Re: [Vo]:IRH = DDL = Dark Matter
In reply to ChemE Stewart's message of Thu, 23 Aug 2012 09:22:57 -0400: Hi, [snip] Gremlins come in different colors: Brown dwarf ~ Brown Gremlin White dwarf ~ White Gremiln Black hole ~.Black Gremlin Micro black hole ~ Invisible Gremlin The smaller they are the more elusive and more trouble they cause in their surroundings. For the gravitational field of an Invisible Gremlin with a single positive charge to be strong enough to attract another proton against the repulsive Coulomb force, it would need to have a mass in excess of 2 billion kg. Such a gremlin would have a Schwarzschild radius = 3E-3 fm (hundreds of times smaller than a proton), exerting a pressure of 2 billion kgf / Pi*SR^2 = 1E41 psi on the containment. Perhaps needless to say, it's going to be impossible to hang on to one. Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
Re: [Vo]:IRH = DDL = Dark Matter
It depends upon your calculation of the strength of quantum gravity and the number of additional dimensions of spacetime it acts upon. The blue-shifted collective radiation surrounding the surface of the collapsed matter will be more than enough to take down a nearby coulomb barrier. A 22 microgram black hole is predicted to have a local temperature as high as 5.6×1032 K . It only takes 40 million degrees to trigger fusion, not a problem for one of these guys. You definitely would not want to lock horns with one of these buggers if they do not evaporate completely. On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 9:36 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote: In reply to ChemE Stewart's message of Thu, 23 Aug 2012 09:22:57 -0400: Hi, [snip] Gremlins come in different colors: Brown dwarf ~ Brown Gremlin White dwarf ~ White Gremiln Black hole ~.Black Gremlin Micro black hole ~ Invisible Gremlin The smaller they are the more elusive and more trouble they cause in their surroundings. For the gravitational field of an Invisible Gremlin with a single positive charge to be strong enough to attract another proton against the repulsive Coulomb force, it would need to have a mass in excess of 2 billion kg. Such a gremlin would have a Schwarzschild radius = 3E-3 fm (hundreds of times smaller than a proton), exerting a pressure of 2 billion kgf / Pi*SR^2 = 1E41 psi on the containment. Perhaps needless to say, it's going to be impossible to hang on to one. Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
Re: [Vo]:IRH = DDL = Dark Matter
Jones, I agree. I believe this reaction starts with a collapse of matter compressed within a crack or void. As in the macro scale universe, the degree of collapse may vary all the way down to a micro black hole, which is the extreme case. Any collapse should be instantly followed by a burst of energy, as observed. It makes sense that Rydberg or inverted Rydberg matter should be more reactive since you can cram more mass into a given size void due to its ultra-high densities. Add electrical charge, compression and the repulsion from the walls of the crack/void and you get the correct environment for a further collapse of matter. If the collapsed matter hangs around it should have extreme localized blue-shifted radiation near it's surface to trigger fission and fusion events with other atoms near its surface. It may or may not evaporate completely and in my opinion would be a bad actor if it hangs around. It would also create magnified quantum mechanical/uncertainty events in its surroundings if it does hang around and behave like a super atom. On Wednesday, August 22, 2012, Jones Beene wrote: The Rice/Kim paper below gives a pretty good introduction to the DDL or Deep Dirac Layer (put forth by Maly and Va'vra in Fusion Technology). Rice/Kim et al make a valiant effort to disprove, or at least cast doubt on the reality of the DDL, but the underlying assumptions in eq. 9,10,11 have problems of their own. http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/RiceRAcommentsona.pdf Curiously Rice/Kim et al do not mention Miley Holmlid's conception of IRH, or Inverted Rydberg Hydrogen. But they do mention Mills conception of deeply redundant ground states, but not accurately. At any rate - the main point of all this is the similarity of Mills, Miley Holmlid and Maly Va'vra - at least when all of their suggestions are taken together and mashed, so to speak; making a putative case for the identity of so-called dark matter. Perhaps one must cherry-pick amongst them to get the best details, but there seems to be something very intuitive in this correlation of dense-hydrogen to dark matter. All of them, and Mills is first in the chronology IIRC, suggest that this dense state of hydrogen can be the ash of reactions such as those which occur in the corona of our sun and most other starts, and which the end product consists of tightly bound hydrogen atoms with an extremely tight orbital. This has appeal in being the best way to account for the missing mass (dark matter) of the universe, since that mass is really nothing new at all, but is in effect another form of hydrogen. The electron orbit radius of the DDL is only ~ 5 fm. I mention this today since the group has been graced by the presence of the honorable Mark Gibbs, who may be looking for every science journalist's dream story - to not just report the little incremental advances in science - but to pick a winner of major importance and deep significance. A game changer. Jones
