Re: [Vo]:Nanor

2013-02-02 Thread Alan Fletcher
 Does anyone know what the status is of the Nanor device at MIT? Has it
 been kept running? Has anyone duplicated the device and successfully
 run it?

Nope ---   But if you trust a dog (Shih-tzu), Dr Bob has some comments on 
Schwartz's presentation :

http://www.drboblog.com/where-is-bob/ (Jan 28)
http://www.drboblog.com/mit-class-day-2/ (Feb 1)

Quick summary : they are regularly getting a COP of 40 (at 80 the equipment 
melts) -- but it's not yet at commercial watt-levels.



Re: [Vo]:Nanor

2013-02-02 Thread Harry Veeder
On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 5:42 PM, Alan Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:
 Does anyone know what the status is of the Nanor device at MIT? Has it
 been kept running? Has anyone duplicated the device and successfully
 run it?

 Nope ---   But if you trust a dog (Shih-tzu), Dr Bob has some comments on 
 Schwartz's presentation :

 http://www.drboblog.com/where-is-bob/ (Jan 28)
 http://www.drboblog.com/mit-class-day-2/ (Feb 1)

 Quick summary : they are regularly getting a COP of 40 (at 80 the equipment 
 melts) -- but it's not yet at commercial watt-levels.


In the second link it says that, according to Hagelstein, the flux of
the gamma rays produced by the Nanor device is comparable to that
emitted by a banana. In light of this, here is a video about measuring
gamma banana rays.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a_SJH7VNAE0

Harry



[Vo]:Nanor

2013-01-31 Thread Mark Gibbs
Does anyone know what the status is of the Nanor device at MIT? Has it been
kept running? Has anyone duplicated the device and successfully run it?

Thanks in advance.

[mg]


Re: [Vo]:Nanor

2013-01-31 Thread Terry Blanton
Swartz has been very secretive.  His web site:

http://world.std.com/~mica/jettech.html

On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 9:00 PM, Mark Gibbs mgi...@gibbs.com wrote:
 Does anyone know what the status is of the Nanor device at MIT? Has it been
 kept running? Has anyone duplicated the device and successfully run it?

 Thanks in advance.

 [mg]



Re: [Vo]:Nanor

2013-01-31 Thread Terry Blanton
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 10:07 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
 Swartz has been very secretive.  His web site:

 http://world.std.com/~mica/jettech.html

Probably the most info publicly available:

http://coldfusionnow.org/jet-energy-nanor-device-at-mit-continuing-to-operate-months-later/



Re: [Vo]:Nanor

2013-01-31 Thread Mark Gibbs
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 7:09 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 10:07 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com
 wrote:
  Swartz has been very secretive.  His web site:
 
  http://world.std.com/~mica/jettech.html


Yep, that's a lot of ... er, stuff.


 Probably the most info publicly available:


 http://coldfusionnow.org/jet-energy-nanor-device-at-mit-continuing-to-operate-months-later/

 And the video is AWOL. Sigh.

[m]


Re: [Vo]:Nanor

2013-01-31 Thread Terry Blanton
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 10:30 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 10:28 PM, Mark Gibbs mgi...@gibbs.com wrote:

 And the video is AWOL. Sigh.

 Damn.  Well the .pdf is there:

 http://coldfusionnow.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/HagelsteinPdemonstra.pdf

Hagelstein's series of vids are still there.  Number 1:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SoPe4TzdJsA

Sorry, I don't know which of the series talks about NANOR.



Re: [Vo]:Nanor

2013-01-31 Thread Terry Blanton
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 10:46 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 10:30 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 10:28 PM, Mark Gibbs mgi...@gibbs.com wrote:

 And the video is AWOL. Sigh.

 Damn.  Well the .pdf is there:

 http://coldfusionnow.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/HagelsteinPdemonstra.pdf

 Hagelstein's series of vids are still there.  Number 1:

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SoPe4TzdJsA

 Sorry, I don't know which of the series talks about NANOR.

Looks like the second one:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F_IoIfL-rTs



Re: [Vo]:Nanor

2013-01-31 Thread Mark Gibbs
I  read that ... which is to say I scanned it but I can't draw any
conclusions from it. Anyone willing to apply their huge brain to that
document and summarize it? Thanks in advance.

