Re: [Vo]:What happend to the Sept. 23 congressional report
your question might have ended up at the spam folders. try again On 10/7/16, Frank Znidarsicwrote: > It is late or is it classified? > > > > > Frank Znidarsic >
Good point! Brian Re: [Vo]:I just came up with LEONARDIUM
Brian, Good point! The choice of HDPE was to illustrate the aim to create the vacuum chamber with a non durable material. I was thinking of sputtering the outer layer with aluminum as to create a non permeable seal, as well as structural reinforcing elements. Bearing in mind that the purpose of using a non durable material is to destroy it during development as to empirically observe the event when the accelerated particles pass the lead target. I do believe that it is proximity and not particle energy that will make the fusion of the electronless particles viable. If I am right, excessive acceleration would make the new nuclei unstable; as observed by others. All this with the understanding that sub atomic particles are high energy particles in their own right. My approach is to look at the electron shell as the only obstacle for fusion. This may be false, but I have never read of anyone claiming to observe a nuclei devoided of electrons other than hydrogen and helium. Feel free to suggest any other choice of materials or testing parameters. On 10/18/16, Brian Ahern <ahern_br...@msn.com> wrote: > > Sorry Leonardo, but your concept is impossible. You can never evacuate to > lowere than 10-7 with teflon seals. Your soft vacuum will prevent observing > your goal. > > ____ > From: Leonardo Ramos <ramosl8...@gmail.com> > Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2016 12:54 AM > To: vortex-l@eskimo.com > Cc: Arik El Boher; Bo Hoistadt; Brian Ahern; Dagmar Kuhn; David Daggett; > doug marker; Dr. Braun Tibor; eCatNews; Gabriel Moagar-Poladian; Gary; Haiko > Lietz; jeff aries; Mark Tsirlin; Nicolaie N. Vlad; Peter Bjorkbom; Peter > Mobberley; Pierre Clauzon; Roberto Germano; Roy Virgilio; Steve Katinski; > Sunwon Park; Valerio Ciampoli; vlad > Subject: Re: [Vo]:I just came up with LEONARDIUM > > I was thinking of using HDPE as material for the vacuum chamber. The > production device would probable be made of a more durable material. > But it is important to the development process that the accelerated > particles do not cross the lead barrier. By using HDPE a full > penetration of the lead barrier can be detected as a loss of vacuum by > the perforation of the chamber wall after collision with the lead > barrier. Also HDPE is an adequate membrane for the outer laying > accelerating guns. Since this is the point of lesser energy of the > betatron, I expect it to be feasible for the membrane to not collapse; > unlike the case for the chamber wall reaching the lead target upon > which a higher energy particle will collide in the event of full > penetration of the lead barrier. The purpose is only to accelerate the > nuclei to penetrate the lead without burning the set up. > > I would use a steady beam of green light on the lasers. I suspect that > the key to the electron cloud devoidance is not in the light photons > harmonic stimulation by duty cycle, but on the energy gained at > acceleration. After all, the photons are already harmonized within the > laser for a suitable frequency. > > I also believe the betatron can devoid a full shell on every pass, or > half circle. Then the apparatus need only have 4 or 8 turns. > > > On 10/17/16, Leonardo Ramos <ramosl8...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hello folks, >> >> I just had one of those Eureka moments in the field of cold fusion. >> What if we could devoid all atoms of their electron cloud? >> Would they naturally merge? >> >> Let me know if you think it is viable or if you know of potential >> investors. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Leonardo >> >> ... >> TITLE: A COLD FUSION DEVICE TO PRODUCE LEONARDIUM >> >> >> SPECIFICATION: >> >> Background of the Invention: >> FIELD OF THE INVENTION: This invention relates to the field of Alchemy. >> >> PRIOR ART: On November 2011 a team of the Vienna University of >> Technology, >> Austria in conjunction with the Institute for Astronomy and Space Physics >> of >> Buenos Aires Argentina, >> DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.193004, >> demonstrated that electrons can be excited out of their orbits at cold >> temperatures with a tuned laser beam. Said team has found no practical >> use. >> No >> other credible prior art is documented in the field of Alchemy. >> >> SUMMARY: A method to produce nuclear fussion. This method is composed of >> three >> steps. One, place a target substance at the end of a vacuum chamber. Two, >> accelerate one or more feeding subtances in a vacuum chamber towards the >> target >> substance.
