[Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Rossi's Information regarding Leonardo Corporation’s Commercial License Policy
2012/2/16 OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson svj.orionwo...@gmail.com: So Rossi doesn't take money from investors, but he does take money from the sale of licenses for an unreliable product. Is this a responsible way to run a business? Harry, what's your point? Surely you realize the fact that many within the Vort Collective question Rossi's business practices. And so do I. It's exacerbated by the fact that Rossi tells us only what he wants to tell us, so who the hell really knows what is happening. I also know that I'm not in Rossi's shoes. Are you in his shoes? Do you really know what's happening? Rossi doesn't just selectively reveal information about the state his business he also lies about the state of his business. I don't think the misinformation is part of some brilliant business stragety. Instead, I think he lies out of a sense of shame of appearing falliable and therefore weak. Perhaps he behaves this way because he his mother or father did not tolerate failure. Anyway a recognition of your own weakness is essential for success in any endeavour. harry
[Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Rossi's Information regarding Leonardo Corporation’s Commercial License Policy
2012/2/18 Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com: Perhaps he behaves this way because he his mother or father did not tolerate failure. Or poor potty training. T
[Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Rossi's Information regarding Leonardo Corporation’s Commercial License Policy
2012/2/16 Andre Blum andre_vor...@blums.nl: Nowhere does Rossi say the invoice is fabricated. He just says it is 'unvalid', which apart from not entirely correct or usual English, is a bit vague, and maybe intentionally so. (he might be conveniently hiding behind his language barrier, here, knowing he gives the impression that it is fabricated, but keeping options open in case more evidence pops up). My feeling is that the invoice is real. The rest of the message very much acknowledges that he has indeed been selling commercial licenses bound to territories, so I wouldn't know why the Byron New Energy Charity Trust couldn't be one of them. [ Nor do I understand exactly why that would incriminate Rossi much ] Agreed. See this paragraph of Rossi's post; After the interested persons sign the agreement, we send an invoice, and the agreement is deemed valid only after the payment of the license fee is done within the term agreed. If the payment is not done, the agreement expires and that invoice for which the payment has not been made is compensated in the accounting by a credit memo. So basically he seems to be saying that invoice is 'unvalid' because Byron never paid him. Rob
