Re: [Vo]:CBCNews Canada: Why the controversial science of cold fusion is getting hot again

2016-09-25 Thread Alain Sepeda 
he have great influence on the sheep & parrots who blocked LENR since 27
years.

2016-09-25 0:36 GMT+02:00 a.ashfield :

> Jed,
> Ethan siegel is a loud mouth.  In exchanges I have had with him he was not
> interested i hearing about anything that contradicted his opinion.  "Too
> busy to look."
> I wouldn't worry too much about what he thinks.
> AA
>
>
>
> On 9/23/2016 5:53 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
>
> Alain Sepeda  wrote:
>
> ethan siegel bash LENR as fraud based on Rossi and Defkalion story,
>> ignoring the science
>>
>> I'm tired
>>
>
> You're tired, and I am apprehensive. This is what I feared might happen.
> We begin to see the harm Rossi and Defkalion caused. I hope this will not
> have an impact on the Congress but I fear that it will.
>
> - Jed
>
>
>
>
>

Re: [Vo]:CBCNews Canada: Why the controversial science of cold fusion is getting hot again

2016-09-24 Thread a.ashfield 

Jed,
Ethan siegel is a loud mouth.  In exchanges I have had with him he was 
not interested i hearing about anything that contradicted his opinion.  
"Too busy to look."

I wouldn't worry too much about what he thinks.
AA


On 9/23/2016 5:53 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Alain Sepeda > 
wrote:


ethan siegel bash LENR as fraud based on Rossi and Defkalion
story, ignoring the science

I'm tired


You're tired, and I am apprehensive. This is what I feared might 
happen. We begin to see the harm Rossi and Defkalion caused. I hope 
this will not have an impact on the Congress but I fear that it will.


- Jed

Re: [Vo]:CBCNews Canada: Why the controversial science of cold fusion is getting hot again

2016-09-23 Thread Frank Znidarsic 
They also have my book.  Maybe, for once, someone read it.


We begin to see the harm Rossi and Defkalion caused. I hope this will not have 
an impact on the Congress but I fear that it will.


- Jed





-Original Message-
From: Jed Rothwell 
To: vortex-l 
Sent: Fri, Sep 23, 2016 5:54 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:CBCNews Canada: Why the controversial science of cold fusion 
is getting hot again




Alain Sepeda  wrote:


ethan siegel bash LENR as fraud based on Rossi and Defkalion story, ignoring 
the science


I'm tired



You're tired, and I am apprehensive. This is what I feared might happen. We 
begin to see the harm Rossi and Defkalion caused. I hope this will not have an 
impact on the Congress but I fear that it will.


- Jed

Re: [Vo]:CBCNews Canada: Why the controversial science of cold fusion is getting hot again

2016-09-23 Thread Jed Rothwell 
Alain Sepeda  wrote:

ethan siegel bash LENR as fraud based on Rossi and Defkalion story,
> ignoring the science
>
> I'm tired
>

You're tired, and I am apprehensive. This is what I feared might happen. We
begin to see the harm Rossi and Defkalion caused. I hope this will not have
an impact on the Congress but I fear that it will.

- Jed

Re: [Vo]:CBCNews Canada: Why the controversial science of cold fusion is getting hot again

2016-09-23 Thread Alain Sepeda 
ethan siegel bash LENR as fraud based on Rossi and Defkalion story,
ignoring the science

I'm tired

2016-09-23 0:04 GMT+02:00 Jones Beene :

> Two slime jobs in New Scientist in response to this
>
>
>
> https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg23130910-300-cold-
> fusion-sciences-most-controversial-technology-is-back/
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Alain Sepeda
>
> An article on LENR, relative to  U.S. House of Representatives committee
> on armed services  with reference to rossi, Larsen, open skepticism, open
> curiosity...
>
> http://www.cbc.ca/news/technology/congress-cold-fusion-briefing-1.3772873
>
>
>
>
>
> I launched a post for debate on lenr-forum
>
> https://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/index.php/Thread/3827-CBCNews-Canada/
>
>
>
> I seen an occasion to spread informations
>