Re: [Vo]:I just came up with LEONARDIUM
I was thinking of using HDPE as material for the vacuum chamber. The production device would probable be made of a more durable material. But it is important to the development process that the accelerated particles do not cross the lead barrier. By using HDPE a full penetration of the lead barrier can be detected as a loss of vacuum by the perforation of the chamber wall after collision with the lead barrier. Also HDPE is an adequate membrane for the outer laying accelerating guns. Since this is the point of lesser energy of the betatron, I expect it to be feasible for the membrane to not collapse; unlike the case for the chamber wall reaching the lead target upon which a higher energy particle will collide in the event of full penetration of the lead barrier. The purpose is only to accelerate the nuclei to penetrate the lead without burning the set up. I would use a steady beam of green light on the lasers. I suspect that the key to the electron cloud devoidance is not in the light photons harmonic stimulation by duty cycle, but on the energy gained at acceleration. After all, the photons are already harmonized within the laser for a suitable frequency. I also believe the betatron can devoid a full shell on every pass, or half circle. Then the apparatus need only have 4 or 8 turns. On 10/17/16, Leonardo Ramos <ramosl8...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello folks, > > I just had one of those Eureka moments in the field of cold fusion. > What if we could devoid all atoms of their electron cloud? > Would they naturally merge? > > Let me know if you think it is viable or if you know of potential > investors. > > Thanks, > > Leonardo > > ... > TITLE: A COLD FUSION DEVICE TO PRODUCE LEONARDIUM > > > SPECIFICATION: > > Background of the Invention: > FIELD OF THE INVENTION: This invention relates to the field of Alchemy. > > PRIOR ART: On November 2011 a team of the Vienna University of Technology, > Austria in conjunction with the Institute for Astronomy and Space Physics > of > Buenos Aires Argentina, DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.193004, > demonstrated that electrons can be excited out of their orbits at cold > temperatures with a tuned laser beam. Said team has found no practical use. > No > other credible prior art is documented in the field of Alchemy. > > SUMMARY: A method to produce nuclear fussion. This method is composed of > three > steps. One, place a target substance at the end of a vacuum chamber. Two, > accelerate one or more feeding subtances in a vacuum chamber towards the > target > substance. Three, remove the electron shells of the feeding subtances while > approaching the target substance. A device to produce nuclear fusion > as aforesaid. > This device is composed of three parts: a discharge chamber, a laser > induced electron shell remover and a feeding subtance guiding > controller. The discharge chamber transports the feeding substance > into the laser induced electron shell remover. The laser induced > electron shell remover accelerates the feeding substance towards the > target substance while progressively removing the feeding substance > electron cloud. The feeding substance guiding controller actuates upon > the feeding substance as to acertain its reach of the target > substance. > > DETAILED DESCRIPTION: > > The embodiment produces a stable superheavy noble element with > periodic number 118 to be named Leonardium for the name of the present > inventor. > The present invention fuses Bromide, Hydrogen and Lead into Leonardium at > cold > temperatures. The embodiment is composed of a Betatron like device with no > moving parts. The device is a vacuum chamber in spiral form creating two > interlocking spiral paths that collide at the center where a block of > lead closes > the spirals. At the outermost entrance to each spiral path an > acceleration gun is > located; one for Bromide and one for Hydrogen. Each acceleration gun is > composed > of a plasma chamber with a membrane orifice that preserves the vacuum of > the > spiral and allows a narrow beam of charged particles to exit the > acceleration gun > and enter the spiral. Within the Bromide spiral, a magnitude tuning > magnetic > field is placed as to preserve inward motion of the increasingly > positive charged > particles which are progressively devoided of electrons at certain > intervals > where a specially tuned laser beam removes outermost electrons from the > Bromide > particles at the same location where an electric field collects said > electrons > and accelerates the increasingly positively charged particles as to obtain > adequate velocity f
[Vo]:I just came up with LEONARDIUM