[m]


On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 7:30 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 10:28 PM, Mark Gibbs mgi...@gibbs.com wrote:

  And the video is AWOL. Sigh.

 Damn.  Well the .pdf is there:


 http://coldfusionnow.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/HagelsteinPdemonstra.pdf




Re: [Vo]:Nanor

2013-01-31 Thread Ruby


There was no other video of the NANOR publicly available other than 
Barry Simon's (that I know).


Mitchell Swartz's two summary of the course posted on Cold Fusion Times 
was re-posted by me here:

http://coldfusionnow.org/2nd-week-summary-of-cold-fusion-101/

Hagelstein's video is of theoretical issues, and speaks of NANOR here 
and there for support, but there is no NANOR video included (I didn't 
get through it to the end though!)


From the release on his website, it seems that there may be some video 
from the Swartz portion of the course soon.




On 1/31/13 7:28 PM, Mark Gibbs wrote:
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 7:09 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com 
mailto:hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:


On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 10:07 PM, Terry Blanton
hohlr...@gmail.com mailto:hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
 Swartz has been very secretive.  His web site:

 http://world.std.com/~mica/jettech.html
http://world.std.com/%7Emica/jettech.html


Yep, that's a lot of ... er, stuff.


Probably the most info publicly available:


http://coldfusionnow.org/jet-energy-nanor-device-at-mit-continuing-to-operate-months-later/

And the video is AWOL. Sigh.

[m]




--
Ruby Carat
r...@coldfusionnow.org mailto:r...@coldfusionnow.org
United States 1-707-616-4894
Skype ruby-carat
www.coldfusionnow.org http://www.coldfusionnow.org



Re: [Vo]:Nanor

2013-01-31 Thread Peter Gluck
technologists are waiting for KILOR and MEGAR
Peter

On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 6:26 AM, Ruby r...@hush.com wrote:


 There was no other video of the NANOR publicly available other than Barry
 Simon's (that I know).

 Mitchell Swartz's two summary of the course posted on Cold Fusion Times
 was re-posted by me here:
 http://coldfusionnow.org/2nd-week-summary-of-cold-fusion-101/

 Hagelstein's video is of theoretical issues, and speaks of NANOR here and
 there for support, but there is no NANOR video included (I didn't get
 through it to the end though!)

 From the release on his website, it seems that there may be some video
 from the Swartz portion of the course soon.




 On 1/31/13 7:28 PM, Mark Gibbs wrote:

 On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 7:09 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 10:07 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com
 wrote:
  Swartz has been very secretive.  His web site:
 
  http://world.std.com/~mica/jettech.html


  Yep, that's a lot of ... er, stuff.


  Probably the most info publicly available:


 http://coldfusionnow.org/jet-energy-nanor-device-at-mit-continuing-to-operate-months-later/

  And the video is AWOL. Sigh.

  [m]



 --
 Ruby Carat
 r...@coldfusionnow.org
 United States 1-707-616-4894
 Skype ruby-carat
 www.coldfusionnow.org




-- 
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com


Re: [Vo]:Nanor

2013-01-31 Thread Mark Gibbs
I must be behind the curve ... and what might KILOR and MEGAR be?

[m]


On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 10:29 PM, Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com wrote:

 technologists are waiting for KILOR and MEGAR
 Peter


 On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 6:26 AM, Ruby r...@hush.com wrote:


 There was no other video of the NANOR publicly available other than Barry
 Simon's (that I know).

 Mitchell Swartz's two summary of the course posted on Cold Fusion Times
 was re-posted by me here:
 http://coldfusionnow.org/2nd-week-summary-of-cold-fusion-101/

 Hagelstein's video is of theoretical issues, and speaks of NANOR here and
 there for support, but there is no NANOR video included (I didn't get
 through it to the end though!)

 From the release on his website, it seems that there may be some video
 from the Swartz portion of the course soon.




 On 1/31/13 7:28 PM, Mark Gibbs wrote:

 On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 7:09 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.comwrote:

 On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 10:07 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com
 wrote:
  Swartz has been very secretive.  His web site:
 
  http://world.std.com/~mica/jettech.html


  Yep, that's a lot of ... er, stuff.


