[Vo]:Mallove murder trial begins

[Jed Rothwell]

See:

http://www.norwichbulletin.com/news/x221044190/Trial-set-to-begin-in-Mallove-slaying#axzz1rZEqp9d8

Re: [Vo]:Mallove murder trial begins

[Guenter Wildgruber]

 Von: Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
An: vortex-l@eskimo.com 
Gesendet: 20:00 Montag, 9.April 2012
Betreff: [Vo]:Mallove murder trial begins
 

See:


http://www.norwichbulletin.com/news/x221044190/Trial-set-to-begin-in-Mallove-slaying#axzz1rZEqp9d8
 
Yeah.
I've read that.
Term this LESR - LENR, read 'S'  as 'Societal' or 'Subjectal',  a new sort of 
unifying conspiracy-theory.
Society has a grid-like structure, formed by an equilibrium of attractive and 
repulsive forces, which occasionally is brought into
chaotic disequilibrium by some force, which energizes the grid.
Because the grid more often than not is imperfect, local energy concentrates 
with probability X.

See Dr Kelly, the anthrax-case, JFK, MLK.

Those are not targeted/punctual cases of simplistic conspiracy, but sort of 
random excitations of the societal grid, which then produces a lot of societal 
energy afterwards.

See eg the suicide of the 77-year-old in Athens lately.
( 
http://greekleftreview.wordpress.com/2012/04/07/syntagma-suicide-could-this-be-greeces-tunisia-moment/
 )
It actually does not matter whether it is murder or suicide.
IT IS BOTH. 
Term this particle-wave dualism of society.

It is the energizing of the societal grid, or the distortion of the 
intersubjective attraction-repulsion-equilibrium, as said.

Maybe I am inspired to say that after watching What The Bleep Do We Know.
Sort of quantum epistemology.

At least it is sort of -ahem- coherent..

Guenter

Re: [Vo]:Mallove murder trial begins

[Guenter Wildgruber]

Von:Jed Rothwell
jedrothw...@gmail.com
An: vortex-l@eskimo.com 
Gesendet: 20:00 Montag, 9.April 2012
Betreff: [Vo]:Mallove murder trial begins
 
See:
 
http://www.norwichbulletin.com/news/x221044190/Trial-set-to-begin-in-Mallove-slaying#axzz1rZEqp9d8
 
just
to elaborate on this a bit:
We have a sociologist/philosopher of society  over here.
Niklas Luhmann, who tried, the bureaucrat he was, to explain society as a
system of communications, which is, in other words, a system of forces.
Society in general was to his opinion, devoid of subjects.
Translate 'subject' to 'particle', then you see the essence:
The subject dissolves into a system of relationships, and essentially
disappears, or, in physical terminology, disappears in a wavelike relationship.
I always fought that, because in this view, the particle/subject 
disappears, and free will and such basically is nonexistent.

On the other hand , as said, Luhmann put a light on something interesting,
which is the grid-like structure of society, with all  its consequences.
That 'society' is the result of a delicate balance of communicative forces.

Now to come back to the issue:
Society is rarely homogenous. 
If this grid is energized, strange things can happen, and they obviously do.
But their origin cannot be tracked down to a 'conspiracy', but to a random
movement of societal interactions, which as a delicate balance of force and
counterforce is our duty to control.
Why is Nationalism on the rise in distressed countries like Hungary?
Simple, according to my theory.
It is because the societal grid is getting out of control, and ANY force is
better than NO force.
This is the ghost in the societal machine, so to say. it is not always a 'good'
one.
This is OUR task!
Not being mere technocrats, who just about know nothing -or ignore- what is at
stake.

The US or GB is much more difficult to control, so to say, than more homogenous
societies, who are less creative, but also less self-destructive.

Probably more than You asked for.
Here You have it.

Amen.
Guenter