Re: [Vo]:IRH = DDL = Dark Matter
Gremlins come in different colors: Brown dwarf ~ Brown Gremlin White dwarf ~ White Gremiln Black hole ~.Black Gremlin Micro black hole ~ Invisible Gremlin The smaller they are the more elusive and more trouble they cause in their surroundings. On Thursday, August 23, 2012, ChemE Stewart wrote: Jones, I agree. I believe this reaction starts with a collapse of matter compressed within a crack or void. As in the macro scale universe, the degree of collapse may vary all the way down to a micro black hole, which is the extreme case. Any collapse should be instantly followed by a burst of energy, as observed. It makes sense that Rydberg or inverted Rydberg matter should be more reactive since you can cram more mass into a given size void due to its ultra-high densities. Add electrical charge, compression and the repulsion from the walls of the crack/void and you get the correct environment for a further collapse of matter. If the collapsed matter hangs around it should have extreme localized blue-shifted radiation near it's surface to trigger fission and fusion events with other atoms near its surface. It may or may not evaporate completely and in my opinion would be a bad actor if it hangs around. It would also create magnified quantum mechanical/uncertainty events in its surroundings if it does hang around and behave like a super atom. On Wednesday, August 22, 2012, Jones Beene wrote: The Rice/Kim paper below gives a pretty good introduction to the DDL or Deep Dirac Layer (put forth by Maly and Va'vra in Fusion Technology). Rice/Kim et al make a valiant effort to disprove, or at least cast doubt on the reality of the DDL, but the underlying assumptions in eq. 9,10,11 have problems of their own. http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/RiceRAcommentsona.pdf Curiously Rice/Kim et al do not mention Miley Holmlid's conception of IRH, or Inverted Rydberg Hydrogen. But they do mention Mills conception of deeply redundant ground states, but not accurately. At any rate - the main point of all this is the similarity of Mills, Miley Holmlid and Maly Va'vra - at least when all of their suggestions are taken together and mashed, so to speak; making a putative case for the identity of so-called dark matter. Perhaps one must cherry-pick amongst them to get the best details, but there seems to be something very intuitive in this correlation of dense-hydrogen to dark matter. All of them, and Mills is first in the chronology IIRC, suggest that this dense state of hydrogen can be the ash of reactions such as those which occur in the corona of our sun and most other starts, and which the end product consists of tightly bound hydrogen atoms with an extremely tight orbital. This has appeal in being the best way to account for the missing mass (dark matter) of the universe, since that mass is really nothing new at all, but is in effect another form of hydrogen. The electron orbit radius of the DDL is only ~ 5 fm. I mention this today since the group has been graced by the presence of the honorable Mark Gibbs, who may be looking for every science journalist's dream story - to not just report the little incremental advances in science - but to pick a winner of major importance and deep significance. A game changer. Jones
Re: [Vo]:IRH = DDL = Dark Matter
I will also suggest that the dark matter around the sun is consuming hydrogen and radiating heat at up to 5.6×1032K Dark Matter = Dark Gremlin They come in different shades and sizes. On earth as near the sun, best to feed them a steady diet of hydrogen else you will end up with a mess of fission and fusion products along with quantum goo On Thursday, August 23, 2012, ChemE Stewart wrote: Gremlins come in different colors: Brown dwarf ~ Brown Gremlin White dwarf ~ White Gremiln Black hole ~.Black Gremlin Micro black hole ~ Invisible Gremlin The smaller they are the more elusive and more trouble they cause in their surroundings. On Thursday, August 23, 2012, ChemE Stewart wrote: Jones, I agree. I believe this reaction starts with a collapse of matter compressed within a crack