Re: [Vo]:More drama: open letter to Christos Stemmenos from Defkalion GT

2011-10-15 Thread mixent
In reply to  Jones Beene's message of Thu, 13 Oct 2011 19:37:46 -0700:
Hi Jones,
[snip]
>-Original Message-
>From: OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson 
>
>> BTW, have you been able to discern anything interesting from the BLP CIHT 
>> patent? I seem to recall in that your last comment on the matter you had not 
>> uncovered anything of particular interest.
>
>
>I was hoping that Robin, Anthony or one of the other dedicated hydrino experts 
>would take this golden opportunity to elucidate this absurdly intimidating 
>document for the "rest of us" mortals. 

Mills seems to have included the kitchen sink. :)


Regards,

Robin van Spaandonk

http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html



Re: [Vo]:More drama: open letter to Christos Stemmenos from Defkalion GT

2011-10-14 Thread Charles Hope
I'm sorry, but how does Stremmenos' letter ruin Rossi's chances of obtaining 
damages?

Sent from my iPhone. 

On Oct 13, 2011, at 15:42, "Jones Beene"  wrote:

> Thanks, Akira ... More drama indeed! Move over, James Bond there is new 
> poker-faced gambler in town.
> 
> This is looking almost like financial suicide on Rossi's part (assuming DGT 
> is not bluffing). AR has made all the wrong strategic moves and with 
> mind-boggling naiveté. In contrast, the low key and well-worded response from 
> DGT is superbly crafted from a legal standpoint, whereas everything coming 
> from the Rossi camp is self-inflicted damage.
> 
> Could Stemmenos end up being a double-agent or "plant" from Defkalion, whose 
> main function has been to cleverly and completely eliminate any chance of 
> Rossi obtaining damages for breach of contract? If so, Stemmenos has 
> performed admirably.
> 
> It is easily possible that DGT may NOT have had money problems after all, but 
> nevertheless desperately wanted to wiggle their way out of an expensive 100 
> million Euro contract and when Rossi could not meet a milestone, they say an 
> opening. Apparently DGT also discovered an alternative technology to E-Cat - 
> and they accomplished this in a most impressive fashion by tricking Rossi 
> into believing that he still had the upper hand, since he had never disclosed 
> the secret ... which may not have been so valuable, after all. 
> 
> Apparently DGT discovered either the secret catalyst itself, or more likely a 
> substitute, and on their own initiative; and Rossi refuses to understand 
> this. Rossi has been played. He apparently even wants to hire away the 
> scientist who found the alternative process. Pity.
> 
> IMO - the past several months may have cost Rossi most of the value of 
> whatever he had to begin with, in terms of value of IP - even if we discount 
> the ludicrous and unenforceable patent.  He has been set-up in such an 
> artistic fashion by his opponents that he is still in the dark just as Act 
> 111 is nearly complete ... and miraculously does not realize that he (EFA, 
> Leonardo, Ampenergo, etc) and NOT his former associates violated the terms of 
> the agreement - and therefore cannot collect either Royalties or the huge 
> lump sum payment, while at the same time allowing DGT to compete worldwide 
> (instead of just that valuable Balkan market :)
> 
> ... and now we learn DGT may compete with what is claimed to be a superior 
> product. Plus, DGT can now redirect that 100 million Euro into a factory and 
> distribution network of their own. They have seem to have pulled off a 
> real-life Casino Royale.
> 
> Of course, this conclusion is valid only if DGT has indeed duplicated the 
> technology successfully. 
> 
> Given the circumstances, it seems at least arguable that they have done this, 
> and that Stemmenos may have been their ace-in-the-hole, so to speak.
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Akira Shirakawa 
> A translation has been posted today on 22passi instead:
> 
> http://22passi.blogspot.com/2011/10/stremmenos-stance-on-defkalion-gts-10.html
> 
> Cheers,
> S.A.
> 
> 
> 



Re: [Vo]:More drama: open letter to Christos Stemmenos from Defkalion GT

2011-10-14 Thread OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson
Understanding the underlying economics of how many consumer products
(like the iPad) are manufactured is going to be a difficult and
soul-searching process for most Americans. This probably goes for the
entire developed world as well.

As is becoming obvious to most of us that care to dig a little into
the matter, the dirty little secret behind why many consumer products
are "cheap" is because they were assembled by hoards individuals who
are being paid wages that are a fraction of what it would cost to
assemble if they were assembled within our own affluent borders. An
irony in all of this is the fact that for many of these individuals
the sub-standard wages (at least from our perspective) for which they
are being paid is probably better than what they could get anywhere
else in their own country. This, of course, does not in any way,
shape, or form condone the fact that many of these workers are being
exploited in reprehensible ways by their employer, and perhaps by
their own government as well.

