf>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Jul 5, 2023, 11:50 AM Chris Zell  wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Does anybody know what the deal is with this guy?  He claims overunity
> >>>  and there appears to be some replication. He’s been published in some
> >>> really good journals across years.  What’s the story?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> *CAUTION:* This message was sent from outside the Nexstar organization.
> >>> Please do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the
> >>> sender.
> >>>
> >>


-- 
Frogfall