or void. As in the macro scale universe, the degree of collapse may vary all the way down to a micro black hole, which is the extreme case. Any collapse should be instantly followed by a burst of energy, as observed. It makes sense that Rydberg or inverted Rydberg matter should be more reactive since you can cram more mass into a given size void due to its ultra-high densities. Add electrical charge, compression and the repulsion from the walls of the crack/void and you get the correct environment for a further collapse of matter. If the collapsed matter hangs around it should have extreme localized blue-shifted radiation near it's surface to trigger fission and fusion events with other atoms near its surface. It may or may not evaporate completely and in my opinion would be a bad actor if it hangs around. It would also create magnified quantum mechanical/uncertainty events in its surroundings if it does hang around and behave like a super atom. On Wednesday, August 22, 2012, Jones Beene wrote: The Rice/Kim paper below gives a pretty good introduction to the DDL or Deep Dirac Layer (put forth by Maly and Va'vra in Fusion Technology). Rice/Kim et al make a valiant effort to disprove, or at least cast doubt on the reality of the DDL, but the underlying assumptions in eq. 9,10,11 have problems of their own. http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/RiceRAcommentsona.pdf Curiously Rice/Kim et al do not mention Miley Holmlid's conception of IRH, or Inverted Rydberg Hydrogen. But they do mention Mills conception of deeply redundant ground states, but not accurately. At any rate - the main point of all this is the similarity of Mills, Miley Holmlid and Maly Va'vra - at least when all of their suggestions are taken together and mashed, so to speak; making a putative case for the identity of so-called dark matter. Perhaps one must cherry-pick amongst them to get the best details, but there seems to be something very intuitive in this correlation of dense-hydrogen to dark matter. All of them, and Mills is first in the chronology IIRC, suggest that this dense state of hydrogen can be the ash of reactions such as those which occur in the corona of our sun and most other starts, and which the end product consists of tightly bound hydrogen atoms with an extremely tight orbital. This has appeal in being the best way to account for the missing mass (dark matter) of the universe, since that mass is really nothing new at all, but is in effect another form of hydrogen. The electron orbit radius of the DDL is only ~ 5 fm. I mention this today since the group has been graced by the presence of the honorable Mark Gibbs, who may be looking for every science journalist's dream story - to not just report the little incremental advances in science - but to pick a winner of major importance and deep significance. A game changer. Jones
[Vo]:IRH = DDL = Dark Matter
The Rice/Kim paper below gives a pretty good introduction to the DDL or Deep Dirac Layer (put forth by Maly and Va'vra in Fusion Technology). Rice/Kim et al make a valiant effort to disprove, or at least cast doubt on the reality of the DDL, but the underlying assumptions in eq. 9,10,11 have problems of their own. http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/RiceRAcommentsona.pdf Curiously Rice/Kim et al do not mention Miley Holmlid's conception of IRH, or Inverted Rydberg Hydrogen. But they do mention Mills conception of deeply redundant ground states, but not accurately. At any rate - the main point of all this is the similarity of Mills, Miley Holmlid and Maly Va'vra - at least when all of their suggestions are taken together and mashed, so to speak; making a putative case for the identity of so-called dark matter. Perhaps one must cherry-pick amongst them to get the best details, but there seems to be something very intuitive in this correlation of dense-hydrogen to dark matter. All of them, and Mills is first in the chronology IIRC, suggest that this dense state of hydrogen can be the ash of reactions such as those which occur in the corona of our sun and most other starts, and which the end product consists of tightly bound hydrogen atoms with an extremely tight orbital. This has appeal in being the best way to account for the missing mass (dark matter) of the universe, since that mass is really nothing new at all, but is in effect another form of hydrogen. The electron orbit radius of the DDL is only ~ 5 fm. I mention this today since the group has been graced by the presence of the honorable Mark Gibbs, who may be looking for every science journalist's dream story - to not just report the little incremental advances in science - but to pick a winner of major importance and deep significance. A game changer. Jones attachment: winmail.dat