For a very long time economists and policy makers have felt obligated
to grapple with the following conundrum:

ONE: Should developed countries continue to assemble consumer products
outside of their borders in less developed economies, in places where
labor is a fraction of what it would cost if assembled domestically in
order to make the products cheaper, so that in theory more of "us" in
the developed world can afford to buy them.

Or TWO... do the developed countries endeavor to rehire assembly
workers within their own borders at significantly higher wagers, which
in turn boosts the price of the product, which in theory means less of
"us" in the developed countries can afford to buy them.

It always seemed to be a trade off.

But then, as books like "Lights in The Tunnel" by Martin Ford are
making clear, the above age-old conundrum may soon no longer apply
anymore. Advances in automation, robotics, and AI may sooner than we
realize render it uneconomical to hire workers in even the cheapest
underdeveloped countries - because it's cheaper to "hire" a robot do
it.

How each country's currency will continue to get evenly and fairly
distributed throughout their borders (in order to keep consumer-based
economies running), where more and more jobs are slowing being taken
over by robots and AI systems, is going to be a major task future
governments are going to have to confront head on. Refusing to grapple
with it will do us all in.

PS: I also read Martin Ford's book "Lights in the Tunnel" on my brand
new iPAD2. Mr. Rothwell was the individual who first brought the book
to my attention.

Regards
Steven Vincent Johnson
www.OrionWorks.com
www.zazzle.com/orionworks



Re: [Vo]:More drama: open letter to Christos Stemmenos from Defkalion GT

2011-10-14 Thread Jed Rothwell

Jouni Valkonen wrote:

This certainly off topic, but Greece economy would not be cured, 
because mining is capital intensive production and thus it does not 
help much the sick market economy of Greece.


Yes. Mineral wealth is a curse. Places like Saudi Arabia and Texas end 
up with dysfunctional economies because of it.



This kind of methods should be utilised also in all other economic 
sectors because less and less wealth is returned to consumers via 
incomes of workers, because work is done by robots and Chinese low 
paid labour force (I.e. part time slaves). This is problematic for 
market economy, because it means that consumers have less purchasing 
power to direct production to satisfy demand. Therefore less iPads are 
produced.


This is even more off-topic, but when you talk about iPads the people 
assembling them are more like full-time slaves, Or what we used to call 
wage-slaves. See:


http://www.slate.com/articles/arts/culturebox/2011/10/the_agony_and_the_ecstasy_of_steve_jobs_reviewed_.html

Someone named Daisey visited the manufacturing plant, Foxconn Inc. 
QUOTE: "Despite dire risk (an AP photographer caught taking pictures 
outside Foxconn had recently been detained and beaten for two days 
before being released to his embassy), Daisey managed to interview 
dozens of these workers. He interviewed girls as young as 12 who worked 
crushing hours; he interviewed a man whose hand had been twisted into a 
claw from overuse; he interviewed a woman who had been blacklisted 
merely for requesting overtime pay."


- Jed



Re: [Vo]:More drama: open letter to Christos Stemmenos from Defkalion GT

2011-10-14 Thread Jouni Valkonen
 Roarty, Francis X  wrote:
> Even sadder for Greece - their nickel deposits
> could cure their bankrupt economy
>
This certainly off topic, but Greece economy would not be cured, because
mining is capital intensive production and thus it does not help much the
sick market economy of Greece. There should be some better means to deposit
the wealth produced by nickel mining into pockets of Greek consumers. But
usually people are violently opposing a drastic means such as basic income.

In Alaska they are paying the wealth produced by oil as a basic income for
each citizen. This kind of methods should be utilised also in all other
economic sectors because less and less wealth is returned to consumers via
incomes of workers, because work is done by robots and Chinese low paid
labour force (I.e. part time slaves). This is problematic for market
economy, because it means that consumers have less purchasing power to
direct production to satisfy demand. Therefore less iPads are produced.

  —Jouni

Ps. I read on last week Martin Ford's book "The Lights in the Tunnel" with
my brand new iPad2. I will recommend the book (just $7 in Kindle Store) and
also tablet computers are nice.


RE: [Vo]:More drama: open letter to Christos Stemmenos from Defkalion GT

2011-10-14 Thread Roarty, Francis X
Even sadder for Greece - their nickel deposits could cure their bankrupt economy

-Original Message-
From: Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint [mailto:zeropo...@charter.net] 
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2011 11:56 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: EXTERNAL: RE: [Vo]:More drama: open letter to Christos Stemmenos from 
Defkalion GT

The sad thing about the conflict between DGT and Rossi is that even if they 
BOTH had all the resources necessary to mass produce the E-Cat, if they shared 
their knowledge with each other, the demand is so great that they BOTH could 
run the manufacturing plants 24/7 and make billions... there is more than 
enough demand to go around... for numerous manufacturers.
-mark




RE: [Vo]:More drama: open letter to Christos Stemmenos from Defkalion GT

2011-10-14 Thread Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint
The sad thing about the conflict between DGT and Rossi is that even if they 
BOTH had all the resources necessary to mass produce the E-Cat, if they shared 
their knowledge with each other, the demand is so great that they BOTH could 
run the manufacturing plants 24/7 and make billions... there is more than 
enough demand to go around... for numerous manufacturers.
-mark




RE: [Vo]:More drama: open letter to Christos Stemmenos from Defkalion GT

2011-10-13 Thread Jones Beene
-Original Message-
From: OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson 

> BTW, have you been able to discern anything interesting from the BLP CIHT 
> patent? I seem to recall in that your last comment on the matter you had not 
> uncovered anything of particular interest.