  Probably the most info publicly available:


 http://coldfusionnow.org/jet-energy-nanor-device-at-mit-continuing-to-operate-months-later/

  And the video is AWOL. Sigh.

  [m]



 --
 Ruby Carat
 r...@coldfusionnow.org
 United States 1-707-616-4894
 Skype ruby-carat
 www.coldfusionnow.org




 --
 Dr. Peter Gluck
 Cluj, Romania
 http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com



Re: [Vo]:Nanor

2013-01-31 Thread Peter Gluck
Easy to answer: something GREAT(ER) - much greater, useful and efficient.
Generating intense heat, usable as a practical energy source.
Science is magnificent, technology works for us.
Peter

On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 8:38 AM, Mark Gibbs mgi...@gibbs.com wrote:

 I must be behind the curve ... and what might KILOR and MEGAR be?

 [m]



 On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 10:29 PM, Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.comwrote:

 technologists are waiting for KILOR and MEGAR
 Peter


 On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 6:26 AM, Ruby r...@hush.com wrote:


 There was no other video of the NANOR publicly available other than
 Barry Simon's (that I know).

 Mitchell Swartz's two summary of the course posted on Cold Fusion Times
 was re-posted by me here:
 http://coldfusionnow.org/2nd-week-summary-of-cold-fusion-101/

 Hagelstein's video is of theoretical issues, and speaks of NANOR here
 and there for support, but there is no NANOR video included (I didn't get
 through it to the end though!)

 From the release on his website, it seems that there may be some video
 from the Swartz portion of the course soon.




 On 1/31/13 7:28 PM, Mark Gibbs wrote:

 On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 7:09 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.comwrote:

 On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 10:07 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com
 wrote:
  Swartz has been very secretive.  His web site:
 
  http://world.std.com/~mica/jettech.html


  Yep, that's a lot of ... er, stuff.


  Probably the most info publicly available:


 http://coldfusionnow.org/jet-energy-nanor-device-at-mit-continuing-to-operate-months-later/

  And the video is AWOL. Sigh.

  [m]



 --
 Ruby Carat
 r...@coldfusionnow.org
 United States 1-707-616-4894
 Skype ruby-carat
 www.coldfusionnow.org




 --
 Dr. Peter Gluck
 Cluj, Romania
 http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com





-- 
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com


Re: [Vo]:Nanor

2013-01-31 Thread Mark Gibbs
Peter,

Come on! Are those acronyms, flavors of vodka, ... What are you talking
about?

[mg]

On Thursday, January 31, 2013, Peter Gluck wrote:

 Easy to answer: something GREAT(ER) - much greater, useful and efficient.
 Generating intense heat, usable as a practical energy source.
 Science is magnificent, technology works for us.
 Peter

 On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 8:38 AM, Mark Gibbs 
 mgi...@gibbs.comjavascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'mgi...@gibbs.com');
  wrote:

 I must be behind the curve ... and what might KILOR and MEGAR be?

 [m]



 On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 10:29 PM, Peter Gluck 
 peter.gl...@gmail.comjavascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'peter.gl...@gmail.com');
  wrote:

 technologists are waiting for KILOR and MEGAR
 Peter


 On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 6:26 AM, Ruby r...@hush.com javascript:_e({},
 'cvml', 'r...@hush.com'); wrote:


 There was no other video of the NANOR publicly available other than
 Barry Simon's (that I know).

 Mitchell Swartz's two summary of the course posted on Cold Fusion Times
 was re-posted by me here:
 http://coldfusionnow.org/2nd-week-summary-of-cold-fusion-101/

 Hagelstein's video is of theoretical issues, and speaks of NANOR here
 and there for support, but there is no NANOR video included (I didn't get
 through it to the end though!)

 From the release on his website, it seems that there may be some video
 from the Swartz portion of the course soon.