Hello folks, I just had one of those Eureka moments in the field of cold fusion. What if we could devoid all atoms of their electron cloud? Would they naturally merge? Let me know if you think it is viable or if you know of potential investors. Thanks, Leonardo ... TITLE: A COLD FUSION DEVICE TO PRODUCE LEONARDIUM SPECIFICATION: Background of the Invention: FIELD OF THE INVENTION: This invention relates to the field of Alchemy. PRIOR ART: On November 2011 a team of the Vienna University of Technology, Austria in conjunction with the Institute for Astronomy and Space Physics of Buenos Aires Argentina, DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.193004, demonstrated that electrons can be excited out of their orbits at cold temperatures with a tuned laser beam. Said team has found no practical use. No other credible prior art is documented in the field of Alchemy. SUMMARY: A method to produce nuclear fussion. This method is composed of three steps. One, place a target substance at the end of a vaccum chamber. Two, accelerate one or more feeding subtances in a vaccum chamber towards the target substance. Three, remove the electron shells of the feeding subtances while approaching the target substance. A device to produce nuclear fusion as aforesaid. This device is composed of three parts: a discharge chamber, a laser induced electron shell remover and a feeding subtance guiding controller. The discharge chamber transports the feeding substance into the laser induced electron shell remover. The laser induced electron shell remover accelerates the feeding substance towards the target substance while progressively removing the feeding substance electron cloud. The feeding substance guiding controller actuates upon the feeding substance as to acertain its reach of the target substance. DETAILED DESCRIPTION: The embodiment produces a stable superheavy noble element with periodic number 118 to be named Leonardium for the name of the present inventor. The present invention fuses Bromide, Hydrogen and Lead into Leonardium at cold temperatures. The embodiment is composed of a Betatron like device with no moving parts. The device is a vaccum chamber in spiral form creating two interlocking spiral paths that collide at the center where a block of lead closes the spirals. At the outermost entrance to each spiral path an acceleration gun is located; one for Bromide and one for Hydrogen. Each acceleration gun is composed of a plasma chamber with a membrane orifice that preserves the vaccum of the spiral and allows a narrow beam of charged particles to exit the acceleration gun and enter the spiral. Within the Bromide spiral, a magnitude tuning magnetic field is placed as to preserve inward motion of the increasingly positive charged particles which are progressively devoided of electrons at certain intervals where a specially tuned laser beam removes outermost electrons from the Bromide particles at the same location where an electric field collects said electrons and accelerates the increasingly positively charged particles as to obtain adequate velocity for penetration of the Lead Electron Cloud. Similarly, at the Hydrogen spiral, a laser pulse removes the remaining electron and a magnitude reducing magnetic field guides the uniformly positive hydrogen particles to the Lead Block from the opposing side of collision in reference to the electron devoided Bromide. All electric fields created within the device are to create currents that discharge into the Lead block. The continious operation will continue until a new block of lead is placed and the vaccum chamber is devoided of intruding air incoming upon removal of the block of lead. The timing of the removal of the block of lead is to be determined empirically as to make it statistically improbable of high energy particles destroying the spiral walls. Once removed, the processed block of lead resembles a sponge with liquid Leonardium embedded within. Mechanical separation of the Leonardo is performed by shredding and decanting.
[Vo]:Eugene Laumann's NASA Internal Combustion Engine hydrogen powered diesel notes
I found this thread from early last year and wonder if anyone has a copy of these notes and data. RE: [Vo]:Nanoscale Heat Engine Beyond the Carnot Limit https://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l%40eskimo.com/msg90330.html 2014-02-12 https://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=vortex-l%40eskimo.comq=date:20140212o=newestf=1 Thread https://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=vortex-l%40eskimo.comq=subject:%22RE%5C%3A+%5C%5BVo%5C%5D%5C%3ANanoscale+Heat+Engine+Beyond+the+Carnot+Limit%22o=newestf=1 Jones Beene https://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=vortex-l%40eskimo.comq=from:%22Jones+Beene%22o=newestf=1 This is an interesting and potentially important article, but to divulge a bit - nano is not required to exceed Carnot. Probably helps though. In fact, almost 50 years ago, working for NASA on a project which was patented and then discontinued (go figure) . Eugene Laumann exceeded the Carnot limitation at the many kilowatt level - with a hydrogen powered diesel. It was possibly OU given the losses - but that claim was carefully avoided. The term OU was not even around then. This particular power supply was intended for space (in a closed cycle with photoelectric water splitting) - but NASA switched to AMTEC for weight reduction - and then ignored the ICE results for many years. After all, gasoline was below 50 cents a gallon so you cannot blame them. Several years ago Eugene Laumann, who was in his eighties and almost blind, provided copies of his papers and data, some of which are not online at DTIC. The grand hope is to renew that work someday, in the context of LENR. He did these experiments using ultra-high compression and an extremely lean fuel mix (all the fuel was H2 at well below the published flammability level). Laumann was yet another of many excellent but overlooked scientists who were way ahead of NASA in civilian relevance - decades ago, who did experiments that would be called groundbreaking today. fonly (as they say) the USA was not now a debtor nation, and also had the good sense to look though its own cold case files.