I was hoping that Robin, Anthony or one of the other dedicated hydrino experts 
would take this golden opportunity to elucidate this absurdly intimidating 
document for the "rest of us" mortals. 

I can see why RM has withdrawn the US version of this IP from USPTO before the 
18 months. Our patent office, unlike the Europeans, frowns on the obfuscation 
of important details by burying them in a mountain of BS. He has been chastised 
for this 3rd-world patent strategy before, but apparently thinks the Euros will 
tolerate it and he can back-door the US coverage.

Jones




RE: [Vo]:More drama: open letter to Christos Stemmenos from Defkalion GT

2011-10-13 Thread OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson
>From Jones

...

> Of course, this conclusion is valid only if DGT has indeed duplicated
> the technology successfully.

U sure have a knack for generating fertile speculation.

BTW, have you been able to discern anything interesting from the BLP CIHT 
patent? I seem to recall in that your last comment on the matter you had not 
uncovered anything of particular interest.

Regards,
Steven Vincent Johnson
www.OrionWorks.com
www.zazzle.com/orionworks



Re: [Vo]:More drama: open letter to Christos Stemmenos from Defkalion GT

2011-10-13 Thread Terry Blanton
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 3:42 PM, Jones Beene  wrote:

> Given the circumstances, it seems at least arguable that they have done this, 
> and that Stemmenos may have been their ace-in-the-hole, so to speak.

Ace? Hole?

LOL!  And from a JD.  :-)

T



RE: [Vo]:More drama: open letter to Christos Stemmenos from Defkalion GT

2011-10-13 Thread Jones Beene
Thanks, Akira ... More drama indeed! Move over, James Bond there is new 
poker-faced gambler in town.

This is looking almost like financial suicide on Rossi's part (assuming DGT is 
not bluffing). AR has made all the wrong strategic moves and with mind-boggling 
naiveté. In contrast, the low key and well-worded response from DGT is superbly 
crafted from a legal standpoint, whereas everything coming from the Rossi camp 
is self-inflicted damage.

Could Stemmenos end up being a double-agent or "plant" from Defkalion, whose 
main function has been to cleverly and completely eliminate any chance of Rossi 
obtaining damages for breach of contract? If so, Stemmenos has performed 
admirably.

It is easily possible that DGT may NOT have had money problems after all, but 
nevertheless desperately wanted to wiggle their way out of an expensive 100 
million Euro contract and when Rossi could not meet a milestone, they say an 
opening. Apparently DGT also discovered an alternative technology to E-Cat - 
and they accomplished this in a most impressive fashion by tricking Rossi into 
believing that he still had the upper hand, since he had never disclosed the 
secret ... which may not have been so valuable, after all. 

Apparently DGT discovered either the secret catalyst itself, or more likely a 
substitute, and on their own initiative; and Rossi refuses to understand this. 
Rossi has been played. He apparently even wants to hire away the scientist who 
found the alternative process. Pity.

IMO - the past several months may have cost Rossi most of the value of whatever 
he had to begin with, in terms of value of IP - even if we discount the 
ludicrous and unenforceable patent.  He has been set-up in such an artistic 
fashion by his opponents that he is still in the dark just as Act 111 is nearly 
complete ... and miraculously does not realize that he (EFA, Leonardo, 
Ampenergo, etc) and NOT his former associates violated the terms of the 
agreement - and therefore cannot collect either Royalties or the huge lump sum 
payment, while at the same time allowing DGT to compete worldwide (instead of 
just that valuable Balkan market :)

... and now we learn DGT may compete with what is claimed to be a superior 
product. Plus, DGT can now redirect that 100 million Euro into a factory and 
distribution network of their own. They have seem to have pulled off a 
real-life Casino Royale.

Of course, this conclusion is valid only if DGT has indeed duplicated the 
technology successfully. 

Given the circumstances, it seems at least arguable that they have done this, 
and that Stemmenos may have been their ace-in-the-hole, so to speak.


-Original Message-
From: Akira Shirakawa 
A translation has been posted today on 22passi instead:

http://22passi.blogspot.com/2011/10/stremmenos-stance-on-defkalion-gts-10.html

Cheers,
S.A.