[Vo]:Re: The distorted mirror of Wikipedia: a quantitative analysis of Wikipedia coverage of academics
Interesting find Daniel. Most of the time you can only find critiques of Wikipedia bias, etc. on message boards, forums, and so on. Not generally in a researched article. I'll be interested to see if more such articles, more focused on other shortcomings of Wikipedia (politicking, censorship, etc.), will come to light in the future. Regards, John
[Vo]:Re: Seminal New Energy paper by Kim and Hadjichristos
On Saturday, October 26, 2013 8:35:34 PM UTC-4, JohnMaguire wrote: Peter, Dr. Hadjichristos, Thank you for your efforts. Few questions/observations after reading the paper that perhaps you can take a moment to comment on: 1) Magnetic fields (caused by ion migration) trap excited Rydberg state hydrogen. Therefore the NAE are these localized trap zones on the surface of Ni particles. So is the evolving (breathing) Ni lattice site NAE outlined in the ICCF-17 paper no longer applicable/postulated? Or do these NAE's coexist in your model? 2) Were the doubts/objections raised about the Tesla fields (in both this forum and elsewhere) considered before drafting the paper (and therefore double checked), or not considered important and drafted despite them? Have those objections been put to rest as far as you are concerned or is there more measurement work to be done? 3) The absence of gammas now seems to be ascribed to momentum distribution/diffusion throughout the boson cluster. So DGT has abandoned the heavy electron shield hypothesis stated in the ICCF-17 paper? 4) When will the real-time mass spectrometers be up and running? When do you think relevant data will be made available? 5) Will deuterium and tritium concentrations be sought after at some point soon? 6) Just an observation: Interesting to see you considering the effect of deuterium impurities on the primary reaction. Glad to see investigation into this possibility. Thank you again and all the best. Regards, John M.