Re: [Vo]:CBCNews Canada: Why the controversial science of cold fusion is getting hot again

2016-09-23 Thread ROGER ANDERTON 
New Scientists just gets lots wrong and keeps repeating its mistakes ad 
infinitum
example:

https://www.newscientist.com/article/2106321-reality-guide-the-essential-laws-of-cosmology/
 
 New Scientist: "Back in the 1860s, James Clerk Maxwell was melding electricity 
and magnetism into one unified theory of electromagnetism. But however he 
sliced the equations, they only made sense if light travelled through space at 
the same constant speed, regardless of the speed of its source. This is odd. If 
someone fires a bullet from a moving car, to a bystander the bullet travels at 
the sum of its speed and the car’s speed. Yet when 20 years later US physicists 
Albert Michelson and Edward Morley were looking for the luminiferous ether, a 
medium supposed to carry light, they reached the same conclusion: however you 
look at it, the speed of light is a constant." 


http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/1743/2/Norton.pdf
John Norton: "The Michelson-Morley experiment is fully compatible with an 
emission theory of light that CONTRADICTS THE LIGHT POSTULATE."





 

On Thursday, 22 September 2016, 23:08, Jones Beene  
wrote:
 

 #yiv5817438683 #yiv5817438683 -- _filtered #yiv5817438683 
{font-family:Calibri;panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;} _filtered #yiv5817438683 
{font-family:Tahoma;panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}#yiv5817438683 
#yiv5817438683 p.yiv5817438683MsoNormal, #yiv5817438683 
li.yiv5817438683MsoNormal, #yiv5817438683 div.yiv5817438683MsoNormal 
{margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;font-size:12.0pt;}#yiv5817438683 a:link, 
#yiv5817438683 span.yiv5817438683MsoHyperlink 
{color:blue;text-decoration:underline;}#yiv5817438683 a:visited, #yiv5817438683 
span.yiv5817438683MsoHyperlinkFollowed 
{color:purple;text-decoration:underline;}#yiv5817438683 
span.yiv5817438683EmailStyle17 {color:#1F497D;}#yiv5817438683 
.yiv5817438683MsoChpDefault {} _filtered #yiv5817438683 {margin:1.0in 1.0in 
1.0in 1.0in;}#yiv5817438683 div.yiv5817438683WordSection1 {}#yiv5817438683 Two 
slime jobs in New Scientist in response to this  
https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg23130910-300-cold-fusion-sciences-most-controversial-technology-is-back/
      From: Alain Sepeda

An article on LENR, relative to  U.S. House of Representatives committee on 
armed services  with reference to rossi, Larsen, open skepticism, open 
curiosity...http://www.cbc.ca/news/technology/congress-cold-fusion-briefing-1.3772873
    I launched a post for debate on 
lenr-forumhttps://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/index.php/Thread/3827-CBCNews-Canada/
  I seen an occasion to spread informations

RE: [Vo]:CBCNews Canada: Why the controversial science of cold fusion is getting hot again

2016-09-22 Thread Jones Beene 
Two slime jobs in New Scientist in response to this

 

https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg23130910-300-cold-fusion-sciences-most-controversial-technology-is-back/

 

 

 

From: Alain Sepeda



An article on LENR, relative to  U.S. House of Representatives committee on 
armed services  with reference to rossi, Larsen, open skepticism, open 
curiosity...

http://www.cbc.ca/news/technology/congress-cold-fusion-briefing-1.3772873

 

 

I launched a post for debate on lenr-forum

https://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/index.php/Thread/3827-CBCNews-Canada/

 

I seen an occasion to spread informations

[Vo]:CBCNews Canada: Why the controversial science of cold fusion is getting hot again

2016-09-22 Thread Alain Sepeda 
An article on LENR, relative to  U.S. House of Representatives committee on
armed services  with reference to rossi, Larsen, open skepticism, open
curiosity...
http://www.cbc.ca/news/technology/congress-cold-fusion-briefing-1.3772873


I launched a post for debate on lenr-forum
https://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/index.php/Thread/3827-CBCNews-Canada/

I seen an occasion to spread informations