From: Stephen A. Lawrence sa...@pobox.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2011 9:41 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:E-Cat vs. Water Heater for coffee/tea...
On 11-06-23 04:23 AM, Joshua Cude wrote:
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 2:51 AM, Mark Iverson zeropo...@charter.net wrote:
You might think that all this time on the steam quality is quibbling over
minor details, but one of the senior contributors to the Vort collective
calculated that if only 5% (by mass) of the water going in was not vaporized
(i.e., ended up as liquid water in the outflowing steam), it would pretty
much wipe out all excess energy being claimed by Rossi.
No. Where do you get that? What senior contributer said that? If 95% of the
water (by mass) is converted to steam then Rossi's claims are 95% right.
(Well, ignoring discrepancies in flow rate and input power.)
What is true is that if the output is 5 % liquid by *volume*, then Rossi's
claims are 6 or 7 times too high. Because 5% liquid by volume corresponds to
99 % liquid by mass.
That would probably have been Horace, and I think he may have meant
by volume. The calculations are in the archive, among the most
recent posts from Horace just before he bowed out due to lack of
time, if anyone cares to go digging.