 On 1/31/13 7:28 PM, Mark Gibbs wrote:

 On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 7:09 PM, Terry Blanton 
 hohlr...@gmail.comjavascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'hohlr...@gmail.com');
  wrote:

 On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 10:07 PM, Terry Blanton 
 hohlr...@gmail.comjavascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'hohlr...@gmail.com');
 wrote:
  Swartz has been very secretive.  His web site:
 
  http://world.std.com/~mica/jettech.html


  Yep, that's a lot of ... er, stuff.


  Probably the most info publicly available:


 http://coldfusionnow.org/jet-energy-nanor-device-at-mit-continuing-to-operate-months-later/

  And the video is AWOL. Sigh.

  [m]



 --
 Ruby Carat
 r...@coldfusionnow.org javascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
 'r...@coldfusionnow.org');
 United States 1-707-616-4894
 Skype ruby-carat
 www.coldfusionnow.org




 --
 Dr. Peter Gluck
 Cluj, Romania
 http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com





 --
 Dr. Peter Gluck
 Cluj, Romania
 http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com



Re: [Vo]:Nanor

2013-01-31 Thread Peter Gluck
NANOR scaled-up from milliwatts up. Nothing to do with vodka.
Peter

On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 8:57 AM, Mark Gibbs mgi...@gibbs.com wrote:

 Peter,

 Come on! Are those acronyms, flavors of vodka, ... What are you talking
 about?

 [mg]


 On Thursday, January 31, 2013, Peter Gluck wrote:

 Easy to answer: something GREAT(ER) - much greater, useful and efficient.
 Generating intense heat, usable as a practical energy source.
 Science is magnificent, technology works for us.
 Peter

 On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 8:38 AM, Mark Gibbs mgi...@gibbs.com wrote:

 I must be behind the curve ... and what might KILOR and MEGAR be?

 [m]



 On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 10:29 PM, Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.comwrote:

 technologists are waiting for KILOR and MEGAR
 Peter


 On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 6:26 AM, Ruby r...@hush.com wrote:


 There was no other video of the NANOR publicly available other than
 Barry Simon's (that I know).

 Mitchell Swartz's two summary of the course posted on Cold Fusion
 Times was re-posted by me here:
 http://coldfusionnow.org/2nd-week-summary-of-cold-fusion-101/

 Hagelstein's video is of theoretical issues, and speaks of NANOR here
 and there for support, but there is no NANOR video included (I didn't get
 through it to the end though!)

 From the release on his website, it seems that there may be some video
 from the Swartz portion of the course soon.




 On 1/31/13 7:28 PM, Mark Gibbs wrote:

 On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 7:09 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.comwrote:

 On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 10:07 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com
 wrote:
  Swartz has been very secretive.  His web site:
 
  http://world.std.com/~mica/jettech.html


  Yep, that's a lot of ... er, stuff.


  Probably the most info publicly available:


 http://coldfusionnow.org/jet-energy-nanor-device-at-mit-continuing-to-operate-months-later/

  And the video is AWOL. Sigh.

  [m]



 --
 Ruby Carat
 r...@coldfusionnow.org
 United States 1-707-616-4894
 Skype ruby-carat
 www.coldfusionnow.org




 --
 Dr. Peter Gluck
 Cluj, Romania
 http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com





 --
 Dr. Peter Gluck
 Cluj, Romania
 http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com




-- 
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com


Re: [Vo]:NANOR at M.I.T.

2012-05-29 Thread Terry Blanton
http://www.iscmns.org/work10/HagelsteinPdemonstra.pdf

T



Re: [Vo]:NANOR at M.I.T.

2012-05-29 Thread Jed Rothwell
Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:

http://www.iscmns.org/work10/HagelsteinPdemonstra.pdf


I have difficulty understanding these graphs. They show so much they are
confusing. Power on one axis and energy (in joules) on another. I am
not familiar with the instruments or measurement techniques either, so I
cannot judge them. However, it appear to me that both input and power are
low, typically around 18 mW input. Output is ~60 mW in Run EJan31B. Such
low power is difficult to measure and easy to get wrong, even with
precision equipment.

Run EJan31A has a higher peak, at ~180 mW I think. That is a lot easier to
measure. I do not understand why it peaks instead of being stable, but it
is reasonably high.

Maybe they should use 10 of these things at a time, to boost the signal.

- Jed